Type 3 long QT syndrome: Is the effectiveness of treatment with beta-blockers population-specific?

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of beta-blocker treatment in type 3 long QT syndrome (LQT3) remains debated. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that beta-blocker use is associated with cardiac events (CEs) in a French cohort of LQT3 patients. METHODS: All patients with a likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant in the SCN5A gene (linked to LQT3) were included and followed-up. Documented ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, torsades de pointes, aborted cardiac arrest, sudden death, and appropriate shocks were considered as severe cardiac events (SCEs). CEs also included syncope. RESULTS: We included 147 patients from 54 families carrying 23 variants. Six of the patients developed symptoms before the age of 1 year and were analyzed separately. The 141 remaining patients (52.5% male; median age at diagnosis 24.0 years) were followed-up for a median of 11 years. The probabilities of a CE and an SCE from birth to the age of 40 were 20.5% and 9.9%, respectively. QTc prolongation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12 [1.0-1.2]; P = .005]) and proband status (HR 4.07 [1.9-8.9]; P <.001) were independently associated with the occurrence of CEs. Proband status (HR 8.13 [1.7-38.8]; P = .009) was found to be independently associated with SCEs, whereas QTc prolongation (HR 1.11 [1.0-1.3]; P = .108) did not reach statistical significance. The cumulative probability of the age at first CE/SCE was not lower in patients treated with a beta-blocker. CONCLUSION: In agreement with the literature, proband status and lengthened QTc were associated with a higher risk of CEs. Our data do not show a protective effect of beta-blocker treatment.

Computerized automated algorithm-based analyses of digitized paper ECGs in Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome is a rare inherited arrhythmic syndrome with a coved type 1 ST-segment elevation on ECG and an increased risk of sudden death. Many studies have evaluated risk stratification performance based on ECG-derived parameters. However, since historical Brugada patient cohorts included mostly paper ECGs, most studies have been based on manual ECG parameter measurements. We hypothesized that it would be possible to run automated algorithm-based analysis of paper ECGs. We aimed: 1) to validate the digitization process for paper ECGs in Brugada patients; and 2) to quantify the acute class I antiarrhythmic drug effect on relevant ECG parameters in Brugada syndrome. METHODS: A total of 176 patients (30% female, 43 ± 13 years old) with induced type 1 Brugada syndrome ECG were included in the study. All of the patients had paper ECGs before and during class I antiarrhythmic drug challenge. Twenty patients also had a digital ECG, in whom printouts were used to validate the digitization process. Paper ECGs were scanned and then digitized using ECGScan software, version 3.4.0 (AMPS, LLC, New York, NY, USA) to obtain FDA HL7 XML format ECGs. Measurements were automatically performed using the Bravo (AMPS, LLC, New York, NY, USA) and Glasgow algorithms. RESULTS: ECG parameters obtained from digital and digitized ECGs were closely correlated (r = 0.96 ± 0.07, R2 = 0.93 ± 0.12). Class I antiarrhythmic drugs significantly increased the global QRS duration (from 113 ± 20 to 138 ± 23, p < 0.0001). On lead V2, class I antiarrhythmic drugs increased ST-segment elevation (from 110 ± 84 to 338 ± 227 µV, p < 0.0001), decreased the ST slope (from 14.9 ± 23.3 to -27.4 ± 28.5, p < 0.0001) and increased the TpTe interval (from 88 ± 18 to 104 ± 33, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Automated algorithm-based measurements of depolarization and repolarization parameters from digitized paper ECGs are reliable and could quantify the acute effects of class 1 antiarrhythmic drug challenge in Brugada patients. Our results support using computerized automated algorithm-based analyses from digitized paper ECGs to establish risk stratification decision trees in Brugada syndrome.

