Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Sr Care Pharm ; 37(6): 227-231, 2022 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35610768

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the literature related to the use of alpha1-blockers and the risk of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS), particularly in cataract surgery. IFIS is characterized by floppiness or billowing of the iris, iris prolapse, and progressive miosis, possibly leading to severe complications. It is thought to be associated with adrenergic alpha-1 receptor antagonists commonly used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Data Sources A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science through May 2021 with MeSH terms and keywords 'intraoperative floppy iris syndrome,' ' adrenergic alpha-1 receptor antagonists,' and 'cataract surgery.' Study Selection and Data Extraction Relevant articles were reviewed and included. In addition, reference lists from identified publications were reviewed to identify additional reports and studies of interest. Data Synthesis Numerous reports have linked IFIS to multiple risk factors including age, gender, hypertension, and the use of adrenergic alpha-1 receptor antagonists, most notably tamsulosin. Tamsulosin selectively blocks the adrenergic alpha-1 receptor in the iris dilator muscle, preventing mydriasis during cataract surgery. Other adrenergic alpha-1 receptor antagonists, including terazosin, doxazosin, alfuzosin, and sildosin, have also been linked to IFIS; however, their relationship to IFIS is not as well defined. Conclusion Patients should be educated regarding potential adverse effects and discuss this with their health care providers prior to cataract surgery. In addition, health care providers should be aware of the adverse effect and take steps to reduce the risk of surgical complications.


Subject(s)
Cataract , Iris Diseases , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Cataract/chemically induced , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/chemically induced , Iris , Iris Diseases/chemically induced , Iris Diseases/diagnosis , Iris Diseases/prevention & control , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Tamsulosin/adverse effects
2.
J Pharm Pract ; 27(5): 496-500, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25374989

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature to assess the incidence and true clinical relevance of recent Food and Drug Administration warnings regarding QT prolongation with azithromycin, given its widespread use, with over 40 million US outpatient prescriptions written in 2011. A literature search of MEDLINE (1946 to May 2013) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to May 2013) was conducted using the terms azithromycin, QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, arrhythmia, and cardiovascular death. A bibliographic search was also performed. Several relevant studies and case reports were identified and reviewed. One cohort study revealed an increased risk of cardiovascular death with azithromycin compared to no antibiotic, especially in those with higher cardiovascular risk. Another cohort study comparing azithromycin, penicillin V, and no antibiotic in a younger Danish population with less cardiac risk found no increased cardiovascular death associated with azithromycin use. The majority of case reports involved ill and/or elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and concomitant medications who were already at a higher risk of cardiovascular events. Although there is evidence that azithromycin may induce QT prolongation and adverse cardiac events, the incidence is fairly limited to patients with high baseline risk, including those with preexisting cardiovascular conditions and concomitant use of other QT-prolonging drugs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Age Factors , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Electrocardiography , Humans , Risk Factors
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 40(6): 1086-95, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16735648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of naltrexone in pediatric patients with autistic disorder (AD). DATA SOURCES: Using the terms pediatric, child, naltrexone, autism, and autistic disorder, a literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1966-May 18, 2006) and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1971-May 18, 2006) database. The references of these articles were scanned for additional relevant literature. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles describing or evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of naltrexone in pediatric patients with AD were included in this review. Three case reports, 8 case series, and 14 clinical studies were identified as pertinent. DATA SYNTHESIS: Naltrexone has been used most commonly at doses ranging from 0.5 to 2 mg/kg/day and found to be predominantly effective in decreasing self-injurious behavior. Naltrexone may also attenuate hyperactivity, agitation, irritability, temper tantrums, social withdrawal, and stereotyped behaviors. Patients may also exhibit improved attention and eye contact. Transient sedation was the most commonly reported adverse event. Small sample size, short duration, and inconsistent evaluative methods characterize the available research. CONCLUSIONS: A child affected by AD may benefit from a trial of naltrexone therapy, particularly if the child exhibits self-injurious behavior and other attempted therapies have failed. Serious adverse effects have not been reported in short-term studies.


Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder/drug therapy , Naltrexone/adverse effects , Naltrexone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/adverse effects , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Autistic Disorder/psychology , Child , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Self-Injurious Behavior/drug therapy , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 38(2): 342-5, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14742776

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature to determine whether hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors are effective for the prevention of nephropathy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966-April 2003) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts(1970-April 2003), as well as bibliographic searches, were conducted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Although the statins are widely used for the prevention of coronary heart disease, non-lipid-lowering effects are also being investigated, namely their potential role in the prevention of nephropathy. Five trials of the statins used in this manner are reviewed, most of which included patients with dyslipidemias, making it difficult to determine whether the renoprotective effects were independent of the lipid-lowering effects. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate evidence does not currently exist to support the widespread use of statins as alternatives to strategies known to prevent the progression of renal disease, but statins may be used to complement other therapies in patients with additional indications.


Subject(s)
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Renal Insufficiency/prevention & control , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Middle Aged , Proteinuria/drug therapy , Proteinuria/physiopathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...