Narcotic Consumption Analysis among Severely Injured and Advanced Aged Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal pain management has been shown to be effective in treating pain in acutely injured trauma patients. Our community-based, level 1 trauma center previously published in 2022 the efficacy of implementing multimodal pain control (MMPC) protocol in our inpatient trauma population which decreased the use of opioids while maintaining similar pain control. The MMPC group had a trend toward higher age and was significantly less injured. We hypothesize MMPC will reduce opioid consumption in both the advanced aged and more severely injured trauma populations while still providing adequate pain control. METHODS: Defined by the year of admission, MMPC and physician managed pain control (PMPC) were compared in both advanced age groups and between the severely injured groups. The advanced age group included patients ≥55 years old. The severely injured group included ≥18 years old with ≥15 ISS. Primary outcomes were total opioid utilization per day, calculated in morphine milliequivalents (MME), and median daily pain scores. RESULTS: For the severely injured population, the MMPC group showed a 3-fold decrease in opioid use (30 MME/d vs 90.3 MME/d, P < .001) and lower pain scores (5/10 vs 6/10, P < .001) than the PMPC group. In the advance age group, there was no significant difference between MMPC and PMPC groups in opioid use (P = .974) or pain scores (P = .553). CONCLUSION: MMPC effectively reduces opioid consumption in a severely injured patient population while simultaneously improving pain control. Advanced age trauma patients can require complex pain management solutions and future research to determine their needs is recommended.

High-grade liver injuries with contrast extravasation managed initially with interventional radiology versus observation: A secondary analysis of a WTA multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: High-grade liver injuries with extravasation (HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav) are associated with morbidity/mortality. For low-grade injuries, an observation (OBS) first-strategy is beneficial over initial angiography (IR), however, it is unclear if OBS is safe for HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav. Therefore, we evaluated the management of HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav patients, hypothesizing IR patients will have decreased rates of operation and mortality. METHODS: HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav patients managed with initial OBS or IR were included. The primary outcome was need for operation. Secondary outcomes included liver-related complications (LRCs) and mortality. RESULTS: From 59 patients, 23 (39.0%) were managed with OBS and 36 (61.0%) with IR. 75% of IR patients underwent angioembolization, whereas 13% of OBS patients underwent any IR, all undergoing angioembolization. IR patients had an increased rate of operation (13.9% vs. 0%, p â€‹= â€‹0.049), but no difference in LRCs (44.4% vs. 43.5%) or mortality (5.6% vs. 8.7%) versus OBS patients (both p â€‹> â€‹0.05). CONCLUSION: Over 60% of patients were managed with IR initially. IR patients had an increased rate of operation yet similar rates of LRCs and mortality, suggesting initial OBS reasonable in appropriately selected HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav patients.

Whole Blood Trauma Resuscitation in Community Trauma Centers Confers Survival Benefit Over Component Therapy.

Whole blood (WB) for trauma resuscitation in civilian populations has become more common. The utilization of WB in community trauma centers has not been reported. Previous studies have centered around large academic medical centers. We hypothesized that WB-based resuscitation compared to component-only resuscitation (CORe) would demonstrate a survival benefit and that WB resuscitation is safe, feasible, and benefits trauma patients regardless of setting. Our results indicate that receiving whole blood during resuscitation conferred a clear survival benefit to discharge, and this benefit was independent of ISS, age, gender, and initial SBP. We conclude WB should be incorporated into all resuscitation protocols for exsanguinating trauma patients and preferred over component therapy in all centers treating trauma patients.

An observation-first strategy for liver injuries with "blush" on computed tomography is safe and effective.

INTRODUCTION: The management of liver injuries in hemodynamically stable patients is variable and includes primary treatment strategies of observation (OBS), angiography (interventional radiology [IR]) with angioembolization (AE), or operative intervention (OR). We aimed to evaluate the management of patients with liver injuries with active extravasation on computed tomography (CT) imaging, hypothesizing that AE will have more complications without improving outcomes compared with OBS. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Patients who underwent CT within 2 hours after arrival with extravasation (e.g., blush) on imaging were included. Exclusion criteria included cirrhosis, nontraumatic hemorrhage, transfers from outside facilities, and pregnancy. No hemodynamic exclusion criteria were used. The primary outcome was liver-specific complications. Secondary outcomes include length of stay and mortality. Angioembolization patients were compared with patients treated without AE. Propensity score matching was used to match based on penetrating mechanism, liver injury severity, arrival vital signs, and early transfusion. RESULTS: Twenty-three centers enrolled 192 patients. Forty percent of patients (n = 77) were initially OBS. Eleven OBS patients (14%) failed nonoperative management and went to IR or OR. Sixty-one patients (32%) were managed with IR, and 42 (69%) of these had AE as an initial intervention. Fifty-four patients (28%) went to OR+/- IR. After propensity score matching (n = 34 per group), there was no difference in baseline characteristics between AE and OBS. The AE group experienced more complications with a higher rate of IR-placed drains for abscess or biloma (22% vs. 0%, p = 0.01) and an increased overall length of stay ( p = 0.01). No difference was noted in transfusions or mortality. CONCLUSION: Observation is highly effective with few requiring additional interventions. Angioembolization was associated with higher rate of secondary drain placement for abscesses or biloma. Given this, a trial of OBS and avoidance of empiric AE may be warranted in hemodynamically stable, liver-injured patient with extravasation on CT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.