ABSTRACT
Identification and screening of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) is important to prevent liver cancer. Comprehensive antiviral treatments should follow three sequential steps: Hepatitis screening (step 1; examination of HB surface antigen and HCV antibody), medical examination (step 2; examination of HBV-DNA and/or HCV-RNA and performance of abdominal ultrasonography) and antiviral treatment (step 3). Patients who underwent these three steps were studied to determine effective information sources (factors) for raising awareness of comprehensive treatments. A total of 182 patients from 11 medical institutions were who were undergoing antiviral treatment were investigated. The number of patients who accessed each of the 18 information sources in each of the three steps and the percentage of these information sources that directly influenced the participants to make treatment-related decisions were calculated. 'Recommendation from a primary care physician' was the most common information source (64.3, 77.5, and 75.8% at steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively). 'Recommendation from a public health nurse (PHN),' 'recommendation from friends or family,' and 'recommendation from work colleagues' were the next most common human factors (3.3-19.8%). 'Recommendation from a primary care physician' had the greatest influence (76.9, 73.0, and 77.5% at steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively). 'Recommendation from a PHN' (50.0, 26.3 and 64.3%), 'recommendations from friends and family' (58.3, 38.9 and 58.3%), and 'recommendations from work colleagues' (33.3, 33.3 and 42.9%) were highly influential factors. Media such as TV commercial messages and programs also had high recognition, but were not directly influential. The findings of the present study indicated that recommendations from primary care physicians, friends, family and work colleagues influenced patients' decision-making regarding hepatitis screening, examination and treatment.
ABSTRACT
AIM: Determination of the percentage of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive participants who undergo screening and treatment may reduce the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. This study assessed the percentages of HBsAg positive participants detected by free screening at medical institutions in Saga Prefecture who underwent detailed examinations and antiviral treatment. METHODS: Participants were screened for HBsAg positivity at medical institutions in Saga Prefecture from April 2008 to January 2013, with some visiting physicians for detailed examinations and applying for reimbursement. Participants in the database of the Health Promotion Division of Saga Prefecture and results of detailed examinations were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Screening revealed 193 eligible participants, 105 men (54%) and 88 women (46%), of a mean age of 55.5 ± 14.9 years. Of these 193 participants, 147 (76%) visited physicians for detailed examinations, 24 (16%) were regarded as needing treatment and seven (3.6%) were reimbursed for antiviral treatments. The 46 participants who did not undergo detailed examinations were significantly younger than the 147 examined participants (50.9 ± 13.2 vs 56.9 ± 15.2 years, P = 0.018). Of the 110 participants thought to require observation, 68 (62%) were assigned to this group without determination of alanine aminotransferase or hepatitis B virus DNA concentration, and 15 (14%) had indications for antiviral treatment according to the 2014 guidelines of the Japanese Society of Hepatology. CONCLUSION: The proportion of HBsAg positive participants receiving antiviral treatment was lower than that of participants undergoing detailed examinations.