Efficacy and safety of oral panobinostat plus subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (PANORAMA 3): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Improved therapeutic options are needed for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Subcutaneous bortezomib has replaced intravenous bortezomib as it is associated with a more favourable toxicity profile. We investigated the activity and safety of three different dosing regimens of oral panobinostat in combination with subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone for this indication. METHODS: PANORAMA 3 is an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study being done at 71 sites (hospitals and medical centres) across 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (as per International Myeloma Working Group 2014 criteria), who had received one to four previous lines of therapy (including an immunomodulatory agent), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly, 20 mg twice weekly, or 10 mg three times weekly, plus subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone. All study drugs were administered in 21-day cycles. Randomisation was done by an interactive response technology provider, and stratified by number of previous treatment lines and age. The primary endpoint was overall response rate after up to eight treatment cycles (analysed in all randomly assigned patients by intention to treat). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug. No statistical comparisons between groups were planned. This trial is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02654990. FINDINGS: Between April 27, 2016, and Jan 17, 2019, 248 patients were randomly assigned (82 to panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly, 83 to panobinostat 20 mg twice weekly, and 83 to 10 mg panobinostat three times weekly). Median duration of follow-up across all treatment groups was 14·7 months (IQR 7·8-24·1). The overall response rate after up to eight treatment cycles was 62·2% (95% CI 50·8-72·7; 51 of 82 patients) for the 20 mg three times weekly group, 65·1% (53·8-75·2; 54 of 83 patients) for the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 50·6% (39·4-61·8; 42 of 83 patients) for the 10 mg three times weekly group. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 71 (91%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 69 (83%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 60 (75%) of 80 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common (≥20% patients in any group) grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [42%] of 78, 26 [31%] of 83, and 19 [24%] of 83 patients) and neutropenia (18 [23%], 13 [16%], and six [8%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 42 (54%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 40 (48%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 35 (44%) of 83 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common serious adverse event (≥10% patients in any group) was pneumonia (nine [12%] of 78, ten [12%] of 83, and nine [11%] of 80 patients). There were 14 deaths during the study (five [6%] of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, three [4%] of 83 in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and six [8%] of 80 in the 10 mg three times weekly group); none of these deaths was deemed treatment related. INTERPRETATION: The safety profile of panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly was more favourable than in previous trials of this regimen with intravenous bortezomib, suggesting that subcutaneous bortezomib improves the tolerability of the panobinostat plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone regimen. The overall response rate was highest in the 20 mg three times weekly and 20 mg twice weekly groups, with 10 mg three times weekly best tolerated. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Secura Bio.

How a concentration-effect analysis of data from the eliglustat thorough electrocardiographic study was used to support dosing recommendations.

Eliglustat is a first-line oral treatment for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 who have cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 extensive, intermediate, or poor metabolizer phenotypes. Per International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guidance, a Phase 1 thorough electrocardiographic (ECG) study was done during drug development to assess eliglustat's effects on cardiac repolarization by measuring ECG intervals in healthy adult subjects. Using data from the thorough ECG study, we performed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-ECG modeling to establish the relationship between eliglustat concentrations and their effects on ECG intervals. We then used that concentration-response relationship to predict the effects of eliglustat on each ECG interval for each CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype (the main determinant of eliglustat exposure) and in different drug-drug interaction scenarios. These predictions, together with other exposure-related factors, contributed to the CYP2D6 phenotype-based dosing recommendations for eliglustat, including dose adjustments and contraindications when co-administered with drugs metabolized by the CYP2D6 and CYP3A pathways.

Sex influences on ventricular repolarization duration in normal subjects and in type 1, 2 and 3 long QT syndrome patients: Different effect in acquired and congenital type 2 LQTS.

