ABSTRACT
Background and purpose:
In our collaborative project, called MRI First!, every patient arriving with neurological symptoms of acute stroke and without contraindications was examined by MRI. Our aim was to detect the symptomatic lesions, to obtain appropriate information about the brain parenchyma and to analyse parenchymal perfusion and brain vasculature.
. Methods:The examinations were conducted on a Philips Ingenia 1.5 Tesla scanner with the following protocol: DWI-ADC, FLAIR, T2 FFE/SWI, PWI, and contrast-enhanced MRA. 415 patients were examined between January 2020 and May 2021. 179 patients arrived within-, and 136 patients after 4.5 hours symptoms onset time, while 100 patients had “wake-up” stroke.
. Results:Within the 4.5 hours group, 81 cases had acute ischemic lesion, 48 of them received reperfusion therapy. Acute ischemic lesion was found in 64 patients in the wake-up stroke group and in 64 in the 4.5-24 hours group. In these groups 10 and 12 patients obtained reperfusion therapy, respectively. Further 117 cases were considered as stroke mimics, in which cases unnecessary intravenous thrombolysis was avoidable.
. Conclusion:MRI is accepted as a sensitive diagnostic modality providing detailed information regarding the brain parenchyma, its perfusion and vasculature. Nonetheless, its worldwide utilization in acute stroke is low and further information should be collected on which patient groups would gain the most benefit from acute MR imaging. Our continuous work is aimed at that goal.
.Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Stroke , Humans , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Brain/pathology , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingABSTRACT
Background and purpose: Previous studies using generic and disease specific instruments showed that both migraine and medication overuse headache are associated with lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of our study was to assess HRQoL differences in migraineurs and in patients with MOH and to examine how headache characteristics such as years with headache, aura symptoms, triptan use, headache pain severity and headache frequency are related to HRQoL. Methods: In this cross-sectional study 334 participants were examined (248 were recruited from a tertiary headache centre and 86 via advertisements). The Comp-rehensive Headache-related Quality of life Questionnaire (CHQQ) was used to measure the participants' HRQoL. Data showed normal distribution, therefore beside Chi-squared test parametric tests (e.g. independent samples t-test) were used with a two-tailed p<0.05 threshold. Linear regression models were used to determine the independent effects of sex, age, recruitment method, headache type (migraine vs. MOH) and headache characteristics (presence of aura symptoms, years with headache, headache pain severity, headache frequency and triptan use) separately for each domain and for the total score of CHQQ. Significance threshold was adopted to pï£0.0125 (0.05/4) to correct for multiple testing and avoid Type I error. Results: Independent samples t-tests showed that patients with MOH had significantly lower scores on all CHQQ domains than migraineurs, except on the social subscale. Results of a series of regression analyses showed that triptan use was inversely related to all the domains of HRQoL after correction for multiple testing (p<0.0125). In addition, headache pain severity was associated with lower physical (p=0.001) and total scores (p=0.002) on CHQQ subscales. Conclusion: Based on the results, different headache characteristics (but not the headache type, namely migraine or MOH) were associated with lower levels of HRQoL in patients with headache. Determining which factors play significant role in the deterioration of HRQoL is important to adequately manage different patient populations and to guide public health policies regarding health service utilization and health-care costs.
Subject(s)
Headache Disorders, Secondary , Migraine Disorders , Cross-Sectional Studies , Headache , Headache Disorders, Secondary/drug therapy , Humans , Hungary , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Tryptamines/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Background: Previous studies suggested a circadian variation of migraine attack onset, although, with contradictory results - possibly because of the existence of migraine subgroups with different circadian attack onset peaks. Migraine is primarily a brain disorder, and if the diversity in daily distribution of migraine attack onset reflects an important aspect of migraine, it may also associate with interictal brain activity. Our goal was to assess brain activity differences in episodic migraine subgroups who were classified according to their typical circadian peak of attack onset. Methods: Two fMRI studies were conducted with migraine without aura patients (n = 31 in Study 1, n = 48 in Study 2). Among them, three subgroups emerged with typical Morning, Evening, and Varying start of attack onset. Whole brain activity was compared between the groups in an implicit emotional processing fMRI task, comparing fearful, sad, and happy facial stimuli to neutral ones. Results: In both studies, significantly increased neural activation was detected to fearful (but not sad or happy) faces. In Study 1, the Evening start group showed increased activation compared to the Morning start group in regions involved in emotional, self-referential (left posterior cingulate gyrus, right precuneus), pain (including left middle cingulate, left postcentral, left supramarginal gyri, right Rolandic operculum) and sensory (including bilateral superior temporal gyrus, right Heschl's gyrus) processing. While in Study 2, the Morning start group showed increased activation compared to the Varying start group at a nominally significant level in regions with pain (right precentral gyrus, right supplementary motor area) and sensory processing (bilateral paracentral lobule) functions. Conclusion: Our fMRI studies suggest that different circadian attack onset peaks are associated with interictal brain activity differences indicating heterogeneity within migraine patients and alterations in sensitivity to threatening fearful stimuli. Circadian variation of migraine attack onset may be an important characteristic to address in future studies and migraine prophylaxis.
