ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: New highly effective drugs for moderate-to-severe cutaneous psoriasis are regularly marketed, and the hierarchy of treatments thus requires frequent review. OBJECTIVES: A Delphi method was used to enable a structured expert consensus on the use of systemic treatments and phototherapy among adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: The Delphi method consists in achieving a convergence of opinions among a panel of experts using several rounds of questionnaires with controlled feedback between rounds. A two-part Delphi questionnaire was administered online to French psoriasis experts. In the first part, 180 items related to the prescription of systemic treatments and phototherapy for adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were grouped into 21 sections covering different lines of treatment and different forms of cutaneous psoriasis. The experts voted on each proposal using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale. The second part comprised 11 open-ended questions about special indications for each therapeutic class. These were converted into 101 questions for subsequent rounds. Consensus was deemed to have been reached if more than 80% of the experts agreed with a given proposal. RESULTS: Three rounds of questionnaires were sequentially sent to 35 participants between November 2021 and March 2022. Thirty-three (94%) completed all three rounds. For plaque psoriasis, only methotrexate was recommended by the experts as first-line systemic treatment (89% of votes). Cyclosporin was advocated in pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, and acitretin was suggested for hyperkeratotic and palmoplantar psoriasis. In the event of failure of or intolerance to non-biological systemic treatments, guselkumab, risankizumab, ixekizumab or secukinumab were recommended by more than 80% of the experts. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors remain useful for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Special indications were provided for each therapeutic class (methotrexate/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen/ultraviolet A phototherapy, cyclosporin, acitretin, apremilast, TNF inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors, IL-17(R)A inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors). CONCLUSIONS: This expert consensus statement indicate that newly available IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be favored over TNF and IL-12/23 inhibitors as first-line biologics. The Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology has drawn up a decision-making algorithm to guide clinicians in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: French guidelines recommend stopping biologic treatment of psoriasis between 3 and 24â¯weeks before conception in accordance with the relevant Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life practice of dermatologists in the management of pregnant women with psoriasis previously treated with biologic agents. We wished to assess the level of practitioner adherence to the relevant SmPCs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a study in collaboration with GRPso and Resopso. A computerized questionnaire was completed by the practitioners. We performed descriptive statistics and studied the profile of the practitioners, their level of confidence with continuation of biological agents during pregnancy, and their reported practices on the use of biological agents in pregnancy. Statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 63 dermatologists (women: 71%; mean age 43.8â¯years) participated in this study, the majority of whom were hospital-based (87%). Recommendations were followed by 36.5% of practitioners, while 44% reported discontinuing biologic agents on diagnosis of pregnancy, and 20.5% reported using these agents during pregnancy. Among dermatologists with more than ten years of experience, 19% reported following the SmPC. Among dermatologists with a patient base >200 (patients treated with biologic agents for psoriasis), 19% reported following the SmPC compared to 54% of practitioners with less than 50 patients. The mean age of dermatologists following the SmPC was 41â¯years vs. 47â¯years for those not following the SmPC. DISCUSSION: The majority of practitioners do not follow recommendations on discontinuation of biologic agents before the planning of pregnancy by patients.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications , Psoriasis , Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Dermatologists , France , Middle Aged , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic useSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic , Psoriasis , Child , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Psoriasis/complicationsSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Psoriasis , Child , Humans , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The nature of the COVID-19 pandemic led to concerns among patients and physicians about the potential impact of immunosuppressive treatments for chronic diseases such as psoriasis on the risk of severe COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment modifications and determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection among psoriasis patients during the first wave of the pandemic, and identify the factors associated with these events. METHODS: Data from PSOBIOTEQ cohort relating to the first COVID-19 wave in France (March to June, 2020), as well as a patient-centred COVID-19 questionnaire, were used to evaluate the impact of lockdown on changes (discontinuations, delays or reductions) in systemic therapies, and to determine the incidence of COVID-19 cases among these patients. Logistic regression models were used to assess associated factors. RESULTS: Among the 1751 respondents (89.3%), 282 patients (16.9%) changed their systemic treatment for psoriasis, with 46.0% of these changes being initiated by the patients themselves. Patients were more likely to experience psoriasis flare-ups during the first wave if they changed their treatment during this period (58.7% vs 14.4%; Pâ¯<â¯0.0001). Changes to systemic therapies were less frequent among patients with cardiovascular diseases (Pâ¯<â¯0.001), and those agedâ¯≥â¯65â¯years (Pâ¯=â¯0.02). Overall, 45 patients (2.9%) reported having COVID-19, and eight (17.8%) required hospitalization. Risk factors for COVID-19 infection were close contact with a positive case (Pâ¯<â¯0.001) and living in a region with a high incidence of COVID-19 (Pâ¯<â¯0.001). Factors associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 were avoiding seeing a physician (Pâ¯=â¯0.002), systematically wearing a mask during outings (Pâ¯=â¯0.011) and being a current smoker (Pâ¯=â¯0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of systemic psoriasis treatments during the first COVID-19 wave (16.9%) - mainly decided by patients themselves (46.0%) - was associated with a higher incidence of disease flares (58.7% vs 14.4%). This observation and factors associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 highlight the need to maintain and adapt patient-physician communication during health crises according to patient profiles, with the aim of avoiding unnecessary treatment discontinuations and ensuring that patients are informed about the risk of infection and the importance of complying with hygiene rules.