A phase 2, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose study evaluating Inarigivir in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Novel agents acting against hepatitis B virus (HBV) are needed to improve HBsAg seroclearance or termed as 'functional cure'. Inarigivir (retinoic acid-inducible gene I agonist) has immunomodulatory and direct antiviral actions against HBV. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of Inarigivir for the treatment of HBV infection. PATIENTS/METHODS: 80 treatment-naïve patients were randomized in 4 ascending dose cohorts to receive 12 weeks of Inarigivir 25, 50, 100, 200 mg or placebo in a ratio of 4:1. All patients were then given tenofovir for another 12 weeks. RESULTS: Least squares (LS) mean reductions in HBV DNA from baseline increased with higher doses of Inarigivir (0.6116 in 25 mg and 1.5774 in 200 mg groups vs. 0.0352 in placebo group) (95% CI 0.9518-0.2011 and 1.921-1.1634 respectively). LS mean changes in HBV RNA and HBsAg from baseline ranged from -0.3856 to -0.5794 versus -0.1474 and -0.0956 to -0.1818 versus +0.0026 in Inarigivir-treated versus placebo groups respectively. During the tenofovir-treated period, LS mean reductions in HBsAg in the Inarigivir-treated groups ranged from 0.1709 to 0.3529 versus 0.1984 in the placebo group. Inarigivir-treated groups showed mean reductions in ALT from baseline between 23.3 and 33.8 versus 0.7 U/L in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to Inarigivir and placebo occurred in 4.7% and 6.3% patients respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week Inarigivir up to 200 mg dose was associated with a reduction of HBV DNA, HBV RNA and antigen levels. A trend for greater HBsAg reduction was observed in Inarigivir pre-treated patients after switching to tenofovir.

First Human Experience with Directly Image-able Iodinated Embolization Microbeads.

PURPOSE: To describe first clinical experience with a directly image-able, inherently radio-opaque microspherical embolic agent for transarterial embolization of liver tumors. METHODOLOGY: LC Bead LUMI™ is a new product based upon sulfonate-modified polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel microbeads with covalently bound iodine (~260 mg I/ml). 70-150 µ LC Bead LUMI™ iodinated microbeads were injected selectively via a 2.8 Fr microcatheter to near complete flow stasis into hepatic arteries in three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, carcinoid, or neuroendocrine tumor. A custom imaging platform tuned for LC LUMI™ microbead conspicuity using a cone beam CT (CBCT)/angiographic C-arm system (Allura Clarity FD20, Philips) was used along with CBCT embolization treatment planning software (EmboGuide, Philips). RESULTS: LC Bead LUMI™ image-able microbeads were easily delivered and monitored during the procedure using fluoroscopy, single-shot radiography (SSD), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), dual-phase enhanced and unenhanced CBCT, and unenhanced conventional CT obtained 48 h after the procedure. Intra-procedural imaging demonstrated tumor at risk for potential under-treatment, defined as paucity of image-able microbeads within a portion of the tumor which was confirmed at 48 h CT imaging. Fusion of pre- and post-embolization CBCT identified vessels without beads that corresponded to enhancing tumor tissue in the same location on follow-up imaging (48 h post). CONCLUSION: LC Bead LUMI™ image-able microbeads provide real-time feedback and geographic localization of treatment in real time during treatment. The distribution and density of image-able beads within a tumor need further evaluation as an additional endpoint for embolization.

Feasibility of EUS-guided injection of irinotecan-loaded microspheres into the swine pancreas.

BACKGROUND: LC beads (Biocompatibles International plc) are designed for the time-released delivery of the chemotherapeutic agent irinotecan into focal, hypervascularized, hepatic tumors. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of EUS-guided injection of LC beads (with/without irinotecan) into the swine pancreas. DESIGN: Survival animal study. SETTING: Academic center. SUBJECTS: This study involved 12 Yorkshire swine. INTERVENTION: LC beads without irinotecan and loaded with up to 300 mg of irinotecan were injected under EUS guidance with a 19-gauge needle into the tail of the pancreas. CT scanning and necropsy with histology were performed at day 7. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Feasibility of the injections, gross and microscopic evidence of pancreatic inflammation, and clinical tolerance by the animals. RESULTS: After injection of LC beads with/without irinotecan, in 10 of 12 animals an intrapancreatic, hyperechoic focus with an average diameter of 2.2 cm was visible by EUS, and a hypodense area in the tail of the pancreas was visible by contrast CT. In 2 animals (1 with irinotecan and 1 without) no beads were seen on CT. In 10 of 12 animals, a depot of beads was located in the tail of the pancreas on gross inspection and histology. Drug depot with only localized pancreatic tissue reactions was seen on histopathologic review. LIMITATIONS: Animal study. CONCLUSION: The EUS-guided injection of LC beads (with/without irinotecan) into the pancreas of the pig is feasible and safe. This technique is a potential minimally invasive local treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.