ABSTRACT
Összefoglaló. A klasszikus esetben ortosztatikus fejfájást okozó, spontán intracranialis hypotensiót az esetek túlnyomó többségében a gerinccsatornában, annak nyaki-háti átmenetében, illetve a háti szakaszán található liquorszivárgás okozza. Meglévo kötoszöveti betegség, degeneratív gerincbetegségek, illetve kisebb traumák szerepet játszhatnak a szivárgás kialakulásában. Az ortosztatikus fejfájás létrejöttében szerepet játszhat a meningealis szerkezetek, érzoidegek és hídvénák vongálódása. A klasszikus pozicionális, ortosztatikus fejfájásban szenvedo betegek körében gondolni kell a spontán intracranialis hypotensio lehetoségére, és az agykoponya, illetve a gerinc kontrasztanyaggal végzett mágneses rezonanciás vizsgálata (MRI) javasolt. A kontrasztanyaggal végzett koponya-MRI-vel klasszikus esetben diffúz, nem nodularis, intenzív, vaskos pachymeningealis kontrasztanyag-halmozás, kitágult vénássinus-rendszer, subduralis effusiók és az agytörzs caudalis diszlokációja ("slumping") látható. Fontos azonban szem elott tartani, hogy az esetek 20%-ában ezen eltérések nem detektálhatók. Jó minoségu, randomizált, kontrollált vizsgálatok nem történtek, a kezelés hagyományokon alapul. Kezdetben általában konzervatív terápiát alkalmaznak (ágynyugalom, koffein- és folyadékbevitel), ennek hatástalansága esetén epiduralis sajátvér-injekció, epiduralis fibrinragasztó-injektálás, illetve sebészi terápia jöhet szóba. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(7): 246-251. Summary. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension, the classic feature of which is orthostatic headache, is most commonly caused by a cerebrospinal fluid leakage at the level of the spinal canal, in most cases at the thoracic level or cervicothoracic junction. Underlying connective tissue disorders, minor trauma, degenerative spinal diseases may play a role in the development of cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Traction on pain-sensitive intracranial and meningeal structures, particularly sensory nerves and bridging veins, may play a role in the development of orthostatic headache. In the case of patients with classic orthostatic headache, the possibility of spontaneous intracranial hypotension should be considered, and if suspected, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium and additional spine MRI are recommended. Diffuse, non-nodular, intense, thick dural enhancement, subdural effusions, engorgement of cerebral venous sinuses, sagging of the brain are typical features on brain MRI, which, however, remain normal in up to 20 percent of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Unfortunately, no randomized clinical trials have evaluated the effectiveness of the various treatment strategies and no definitive treatment protocols have been established. In clinical practice, the first-line treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension is conservative (bed rest, caffeine and fluid intake). If conservative therapy is not effective, epidural blood patch, epidural fibrin glue, or surgical repair should be considered. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(7): 246-251.
Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Intracranial Hypotension/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Headache/etiology , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cluster headache (CH), which affects 0.1% of the population, is one of the most painful human conditions: despite adequate treatment, the frequent and severe headaches cause a significant burden to the patients. According to a small number of previous studies, CH has a serious negative effect on the sufferers' quality of life (QOL). In the current study, we set out to examine the quality of life of the CH patients attending our outpatient service between 2013 and 2016, using generic and headache-specific QOL instruments. METHODS: A total of 42 CH patients (16 females and 26 males; mean age: 39.1±13.5 years) completed the SF-36 generic QOL questionnaire and the headache- specific CHQQ questionnaire (Comprehensive Headache- related Quality of life Questionnaire), during the active phase of their headache. Their data were compared to those of patients suffering from chronic tension-type headache (CTH) and to data obtained from controls not suffering from significant forms of headache, using Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: During the active phase of the CH, the patients' generic QOL was significantly worse than that of normal controls in four of the 8 domains of the SF-36 instrument. Apart from a significantly worse result in the 'Bodily pain' SF-36 domain, there were no significant differences between the CH patients' and the CTH patients' results. All the dimensions and the total score of the headache-specific CHQQ instrument showed significantly worse QOL in the CH group than in the CTH group or in the control group. CONCLUSION: Cluster headache has a significant negative effect on the quality of life. The decrease of QOL experienced by the patients was better reflected by the headache-specific CHQQ instrument than by the generic SF-36 instrument.
