Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am Fam Physician ; 99(5): 295-296, 2019 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811167
3.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 47(9): 1871-81, 2006 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16682315

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Given that adverse effects of chronic sympathetic activation are mediated by all three adrenergic receptor subtypes (beta1, beta2, alpha1), we examined the effects of standard doses of carvedilol and metoprolol succinate (metoprolol controlled release/extended release [CR/XL]) on hemodynamics, myocardial metabolism, and regional organ perfusion. BACKGROUND: Both beta1 selective and combined adrenergic blockade reduce morbidity and mortality in heart failure. Whether there are advantages of one class over the other remains controversial, even in the wake of the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET). Similarly, the mechanistic basis for the relative differences is incompletely understood. METHODS: Thirty-three conscious, chronically instrumented dogs with pacing-induced (240 min(-1) for 4 weeks) dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were randomized to carvedilol (25 mg twice daily, Coreg, Glaxo Smith Kline, Research Triangle, North Carolina) or metoprolol succinate (100 mg qd, Toprol XL, Astra Zeneca, Wilmington, Delaware). Left ventricular and systemic hemodynamics, myocardial substrate uptake, and norepinephrine spillover were measured before and after three days of treatment. Regional (renal, hepatic, skeletal muscle) blood flows were measured using neutron-activated microspheres. RESULTS: Both agents had comparable heart rate effects. However, carvedilol-treated dogs showed significantly greater increases in stroke volume and cardiac output and decreases in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and systemic vascular resistance. Carvedilol increased renal, hepatic, and skeletal muscle blood flow. Carvedilol increased myocardial glucose uptake and suppressed norepinephrine and glucagon. Carvedilol antagonized the response to exogenous norepinephrine to a greater extent than metoprolol CR/XL. CONCLUSIONS: At doses inducing comparable heart rate reductions, short-term treatment with carvedilol had superior hemodynamic and metabolic effects compared with metoprolol CR/XL. These data suggest important advantages of blocking all three adrenergic receptor subtypes in DCM.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Carbazoles/therapeutic use , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/drug therapy , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Metoprolol/analogs & derivatives , Myocardium/metabolism , Propanolamines/therapeutic use , Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/pharmacology , Animals , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/metabolism , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/physiopathology , Carvedilol , Dogs , Heart Rate/drug effects , Isoproterenol/pharmacology , Metoprolol/therapeutic use , Regional Blood Flow/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL