Platinum-sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer: towards a definition.

BACKGROUND: First-line oxaliplatin-based therapy is the standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its dose-limiting toxicity is sensory neuropathy. The OPTIMisation of OXaliplatin (OPTIMOX) stop-and-go approach with oxaliplatin-free interval (OFI) offers a reasonable strategy. Influence of the first-line oxaliplatin-based treatment efficacy and the duration of OFI on tumour sensitivity to oxaliplatin reintroduction were investigated. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of OPTIMOX1 and OPTIMOX2 studies, on 285 patients with previously untreated mCRC and FOLFOX reintroduction. An optimal OFI was estimated. Efficacy endpoints measured from reintroduction of FOLFOX included response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). FINDINGS: Two groups of OFI <6 and ≥ 6 months, were defined. The RR following FOLFOX reintroduction were 14% and 22% in patients with an OFI <6 and ≥ 6 months, respectively (overall RR 19%). The median PFS after FOLFOX reintroduction following OFI< 6 and ≥ 6 months were 3.0 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.7-3.7] and 5.5 months [95% CI: 4.8-6.5], respectively. The median OS following OFI <6 months was 8.8 months [95% CI: 7.5-10.5] and OFI ≥ 6 was months 16.8 months [95% CI: 15.3-19.6]. In the case of partial response (PR), median PFS and OS were 4.6 [95% CI: 4.1-5.0] and 14 months [95% CI: 12.1-16.4], respectively, whereas in patients with initial stable disease (SD) 3.4 [95% CI: 2.7-4.7] and 10.3 months [95% CI: 7.3-12.9], respectively. INTERPRETATION: A sensitive population of patients more likely to benefit from oxaliplatin reintroduction is defined by the efficacy of induction therapy followed by an OFI of at least 6 months between two periods of FOLFOX therapy. OFI of < 6 months identifies a subgroup of partially-resistant patients who can still benefit from oxaliplatin reintroduction.

Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer (AVANT): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab improves the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Our aim was to assess the use of bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected stage III or high-risk stage II colon carcinoma. METHODS: Patients from 330 centres in 34 countries were enrolled into this phase 3, open-label randomised trial. Patients with curatively resected stage III or high-risk stage II colon carcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) bolus plus 600 mg/m(2) 22-h continuous infusion on day 1; leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) plus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) bolus plus 600 mg/m(2) 22-h continuous infusion on day 2) every 2 weeks for 12 cycles; bevacizumab 5 mg/kg plus FOLFOX4 (every 2 weeks for 12 cycles) followed by bevacizumab monotherapy 7·5 mg/kg every 3 weeks (eight cycles over 24 weeks); or bevacizumab 7·5 mg/kg plus XELOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 2 weeks plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-15) every 3 weeks for eight cycles followed by bevacizumab monotherapy 7·5 mg/kg every 3 weeks (eight cycles over 24 weeks). Block randomisation was done with a central interactive computerised system, stratified by geographic region and disease stage. Surgery with curative intent occurred 4-8 weeks before randomisation. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed for all randomised patients with stage III disease. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00112918. FINDINGS: Of the total intention-to-treat population (n=3451), 2867 patients had stage III disease, of whom 955 were randomly assigned to receive FOLFOX4, 960 to receive bevacizumab-FOLFOX4, and 952 to receive bevacizumab-XELOX. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range 0-66 months), 237 patients (25%) in the FOLFOX4 group, 280 (29%) in the bevacizumab-FOLFOX4 group, and 253 (27%) in the bevacizumab-XELOX group had relapsed, developed a new colon cancer, or died. The disease-free survival hazard ratio for bevacizumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 was 1·17 (95% CI 0·98-1·39; p=0·07), and for bevacizumab-XELOX versus FOLFOX4 was 1·07 (0·90-1·28; p=0·44). After a minimum follow-up of 60 months, the overall survival hazard ratio for bevacizumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 was 1·27 (1·03-1·57; p=0·02), and for bevacizumab-XELOX versus FOLFOX4 was 1·15 (0·93-1·42; p=0·21). The 573 patients with high-risk stage II cancer were included in the safety analysis. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were neutropenia (FOLFOX4: 477 [42%] of 1126 patients, bevacizumab-FOLFOX4: 416 [36%] of 1145 patients, and bevacizumab-XELOX: 74 [7%] of 1135 patients), diarrhoea (110 [10%], 135 [12%], and 181 [16%], respectively), and hypertension (12 [1%], 122 [11%], and 116 [10%], respectively). Serious adverse events were more common in the bevacizumab groups (bevacizumab-FOLFOX4: 297 [26%]; bevacizumab-XELOX: 284 [25%]) than in the FOLFOX4 group (226 [20%]). Treatment-related deaths were reported in one patient receiving FOLFOX4, two receiving bevacizumab-FOLFOX4, and five receiving bevacizumab-XELOX. INTERPRETATION: Bevacizumab does not prolong disease-free survival when added to adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage III colon cancer. Overall survival data suggest a potential detrimental effect with bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy in these patients. On the basis of these and other data, we do not recommend the use of bevacizumab in the adjuvant treatment of patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer. FUNDING: Genentech, Roche, and Chugai.