Subject(s)
Cluster Headache , Quality of Life , Tension-Type Headache , Adult , Cluster Headache/complications , Cluster Headache/therapy , Female , Headache , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tension-Type Headache/complications , Tension-Type Headache/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is a key structure of the pain processing network. Several structural and functional alterations of this brain area have been found in migraine. In addition, altered serotonergic neurotransmission has been repeatedly implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine, although the exact mechanism is not known. Thus, our aim was to investigate the relationship between acute increase of brain serotonin (5-HT) level and the activation changes of the ACC using pharmacological challenge MRI (phMRI) in migraine patients and healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty-seven pain-free healthy controls and six migraine without aura patients participated in the study. All participant attended to two phMRI sessions during which intravenous citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), or placebo (normal saline) was administered. We used region of interest analysis of ACC to compere the citalopram evoked activation changes of this area between patients and healthy participants. RESULTS: Significant difference in ACC activation was found between control and patient groups in the right pregenual ACC (pgACC) during and after citalopram infusion compared to placebo. The extracted time-series showed that pgACC activation increased in migraine patients compared to controls, especially in the first 8-10 min of citalopram infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a small increase in 5-HT levels can lead to increased phMRI signal in the pregenual part of the ACC that is involved in processing emotional aspects of pain. This increased sensitivity of the pgACC to increased 5-HT in migraine may contribute to recurring headache attacks and increased stress-sensitivity in migraine.
Subject(s)
Gyrus Cinguli/metabolism , Gyrus Cinguli/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/metabolism , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Serotonin/metabolism , Adult , Brain Mapping/methods , Citalopram/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gyrus Cinguli/drug effects , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacologyABSTRACT
The dysfunctions of the mesolimbic cortical reward circuit have been proposed to contribute to migraine pain. Although supporting empirical evidence was mainly found in connection with primary rewards or in chronic migraine where the pain experience is (almost) constant. Our goal however was to investigate the neural correlates of secondary reward/loss anticipation and consumption using the monetary incentive delay task in 29 episodic migraine patients and 41 headache-free controls. Migraine patients showed decreased activation in one cluster covering the right inferior frontal gyrus during reward consumption compared to controls. We also found significant negative correlation between the time of the last migraine attack before the scan and activation of the parahippocampal gyrus and the right hippocampus yielded to loss anticipation. During reward/loss consumption, a relative increase in the activity of the visual areas was observed the more time passed between the last attack and the scan session. Our results suggest intact reward/loss anticipation but altered reward consumption in migraine, indicating a decreased reactivity to monetary rewards. The findings also raise the possibility that neural responses to loss anticipation and reward/loss consumption could be altered by the proximity of the last migraine attack not just during pre-ictal periods, but interictally as well.
Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Nerve Net/physiopathology , Adult , Anticipation, Psychological/physiology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain Mapping , Female , Humans , Male , Migraine Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Motivation , Nerve Net/diagnostic imaging , Prefrontal Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Reward , Young AdultABSTRACT
Tension type headache, the most common type of primary headaches, affects approximately 80% of the population. Mainly because of its high prevalence, the socio-economic consequences of tension type headache are significant. The pain in tension type headache is usually bilateral, mild to moderate, is of a pressing or tightening quality, and is not accompanied by other symptoms. Patients with frequent or daily occurrence of tension type headache may experience significant distress because of the condition. The two main therapeutic avenues of tension type headache are acute and prophylactic treatment. Simple or combined analgesics are the mainstay of acute treatment. Prophylactic treatment is needed in case of attacks that are frequent and/or difficult to treat. The first drugs of choice as preventatives of tension type headache are tricyclic antidepressants, with a special focus on amitriptyline, the efficacy of which having been documented in multiple double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Among other antidepressants, the efficacy of mirtazapine and venlafaxine has been documented. There is weaker evidence about the efficacy of gabapentine, topiramate, and tizanidin. Non-pharmacological prophylactic methods of tension type headache with a documented efficacy include certain types of psychotherapy and acupuncture.
