Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
1.
Eur Heart J ; 45(13): 1159-1169, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38291599

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (BPV) is an important predictor of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. The long-term effect of a period of blood pressure (BP) control, but with differential BPV, is uncertain. Morbidity and mortality follow-up of UK participants in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure-Lowering Arm has been extended for up to 21 years to determine the CV impact of mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) control and BPV during the trial, and amongst those allocated to amlodipine- and atenolol-based treatment. METHODS: Eight thousand five hundred and eighty hypertensive participants (4305 assigned to amlodipine ± perindopril-based and 4275 to atenolol ± diuretic-based treatment during the in-trial period (median 5.5 years) were followed for up to 21 years (median 17.4 years), using linked hospital and mortality records. A subgroup of participants (n = 2156) was followed up 6 years after the trial closure with a self-administered questionnaire and a clinic visit. In-trial mean SBP and standard deviation of visit-to-visit SBP as a measure of BPV, were measured using >100 000 BP measurements. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk [hazard ratios (HRs)], associated with (i) mean with SBP and BPV during the in-trial period, for the CV endpoints occurring after the end of the trial and (ii) randomly assigned treatment to events following randomization, for the first occurrence of pre-specified CV outcomes. RESULTS: Using BP data from the in-trial period, in the post-trial period, although mean SBP was a predictor of CV outcomes {HR per 10 mmHg, 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.17], P < .001}, systolic BPV independent of mean SBP was a strong predictor of CV events [HR per 5 mmHg 1.22 (95% CI 1.18-1.26), P < .001] and predicted events even in participants with well-controlled BP. During 21-year follow-up, those on amlodipine-based compared with atenolol-based in-trial treatment had significantly reduced risk of stroke [HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.93), P = .003], total CV events [HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98), P = .008], total coronary events [HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.99), P = .024], and atrial fibrillation [HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.83-0.99), P = .030], with weaker evidence of a difference in CV mortality [HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-1.01), P = .073]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal coronary heart disease, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic BPV is a strong predictor of CV outcome, even in those with controlled SBP. The long-term benefits of amlodipine-based treatment compared with atenolol-based treatment in reducing CV events appear to be primarily mediated by an effect on systolic BPV during the trial period.


Subject(s)
Atenolol , Hypertension , Humans , Blood Pressure/physiology , Atenolol/therapeutic use , Atenolol/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Hypertension/complications , Amlodipine/therapeutic use , Risk Factors
2.
Tob Control ; 31(2): 146-149, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35241579

ABSTRACT

For many decades, the international tobacco industry has set its sights on Asia, due to the large population numbers, the high prevalence of male smokers who might shift to its brands, and the extremely low number of female smokers who could possibly be induced into starting smoking. Because of US trade threats against several Asian countries in the 1980s, Asia became quickly aware that tobacco control involved politics, legislation, economics and trade. Several Asian jurisdictions pioneered tobacco control measures, and the Western Pacific is still the only WHO region where all countries have ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Progress needs to be accelerated to reduce the still high male smoking prevalence and maintain the low female prevalence by fully implementing the WHO FCTC as part of achieving sustainable development, even while grappling with the looming epidemic of new products, holding the companies accountable, and protecting tobacco control policies against constant industry interference.


Subject(s)
Tobacco Industry , Tobacco Products , Asia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Smoking , Smoking Prevention , Nicotiana , World Health Organization
3.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 21(S1): 23-25, 2020 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649167

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This case series describes tobacco industry tactics and strategies used to interfere, derail, delay, and weaken the development of effective health warning regulations in Malaysia, Cambodia, the Philippines, and Hong Kong. METHODS: A historical review of official reports, news articles, and gray literature was undertaken to identify tobacco industry tactics and strategies to hamper government efforts in implementing stronger pictorial health warning regulations in four Asian jurisdictions (Cambodia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and the Philippines). RESULTS: Nineteen countries/jurisdictions in the WHO Western Pacific region currently require pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs, including some of the world's largest, in line with the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 11 Guidelines. In the four jurisdictions examined, tobacco industry interference consisted of lobbying and misinformation of high-level government officers and policy-makers, distributing industry-friendly legislative drafts, taking government to court, challenging government timelines for law implementation, and mobilizing third parties. Strong political leadership and strategic advocacy enabled governments to successfully overcome this industry interference. CONCLUSION: The tobacco industry uses similar tactics in different jurisdictions to derail, delay, and weaken the implementation of effective health warning policies. Identifying and learning from international experiences can help anticipate and defeat such challenges.