Phase II trial of weekly alternating sequential BIBF 1120 and afatinib for advanced colorectal cancer.

AIM: The feasibility of an alternating regimen of BIBF 1120, a potent, oral, triple angiokinase inhibitor, and afatinib (BIBW 2992), a potent ErbB family blocker, was explored in patients with advanced pretreated colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received repeated courses of alternating 7-day treatment periods, first with BIBF 1120 250 mg twice daily and then afatinib 50 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate; the incidence/severity of adverse events (AEs) and pharmacokinetics (PK) were determined. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (≥4 prior lines, most anti-VEGF and/or -EGFR pretreated) received BIBF 1120 and afatinib. No objective responses were observed; the best response was stable disease in 20 patients (43.5%). Seven patients (15.2%) remained progression-free for ≥16 weeks. Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months; median overall survival was 5.5 months. The most frequent drug-related AEs were diarrhoea (80.4%), asthenia (47.8%), nausea (43.5%) and rash (41.3%). PK assessments did not show obvious alterations for either drug. CONCLUSION: Weekly alternating administration of BIBF 1120 and afatinib is feasible; however, its efficacy was limited in this highly palliative patient population.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and FOLFOX response in colorectal cancer patients.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Numerous clinical studies, including a few prospective ones, have reported conflicting results on the impact of gene polymorphisms related to fluorouracil (FU) and oxaliplatin pharmacodynamics. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * This prospective study is the first to report that clinical response to FOLFOX is significantly related to methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms (677C-->T and 1298A-->C), with a response rate of 37, 53, 63 and 80% in patients harbouring no, one, two or three favourable MTHFR alleles, respectively. * Only polymorphisms of genes related to oxaliplatin pharmacodynamics (GSTpi 105Ile-->Val and XPD 751Ly-->Gln) influenced progression-free survival. * These results corroborate the observation that response was related to the cumulative FU dose, whereas progression-free survival was related to the cumulative oxaliplatin dose. AIMS: To test prospectively the predictive value of germinal gene polymorphisms related to fluorouracil (FU) and oxaliplatin (Oxa) pharmacodynamics on toxicity and responsiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients receiving FOLFOX therapy. METHODS: Advanced CRC patients (n= 117) receiving FOLFOX 7 therapy were enrolled. Gene polymorphisms relevant for FU [thymidylate synthase (TYMS, 28 bp repeats including the G-->C mutation + 6 bp deletion in 3'UTR), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR, 677C-->T, 1298A-->C), dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase (IVS14+1G-->A) and Oxa: glutathione S-transferase (GST) pi (105Ile-->Val, 114Ala-->Val), excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) (118AAT-->AAC), ERCC2 (XPD, 751Lys-->Gln) and XRCC1 (399Arg-->Gln)] were determined (blood mononuclear cells). RESULTS: None of the genotypes was predictive of toxicity. Response rate (54.7% complete response + partial response) was related to FU pharmacogenetics, with both 677C-->T (P= 0.042) and 1298A-->C (P= 0.004) MTHFR genotypes linked to clinical response. Importantly, the score of favourable MTHFR alleles (677T and 1298C) was positively linked to response, with response rates of 37.1, 53.3, 62.5 and 80.0% in patients bearing no, one, two or three favourable alleles, respectively (P= 0.040). Polymorphisms of genes related to Oxa pharmacodynamics showed an influence on progression-free survival, with a better outcome in patients bearing GSTpi 105 Val/Val genotype or XPD 751Lys-containing genotype (P= 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that response to FOLFOX therapy in CRC patients may be driven by MTHFR germinal polymorphisms.

Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study.

PURPOSE: This study compared chemotherapy discontinuation with maintenance therapy with leucovorin and fluorouracil after six cycles of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred two patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of modified FOLFOX7 (mFOLFOX7) followed by simplified leucovorin plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil until progression (arm 1 or maintenance arm, n = 98) or six cycles of mFOLFOX7 before a complete stop of chemotherapy (arm 2 or chemotherapy-free interval [CFI] arm, n = 104). Reintroduction of mFOLFOX7 was scheduled after tumor progression in both arms. The primary study end point was duration of disease control (DDC). RESULTS: Median DDC was 13.1 months in patients assigned to the maintenance arm and 9.2 months in patients assigned to the CFI arm (P = .046). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 8.6 and 23.8 months, respectively, in the maintenance arm and 6.6 and 19.5 months, respectively, in the CFI arm. Median duration of maintenance therapy (arm 1) and CFIs (arm 2) were 4.8 months and 3.9 months, respectively. Overall response rates were 59.2% and 59.6% for the initial FOLFOX chemotherapy and 20.4% and 30.3% for FOLFOX reintroduction in arms 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The planned complete discontinuation of chemotherapy had a negative impact on DDC and PFS compared with the maintenance therapy strategy. These results suggest that chemotherapy discontinuation cannot be decided before therapy is initiated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

[Use of complementary medicine by cancer patients in a French oncology department]. / Utilisation de médecine complémentaire chez les patients atteints de cancer dans un service de cancérologie français.

The aims of this study was to estimate and describe the reasons of use of complementary medicine in patients with a cancer treated in a French oncology department. An anonymous questionnaire was proposed to patients during treatment or follow-up in an oncology department. It was a descriptive study over 207 questionnaires. Over 195 analysable questionnaires, 34% of patients were using complementary medicine. Homeopathy (42%), plants (27%) and vitamins (18%) were the main substances used. Acupuncture (22%) and massages (15%) were the most significant techniques. No specific profile of user was observed. The main reason of using complementary medicine was not curing cancer but reducing side effects of the conventional treatment (66%). More than a half of the users of complementary medicine were not revealing their habits to their oncologist because the question was not raised in consultation. One third of cancer patients are using complementary medicine during the treatment of their disease. Complementary medicine must benefit, as well as conventional medicine, of scientific studies. The purpose of these studies should be evaluating potential benefits, toxicity and interactions with the conventional treatment in order the oncologist could warned the users. This warning could improve the confidence relationship between the oncologist and his patient.

[Conservative treatment undifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the anal canal: two cases]. / Traitement conservateur des tumeurs endocrines peu différenciées du canal anal.

Undifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors are rare, and are characteristically aggressive with a poor prognosis. Most patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis, and cannot undergo curative surgical treatment. A chemotherapy regimen combining etoposide plus cisplatin is currently considered to be the reference treatment. We report two cases of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors localized in the anal canal and treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy resulting in prolonged complete local remission and preventing extended surgical excision.

Phase II study of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine combination in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pre-treated metastatic breast cancer.

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin (OXA)/vinorelbine (VNB) combination in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients pre-treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients received OXA at 130 mg/m (2-h i.v.), day 1, and VNB days 1 and 8 at 24-26 mg/m repeated every 3 weeks. Forty-two patients (median age 54; 64% with liver metastasis, 67% taxane resistant/refractory and 38% anthracycline resistant/refractory) were treated. A median of 4 cycles of treatment was given per patient, with 31% receiving 6 or more. Eleven partial responses and 16 patients with stable disease (five lasting more than 4 months) in 41 eligible patients were seen, for an overall response rate of 26.8% (95% confidence interval 14.2-42.9). Median follow-up was 15.9 months (7.2-30.6), median time to progression was 3.4 months and estimated overall survival was 12.7 months (20 events). Thirty-three patients experienced (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2) grade 3-4 neutropenia (one case of febrile neutropenia) and three patients had severe constipation requiring hospitalization. Nine patients developed grade 3 OXA-specific neurotoxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. We conclude that OXA 130 mg/m (day 1) and VNB 24 mg/m (day 1 and 8) combination given every 3 weeks is effective with a good safety profile in MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Allergic-type reactions to oxaliplatin: retrospective analysis of 42 patients.

Oxaliplatin is a platinum salt that is particularly effective in treating gastrointestinal tumours. Its increased use has resulted in emergence of allergic reactions, including anaphylactic shock. Allergic reactions to oxaliplatin documented over the last 5 years have been analysed using predefined criteria. The 42 analysed patients had cancer and received a FOLFOX regimen in first line or beyond. Two types of allergy were observed: a type I immediate allergic reaction in 39 patients in whom the most frequent signs were respiratory (50%) and cutaneous (40%); anaphylactic shock that occurred in three patients; type II allergy (immunological thrombopenia) was observed in three patients. All the toxicities were reversible on symptomatic treatment. No predictive factor was evidenced. Anaphylactic shock, is rare but serious, and must be considered in the event of any severe blood pressure decrease. For the non-life-threatening reactions, prolonging infusion duration, "Stop and Go" regimen seem to be effective means of preventing recurrence.

First-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

First-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer is rapidly moving from modulation and infusional administration of fluoropyrimidines in the past decades to more complex and more active regimens, with new chemotherapy drugs, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and modulated targeted drugs inhibiting angiogenesis or the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The choice of first-line therapy is becoming more complex and is part of a global strategy also integrating individual prognostic factors, salvage surgery, and second-line therapy. Furthermore, we fear that limited financial resources will also influence the management of this disease.