ABSTRACT
Introduction The use of cochlear implants and hearing aids (bimodal) has been growing with the expansion of the indication for them, and it is important to ensure protocols so that there is a balance of the loudness regarding the two devices. Objective To evaluate if the limited complex sounds present in the frequency bands of the current devices enable the balance of the loudness in adult users of bimodal stimulation, and to analyze if speech recognition improves after balancing. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study with convenience sampling. The sample was composed of 25 adults who had used either a cochlear implant for at least 6 months or a contralateral hearing aid, with a mean age of 46 years. The balancing of the loudness was performed in an acoustic room with the computer's sound box (0° azimuth at 70 dB SPL). The instrumental sounds were filtered through eight different frequency bands. The patients used both hearing devices and were asked if the sound was perceived to be louder in one of the ears or centrally. The speech test was evaluated with sentence silence (65 dB SPL) and/or noise signal ratio of 0 dB/+ 10 dB in free field at 0° azimuth, before and after balancing. Results : Out of the 25 patients, 5 failed to achieve balance at every tested frequency, and 3 achieved balance at almost every frequency, except 8 kHz. There was a significant difference between the speech recognition test only in silence before and after balancing. Conclusion : Most patients achieved sound equalization at all evaluated frequencies under the complex-sound protocol. Additionally, most patients experienced improved speech recognition after balancing.
ABSTRACT
Vários estudos mostram a importância do uso combinado do aparelho de amplificação sonora individual (AASI) com implante coclear (IC), entretanto nem todos os usuários de IC usam a adaptação bimodal efetivamente. Objetivos: Identificar as características e os motivos que permeiam o uso combinado dos dispositivos em adultos usuários de IC com AASI na orelha contralateral. Método: Foi aplicado um questionário com 39 perguntas fechadas relacionadas à experiência com AASI antes e após a cirurgia do IC em usuários bimodais. A amostra foi dividida segundo as médias tritonais de limiares na orelha contralateral ao IC. Grupo 1: até 100 dBHL e Grupo 2: acima de 100 dBHL. Resultados: Foram avaliados 49 adultos, com mediana de limiares auditivos no grupo 1: 92 dB e no grupo 2: 114 dB. Após a cirurgia do IC, 78% do grupo 1 e 73% do grupo 2 continuaram a usar AASI por 10 horas diárias ou mais. 41% do grupo 1 e 65% do grupo 2 precisaram de um a três ajustes por ano no AASI, porém 41% do grupo 1 e 31% do grupo 2 não haviam realizado nenhuma regulagem no último ano. Ambos os grupos responderam que sentem benefícios na estimulação bimodal para situações silenciosas, ruidosas, em locais reverberantes e na percepção da música. Na percepção da localização sonora apenas 35% do grupo 1 e 12% do grupo 2 percebem que usar o bimodal ajuda na identificação da direção do som. Conclusão: A maioria dos pacientes prefere usar a estimulação bimodal em situações diárias, independentemente do resíduo auditivo do ouvido contralateral ao IC.
Several studies showed the importance of the combined use of the hearing aid (HA) with cochlear implant (CI), but not all CI users wear bimodal stimulation effectively. Objective: To identify the characteristics and reasons that explain the use of combined devices in adult CI users with HA in contralateral ear. Methods: A questionnaire was applied with 39 closed questions related to the experience with HA before and after CI surgery in bimodal users. The sample was divided according to the three-frequency pure tone average in the non-implanted ear. Group 1: below or equal 100 dBHL and Group 2: above 100 dBHL. Results: 49 adults were evaluated, with median auditory thresholds in group 1: 92 dB and group 2: 114 dB. After IC surgery, 78% (group 1) and 73% (group 2) continued to use HA for 10 hours daily or more. 41% (group 1) and 65% (group 2) required one to three adjustments per year in the HA, but 41% (group 1) and 31% (group 2) had not made any adjustments during the former year. Both groups responded that they feel benefits in bimodal stimulation for quiet, noisy situations, in reverberant places and in the perception of music. In the perception of sound localization, only 35% (group 1) and 12% (group 2) perceived that using bimodal helps in the identification of the direction of sound. Conclusion: The majority of patients prefer to use bimodal stimulation in daily basis, independently of residual hearing in the contralateral ear to CI.
Vários estudios demuestran la importancia del uso combinado del audífonos con el implante coclear (IC), aunque nó todos los usuários de IC usan la adaptación bimodal efectivamente. Objectivos: Identificar las características y los motivos por detrás del uso combinado de los dos dispositivos en adultos usuários de IC y audífono en el oído contralateral. Método: Se aplico um cuestionario con 39 preguntas cerradas relacionadas a la experiencia con audífonos antes y después de la cirugía del IC en usuários bimodales. La muestra se dividió en dos grupos según el umbral promedio tritonal en el oído contralateral al IC. Grupo 1: hasta 100 dBHL y Grupo 2: más de 100 dBHL. Resultados: Fueron evaluados 49 adultos, con mediana de umbrales auditivos en el grupo 1: 92dB y en el grupo 2: 114dB. Despues de la cirugía del IC, 78% del grupo 1 y 73% del grupo 2 siguieron usando el audífono por 10 horas diárias o más. El 41% del grupo 1, y 65% del grupo 2 necesitaron entre um y tres ajustes anuales del audífono. Por outro lado, el 41% del grupo 1 y 31% del grupo 2, nó habían hecho ningún ajuste durante el último año. Ambos grupos reportaron benefícios de la estimulación bimodal en situaciones silenciosas, ruidosas, en locales reverberantes y en la percepción de música. En la percepción de localización sonora, solo un 35% del grupo 1 y 12% del grupo 2 reportaron que la estimulación bimodal ayuda en la identificación de la dirección del sonido. Conclusion: La mayoria de los pacientes prefieren usar la estimulación bimodal en situaciones diárias, independientemente del resíduo auditivo del oido contralateral al IC.
