ABSTRACT
In temperate and subtropical regions, ancient proteins are reported to survive up to about 2 million years, far beyond the known limits of ancient DNA preservation in the same areas. Accordingly, their amino acid sequences currently represent the only source of genetic information available to pursue phylogenetic inference involving species that went extinct too long ago to be amenable for ancient DNA analysis. Here we present a complete workflow, including sample preparation, mass spectrometric data acquisition and computational analysis, to recover and interpret million-year-old dental enamel protein sequences. During sample preparation, the proteolytic digestion step, usually an integral part of conventional bottom-up proteomics, is omitted to increase the recovery of the randomly degraded peptides spontaneously generated by extensive diagenetic hydrolysis of ancient proteins over geological time. Similarly, we describe other solutions we have adopted to (1) authenticate the endogenous origin of the protein traces we identify, (2) detect and validate amino acid variation in the ancient protein sequences and (3) attempt phylogenetic inference. Sample preparation and data acquisition can be completed in 3-4 working days, while subsequent data analysis usually takes 2-5 days. The workflow described requires basic expertise in ancient biomolecules analysis, mass spectrometry-based proteomics and molecular phylogeny. Finally, we describe the limits of this approach and its potential for the reconstruction of evolutionary relationships in paleontology and paleoanthropology.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: A modern pattern (rate and duration) of dental development occurs relatively recently during human evolution. Given the temporal overlap of Homo naledi with the first appearance of fossil Homo sapiens in Africa, this small-bodied and small-brained hominin presents an opportunity to elucidate the evolution of enamel growth in the hominin clade. Here we conduct the first histological study of two permanent mandibular canines and one permanent maxillary first molar, representing three individuals attributed to H. naledi. We reconstruct the rate and duration of enamel growth and compare these findings to those reported for other fossil hominins and recent humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thin sections of each tooth were produced using standard histological methods. Daily and longer period incremental markings were measured to reconstruct enamel secretion and extension rates, Retzius periodicity, canine crown and molar cusp formation time. RESULTS: Daily enamel secretion rates overlapped with those from recent hominins. Canine crown formation time is similar to that observed in recent Europeans but is longer than canine formation times reported for most other hominins including Australopithecus and H. neanderthalensis. The extended period of canine formation appears to be due to a relatively tall enamel crown and a sustained slow rate of enamel extension in the cervical portion of the crown. A Retzius periodicity of 11 days for the canines, and nine days for the molar, in H. naledi parallel results found in recent humans. An 11-day periodicity has not been reported for Late Pleistocene Homo (H. erectus, H. neanderthalensis) and is rarely found in Australopithecus and Paranthropus species. DISCUSSION: Enamel growth of H. naledi is most similar to recent humans though comparative data are limited for most fossil hominin species. The high Retzius periodicity values do not follow expectations for a small-brained hominin.