AIM: To evaluate the interaction between sex and rate corrected QT interval (QTc) duration in normal subjects after drug-induced QT prolongation and in LQTS patients. METHODS: Semi-automated measurements were performed on 875 digital ECGs (200 normal subjects off drugs (100 females), 200 normal subjects on Moxifloxacin (100 females), 259 LQT1 patients (161 females), 183 LQT2 patients (100 females) and 33 LQT3 patients (15 females)). A sex specific coefficient was calculated in each group and was used to calculate group specific corrected QT intervals (QTci). RESULTS: The mean sex difference (female minus male) in QTci interval duration was 17 ms 95%CI(12.7; 21.3) in normal subjects, 19 ms (14.5; 23.5) on Moxifloxacin, and 13 ms (4.8; 21.2) in LQT1 patients. The mean difference was 2 ms (-7.9; 11.9) in LQT2 and - 5 ms (-32.2; 22.2) in LQT3 patients (p = 0.0067 for the group and sex interaction). In the subgroup of patients above 15 years and without beta blocker treatment, the sex effect (female minus male) on QTci interval duration was 17 ms (4.1; 29.9) in LQT1 patients. QTc duration was not different between sex in LQT2 and in LQT3 patients (mean difference - 3 ms (-21.6; 15.6) and 12 ms (-28.4; 52.4), respectively) (p = 0.0191 for group and sex interaction). CONCLUSIONS: The interaction between sex and QTc interval is preserved in type 1 LQTS and drug-induced QTc prolongation but blurred in type 2 LQTS. Further experimental studies are warranted to better understand the interaction of sexual hormones with malfunctioning KCNH2 encoded repolarizing potassium channel.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy of S66913 in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Aims: Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with limited efficacy and adverse effects. Inhibition of the atrial current IKur, absent from the ventricle, is expected to be antiarrhythmic, without adverse cardiac effects, particularly ventricular pro-arrhythmic effects. Methods and results: A randomized clinical trial in symptomatic paroxysmal AF patients being considered for ablation. The primary endpoint was AF burden (AFB) as measured by insertable continuous monitoring (ICM) devices. Screened patients had an ICM implanted and were included if AFB was between 1% and 70% after 4 weeks of recording. They were randomly allocated to 4-week treatment of a selective IKur inhibitor S66913 (5 mg, 25 mg, or 100 mg orally per day) or placebo. The study was to enroll 160 patients. The study was terminated prematurely, due to non-study related preclinical safety concerns, after 58 patients had been enrolled. The median AFB ranged from 4.3% to 10.3% at baseline in the four treatment groups. S66913 had no significant effect on AFB or on AFB plus atrial tachycardia (AT) burden, at any dosage; nor on any secondary endpoints including the number and duration of AT or AF episodes, and symptoms. The drug was well tolerated with no safety concern during the treatment or the extended clinical follow-up. Conclusions: DIAGRAF-IKUR was the first study to show that using ICM to assess the effect of an AAD is feasible. The selective IKur inhibitor S66913 was safe but had no clinically meaningful effect at the time of early termination of the study.

Comparison of automated interval measurements by widely used algorithms in digital electrocardiographs.

BACKGROUND: Automated measurements of electrocardiographic (ECG) intervals by current-generation digital electrocardiographs are critical to computer-based ECG diagnostic statements, to serial comparison of ECGs, and to epidemiological studies of ECG findings in populations. A previous study demonstrated generally small but often significant systematic differences among 4 algorithms widely used for automated ECG in the United States and that measurement differences could be related to the degree of abnormality of the underlying tracing. Since that publication, some algorithms have been adjusted, whereas other large manufacturers of automated ECGs have asked to participate in an extension of this comparison. METHODS: Seven widely used automated algorithms for computer-based interpretation participated in this blinded study of 800 digitized ECGs provided by the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium. All tracings were different from the study of 4 algorithms reported in 2014, and the selected population was heavily weighted toward groups with known effects on the QT interval: included were 200 normal subjects, 200 normal subjects receiving moxifloxacin as part of an active control arm of thorough QT studies, 200 subjects with genetically proved long QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1), and 200 subjects with genetically proved long QT syndrome Type 2 (LQT2). RESULTS: For the entire population of 800 subjects, pairwise differences between algorithms for each mean interval value were clinically small, even where statistically significant, ranging from 0.2 to 3.6milliseconds for the PR interval, 0.1 to 8.1milliseconds for QRS duration, and 0.1 to 9.3milliseconds for QT interval. The mean value of all paired differences among algorithms was higher in the long QT groups than in normals for both QRS duration and QT intervals. Differences in mean QRS duration ranged from 0.2 to 13.3milliseconds in the LQT1 subjects and from 0.2 to 11.0milliseconds in the LQT2 subjects. Differences in measured QT duration (not corrected for heart rate) ranged from 0.2 to 10.5milliseconds in the LQT1 subjects and from 0.9 to 12.8milliseconds in the LQT2 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Among current-generation computer-based electrocardiographs, clinically small but statistically significant differences exist between ECG interval measurements by individual algorithms. Measurement differences between algorithms for QRS duration and for QT interval are larger in long QT interval subjects than in normal subjects. Comparisons of population study norms should be aware of small systematic differences in interval measurements due to different algorithm methodologies, within-individual interval measurement comparisons should use comparable methods, and further attempts to harmonize interval measurement methodologies are warranted.

