Safety in higher level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems.

With emerging Automated Driving Systems (ADS) representing Automated Vehicles (AVs) of Level 3 or higher as classified by the Society of Automotive Engineers, several AV manufacturers are testing their vehicles on public roadways in the U.S. The safety performance of AVs has become a major concern for the transportation industry. Several ADS-equipped vehicle crashes have been reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in recent years. Scrutinizing these crashes can reveal rare or complex scenarios beyond the normal capabilities of AV technologies called "edge cases." Investigating edge-case crashes helps AV companies prepare vehicles to handle these unusual scenarios and, as such, improves traffic safety. Through analyzing the NHTSA data from July 2021 to February 2023, this study utilizes an unsupervised machine learning technique, hierarchical clustering, to identify edge cases in ADS-equipped vehicle crashes. Fifteen out of 189 observations are identified as edge cases, representing 8 % of the population. Injuries occurred in 10 % of all crashes (19 out of 189), but the proportion rose to 27 % for edge cases (4 out of 15 edge cases). Based on the results, edge cases could be initiated by AVs, humans, infrastructure/environment, or their combination. Humans can be identified as one of the contributors to the onset of edge-case crashes in 60 % of the edge cases (9 out of 15 edge cases). The main scenarios for edge cases include unlawful behaviors of crash partners, absence of a safety driver within the AV, precrash disengagement, and complex events challenging for ADS, e.g., unexpected obstacles, unclear road markings, and sudden and unexpected changes in traffic flow, such as abrupt road congestion or sudden stopped traffic from a crash. Identifying and investigating edge cases is crucial for improving transportation safety and building public trust in AVs.

Understanding the role of faster emergency medical service response in the survival time of pedestrians.

Fatalities and severe injuries among vulnerable road users, particularly pedestrians, are rising. In addition to the loss of life, about 6,000 annual pedestrian deaths in the U.S. cost society about $6 billion. Contrary to the assumption that all fatal pedestrian-involved crashes are similar, instantaneous death is substantially more severe than death that occurs several days after the crash. Instead of homogenizing all fatal pedestrian crashes, this study takes into account the severity of fatal injury crashes as a timeline based on the survival time of pedestrians. This study extracts valuable information from fatal crashes by examining pedestrians' survival time ranging from early death to death within 30 days of the crash. The Fatality Analysis Reporting System dataset is utilized from 2015 to 2018. The emergency medical service (EMS) response time is the key post-crash measure, while controlling for pedestrian, driver, roadway, and environmental characteristics. Notably, the response time and survival time can cause endogeneity, i.e., the response times may be shorter for more severe crashes. Due to the spatial and temporal nature of traffic crashes, to extract the association of different variables with pedestrians' survival time, a geographically and temporally weighted truncated regression with a two-stage residual inclusion treatment (local model) is estimated. The local model can overcome the endogeneity limitation (between EMS response time and survival time) and uncover the potentially spatially and temporally varying correlates of pedestrians' survival time with associated factors to account for unobserved heterogeneity. Moreover, to verify the variations are noticeable, a truncated regression with the two-stage residual inclusion treatment is developed (global model). The modeling results indicate that while capturing the unobserved heterogeneity, the local model outperformed the global model. The empirical results show that EMS response time, speeding, and some pedestrian behaviors are the most important factors that affect pedestrians' survival time in fatal injury crashes. However, the effect of factors on pedestrians' survival time is noticeably varied spatially and temporally. The results and their implications are discussed in detail in the paper.

How effective are pedestrian crash prevention systems in improving pedestrian safety? Harnessing large-scale experimental data.

