DNA high-risk HPV, mRNA HPV and P16 tests for diagnosis of anal cancer and precursor lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Anal cancer prevention has two critical points: the incidence rate is several fold higher for some groups, such as people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and men who have sex with men (MSM), and there is not a well-defined guideline for its screening. This systematic review evaluates the accuracy of DNA HRHPV (high-risk human papillomavirus), mRNA HPV, DNA HPV16 isolated and p16 staining biomarkers in anal canal smears for identifying anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) 2 or 3, summarised as anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (aHSIL), and cancer. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Embase electronic databases as well as Grey literature to identify eligible papers published up to 31st July 2022. This systematic review and meta-analysis included observational studies comparing biomarker tests to histopathology after HRA (High-resolution Anoscopy) as a reference standard. We (ACM, TF) analysed studies in which patients of both sexes were screened for anal cancer using DNA HRHPV, mRNA HPV, DNA HPV16 and/or p16 biomarkers. The analysis was performed in pairs, for instance AIN2 or worse (AIN2+) vs. AIN1, HPV infection and normal (AIN1-). PROSPERO CRD42015024201. Findings: We included 21 studies with 7445 patients. DNA HR HPV showed a higher sensitivity 92.4% (95% CI 84.2-96.5), specificity 41.7% (95% CI 33.9-44.9) and AUC 0.67, followed by the mRNA HPV test, with a sensitivity 77.3% (95% CI 73.2%-80.9%), specificity 61.9% (95% CI 56.6-66.9) and AUC 0.78. DNA HPV16 showed higher specificity 71.7% (95% CI 55.3-83.8), followed by p16 test, 64.1% (95% CI 51.0-75.4); Sensitivity of DNA HPV16 was 53.3% (95% CI 35.4-70.3) and AUC 0.69, while p16 had a sensitivity of 68.8% (95% CI 47.9-84.1) and AUC 0.74. Subgroup analysis of MSM with HIV, with 13 studies and 5123 patients, showed similar accuracy, with a bit higher sensitivities and lower specificities. Considering the measure of the total between-study variability, mRNA HPV tests showed the smallest area of the 95% prediction ellipse, 6.0%, influenced by the low logit sensitivity, 0.011. All other groups of tests exceed 50% prediction ellipse area, which represent a high heterogeneity. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that DNA HR HPV can be a useful tool for screening for aHSIL and anal cancer if followed by biomarker with a higher specificity. As an isolated test, mRNA HPV had better performance. Funding: There was no funding source for this study.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of SARS-COV-2 IGM and IGG tests in individuals with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Active SARS-CoV-2 infection is confirmed mainly through the detection of viral nucleic acid via the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique. Methods to assess humoral responses contribute to the monitoring of the disease and confirmation of exposure to the virus. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of tests for IgM and IgG antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-PCR and utility as complementary data for immunosurveillance. METHODS: Literature research was performed by searching the terms "COVID-19", "COVID-19 diagnostic testing" and "test" in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to search for potentially eligible observational studies without language restrictions published up to September 2020. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity and specificity, regardless of collection moment, was 80.0% (CI 95% 72.0-86.0) and 97.0% (CI 95% 94.0-98.0) for "IgM and/or IgG", respectively. Serology considering immunoglobulins M and G together had a high accuracy performance on "fifteenth day and after": sensitivity and specificity was 91.0% (CI 95% 85.0-94.0) and 98.0% (CI 95% 95.0-99.0) respectively, DOR 461 and AUC 0.98. CONCLUSION: This study shows that serology is a group of tests with high accuracy, mainly following the second week after infection.

Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Breast Implant Rupture Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is the most common aesthetic operation performed in the United States and worldwide; 1,862,506 breast augmentation procedures were performed in 2018, an increase of 27.6 percent compared to 2014 data. METHODS: In the present study, the authors performed a systematic review to identify the accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing breast prosthesis rupture. Studies in which the ultrasound diagnostic test was compared to a surgical finding as a reference standard were reviewed. RESULTS: As a result, 20 primary studies were included in the analyses, with a total of 1987 patients and 3297 prostheses. The use of ultrasound for diagnosis of breast prosthesis rupture presented the following results: pooled sensitivity, 73.7 percent (95 percent CI, 70.2 to 77.1 percent); pooled specificity, 87.8 percent (95 percent CI, 86.5 to 89.0); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.7762; diagnostic odds ratio, 11.04 (95 percent CI, 5.79 to 21.08). CONCLUSION: This study supports that ultrasound of breast prostheses is an adequate tool in the diagnosis of rupture.

Meta-Analysis of Breast Cancer Risk in Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Users.

To map and assess evidence regarding use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and its association with breast cancer, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. A search strategy was developed using the terms "Levonorgestrel-releasing," "LNG-IUS," "intrauterine system," and "breast cancer. The electronic databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Latin American & Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and Google Scholar for studies published until August 2020. We included observational studies: prospective or retrospective cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional. A total of 494 studies were identified, 294 studies were evaluated by title and abstract, and 262 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 32 studies were read in full, and 24 were excluded. Thus, eight studies were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included four studies (two cohort and two case-control studies). Two subgroup analyses were performed for different study designs. The estimated relative risk for the two cohort studies (144,996 cases), with moderate-quality evidence, was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.840-1.03). The odds ratio estimated for the two case-control studies (5556 cases and 35987 controls), with moderate-quality evidence, was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.91-1.26). Evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer was not observed in levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system users.

