Characteristics of radiation-induced brain tumors: case series and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation therapy (RT) improves the outcome of patients with cancer but introduces the risk of radiation-induced neoplasms in cancer survivors. The most common radiation-induced brain tumors (RIBTs) are gliomas (RIGs), meningiomas (RIMs), and sarcomas (RISs). To investigate the characteristics of these RIBTs, the authors conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of their case series and relevant cases from the literature. METHODS: Sixteen patients in the case series and 941 patients from the literature who previously underwent cranial irradiation were included in this study. The age at irradiation for primary disease was recorded, and the latency period from irradiation to the development of RIBT and the median overall survival (OS) of patients with RIBTs were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients were stratified by age at the time of irradiation (pediatric vs nonpediatric) and the irradiation dose (higher vs lower dose), and latency and OS were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Among patients with RIBTs, 23.4% underwent radiation at < 5 years of age, and 46.6% underwent RT in the 1st decade of life. The median ages at cranial irradiation were 8.4 (IQR 4.1-16) years in patients with RIMs, 9 (IQR 5-23) years in patients with RIGs, and 27.7 (IQR 13.8-40) years in patients with RISs. The median latency period from irradiation to the development of RIM was significantly longer than that to the development of RIG and RIS (RIM: 20 years, RIG: 9 years, RIS: 10 years; p < 0.0001). The latency period was shorter in the nonpediatric patient group with RIMs (p = 0.047). The OS was significantly longer in patients with RIMs than in those with RIGs and RISs (RIM: not reached, RIG: 11 months, RIS: 11 months; p < 0.0001). The OS of patients with RIMs and RIGs was significantly shorter in patients who received higher radiation doses (p = 0.0095 and p = 0.0026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis was poor and worse for patients with RIGs and RISs than for those with RIMs, and patients with RIBTs who underwent higher-dose irradiation for primary disease had poor prognoses. Because RIBTs develop more than a decade after cranial irradiation, long-term follow-up is crucial.

T1-T2 Mismatch Sign as a Predictor of Ipsilateral Ischemic Change After Carotid Artery Stenting.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance (MR)-plaque imaging reflects the characteristics of carotid plaque. We evaluated the relationship between MR-plaque images and ischemic change after carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: MR-plaque images were acquired from patients with carotid artery stenosis before CAS treatment. We calculated the relative signal intensity of plaque components compared with that of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and evaluated the presence/absence of T1-T2 mismatch and match sign. We then assessed the appearance of new ischemic lesions after CAS on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Factors associated with the appearance of a high-intensity lesion on DWI were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients with carotid artery stenoses treated with CAS were included in this study. In univariate analysis, T1-T2 mismatch sign was associated with the appearance of high-intensity lesions on DWI after CAS (odds ratio [OR], 12.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.593-40.072; P < 0.0001), whereas T1-T2 match sign and high intensity on T2-weighted imaging were negatively associated (OR, 0.061, 95% CI, 0.007-0.502, P = 0.009 and OR, 0.085; 95% CI, 0.022-0.334, P = 0.0004, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, T1-T2 mismatch sign was independently associated with the appearance of a high-intensity lesion on DWI after CAS (OR, 16.695; 95% CI, 1.324-210.52; P = 0.0295). CONCLUSIONS: T1-T2 mismatch sign on MR-plaque imaging is significantly associated with the appearance of new ischemic lesions after CAS. T1-T2 mismatch sign may be useful in considering treatment strategies for carotid artery stenosis.

Secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation: case series and comprehensive literature review.

BACKGROUND: Secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation, so-called radiation-induced meningioma, is one of the important late effects after cranial radiation therapy. In this report, we analyzed our case series of secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation and conducted a critical review of literature to reveal the characteristics of secondary meningioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review by using Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google scholar databases and investigated pathologically confirmed individual cases. In our institute, we found pathologically diagnosed seven cases with secondary meningioma between 2000 and 2018. Totally, 364 cases were analyzed based on gender, WHO grade, radiation dose, chemotherapy. The latency years from irradiation to development of secondary meningioma were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the relationship between age at irradiation and the latency years. RESULTS: The mean age at secondary meningioma development was 35.6 ± 15.7 years and the mean latency periods were 22.6 ± 12.1 years. The latency periods from irradiation to the development of secondary meningioma are significantly shorter in higher WHO grade group (P = 0.0026, generalized Wilcoxon test), higher radiation dose group (P < 0.0001) and concomitant systemic chemotherapy group (P = 0.0003). Age at irradiation was negatively associated with the latency periods (r = -0.23231, P < 0.0001, Spearman's correlation test). CONCLUSION: Cranial irradiation at older ages, at higher doses and concomitant chemotherapy was associated with a shorter latency period to develop secondary meningiomas. However, even low-dose irradiation can cause secondary meningiomas after a long latency period. Long-term follow-up is necessary to minimize the morbidity and mortality caused by secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation.