Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of chagasic achalasia.

According to the WHO, 16-18 million people in Central and South America are infected by Trypanosoma cruzi. Chagasic achalasia affects between 7.1% and 10.6% of the population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Botox injections in the clinical response and esophageal function of patients with dysphagia due to chagasic achalasia. In total, 24 symptomatic patients with chagasic achalasia were randomly chosen to receive Botulinum Toxin (BT) or saline injected by endoscopy in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Patients were monitored with a clinical score of dysphagia and an objective assessment (esophagograms, scintillography, manometry, and nutritional assessment) for a period of 6 months. Clinical improvement of dysphagia was statistically significant (P < 0.001) in patients receiving BT when compared with the placebo. There was no significant difference in the placebo group regarding clinical score, LES basal pressure and esophageal emptying time. Esophageal emptying time in the toxin group was significantly lower than in the placebo (P=0.04) after 90 days. There were non-significant increases in esophageal emptying of 25.36% and 17.39%, respectively, at 90 and 180 days, in the BT group (P=0.266). Gender, age, and baseline LES pressure did not influence the response to BT. Our data strongly suggests that intrasphincteric injection of BT in LES is clinically effective in the treatment of chagasic achalasia.

[Comparison between invasive tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infections]. / Comparação entre testes invasivos para o diagnóstico da infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori.

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram negative bacteria that colonizes gastric epithelial cells. It has been associated with several gastric disease including chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer. Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis can be done with invasive and non-invasive methods. In invasive methods an endoscopic gastric mucosa biopsy specimen is used. In our study we compare the sensitivity, specificity, costs and applicability of four invasive diagnostic tests: culture, urease ultra-rapid test, histology (Giemsa and Hematoxilineosin stain) and fuchsin stained mucosal slides. Urease test was the easiest, fastest diagnostic test, with sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100%, being also the cheapest test. We concluded that it should be the test of choice for Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis.

The value of adenosine deaminase (ADA) determination in the diagnosis of tuberculous ascites.

In order to evaluate the role of the determination of adenosine deaminase activity (ADA) in ascitic fluid for the diagnosis of tuberculosis, 44 patients were studied. Based on biochemical, cytological, histopathological and microbiological tests, the patients were divided into 5 groups: G1-tuberculous ascites (n = 8); G2-malignant ascites (n = 13); G3-spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (n = 6); G4-pancreatic ascites (n = 2); G5-miscelaneous ascites (n = 15). ADA concentration were significantly higher in G1 (133.50 +/- 24.74 U/l) compared to the other groups (G2 = 41.85 +/- 52.07 U/l; G3 = 10.63 +/- 5.87 U/l; G4 = 18.00 +/- 7.07 U/l; G5 = 11.23 +/- 7.66 U/l). At a cut-off value of > 31 U/l, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 92%, 72% and 100%, respectively. ADA concentrations as high as in tuberculous ascites were only found in two malignant ascites caused by lymphoma. We conclude that ADA determination in ascitic fluid is a useful and reliable screening test for diagnosing tuberculous ascites. Values of ADA higher than 31 U/l indicate more invasive methods to confirm the diagnosis of tuberculosis.