Over the past few years, the number of fatalities and severe injuries of vulnerable road users, particularly pedestrians, has risen substantially. Clearly, the safe mobility of pedestrians is critical in our transportation system. Technology can help reduce vehicle-pedestrian crashes, fatalities, and injuries. Emerging technologies such as pedestrian crash prevention (PCP) systems utilized in on-road vehicles have the potential to mitigate pedestrian crash severity or prevent crashes. However, the reliability and effectiveness of these technologies have remained uncertain. This study contributes toward understanding the effectiveness of PCP systems utilized in on-road vehicles with a low level of automation by investigating two crossing and one longitudinal scenarios. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety field test data from 2018 to 2021 is harnessed, where several on-road vehicles and their PCP systems are evaluated in terms of safety. The large-scale experimental dataset is comprised of 3095 tests of 91 vehicles with different sizes, makes, and models. The empirical results indicate that in hazardous pedestrian-vehicle conflict situations, the performance of PCP systems has been improved during recent years. The test data shows that some pedestrians were undetected in some tests, but on average, in 70% of the tests, the PCP systems avoided pedestrian crashes. However, for the occurred crashes, PCP systems, on average, were able to mitigate impact speeds of >50%. In real-life situations, this could translate to substantial reductions in injury and fatality risk. Through rigorous analysis, the associations of key factors in the studied scenarios and the performance of PCP systems are explored and discussed in this paper. The modeling results show that increasing the maximum deceleration rate of the PCP system and lower weight of vehicles can significantly improve the performance of the PCP system by decreasing the speed at impact with pedestrians. The average maximum deceleration utilized in PCP systems has been increased over time from 7.48 m/s2 in 2018 to 9.36 m/s2 in 2021. This can be one of the reasons behind the improvement of PCP systems during recent years.

Understanding how relationships between crash frequency and correlates vary for multilane rural highways: Estimating geographically and temporally weighted regression models.

Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) are critical tools in the management of highway safety projects. SPFs are used to predict the average number of crashes per year at a location, such as a road segment or an intersection. The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) provides default safety performance functions (SPFs), but it is recommended that states in the U.S. develop jurisdiction-specific SPFs using local crash data. To do this for the state of Tennessee, crash and road inventory data were integrated for multi-lane rural highway segments for the years 2013-2017. In addition to developing SPFs similar to those contained in the HSM, this study applied a new methodology to capture variation in crashes in both space and time. Specifically, Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR) models for the localization of SPFs were developed. The new methodology incorporates temporal aspects of crashes in the models because the impact of a specific variable on crash frequency may vary over time due to several reasons. Results indicate that GTWR models remarkably outperform the traditional regression models by capturing spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Most parameter estimates were found to vary substantially across space and time. In other words, the association of contributing variables with the number of crashes can vary from one region or period of time to another. This finding weakens the idea of transferring default SPFs to other states and applying a single localized SPF to all regions of a state. Enabled by growing computational power, these results emphasize the importance of accounting for spatial and temporal heterogeneity and developing highly localized SPFs. The methodology of this study can be used by researchers to follow the temporal trend and location of critical factors to identify sites for safety improvements.

Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.

The introduction of Automated Vehicles (AVs) into the transportation network is expected to improve system performance, but the impacts of AVs in mixed traffic streams have not been clearly studied. As AV's market penetration increases, the interactions between conventional vehicles and AVs are inevitable but by no means clear. This study aims to create new knowledge by quantifying the behavioral changes caused when conventional human-driven vehicles follow AVs and investigating the impact of these changes (if any) on safety and the environment. This study analyzes data obtained from a field experiment by Texas A&M University to evaluate the effects of AVs on the behavior of a following human-driver. The dataset is comprised of nine drivers that attempted to follow 5 speed-profiles, with two scenarios per profile. In scenario one, a human-driven vehicle follows an AV that implements a human driver speed profile (base). In scenario two, the human-driven vehicle follows an AV that executes an AV speed profile. In order to evaluate safety, these scenarios are compared using time-to-collision (TTC) and several other driving volatility measures. Likewise, fuel consumption and emissions are used to investigate environmental impacts. Overall, the results show that AVs in mixed traffic streams can induce behavioral changes in conventional vehicle drivers, with some beneficial effects on safety and the environment. On average, a driver that follows an AV exhibits lower driving volatility in terms of speed and acceleration, which represents more stable traffic flow behavior and lower crash risk. The analysis showed a remarkable improvement in TTC as a result of the notably better speed adjustments of the following vehicle (i.e., lower differences in speeds between the lead and following vehicles) in the second scenario. Furthermore, human-driven vehicles were found to consume less fuel and produce fewer emissions on average when following an AV.