Accuracy of mRNA HPV Tests for Triage of Precursor Lesions and Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluates the accuracy of the mRNA HPV biomarker in cervical smears to identify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3 and cervical cancer. DATA SOURCE: Eligible studies were identified by performing a search of electronic databases on Medline via Pubmed, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Grey literature for papers published between January 1990 and June 2018. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: As no randomized studies were identified, this review focuses on observational studies in which the mRNA HPV diagnostic test was compared to a histopathology reference standard. We analyzed studies that included women screened for cervical cancer using mRNA HPV. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: After screening, 61 studies including 29,674 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Dichotomization was performed by defining CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) versus CIN1, HPV infection, and normal (CIN 1-). The analysis was discriminated by the following tests: Aptima, PreTect HPV Profeer, NucliSens EasyQ HPV, OncoTect, and Quantivirus. RESULTS: Analyzing by technique, Aptima, with 28 studies, exhibited superior performance, showing for the outcomes CIN2+ and CIN3+ an AUC of 0.88 (0.82-0.95) and 0.91 (0.84-0.99), a pooled sensitivity of 92.8% (95%CI 91.9-93.7) and 95.6% (95%CI 94.5-96.5), and a pooled specificity of 60.5% (95%CI 59.8-61.3) and 61.9% (95%CI 61.1-62.7), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study supports the current hypothesis that the mRNA HPV assay is an adequate tool for secondary cervical cancer screening.

Accuracy of Messenger RNA Human Papillomavirus Tests for Diagnostic Triage of Minor Cytological Cervical Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to specify the accuracy of messenger RNA human papillomavirus (HPV) tests among women with previous minor cervical lesion cytology to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN2+ and CIN3+) compared with a histopathological reference standard. The secondary objective is to compare messenger RNA HPV test accuracies and the DNA high-risk HPV test among these women. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified by searching the electronic databases with medical subject headings. MAIN RESULTS: Among the 2052 studies identified, 20 primary studies were included. Two tests were mainly identified: Aptima and PreTect HPV-Proofer. Aptima, with 10 studies, had better performance, considering atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion together, with a pooled sensitivity of 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.1-92.6) and specificity of 55.1% (95% CI, 53.5-56.8) for CIN2+. For the ASC-US sample, Aptima had a pooled sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI, 87.1-92.7) and specificity of 59.3% (95% CI, 57.5-61.1). CONCLUSIONS: Messenger RNA HPV tests, mainly Aptima assay, can be recommended to triage women with ASC-US and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion because it has higher specificity with a small loss of sensitivity than Hybrid Capture 2 assay; this finding is promising as a means to reduce the overmanagement of minor cytological abnormalities.

Accuracy of mRNA HPV tests as a predictor of recurrence of precursor lesions and cervical cancer after conization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This systematic review evaluates the accuracy of mRNA HPV biomarker for the identification of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cervical cancer during a follow-up after conization, taking histopathology as reference standard. Methods: A search of electronic databases was performed, for studies published until June 2018. As results, after screening, five studies including 1148 patients met the inclusion criteria. Dichotomization was performed by CIN2+ versus CIN1-. By analyzing all five studies, a sensitivity of 62.4% (95% CI: 54.8-69.7), specificity of 91.9% (95% CI: 90.0-93.5) and area under the curve of 0.5685 were revealed. Conclusion: mRNA HPV assay presents a high specificity and is an adequate tool for cervical cancer screening in the follow-up after conization.

Accuracy of serum human epididymis protein 4 in ovarian cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review was performed to estimate the accuracy of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) assay in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, IBECS, BIOSIS, Web of Science, SCOPUS, congress abstracts, and Grey literature (Google scholar; British Library) from January 1990 to April 2013 was conducted. Studies that evaluated HE4 levels for the diagnosis of ovarian tumors and compared them with paraffin-embedded sections as the diagnostic standard were included. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were analyzed, which included 10,671 women and 3946 ovarian cancer cases. The pooled sensitivity for the diagnosis of borderline tumors or ovarian cancer was 78% (95% confidence interval, 77%-79%), and the specificity was 86% (95% confidence interval, 85%-87%). Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. For malignant and borderline ovarian tumors versus benign lesions, the area under the curve was 0.916. Besides the overall analysis, stratification was performed in premenopause and postmenopause, early and late stages, and for accuracy by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and chemiluminescence microparticle immuno assay. CONCLUSIONS: A HE4 level is a useful preoperative test for predicting the benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses.

O atendimento obstétrico à mulher HIV positivo / The obstetric assistance to HIV positive pregnant women

O advento da infecção pelo HIV tem gerado forte impacto social e, além do aspecto clínico, questões sociais e comportamentais são permanentemente trazidas à discussão. Estas têm influência decisiva sobre a incidência de novos casos e, conseqüentemente, são fundamentais para a definição de medidas de saúde pública. O atendimento oferecido às gestantes soropositivo deve abranger questões como planejamento familiar, prevenção de doenças e mesmo espaço para conversar sobre expectativas e qualidade de vida. Os estudos com mulheres soropositivo deixam claras as carências de informações e de planejamento familiar. A partir da sensibilização e informação dos profissionais de saúde, será possível orientá-las de forma mais precisa, proporcionando melhores condições de cuidado à sua saúde, de seus filhos e parceiros, além de diminuir a incidência de transmissão vertical.