Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anticancer Res ; 42(6): 3003-3009, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35641273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: A single-institution prospective study was conducted to evaluate hearing loss rate after intensity modulated radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck cancer and identify cochlear dosimetric parameters associated with hearing loss risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hearing assessment, patients' characteristics, tumor-related variables, and cochlear quantitative dosimetric factors for adults with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with CRT were prospectively collected. Each patient repeated audiometry at baseline (pre-CRT), 1 month after CRT, and then every 3 to 6 months. For each cochlea minimum dose (Dmin), mean dose (Dmean), and maximum dose (Dmax) were extracted from treatment plans. Logistic analysis was used for multivariate modeling. The relation between cochlear dosimetric factors and significant hearing loss was also analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Between January 2016 and December 2018, 35 patients (70 cochleae) were included. Most patients (n=29; 82.9%) had primary cancer in a low-risk region (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx). All patients completed the programmed CRT. During follow-up, significant hearing loss was recorded in 13 cases (37.1%). The ROC areas for significant hearing loss in relation to Dmin, Dmean, and Dmax were 0.70, 0.66, and 0.66, respectively. A dose-dependent relationship was noted between cochlear Dmin and significant hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Dmin <14.4 Gy is associated with reduced rates of significant hearing loss after concomitant cisplatin-based CRT in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Hearing Loss , Adult , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Hearing Loss/chemically induced , Humans , Prospective Studies
2.
Anticancer Res ; 41(6): 3187-3191, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34083314

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess feasibility, complications and efficacy of induction chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with bulky anal canal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal, staged bulky tumor with or without nodal involvement were prospectively enrolled. Before standard chemoradiotherapy, patients received induction chemotherapy with 3 cycles of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin and 750 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil. Patients were followed-up routinely until recurrence or death. RESULTS: Seven patients with bulky anal canal cancer were evaluable for this pilot phase of the study. All patients had human papillomavirus-negative disease. Five completed the scheduled induction chemotherapy and all patients completed the programmed concomitant chemoradiotherapy. None had severe hematological toxicity. The majority of patients (6/7) had tumor downsizing after induction treatment. Six months after chemoradiotherapy, complete response was documented in three patients and salvage surgery was performed in two cases. With a median follow-up of 38 months (range=28-48 months), two patients are disease-free survivors. CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy has the potential to become a standard approach in patients with bulky human papillomavirus-negative anal canal cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Anus Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Anus Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Female , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 21(1): 1, 2020 01 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31927649

ABSTRACT

Independently of age, evidence-based guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary treatment approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). But actually, elderly patients are grossly underrepresented in clinical trials, accounting < 10% of enrolled cases. Therefore, LARC management in elderly patients remains a crucial issue in daily practice, especially due to their frailty. Multiple clinical factors, including general health status, cognitive status, co-morbidity, disability, and life expectancy should be considered to understand the complexities of geriatric assessment and then define therapy. We use a patient-centered approach in order to tailor the optimal treatment strategy. We treat fit elderly patients as younger patients, including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Whereas, in vulnerable and frail patients, we propose standard CRT (vulnerable patients) or radiotherapy alone (frail patients).


Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Age Factors , Aged , Algorithms , Clinical Decision-Making , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Disease Management , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Rectal Neoplasms/etiology , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...