Subclinical epileptiform activity and sleep disturbances in Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Subclinical epileptiform activity (SEA) and sleep disturbances are frequent in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Both have an important relation to cognition and potential therapeutic implications. We aimed to study a possible relationship between SEA and sleep disturbances in AD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we performed a 24-h ambulatory EEG and polysomnography in 48 AD patients without diagnosis of epilepsy and 34 control subjects. RESULTS: SEA, mainly detected in frontotemporal brain regions during N2 with a median of three spikes/night [IQR1-17], was three times more prevalent in AD. AD patients had lower sleep efficacy, longer wake after sleep onset, more awakenings, more N1%, less REM sleep and a higher apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI). Sleep was not different between AD subgroup with SEA (AD-Epi+) and without SEA (AD-Epi-); however, compared to controls, REM% was decreased and AHI and ODI were increased in the AD-Epi+ subgroup. DISCUSSION: Decreased REM sleep and more severe sleep-disordered breathing might be related to SEA in AD. These results could have diagnostic and therapeutic implications and warrant further study at the intersection between sleep and epileptiform activity in AD.

Wearable detection of tonic seizures in childhood epilepsy: An exploratory cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of a multimodal wearable device for the offline detection of tonic seizures (TS) in a pediatric childhood epilepsy cohort, with a focus on patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. METHODS: Parallel with prolonged video-electroencephalography (EEG), the Plug 'n Patch system, a multimodal wearable device using the Sensor Dot and replaceable electrode adhesives, was used to detect TS. Multiple biosignals were recorded: behind-the-ear EEG, surface electromyography, electrocardiography, and accelerometer/gyroscope. Biosignals were annotated blindly by a neurologist. Seizure characteristics were described, and performance was assessed by sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), F1 score, and false alarm rate (FAR) per hour. Performance was compared to seizure diaries kept by the caretaker. RESULTS: Ninety-nine TS were detected in 13 patients. Seven patients (54%) had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and six patients (46%) had other forms of (developmental) epileptic encephalopathies or drug-resistant epilepsy. All but one patient had intellectual disability. Overall sensitivity was 41%, with a PPV of 9%, an F1 score of 14%, and a median FAR per hour of 0.75. Performance increased to an F1 score of 66% for nightly seizures lasting at least 10 s (sensitivity 66%, PPV 66%) and 71% for nightly seizures lasting at least 20 s (sensitivity 62%, PPV 82%). For these seizures there were no false alarms in 10 of 13 patients. Sensitivity of seizure diaries reached a maximum of 52% for prolonged (≥20 s) nightly seizures, even though caretakers slept in the same room. SIGNIFICANCE: We showed that it is feasible to use a multimodal wearable device with multiple adhesive sites in children with epilepsy and intellectual disability. For prolonged nightly seizures, offline manual detection of TS outperformed seizure diaries. The recognition of seizure-specific signatures using multiple modalities can help in the development of automated TS detection algorithms.

The Power of ECG in Semi-Automated Seizure Detection in Addition to Two-Channel behind-the-Ear EEG.

Long-term home monitoring of people living with epilepsy cannot be achieved using the standard full-scalp electroencephalography (EEG) coupled with video. Wearable seizure detection devices, such as behind-the-ear EEG (bte-EEG), offer an unobtrusive method for ambulatory follow-up of this population. Combining bte-EEG with electrocardiography (ECG) can enhance automated seizure detection performance. However, such frameworks produce high false alarm rates, making visual review necessary. This study aimed to evaluate a semi-automated multimodal wearable seizure detection framework using bte-EEG and ECG. Using the SeizeIT1 dataset of 42 patients with focal epilepsy, an automated multimodal seizure detection algorithm was used to produce seizure alarms. Two reviewers evaluated the algorithm's detections twice: (1) using only bte-EEG data and (2) using bte-EEG, ECG, and heart rate signals. The readers achieved a mean sensitivity of 59.1% in the bte-EEG visual experiment, with a false detection rate of 6.5 false detections per day. Adding ECG resulted in a higher mean sensitivity (62.2%) and a largely reduced false detection rate (mean of 2.4 false detections per day), as well as an increased inter-rater agreement. The multimodal framework allows for efficient review time, making it beneficial for both clinicians and patients.