Eligibility of cardiac resynchronization therapy patients for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

The eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) was assessed among patients already implanted with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We included 20 patients (15 men, age 73±10years, LVEF 35±10%). Seventeen (85%) patients were eligible for S-ICDs: 11 (55%) patients on only 1 vector and 6 (30%) patients on 2 or 3 vectors. Patients who were eligible on 2-3 vectors had narrower paced QRS than patients who were not eligible or were eligible on only one vector (133±18ms vs 167±17ms, p=0.007). If necessary, S-ICD implantation could be considered in most patients with CRT.

Nonclinical cardiovascular safety of pitolisant: comparing International Conference on Harmonization S7B and Comprehensive in vitro Pro-arrhythmia Assay initiative studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We evaluated the concordance of results from two sets of nonclinical cardiovascular safety studies on pitolisant. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Nonclinical studies envisaged both in the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) S7B guideline and Comprehensive in vitro Pro-arrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative were undertaken. The CiPA initiative included in vitro ion channels, stem cell-derived human ventricular myocytes, and in silico modelling to simulate human ventricular electrophysiology. ICH S7B-recommended assays included in vitro hERG (KV 11.1) channels, in vivo dog studies with follow-up investigations in rabbit Purkinje fibres and the in vivo Carlsson rabbit pro-arrhythmia model. KEY RESULTS: Both sets of nonclinical data consistently excluded pitolisant from having clinically relevant QT-liability or pro-arrhythmic potential. CiPA studies revealed pitolisant to have modest calcium channel blocking and late INa reducing activities at high concentrations, which resulted in pitolisant reducing dofetilide-induced early after-depolarizations (EADs) in the ICH S7B studies. Studies in stem cell-derived human cardiomyocytes with dofetilide or E-4031 given alone and in combination with pitolisant confirmed these properties. In silico modelling confirmed that the ion channel effects measured are consistent with results from both the stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes and rabbit Purkinje fibres and categorized pitolisant as a drug with low torsadogenic potential. Results from the two sets of nonclinical studies correlated well with those from two clinical QT studies. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings support the CiPA initiative but suggest that sponsors should consider investigating drug effects on EADs and the use of pro-arrhythmia models when the results from CiPA studies are ambiguous.

Management and monitoring recommendations for the use of eliglustat in adults with type 1 Gaucher disease in Europe.

PURPOSE: In Gaucher disease, diminished activity of the lysosomal enzyme, acid ß-glucosidase, leads to accumulation of glucosylceramides and related substrates, primarily in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. Eliglustat is an oral substrate reduction therapy approved in the European Union and the United States as a first-line treatment for adults with type 1 Gaucher disease who have compatible CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes. A European Advisory Council of experts in Gaucher disease describes the characteristics of eliglustat that are distinct from enzyme augmentation therapy (the standard of care) and miglustat (the other approved substrate reduction therapy) and recommends investigations and monitoring for patients on eliglustat therapy within the context of current recommendations for Gaucher disease management. RESULTS: Eliglustat is a selective, potent inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, the enzyme responsible for biosynthesis of glucosylceramides which accumulate in Gaucher disease. Extensive metabolism of eliglustat by CYP2D6, and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A of the cytochrome P450 pathway, necessitates careful consideration of the patient's CYP2D6 metaboliser status and use of concomitant medications which share metabolism by these pathways. Guidance on specific assessments and monitoring required for eliglustat therapy, including an algorithm to determine eligibility for eliglustat, are provided. CONCLUSIONS: As a first-line therapy for type 1 Gaucher disease, eliglustat offers eligible patients a daily oral therapy alternative to biweekly infusions of enzyme therapy. Physicians will need to carefully assess individual Gaucher patients to determine their appropriateness for eliglustat therapy. The therapeutic response to eliglustat and use of concomitant medications will require long-term monitoring.