Subject(s)
Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy , Product Labeling/standards , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Industry/standards , Tobacco Use/prevention & control , Advertising , Cambodia/epidemiology , Government Regulation , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Malaysia/epidemiology , Philippines/epidemiology , Pictorial Works as Topic , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking Cessation/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , World Health Organization
6.
Lancet ; 392(10153): 1127-1137, 2018 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30158072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with hypertension, the long-term cardiovascular and all-cause mortality effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens and lipid-lowering treatment are not well documented, particularly in clinical trial settings. The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Legacy Study reports mortality outcomes after 16 years of follow-up of the UK participants in the original ASCOT trial. METHODS: ASCOT was a multicentre randomised trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. UK-based patients with hypertension were followed up for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality for a median of 15·7 years (IQR 9·7-16·4 years). At baseline, all patients enrolled into the blood pressure-lowering arm (BPLA) of ASCOT were randomly assigned to receive either amlodipine-based or atenolol-based blood pressure-lowering treatment. Of these patients, those who had total cholesterol of 6·5 mmol/L or lower and no previous lipid-lowering treatment underwent further randomisation to receive either atorvastatin or placebo as part of the lipid-lowering arm (LLA) of ASCOT. The remaining patients formed the non-LLA group. A team of two physicians independently adjudicated all causes of death. FINDINGS: Of 8580 UK-based patients in ASCOT, 3282 (38·3%) died, including 1640 (38·4%) of 4275 assigned to atenolol-based treatment and 1642 (38·1%) of 4305 assigned to amlodipine-based treatment. 1768 of the 4605 patients in the LLA died, including 903 (39·5%) of 2288 assigned placebo and 865 (37·3%) of 2317 assigned atorvastatin. Of all deaths, 1210 (36·9%) were from cardiovascular-related causes. Among patients in the BPLA, there was no overall difference in all-cause mortality between treatments (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·81-1·01, p=0·0776]), although significantly fewer deaths from stroke (adjusted HR 0·71, 0·53-0·97, p=0·0305) occurred in the amlodipine-based treatment group than in the atenolol-based treatment group. There was no interaction between treatment allocation in the BPLA and in the LLA. However, in the 3975 patients in the non-LLA group, there were fewer cardiovascular deaths (adjusted HR 0·79, 0·67-0·93, p=0·0046) among those assigned to amlodipine-based treatment compared with atenolol-based treatment (p=0·022 for the test for interaction between the two blood pressure treatments and allocation to LLA or not). In the LLA, significantly fewer cardiovascular deaths (HR 0·85, 0·72-0·99, p=0·0395) occurred among patients assigned to statin than among those assigned placebo. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show the long-term beneficial effects on mortality of antihypertensive treatment with a calcium channel blocker-based treatment regimen and lipid-lowering with a statin: patients on amlodipine-based treatment had fewer stroke deaths and patients on atorvastatin had fewer cardiovascular deaths more than 10 years after trial closure. Overall, the ASCOT Legacy study supports the notion that interventions for blood pressure and cholesterol are associated with long-term benefits on cardiovascular outcomes. FUNDING: Pfizer.


Subject(s)
Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Hypercholesterolemia/mortality , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/mortality , Adult , Aged , Amlodipine/therapeutic use , Atenolol/therapeutic use , Atorvastatin/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cause of Death , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , United Kingdom
8.
Br Med Bull ; 120(1): 15-25, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27941037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tobacco control in China, the world's largest producer and consumer of tobacco, began in the 1980s with the first national prevalence survey and a conference on tobacco held in Tianjin. Since then, there have been dozens of research papers, partial restrictions on smoking and tobacco advertising, public education campaigns, and the ratification of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, but progress has been slow. The state-owned tobacco industry remains a major obstacle to tobacco control. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: In the last few years, tobacco control efforts have accelerated beyond expectations. The triggering event was the publication on tobacco by the Chinese Central Party School, the ideological think tank of the Communist Party, followed by a spate of activity: directives to government officials; regulations issued by the Ministry of Education, the People's Liberation Army and the Healthy City Standards; tobacco clauses in national advertising and philanthropy laws; the creation of a Smoke-free Beijing; an increase in tobacco taxation; and a national smoke-free law currently in draft. AREAS TIMELY FOR POLICY RESEARCH AND ACTION: There is a crucial need for China to build upon these recent developments, in accepting the economic research evidence of the debit of tobacco to the economy; in implementing robust, comprehensive legislation; in increasing cigarette price through taxation and, most challenging of all, to tackle the power and influence of the state tobacco monopoly over tobacco control.