Subject(s)
Amitriptyline/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy , Humans , Tension-Type Headache/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite its high prevalence, migraine remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. ID-Migraine is a short, self-administrated questionnaire, originally developed in English by Lipton et al. and later validated in several languages. Our goal was to validate the Hungarian version of the ID-Migraine Questionnaire. METHODS: Patients visiting two headache specialty services were enrolled. Diagnoses were made by headache specialists according to the ICHD-3beta diagnostic criteria. There were 309 clinically diagnosed migraineurs among the 380 patients. Among the 309 migraineurs, 190 patients had only migraine, and 119 patients had other headache beside migraine, namely: 111 patients had tension type headache, 3 patients had cluster headache, 4 patients had medication overuse headache and one patient had headache associated with sexual activity also. Among the 380 patients, 257 had only a single type headache whereas 123 patients had multiple types of headache. Test-retest reliability of the ID-Migraine Questionnaire was studied in 40 patients. RESULTS: The validity features of the Hungarian version of the ID-Migraine questionnaire were the following: sensitivity 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), specificity 0.42 (95% CI, 0.31-0.55), positive predictive value 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.91), negative predictive value 0.65 (95% CI, 0.5-0.78), missclassification error 0.15 (95% CI, 0.12-0.19). The kappa coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.77. CONCLUSION: The Hungarian version of the ID-Migraine Questionnaire had adequate sensitivity, positive predictive value and misclassification error, but a low specificity and somewhat low negative predictive value.
Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Translating , Adult , Cluster Headache/classification , Cluster Headache/diagnosis , Cluster Headache/epidemiology , Female , Headache/classification , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/epidemiology , Headache Disorders, Secondary/classification , Headache Disorders, Secondary/diagnosis , Headache Disorders, Secondary/epidemiology , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Language , Male , Migraine Disorders/classification , Reproducibility of Results , Tension-Type Headache/classification , Tension-Type Headache/diagnosis , Tension-Type Headache/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Migraine and depression frequently occur as comorbid conditions, and it has been hypothesized that migraine with and without depression may have a different genetic background. A distinct personality trait constellation has been described in migraineurs. Less attention, however, was paid to personality differences in migraineurs with and without depression which may also shed light on differences in the neurobiological, background. The aim of our study was to investigate big five personality traits, headaches, and lifetime depression (DEP) in a large European general population sample. METHODS: Relationship between DEP, Big Five Inventory personality traits, and headaches identified by the ID-Migraine Questionnaire were investigated in 3,026 individuals from Budapest and Manchester with multivariate and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Both DEP and migraine(ID) showed differences in personality traits. Neuroticism was an independent risk factor for both conditions while a significant interaction effect appeared between the two in the case of openness. Namely, subjects with migraine(ID) and without DEP scored higher on openness compared to those who had depression. CONCLUSION: While we confirmed previous results that high neuroticism is a risk factor for both depression and migraine, openness to experience was significantly lower in the co-occurrence of migraine and depression. Our results suggest that increased openness, possibly manifested in optimal or advantageous cognitive processing of pain experience in migraine may decrease the risk of co-occurrence of depression and migraine and thus may provide valuable insight for newer prevention and intervention approaches in the treatment of these conditions.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although migraine is one of the most investigated neurologic disorders, we do not have a perfect neuroimaging biomarker for its pathophysiology. One option to improve our knowledge is to study resting-state functional connectivity in and out of headache pain. However, our understanding of the functional connectivity changes during spontaneous migraine attack is partial and incomplete. CASE PRESENTATION: Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging we assessed a 24-year old woman affected by migraine without aura at two different times: during a spontaneous migraine attack and in interictal phase. Seed-to-voxel whole brain analysis was carried out using the posterior cingulate cortex as a seed, representing the default mode network (DMN). Our results showed decreased intrinsic connectivity within core regions of the DMN with an exception of a subsystem including the dorsal medial and superior frontal gyri, and the mid-temporal gyrus which is responsible for pain interpretation and control. In addition, increased connectivity between the DMN and pain and specific migraine-related areas, such as the pons and hypothalamus, developed during the spontaneous migraine attack. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results provide further support for the hypothesis that alterations of the DMN functional connectivity during migraine headache may lead to maladaptive top-down modulation of migraine pain-related areas which might be a specific biomarker for migraine.