Evaluation of the Effects of CHF6001, an Inhaled PDE4 Inhibitor, on Cardiac Repolarization and Cardiac Arrhythmias in Healthy Volunteers.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a multicomponent condition characterized by airway inflammation and associated to comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases. Among anti-inflammatory agents in development for COPD, the phosphodiesterase inhibitors administrated by inhalation have the potential for increased efficacy and reduced systemic side effects. CHF6001 is an inhaled PDE4 inhibitor with proven anti-inflammatory properties in animal models. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was aimed to demonstrate its cardiovascular safety and tolerability in healthy male volunteers with normal electrocardiogram and cardiac parameters. Single and multiple ascending doses (7 days of administration) of CHF6001 were administered. Three electrocardiograms were recorded at several pharmacokinetic time points and at each time points, postdose heart rate, QRS and PR intervals, and presence of arrhythmia were evaluated. In single ascending dose, QTcF intervals did not increase more than 30 milliseconds from the baseline, all heart rate was between 45 and 100 bpm, and no statistically significant differences were observed in PR and QRS intervals. In multiple ascending dose, cardiac parameters did not differ significantly from baseline. In the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis, no medically or clinically significant changes were found. Further studies are ongoing to demonstrate that CHF6001 is safe and well tolerated in COPD patients as well.

Can an early phase clinical pharmacology study replace a thorough QT study? Experience with a novel H3-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of pitolisant on QTcF interval in a single ascending dose (SAD) study and a thorough QT (TQT) study. METHODS: The SAD study at three dose levels of pitolisant enrolled 24 males and the TQT study at two dose levels 25 males. Both studies intensively monitored ECGs and pitolisant exposure. Effect on QTcF interval was analysed by Intersection Union Test (IUT) and by exposure-response (ER) analysis. Results from the two studies were compared. RESULTS: In both studies, moxifloxacin effect established assay sensitivity. IUT analysis revealed comparable pitolisant-induced maximum mean (90 % confidence interval (CI)) placebo-corrected increase from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) in both the studies, being 13.3 (8.1; 18.5) ms at 200-mg and 9.9 (4.7; 15.1) ms at 240-mg doses in SAD study and 5.27 (2.35; 8.20) ms at 120-mg dose in TQT study. ER analysis revealed that ER slopes in SAD and TQT studies were comparable and significantly positive (0.031 vs 0.027 ms/ng/mL, respectively). At geometric mean concentrations, bootstrap predicted ΔΔQTcF (90 % CI) were 9.23 (4.68; 14.4) ms at 279 ng/mL (240-mg dose) in the SAD study and 4.97 (3.42; 8.19) ms at 156 ng/mL (120-mg dose) in the TQT study. CONCLUSION: Pitolisant lacked an effect of regulatory concern on QTc interval in both the studies, however analysed, suggesting that the results from the SAD study could have mitigated the need for a TQT study. Our findings add to the growing evidence that intensive ECG monitoring in early phase clinical studies can replace a TQT study.

Establishing assay sensitivity in QT studies: experience with the use of moxifloxacin in an early phase clinical pharmacology study and comparison with its effect in a thorough QT study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of moxifloxacin as a positive control in a single ascending dose (SAD) study with that in a thorough QT (TQT) study. METHODS: Moxifloxacin was used as a positive control in a SAD study and a TQT study during the evaluation of the QT liability of a new drug. The SAD study had enrolled 24 males and the TQT study 25 males. Both studies intensively monitored electrocardiograms (ECGs) and pharmacokinetic sampling. Effect of moxifloxacin on QTc interval was analysed in each study by intersection union test (IUT) and by exposure-response (ER) analysis and the results compared. Cost-effectiveness of this approach was computed. RESULTS: Analysis by IUT revealed that the maximum mean (90 % confidence interval (CI)) placebo-corrected change from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) in the SAD study and the TQT study were remarkably similar (10.7 (6.5; 14.9) ms vs. 9.09 (6.20; 11.98) ms, respectively). In both studies, assay sensitivity was established by the 90 % lower bound exceeding 5 ms. ER analysis revealed the slopes in both studies to be significantly different from zero and comparable. Bootstrap-predicted effects of moxifloxacin at geometric mean concentrations of ~3000 ng/mL were 8.19 (90 % CI 5.86; 10.7) ms in the SAD study and 7.33 (90 % CI 5.69; 9.70) ms in the TQT study. CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin can be integrated effectively in a SAD study to establish assay sensitivity, and a TQT study may be replaced by a SAD study which has the required assay sensitivity. Further experience is warranted to verify this conclusion.