Subject(s)
Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , China/epidemiology , Health Promotion , Humans , Policy Making , Prevalence , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , World Health Organization
12.
Internet resource in English, Spanish, French | LIS -Health Information Locator | ID: lis-39944

ABSTRACT

Download the Tobacco AtlasNote: These .pdfs represent the last printed edition and updates may have occurred online. Please check the authors Notes blog for more information on data and content updates.


Subject(s)
Smoking , Atlas
13.
Lancet ; 385(9972): 1011-8, 2015 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25784348

ABSTRACT

The time has come for the world to acknowledge the unacceptability of the damage being done by the tobacco industry and work towards a world essentially free from the sale (legal and illegal) of tobacco products. A tobacco-free world by 2040, where less than 5% of the world's adult population use tobacco, is socially desirable, technically feasible, and could become politically practical. Three possible ways forward exist: so-called business-as-usual, with most countries steadily implementing the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) provisions; accelerated implementation of the FCTC by all countries; and a so-called turbo-charged approach that complements FCTC actions with strengthened UN leadership, full engagement of all sectors, and increased investment in tobacco control. Only the turbo-charged approach will achieve a tobacco-free world by 2040 where tobacco is out of sight, out of mind, and out of fashion--yet not prohibited. The first and most urgent priority is the inclusion of an ambitious tobacco target in the post-2015 sustainable development health goal. The second priority is accelerated implementation of the FCTC policies in all countries, with full engagement from all sectors including the private sector--from workplaces to pharmacies--and with increased national and global investment. The third priority is an amendment of the FCTC to include an ambitious global tobacco reduction goal. The fourth priority is a UN high-level meeting on tobacco use to galvanise global action towards the 2040 tobacco-free world goal on the basis of new strategies, new resources, and new players. Decisive and strategic action on this bold vision will prevent hundreds of millions of unnecessary deaths during the remainder of this century and safeguard future generations from the ravages of tobacco use.


Subject(s)
Tobacco Use/prevention & control , Commerce , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Global Health , Government Programs , Health Policy , Health Promotion , Humans , Smoking/economics , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Industry , Tobacco Products/supply & distribution , Tobacco Use/economics , Tobacco Use Cessation/economics , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Tobacco, Smokeless/economics , Tobacco, Smokeless/supply & distribution
14.
Atlanta; American Cancer Society; 5; 2015. map, tab, graf.
Monography in English | Coleciona SUS, Inca | ID: biblio-940524
15.
Lancet ; 381(9877): 1581-7, 2013 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23642699

ABSTRACT

For the purpose of this article, Asia refers to WHO's combined South-East Asia and Western Pacific regions and thus includes Australia and New Zealand. Asia has the highest number of tobacco users and is the prime target of transnational tobacco companies. The future of global tobacco control rests in this region and the challenges are clear. China, India, and Indonesia are key markets and Asia is a frontrunner in tobacco control measures, such as plain packaging of cigarettes. Some countries in Asia have a long history of tobacco control activities beginning in the 1970s, and WHO's Western Pacific Region is still the only region where all countries have ratified WHO's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. We reviewed the history, research, epidemiology, tobacco control action, obstacles, and potential responses and solutions to the tobacco epidemic in this region. Levels of development, systems of government, and population size are very different between countries, with population size ranging from 1500 to 1·3 billion, but similarities exist in aspects of the tobacco epidemic, harms caused, obstacles faced, and tobacco control actions needed.


Subject(s)
Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Asia/epidemiology , Female , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Products/adverse effects , Tobacco Products/economics
18.
Atlanta; The American Cancer Society. World Lung Foundation; 2013. 134 p. ilus, map, graf.
Monography in Spanish | MINSALCHILE | ID: biblio-1545125
19.
Lancet ; 380(9842): 629-30, 2012 Aug 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22901873
20.
Br Med Bull ; 102: 5-16, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22586210

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION OR BACKGROUND: Tobacco currently kills 6 million people each year, increasingly in the low- and middle-income countries, which will bear the economic brunt of this epidemic. Tobacco control takes health professionals to very new destinations, away from the traditional curative medical model to mastering the corridors of power, using the media, and political lobbying and advocacy. None of these skills is taught in medical schools. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: The magnitude and future expansion of the tobacco epidemic is beyond controversy, as is the fact that the economic costs of tobacco outweigh any benefits. The tools needed to reduce the epidemic are also known and accepted, and these are virtually identical in all countries. It only requires political will to implement these. GROWING POINTS: All countries should ratify and implement the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and commit adequate funding to counter this global pandemic. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Action must be based on the science of epidemiology, prevalence, health effects, economic burden, success of action taken and tracking the tobacco industry.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Smoking Prevention , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/trends , Smoking Cessation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...