Primary Periocular Orofacial Granulomatosis: Case Series and Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: There is no known optimal treatment for primary periocular orofacial granulomatosis (PPOFG), a disorder that results in periocular edema. This case series and systematic review identifies management strategies and their reported improvement. METHODS: Systematic review and case series. PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify published cases of PPOFG. Cases were included when edema involved the periocular tissues and when a biopsy was interpreted to be PPOFG. Cases were excluded when edema did not involve the periocular tissues or when the edema was secondary to another process. The electronic medical records of the pathology department were studied to identify cases that were in keeping with PPOFG. The clinical charts were examined to confirm the diagnosis and provide a local case series. RESULTS: There are 38 published cases of PPOFG. An additional 9 cases were identified locally. These cases were combined and analyzed. Most PPOFG has eyelid swelling in isolation, without other facial swelling (36/47; 76.6%). It is most commonly a bilateral disease (30/47; 63.8%). Fissured tongue and facial nerve palsy occur, just as they do in other cases of orofacial granulomatosis. Treatment with surgical debulking or intralesional steroids resulted in high rates of symptomatic improvement of eyelid swelling, but recurrences were common. CONCLUSIONS: In light of no curative or highly successful treatment currently available, intralesional steroids and/or surgical debulking are therapies in the treatment of eyelid swelling associated with PPOFG that demonstrate reasonable short- and medium-term results. There is no established therapy that can offer disease remission or long-term symptom improvement.

Combined Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery - A Review of the Literature and Future Directions.

The use of microinvasive invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in the treatment of glaucoma has increased exponentially over the last 10 years. However, practice patterns vary widely given the relative newness of these technologies. Some surgeons perform two or more MIGS simultaneously, such as those that target aqueous production and those that target aqueous outflow. These combined MIGS (cMIGS) may result in lower intraocular pressure (IOP) and reduced medication burden as compared to single MIGS (sMIGS). Current evidence suggests some cMIGS are more effective in reducing medication burden for at least 12 months versus sMIGS. This review focuses on the current evidence related to the efficacy of cMIGS as well as novel combinations of standalone MIGS, limitations of the current literature, and future directions for research.

Two pediatric cases of reticular corneal epithelial edema associated with netarsudil.

Purpose: To report two pediatric cases of reticular corneal epithelial edema associated with the use of netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02%. Observations: In Case 1, a six-year-old male with glaucoma following cataract surgery was treated with netarsudil for thirteen months and developed diffuse reticular corneal epithelial edema on post-operative day one after undergoing transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation for persistently elevated intraocular pressures. In Case 2, a three-month-old male with bilateral ocular hypertension developed unilateral inferior reticular corneal epithelial edema five weeks after initiation of netarsudil, which had been discontinued in the fellow eye two weeks prior. In both cases, the reticular epithelial edema resolved following cessation of netarsudil. Conclusions and Importance: Netarsudil-associated reticular corneal epithelial edema can occur in infants and young children.

Inferior rectus displacement in heavy eye syndrome and sagging eye syndrome.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if there is a nasal displacement of the vertical rectus muscles in heavy eye syndrome (HES) and/or sagging eye syndrome (SES) compared with age-matched controls. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients with the diagnosis of HES or SES who were seen at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) between the years 2008-2016 who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and orbits. The control group included patients who had brain and orbital MRIs at UCSD in the absence of known pathology in the orbits or globes. Measurements were taken by 3 separate examiners for all groups. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (16 with SES and 8 with HES) and 24 age-matched controls were retrospectively reviewed. The superior rectus (SR) of patients with HES and SES was more nasally displaced from the midline compared with that of age-matched controls (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, respectively). The inferior rectus (IR) of patients with HES but not with SES was more nasally displaced from the midline compared with that of age-matched controls (p = 0.04, p = 0.62, respectively). In all groups, the IR nasal displacement from the midline was approximately double compared with the SR. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant nasal displacement of the SR in HES and SES and IR in HES. The observed IR nasal displacement in HES is a new finding and may explain the residual hypotropia and/or esotropia following surgical interventions for HES not involving the IR.

Reproducibility and Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameter Measurements Obtained Using the CASIA2 and Spectralis OCT2 Optical Coherence Tomography Devices.

PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility and agreement of measurement values obtained from the Tomey CASIA2 and Heidelberg Spectralis OCT2 anterior segment optical coherence tomographic devices. METHODS: Twenty eyes from 10 subjects ranging from age 28 to 45 years with no history of eye conditions or intraocular surgery were included. Two scans were obtained with each device in a standardized dark room environment after a period of dark adaptation. One anterior segment optical coherence tomography image along the horizontal (temporal nasal) meridian was analyzed per eye and per scan. Lens vault, pupil diameter, anterior chamber width, angle opening distance, trabecular iris space area, and scleral spur angle were measured using manufacturer-provided image analysis programs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values, coefficients of variation, and Bland-Altman plots were computed to assess the intradevice correlation and interdevice agreement of measurement values. RESULTS: There was excellent intradevice reproducibility of measurement values for both the CASIA (ICC range, 0.86 to 0.99) and Spectralis (ICC range, 0.79 to 1.00). There was also excellent interdevice correlation of measurement values (ICC range, 0.78 to 0.93) for all parameters except anterior chamber width (ICC 0.20). Linear regression models and Bland-Altman plots showed that this relationship was strongest when measurement values were small. CONCLUSIONS: There is excellent intradevice reproducibility and good interdevice agreement of anterior segment parameter measurement values for the CASIA2 and Spectralis OCT2. However, the measurements obtained with each device should not be considered interchangeable.