An open-label study to investigate the cardiac safety profile of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the cardiovascular safety of cabazitaxel, based on thorough evaluation of QT and non-QT variables, and the relationship between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic electrocardiographic (ECG) profiles and the occurrence of Grade ≥3 cardiovascular adverse events. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with cabazitaxel 25 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Digital ECG recordings were obtained during Cycle 1 over 24 h after dosing. The primary end point was effect of cabazitaxel on QT interval corrected by the Fridericia formula (QTcF). Secondary end points were additional ECG parameters (QT, PR and QRS intervals, and heart rate), plasma pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel and overall clinical safety. RESULTS: The pharmacodynamic (ECG) population included 94 patients. In 63 patients with a full 24-h ECG evaluation, the maximum upper bound of 90 % confidence interval (CI) for mean QTcF change from baseline was 7.46 ms (mean 4.8 ms), occurring at 1 h 30 min post-infusion. The slope of QTcF change from baseline versus cabazitaxel concentration was slightly negative (-0.012 [95 % CI -0.017; -0.008], equivalent to a 1.2 ms decrease per 100 ng/mL increase in cabazitaxel concentration). For non-QT variables, no effect was noted. No Grade ≥3 cardiac adverse events were observed; Grade ≥3 hypotension and lymphocele occurred in two patients and one patient, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that cabazitaxel has no clinically significant cardiovascular adverse effects in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Gene-specific effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on corrected QT interval in the long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In the long QT syndrome (LQTS) the effects of beta-blocker treatment on prevention of cardiac events differs according to the genotype. We aimed to assess the effect of beta-blocker treatment on QT/QTc duration in Type 1 LQTS (LQT1) and Type 2 LQTS (LQT2) patients. METHODS: 24-hour digital Holter ECG were recorded before and after beta-blocking therapy initiation in LQT1 (n = 30) and LQT2 patients (n = 16). QT duration was measured on consecutive 1-minute averaged QRS-T complexes leading to up to 1440 edited QT-RR pairs for each recording. We computed subject- and treatment-specific log/log QT/RR relationships which were used to correct the QT intervals. The QT duration was also evaluated at predefined heart rates and after correction using Bazett and Fridericia coefficients. RESULTS: At baseline, individual QT/RR coefficients were higher in LQT2 than in LQT1 patients (0.53 ± 0.10 vs. 0.40 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) and QT1000 was longer in LQT2 than in LQT1 patients (521 ± 38 vs. 481 ± 39 ms, P < 0.01). Beta-blockers significantly prolonged the mean RR interval (from 827 ± 161 to 939 ± 197 ms, P < 0.0001). The individual QT/RR coefficients were not significantly modified by beta-blockers. Beta-blocker treatment was associated with a prolongation of the QT1000 interval (from 481 ± 39 to 498 ± 43 ms, P < 0.01) in LQT1 patients but with a shortening in LQT2 patients (from 521 ± 38 to 503 ± 32 ms, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on QTc duration is different in LQT1 and LQT2 patients. Our data suggest that, in LQT1 patients, the well-known positive effect of beta-blockade might be associated with a prolongation of QTc duration. The mechanisms of beta-blockade protection may be different in LQT1 and in LQT2 patients.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess QTc interval prolongation of standard dose aflibercept in cancer patients treated with docetaxel.

: The effect of repeated doses of aflibercept on ventricular repolarization in cancer patients was evaluated in an intensive electrocardiogram trial. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted in 87 treated solid tumor patients. Treatment was with 6 mg/kg aflibercept, 1-hour intravenous (n = 43), or placebo (n = 44), combined with ≤75 mg/m docetaxel, every 3 weeks. Electrocardiograms were collected for 6 hours posttreatment using digital 12-lead Holter recorders, at day 1, in cycles 1 and 3. Free and vascular endothelial growth factor-bound aflibercept concentrations were assessed at similar time points. Eighty-four patients (43 placebo and 41 aflibercept) were evaluable for QT interval, Fridericia correction (QTcF) at cycle 1 and 59 (31 placebo and 28 aflibercept) at cycle 3. During cycle 3, from 30 minutes to 6 hours after the start of aflibercept, the maximum observed upper limit of the QTcF 90% confidence interval was 16 ms, for a mean of 8.4 ms. QTcF prolongation above 480 ms and 60 ms above baseline was observed in 1 aflibercept patient (2%). The slope of the relationship between free aflibercept concentration and QTcF was 0.048 (95% confidence interval, 0.013-0.082), corresponding to a 5-ms increase per 100 µg/mL increase in concentration. These results exclude a clinically important effect of aflibercept on ventricular repolarization.