Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
G3 (Bethesda) ; 12(11)2022 11 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36029240

ABSTRACT

The Drosophila Boundary Element-Associated Factor of 32 kDa (BEAF) binds in promoter regions of a few thousand mostly housekeeping genes. BEAF is implicated in both chromatin domain boundary activity and promoter function, although molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we show that BEAF physically interacts with the polybromo subunit (Pbro) of PBAP, a SWI/SNF-class chromatin remodeling complex. BEAF also shows genetic interactions with Pbro and other PBAP subunits. We examine the effect of this interaction on gene expression and chromatin structure using precision run-on sequencing and micrococcal nuclease sequencing after RNAi-mediated knockdown in cultured S2 cells. Our results are consistent with the interaction playing a subtle role in gene activation. Fewer than 5% of BEAF-associated genes were significantly affected after BEAF knockdown. Most were downregulated, accompanied by fill-in of the promoter nucleosome-depleted region and a slight upstream shift of the +1 nucleosome. Pbro knockdown caused downregulation of several hundred genes and showed a correlation with BEAF knockdown but a better correlation with promoter-proximal GAGA factor binding. Micrococcal nuclease sequencing supports that BEAF binds near housekeeping gene promoters while Pbro is more important at regulated genes. Yet there is a similar general but slight reduction of promoter-proximal pausing by RNA polymerase II and increase in nucleosome-depleted region nucleosome occupancy after knockdown of either protein. We discuss the possibility of redundant factors keeping BEAF-associated promoters active and masking the role of interactions between BEAF and the Pbro subunit of PBAP in S2 cells. We identify Facilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT) and Nucleosome Remodeling Factor (NURF) as candidate redundant factors.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Insulator Elements , Animals , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly , Nucleosomes/genetics , Nucleosomes/metabolism , Micrococcal Nuclease/genetics , Micrococcal Nuclease/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism
2.
Exp Hematol ; 91: 39-45.e2, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32961298

ABSTRACT

Mutations in the gene encoding DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) comprise the majority of mutations found in clonal hematopoiesis (CH), an age-related condition that was recently found to affect outcomes in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Recent studies have indicated that patients with CH have worse prognoses after HSCT, suggesting stress imposed by HSCT preconditioning agents may impact hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) dynamics in transplant recipients. In this study, we used a competitive transplantation mouse model to investigate how treatment with the common preconditioning agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and busulfan (BU) affect the prevalence of Dnmt3a-/- HSCs and progenitor cells in competition with wild-type cells. We found that, though sufficient to deplete peripheral blood counts, 5-FU preconditioning did not significantly alter the frequency of Dnmt3a-null hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in mosaic mice. In contrast, mice treated with BU had a sevenfold decline in total bone marrow cells and an increase in Dnmt3a-null HSPCs that was detectable in peripheral blood. Indeed, even though all mosaic mice had a starting engraftment of ∼10%-40%, 85%-100% of HSPCs were Dnmt3a-null in four of seven mice after BU treatment, indicating these cells expand dramatically during recovery. Overall, these results suggest that individual preconditioning regimens have different effects on the expansion of Dnmt3a-mutant cells in patients with pre-existing CH. Thus, the presence of CH-associated mutants should be evaluated prior to selecting preconditioning regimens for HSCT.


Subject(s)
Busulfan/pharmacology , DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases/deficiency , Hematopoiesis/genetics , Hematopoietic Cell Growth Factors/pharmacology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/drug effects , Animals , Bone Marrow/pathology , Cell Division/drug effects , Cell Lineage , Clone Cells , DNA Methyltransferase 3A , Fluorouracil/pharmacology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Mice , Radiation Chimera
3.
Genetics ; 215(4): 1003-1012, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32554599