Subject(s)
Gyrus Cinguli/physiopathology , Hypothalamus/physiopathology , Pons/physiopathology , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathology , Temporal Lobe/physiopathology , Connectome/methods , Female , Functional Neuroimaging , Gyrus Cinguli/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Hypothalamus/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pons/diagnostic imaging , Prefrontal Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Rest/physiology , Temporal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The relationship between migraine and psychological distress has been consistently reported in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. We hypothesised that a stable tendency to perseverative thoughts such as rumination would mediate the relationship between migraine and psychological distress. Design and Main Outcomes Measures: Self-report questionnaires measuring depressive rumination, current psychological distress and migraine symptoms in two independent European population cohorts, recruited from Budapest (N = 1139) and Manchester (N = 2004), were used. Structural regression analysis within structural equation modelling was applied to test the mediational role of brooding and reflection, the components of rumination, between migraine and psychological distress. Sex, age and lifetime depression were controlled for in the analysis. RESULTS: Migraine predicted higher brooding and reflection scores, and brooding proved to be a mediator between migraine and psychological distress in both samples, while reflection mediated the relationship significantly only in the Budapest sample. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated psychological distress in migraine is partially attributed to ruminative response style. Further studies are needed to expand our findings to clinical samples and to examine how rumination links to the adjustment to migraine.
Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Thinking , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
Medication-overuse headache affects 1 to 2 percent of the population. Any kind of painkiller, if taken regularly at least 10 days per month can cause medication-overuse headache, and therefore the possibility of this headache has to be raised whenever a patient with a preexistent headache notices a significant increase in headache frequency during a period of frequent painkiller consumption. Medication-overuse headache is most prevalent in females between 40 and 50 years of age. Its main risk factors are smokig, obesity, depression, and anxiety. The pathomechanism of medication-overuse headache is complex, with a probable genetic propensity and other biological (neurochemical and neurophysiological), as well as psychological and behavioural factors (such as anticipatory anxiety, catastrophisation of pain and consequentially a compulsive painkiller use) contributing to its genesis. The prerequisite of successful treatment is the withdrawal of the overused substance, other necessary elements of the therapy include the treatment of withdrawal symptoms including rebound headache, the introduction of an effective preventative therapy, taking into consideration the highly prevalent comorbid disorders as well, and the education and psychological support of patients. As the relapse rate can be as high as 30 to 40% regardless of effective treatment, the prevention of medication-overuse headache is of paramount importance, and the role of general practitioners can hardly be overstated.
Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/adverse effects , Headache/chemically induced , Headache/drug therapy , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Adult , Anxiety/complications , Depression/complications , Female , General Practitioners , Headache/physiopathology , Headache/therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Physician's Role , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/prevention & control , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/therapyABSTRACT
The exact pathomechanism of migraine is still unknown, currently there are no biomarkers for migraine diagnosis, and current animal models reflect only one aspect of migraine, therefore future migraine studies are necessary. The current treatment of migraine (both acute and preventive) is suboptimal. There are no specific preventive drugs for migraine, and current preventatives may become inefficient during long-term use. Triptans are useful abortive drugs, but not effective in some of the patients; severe cardio-or cerebrovascular side effects may occur. Triptans and ergot alkaloids (and also non-specific abortive agents) can cause medication overuse headache. A number of newly synthesized experimental drugs seem to be effective and promising for migraine therapy, but at present our experience with these is limited, therefore further studies are essential.
Subject(s)
Analgesics , Drugs, Investigational , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/pharmacology , Drugs, Investigational/pharmacology , Ergot Alkaloids/administration & dosage , Ergot Alkaloids/adverse effects , Humans , Tryptamines/administration & dosage , Tryptamines/adverse effectsABSTRACT
The two most important representatives of the primary headaches are migraine and tension-type headache. More than 10% of the population suffer from migraine and even a greater part, approximately 30-40% from tension-type headache. These two headache types have a great effect both on the individual and on the society. There are two types of therapeutic approaches to headaches: the abortive and the prophylactic therapy. Prophylactic treatment is used for frequent and/or difficult-to-treat headache attacks. Although both migraine and tension-type headache are often associated with depression, for their treatment - in contrast to the widespread medical opinion - not all antidepressants were found to be effective. Amitriptyline, which is a tricyclic antidepressant, is used as a prophylactic therapy for headache since 1968. Its efficacy has been demonstrated in several double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Although the newer types of antidepressant, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, have a more favorable side-effect profile than tricyclic antidepressants, their headache prophylactic effect has not been proven yet.