Mild traumatic brain injury in Drosophila melanogaster alters reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in a sex-dependent manner.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an outside force causing a modification in brain function and/or structural brain pathology that upregulates brain inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), instigating increased levels of nitric oxide activity which is implicated in secondary pathology leading to behavioral deficits (Hall et al., 2012; Garry et al., 2015; Kozlov et al., 2017). In mammals, TBI-induced NO production activates an immune response and potentiates metabolic crisis through mitochondrial dysfunction coupled with vascular dysregulation; however, the direct influence on pathology is complicated by the activation of numerous secondary cascades and activation of other reactive oxygen species. Drosophila TBI models have demonstrated key features of mammalian TBI, including temporary incapacitation, disorientation, motor deficits, activation of innate immunity (inflammation), and autophagy responses observed immediately after injury (Katzenberger et al., 2013; Barekat et al., 2016; Simon et al., 2017; Anderson et al., 2018; Buhlman et al., 2021b). We hypothesized that acute behavioral phenotypes would be associated with deficits in climbing behavior and increased oxidative stress. Because flies lack mammalian-like cardiovascular and adaptive immune systems, we were able to make our observations in the absence of vascular disruption and adaptive immune system interference in a system where highly targeted interventions can be rapidly evaluated. To demonstrate the induction of injury, ten-day-old transgenic flies received an injury of increasing angles from a modified high impact trauma (HIT) device where angle-dependent increases occurred for acute neurological behavior assessments and twenty-four-hour mortality, and survival was significantly decreased. Injury caused sex-dependent effects on climbing activity and measures of oxidative stress. Specifically, after a single 60-degree HIT, female flies exhibited significant impairments in climbing activity beyond that observed in male flies. We also found that several measures of oxidative stress, including Drosophila NOS (dNOS) expression, protein nitration, and hydrogen peroxide production were significantly decreased in female flies. Interestingly, protein nitration was also decreased in males, but surpassed sham levels with a more severe injury. We also observed decreased autophagy demand in vulnerable dopaminergic neurons in female, but not male flies. In addition, mitophagy initiation was decreased in females. Collectively, our data suggest that TBI in flies induces acute behavioral phenotypes and climbing deficits that are analogous to mammalian TBI. We also observed that various indices of oxidative stress, including dNOS expression, protein tyrosine nitration, and hydrogen peroxide levels, as well as basal levels of autophagy, are altered in response to injury, an effect that is more pronounced in female flies.

A collaborative approach to adopting/adapting guidelines - The Australian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the early years (Birth to 5 years): an integration of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the Australian Government funded the update of the National Physical Activity Recommendations for Children 0-5 years, with the intention that they be an integration of movement behaviours across the 24-h period. The benefit for Australia was that it could leverage research in Canada in the development of their 24-h guidelines for the early years. Concurrently, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group published a model to produce guidelines based on adoption, adaption and/or de novo development using the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework. Referred to as the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach, it allows guideline developers to follow a structured and transparent process in a more efficient manner, potentially avoiding the need to unnecessarily repeat costly tasks such as conducting systematic reviews. The purpose of this paper is to outline the process and outcomes for adapting the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the Early Years to develop the Australian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the Early Years guided by the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT framework. METHODS: The development process was guided by the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach. A Leadership Group and Consensus Panel were formed and existing credible guidelines identified. The draft Canadian 24-h integrated movement guidelines for the early years best met the criteria established by the Panel. These were evaluated based on the evidence in the GRADE tables, summaries of findings tables and draft recommendations from the Canadian Draft Guidelines. Updates to each of the Canadian systematic reviews were conducted and the Consensus Panel reviewed the evidence for each behaviour separately and made a decision to adopt or adapt the Canadian recommendations for each behaviour or create de novo recommendations. An online survey was then conducted (n = 302) along with five focus groups (n = 30) and five key informant interviews (n = 5) to obtain feedback from stakeholders on the draft guidelines. RESULTS: Based on the evidence from the Canadian systematic reviews and the updated systematic reviews in Australia, the Consensus Panel agreed to adopt the Canadian recommendations and, apart from some minor changes to the wording of good practice statements, keep the wording of the guidelines, preamble and title of the Canadian Guidelines. The Australian Guidelines provide evidence-informed recommendations for a healthy day (24-h), integrating physical activity, sedentary behaviour (including limits to screen time), and sleep for infants (<1 year), toddlers (1-2 years) and preschoolers (3-5 years). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is only the second time the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach has been used. Following this approach, the judgments of the Australian Consensus Panel did not differ sufficiently to change the directions and strength of the recommendations and as such, the Canadian recommendations were adopted with very minor alterations. This allowed the Guidelines to be developed much faster and at lower cost. As such, we would recommend the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach, especially if a credible set of guidelines, with all supporting materials and developed using a transparent process, is available. Other countries may consider using this approach when developing and/or revising national movement guidelines.