In-hospital and home-based long-term monitoring of focal epilepsy with a wearable electroencephalographic device: Diagnostic yield and user experience.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to report the performance of an electroencephalogram (EEG) seizure-detector algorithm on data obtained with a wearable device (WD) in patients with focal refractory epilepsy and their experience. METHODS: Patients used a WD, the Sensor Dot (SD), to measure two channels of EEG using dry electrode patches during presurgical evaluation and at home for up to 8 months. An automated seizure detection algorithm flagged EEG regions with possible seizures, which we reviewed to evaluate the algorithm's diagnostic yield. In addition, we collected data on usability, side effects, and patient satisfaction with an electronic seizure diary application (Helpilepsy). RESULTS: Sixteen inpatients used the SD for up to 5 days and had 21 seizures. Sixteen outpatients used the device for up to 8 months and reported 101 focal impaired awareness seizures during the periods selected for analysis. Focal seizure detection sensitivity based on behind-the-ear EEG was 52% in inpatients and 23% in outpatients. False detections/h, positive predictive value (PPV), and F1 scores were 7.13%, .11%, and .002% for inpatients and 7.77%, .04%, and .001% for outpatients. Artifacts and low signal quality contributed to poor performance metrics. The seizure detector identified 19 nonreported seizures during sleep, when the signal quality was better. Regarding patients' experience, the likelihood of using the device at 6 months was 62%, and side effects were the main reason for dropping out. Finally, daily and monthly questionnaire completion rates were 33% and 65%, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: Focal seizure detection sensitivity based on behind-the-ear EEG was 52% in inpatients and 23% in outpatients, with high false alarm rates and low PPV and F1 scores. This unobtrusive wearable seizure detection device was well received but had side effects. The current workflow and low performance limit its implementation in clinical practice. We suggest different steps to improve these performance metrics and patient experience.

Accurate detection of typical absence seizures in adults and children using a two-channel electroencephalographic wearable behind the ears.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with absence epilepsy sensitivity <10% of their absences. The clinical gold standard to assess absence epilepsy is a 24-h electroencephalographic (EEG) recording, which is expensive, obtrusive, and time-consuming to review. We aimed to (1) investigate the performance of an unobtrusive, two-channel behind-the-ear EEG-based wearable, the Sensor Dot (SD), to detect typical absences in adults and children; and (2) develop a sensitive patient-specific absence seizure detection algorithm to reduce the review time of the recordings. METHODS: We recruited 12 patients (median age = 21 years, range = 8-50; seven female) who were admitted to the epilepsy monitoring units of University Hospitals Leuven for a 24-h 25-channel video-EEG recording to assess their refractory typical absences. Four additional behind-the-ear electrodes were attached for concomitant recording with the SD. Typical absences were defined as 3-Hz spike-and-wave discharges on EEG, lasting 3 s or longer. Seizures on SD were blindly annotated on the full recording and on the algorithm-labeled file and consequently compared to 25-channel EEG annotations. Patients or caregivers were asked to keep a seizure diary. Performance of the SD and seizure diary were measured using the F1 score. RESULTS: We concomitantly recorded 284 absences on video-EEG and SD. Our absence detection algorithm had a sensitivity of .983 and false positives per hour rate of .9138. Blind reading of full SD data resulted in sensitivity of .81, precision of .89, and F1 score of .73, whereas review of the algorithm-labeled files resulted in scores of .83, .89, and .87, respectively. Patient self-reporting gave sensitivity of .08, precision of 1.00, and F1 score of .15. SIGNIFICANCE: Using the wearable SD, epileptologists were able to reliably detect typical absence seizures. Our automated absence detection algorithm reduced the review time of a 24-h recording from 1-2 h to around 5-10 min.