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psoriasis , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Communicable Disease Control , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Alopecia Areata , Azetidines , Tinea Capitis , Child , Humans , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Tinea Capitis/drug therapy , Alopecia , Azetidines/therapeutic useSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Chickenpox , Herpes Zoster , Child , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Isotretinoin is an effective treatment for severe juvenile acne, but it appears to be underused in relation to the recommendations. Therapeutic inertia is defined as a failure to initiate or intensify treatment even when warranted by the recommendations. The aim of this study was to investigate therapeutic inertia among dermatologists (D), paediatricians (P), and general practitioners (GPs) in initiating isotretinoin for moderate-to-very severe juvenile acne. METHODS: Data were collected using a questionnaire distributed to French physicians through medical societies via Internet. The questions explored the role in inertia of factors related to physicians, patients, parents, and the healthcare system, and evaluated barriers and facilitators to prescribing isotretinoin. RESULTS: In all, 768 physicians responded to the survey (528 D, 178P, and 61 GPs; mean age: 51â¯years; women: 78â¯%). Their responses revealed that 99â¯% of dermatologists felt comfortable prescribing isotretinoin, compared with 8â¯% and 15â¯% of paediatricians and GPs (pâ¯<â¯0.05); 93â¯% of dermatologists were aware of the current guidelines compared with 37â¯% of paediatricians and GPs. Under 50â¯% of the physicians had received training on acne in the previous 3â¯years, regardless of specialty. The most frequently identified factors for inertia were concerns over the psychological consequences of the treatment in adolescents, exclusive requests from parents, and patient unavailability. Paediatricians reported having insufficient knowledge of current recommendations, a lack of training, and a tendency to anticipate poor compliance. Paediatricians and GPs considered that access to first-time prescriptions and peer-to-peer exchanges would constitute facilitating factors in their use of isotretinoin. DISCUSSION: Concerns over the psychiatric consequences of isotretinoin in adolescents, the need for frequent follow-up, and lack of continuing medical education were identified as factors favouring inertia in the initiation of isotretinoin treatment in patients with moderate-to-very severe juvenile acne, particularly among paediatricians and GPs. Potential strategies to overcome these barriers include regular training, simplified recommendations in French, and access to first-time prescription for paediatricians and GPs.
Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris , Dermatologic Agents , General Practitioners , Adolescent , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Isotretinoin/therapeutic use , Dermatologists , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Pediatricians , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biologics are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and switches between biologics are frequently needed to maintain clinical improvement over time. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to describe precisely switches between biologics and how their pattern changed over time with the recent availability of new biologic agents. METHODS: We included patients receiving a first biologic agent in the Psobioteq multicenter cohort of adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving systemic treatment. We described switches between biologics with chronograms, Sankey and Sunburst diagrams, assessed cumulative incidence of first switch by competing risks survival analysis and reasons for switching. We assessed the factors associated with the type of switch (intra-class - i.e. within the same therapeutic class - vs. inter-class) in patients switching from a TNF-alpha inhibitor using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2153 patients was included. The cumulative incidence of switches from first biologic was 34% at 3 years. Adalimumab and ustekinumab were the most prescribed biologic agents as first and second lines of treatment. The main reason for switching was loss of efficacy (72%), followed by adverse events (11%). Patients receiving a TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 mostly switched to ustekinumab, whereas those switching in 2016 or after mostly switched to an IL-17 inhibitor. Patients switching from a first-line TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 were more likely to switch to another TNF-alpha inhibitor compared with patients switching since 2018. Patients switching from etanercept were more likely to receive another TNF-alpha inhibitor rather than another therapeutic class of bDMARD compared with patients switching from adalimumab. CONCLUSION: This study described the switching patterns of biologic treatments and showed how they changed over time, due to the availability of the new biologic agents primarily IL-17 inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , Psoriasis , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adult , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Humans , Interleukin-17 , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Ustekinumab/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is the first biotherapy available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe childhood atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in daily practice. METHODS: Patients aged 6-11, who had received a first dose of dupilumab, were included in this multicentre retrospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was change in SCORAD after 3 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints were change in IGA score at 3 months, proportion of patients with SCORAD50 and SCORAD75, description of adverse events and proportion of children in our cohort who would be excluded from pivotal phase 3 clinical trial. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. After 3 months of treatment, there was a significant decrease in SCORAD (mean: 21.8 ± 13.8 vs 53.9 ± 18.5; P < 0.0001) and IGA (1.3 ± 0.8 vs 3.5 ± 0.7; P < 0.0001). Conjunctivitis was observed in 11.3% (n = 9/80); three patients experienced dupilumab facial redness (DFR); 17.5% (n = 14/80) reported injection site reactions; 6.3% (n = 5/80) discontinued treatment. 61.2% (n = 49/80) children were ineligible in the phase 3 trial. LIMITATIONS: There is no control group. Because it was a real life study based on information from patient medical records in a French multicentre cohort, we cannot rule out the presence of reporting bias generated by the use of patient reported characteristics and missing information. CONCLUSION: These real-life data confirm the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in children with moderate to severe AD extended to dyshidrosis and atopic prurigo, but it also revealed a lower frequency of DFR and conjunctivitis. However, administration in injectable form may be a barrier in this age group.
Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis , Dermatitis, Atopic , Child , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Conjunctivitis/chemically induced , Cohort Studies , Immunoglobulin AABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions regarding the management of chronic skin diseases, especially in patients on systemic treatments. Data concerning the use of biologics in adults with psoriasis are reassuring, but data specific to children are missing. Moreover, COVID-19 could impact the course of psoriasis in children. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was therefore to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the psoriasis of children, and the severity of the infection in relation to systemic treatments. METHODS: We set up an international registry of paediatric psoriasis patients. Children were included if they were under 18 years of age, had a history of psoriasis, or developed it within 1 month of COVID-19 and had COVID-19 with or without symptoms. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty episodes of COVID-19 in 117 children (mean age: 12.4 years) were reported. The main clinical form of psoriasis was plaque type (69.4%). Most children were without systemic treatment (54.2%); 33 (28.3%) were on biologic therapies, and 24 (20%) on non-biologic systemic drugs. COVID-19 was confirmed in 106 children (88.3%) and 3 children had two COVID-19 infections each. COVID-19 was symptomatic for 75 children (62.5%) with a mean duration of 6.5 days, significantly longer for children on non-biologic systemic treatments (P = 0.02) and without systemic treatment (P = 0.006) when compared with children on biologics. The six children who required hospitalization were more frequently under non-biologic systemic treatment when compared with the other children (P = 0.01), and particularly under methotrexate (P = 0.03). After COVID-19, the psoriasis worsened in 17 cases (15.2%). Nine children (8%) developed a psoriasis in the month following COVID-19, mainly a guttate form (P = 0.01). DISCUSSION: Biologics appear to be safe with no increased risk of severe form of COVID-19 in children with psoriasis. COVID-19 was responsible for the development of psoriasis or the worsening of a known psoriasis for some children.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , COVID-19 , Psoriasis , Adolescent , Adult , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Child , Disease Progression , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/epidemiology , RegistriesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acral pustular disease within the pustular psoriasis/psoriasis-like spectrum mainly includes palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) and acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH). Scarce data argue for a distinction between these two entities, but no study has compared the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of ACH and PPP. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a comparative description of the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of PPP and ACH in a multicentre retrospective cohort. METHODS: In this multicentre national retrospective cohort study, we compared the epidemiological characteristics, comorbidities and psoriasis characteristics of patients with PPP and ACH. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were included: 203 (87%) with PPP, 18 (8%) with ACH and 13 (6%) with both, according to 2017 ERASPEN criteria. As compared with ACH, PPP was associated with female sex, smoking activity and higher median BMI (P = 0.01, P = 0.02 and P = 0.05 respectively). A family background of psoriasis was more frequent in PPP than ACH. Age of onset of palmoplantar disease was similar between PPP and ACH patients, median age 44 and 48 years respectively. Peripheral joint inflammatory involvement was the only rheumatic disease associated with ACH. The association with another psoriasis type was similar in PPP and ACH (57.6% and 61.1% respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms in a large PPP cohort the predominance of females and a high prevalence of smoking and elevated body mass index but also shows an association of these features in PPP as compared with ACH. In addition, it highlights peripheral arthritis as the only arthritis endotype associated with ACH. Increased knowledge of the immunogenetic backgrounds underlying these two entities is warranted to better stratify pustular psoriasis or psoriasis-like entities for precision medicine.