Reactive gastropathy is associated with inflammatory conditions throughout the gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of reactive gastropathy and its relationship with other conditions of the gastrointestinal tract associated with NSAID use have not been evaluated. AIMS: To test the hypothesis that if reactive gastropathy shares common aetiological factors with these conditions, the analysis of a large cohort would unveil associations. METHODS: We queried a national pathology database for subjects with a diagnosis of reactive gastropathy; controls were patients with normal gastric biopsies. We also extracted diagnoses of H. pylori infection, intestinal metaplasia, duodenal lymphocytosis, duodenitis, ileitis, microscopic colitis and focal colitis. RESULTS: Of 504 011 patients with gastric biopsies, 69 101 had oesophageal, 166 134 duodenal, 13 010 ileal and 83 334 colonic biopsies. Reactive gastropathy was diagnosed in 15.6% of patients, H. pylori infection in 10.3% and normal gastric mucosa in 16.3%. Reactive gastropathy was evenly distributed across the US and increased from 2.0% in the first decade of life to >20% in octogenarians. Compared with controls, reactive gastropathy was significantly associated with Barrett's mucosa (OR 1.21 95% CI 1.16-129); duodenitis (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.28-1.44); duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.13-1.39); active ileitis (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.47-2.40); focal active colitis (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.33-1.86); and collagenous colitis (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.12-2.03). CONCLUSIONS: Reactive gastropathy, a common histopathological feature of the stomach, shows an age-dependent rise and is associated with changes of the digestive tract believed to be caused by NSAID use or duodenogastric reflux. However, a large fraction of reactive gastropathy remains unexplained; its frequent occurrence merits further efforts at elucidating its aetiology.

Efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of reflux esophagitis and the influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on healing rate.

Patients with reflux esophagitis (grade II or III, Savary-Miller, intention-to-treat, n=256, age range 19-82 years) were randomly assigned to a double-blind, double-dummy treatment with either pantoprazole 40 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. After 4 weeks, each patient was clinically and endoscopically assessed. Failure to heal required a further 4 weeks of treatment and a new evaluation thereafter. After 4 weeks, healing of lesions was confirmed in 63% (69 out of 109) of patients receiving pantoprazole and in 22% (25 out of 113) receiving ranitidine (P < 0.001, per protocol population). After 8 weeks, the cumulative healing rates were 88% and 46%, respectively (P < 0.001). Complete freedom from esophagitis-related symptoms (acid eructation, heartburn, pain while swallowing) was greater in the pantoprazole than in ranitidine group after 2 and 4 weeks (74% vs. 47%; 87% vs. 52%, respectively, P < 0.001). After 4 weeks, the healing rate was 76% in Helicobacter pylori (Hp)-positive vs. 45% in Hp-negative patients treated with pantoprazole (P < 0.01). The Hp status did not influence healing rates in patients treated with ranitidine. The most frequent adverse events in the pantoprazole group were diarrhea and somnolence (2-3% of patients), and in the ranitidine group, headache, diarrhea, dizziness, increase of liver enzymes and pruritus (2-4% of patients). In conclusion, pantoprazole was more effective than ranitidine in the healing rate and relief from reflux esophagitis-associated symptoms, and Hp infection was associated with higher healing rate during therapy with pantoprazole but not with ranitidine.

Clinical and endoscopic aspects in the evolution of patients with bleeding peptic ulcer--a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding ulcers are a major problem in public health and represent approximately half of all the cases of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the United States. This study aims to determine the prognostic value of factors such as clinical history, laboratory and endoscopic findings in the occurrence of new episodes of bleeding in patients who have upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by gastric or duodenal peptic ulcer. METHODS: A cohort study with 94 patients was designed to investigate prognostic factors to the occurrence of new episodes of bleeding. RESULTS: From the 94 patients studied, 88 did not present a new bleeding episode in the 7 days following hospital admission. The incidence of rebleeding was significantly higher in those patients with hemoglobin < 6 g/dL at the admission (P = 0.03, RR = 6.2). The localization of the ulcers in bulb was positively associated to rebleeding (P = 0.003). The rebleeding group needed a greater number of units transfunded (P = 0.03) and the time of hospitalization was longer than the time of the hemostasia group (P = 0.0349). CONCLUSIONS: The identification of patients with risk of death by bleeding peptic ulcer remains as a challenge, once few factors are capable of predicting the severity of the evolution. The identification of such factors will allow the choice of the better therapeutic conduct improving the diagnosis and decreasing the rate of rebleeding and the mortality.

Total and segmental colonic transit time with radio-opaque markers in adolescents with functional constipation.

BACKGROUND: In most instances, constipation is considered idiopathic or functional. The total and segmental colonic transit time, traced by radio- opaque markers, makes possible the identification of the colon segment that has the motility alteration that causes constipation. METHODS: A study was performed of 13 adolescents, aged 12 to 18, with functional chronic constipation and 13 without constipation. In all of them the total and segmental colonic transit times were measured with radio-opaque markers. The adolescents ingested 20 markers each on three successive days, and on the fourth day a plain abdominal radiograph was performed. RESULTS: In the nonconstipated adolescents the total colonic transit time (mean +/- SD) was 30.2 +/- 13.1 hours, in the right colon 5.7 +/- 3.9 hours, in the left colon 7.9 +/- 7.8 hours, and in the rectosigmoid 15.5 +/- 10.6 hours. In the constipated adolescents, the total colonic transit time was 58.3 +/- 17.4 hours, in the right colon 15.9 +/- 12.4 hours, in the left colon 14.7 +/- 13.4 hours, and in the rectosigmoid 17.2 +/- 16.2 hours. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the total colonic transit time, and in both the right and left colon transit times between constipated and nonconstipated adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of total and segmental colonic transit times is a simple method that allows one to distinguish constipation due to colonic dysfunction (right colon and left colon) from constipation due to distal obstruction (rectosigmoid).

[Single nocturnal dose of ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: results of an open multicenter, comparative trial]. / Ranitidina em dose única noturna no tratamento da úlcera duodenal. Resultado de um estudo aberto, multicêntrico, comparativo.

This prospective multicentric randomized open trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine 150 mg bid vs 300 mg nocte in the short-term (4 weeks) treatment of duodenal ulcer in 15 Brazilian centers. On the basis of a randomization table 190 patients with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer were allocated to receive either ranitidine 150 mg bid (94 pts) or 300 mg nocte (96 pts). The 2 treatment groups were well matched for age, sex, duration of ulcer disease, number and size of ulcers, duration of current episode, intensity of ulcer pain, alcohol and coffee intake and smoking habits. They were endoscopically controlled at the end of the 4 weeks. At 4 weeks 78 of 94 patients (83.0%) had their ulcers healed with the 150 mg bid regimen as opposed to 79 of 96 patients (82.3%) allocated to the 300 mg nocte dosage. This difference was not statistically significant. Ulcer symptoms diminished with treatment in both groups. The tolerability and compliance was excellent in both groups. The results show that ranitidine 300 mg nocte is as effective in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer as ranitidine 150 mg bid. Considering the greater simplicity of administration enhancing patient compliance, the treatment with 300 mg nocte is preferable.