ABSTRACT

Chromatin domain insulators are thought to help partition the genome into genetic units called topologically associating domains (TADs). In Drosophila, TADs are often separated by inter-TAD regions containing active housekeeping genes and associated insulator binding proteins. This raises the question of whether insulator binding proteins are involved primarily in chromosomal TAD architecture or gene activation, or if these two activities are linked. The Boundary Element-Associated Factor of 32 kDa (BEAF-32, or BEAF for short) is usually found in inter-TADs. BEAF was discovered based on binding to the scs' insulator, and is important for the insulator activity of scs' and other BEAF binding sites. There are divergent promoters in scs' with a BEAF binding site by each. Here, we dissect the scs' insulator to identify DNA sequences important for insulator and promoter activity, focusing on the half of scs' with a high affinity BEAF binding site. We find that the BEAF binding site is important for both insulator and promoter activity, as is another sequence we refer to as LS4. Aside from that, different sequences play roles in insulator and promoter activity. So while there is overlap and BEAF is important for both, insulator and promoter activity can be separated.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/genetics , Chromosomes/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Eye Proteins/genetics , Insulator Elements , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Eye Proteins/metabolism , Female
4.
Genetics ; 215(1): 89-101, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32179582

ABSTRACT

BEAF (Boundary Element-Associated Factor) was originally identified as a Drosophila melanogaster chromatin domain insulator-binding protein, suggesting a role in gene regulation through chromatin organization and dynamics. Genome-wide mapping found that BEAF usually binds near transcription start sites, often of housekeeping genes, suggesting a role in promoter function. This would be a nontraditional role for an insulator-binding protein. To gain insight into molecular mechanisms of BEAF function, we identified interacting proteins using yeast two-hybrid assays. Here, we focus on the transcription factor Serendipity δ (Sry-δ). Interactions were confirmed in pull-down experiments using bacterially expressed proteins, by bimolecular fluorescence complementation, and in a genetic assay in transgenic flies. Sry-δ interacted with promoter-proximal BEAF both when bound to DNA adjacent to BEAF or > 2-kb upstream to activate a reporter gene in transient transfection experiments. The interaction between BEAF and Sry-δ was detected using both a minimal developmental promoter (y) and a housekeeping promoter (RpS12), while BEAF alone strongly activated the housekeeping promoter. These two functions for BEAF implicate it in playing a direct role in gene regulation at hundreds of BEAF-associated promoters.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Eye Proteins/metabolism , Genes, Essential , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster , Eye Proteins/genetics , Protein Binding , Ribosomal Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
5.
PLoS One ; 13(10): e0205538, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30296303

ABSTRACT

An engineered phiC31 "Disintegrase" able to make an attP site in Drosophila out of an attR-attL pair is described. This was used to generate attP sites at genomic locations where a mini-white (mini-w) transgene was subject to chromosomal position effects (CPE). The first step was random genomic integration of a P-element-based transposon with an insulated mini-w transgene. We then removed the upstream insulator using FLP recombinase to detect CPE. Next mini-w and the downstream insulator were "dis-integrated" leaving behind an attP site. The location is marked by a yellow+ transgene that is flanked by loxP sites, so it can also be removed. Using this system, we generated 10 new attP landing platforms. Three of these showing strong activating CPE were selected for further analysis. We show that the attP sites are functional by integrating in plasmids with attB sites. The CPE is recapitulated and can be blocked by insulators. We show that a dimerized 215 bp fragment of the 500 bp BEAF-dependent scs' insulator containing a high affinity BEAF binding site blocks the CPE, while a monomer of the sequence is less effective. This indicates that two BEAF binding sites make a stronger insulator than a single site. This system could be useful for generating attP sites at prescreened sites for other purposes, such as studying CPE in embryos or other tissues or for use with "trapped" enhancers of interest.


Subject(s)
Attachment Sites, Microbiological , Chromosomal Position Effects , Drosophila/genetics , Genetic Engineering/methods , ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/genetics , ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Bacteriophages , Binding Sites , Compound Eye, Arthropod/metabolism , DNA Transposable Elements , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Enzymes , Eye Proteins/genetics , Eye Proteins/metabolism , Female , Genome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL