Chronic diarrhoea in adults: what not to miss.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic diarrhoea remains a diagnostic challenge, with numerous causes and few effective symptomatic treatments. This review focuses on new methods for diagnosis of common disorders and alerts readers to rarer causes through a systematic approach to the underlying mechanisms. RECENT FINDINGS: New strategies are emerging to stratify the need for endoscopic investigation. Faecal immunochemical testing, combined with standard blood tests, shows promise in excluding colorectal cancers, adenoma and inflammatory bowel disease, challenging the current use of faecal calprotectin. Serum analysis for markers of bile acid synthesis has been refined, potentially streamlining diagnostic pathways of bile acid malabsorption for those who are unable to access nuclear medicine scans, but the positive predictive value of faecal elastase in low prevalence populations has been questioned. Novel markers such as volatile organic compounds and stool DNA analyses continue to develop. SUMMARY: A systematic approach to investigation of chronic diarrhoea will ensure all relevant causes are considered and minimize the chance of a missed diagnosis. Combination of clinical features with noninvasive testing supports a judicious approach to endoscopic investigations but further innovation will be needed to resolve the diagnostic challenge that diarrhoea poses.

A low FODMAP diet is associated with changes in the microbiota and reduction in breath hydrogen but not colonic volume in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ingestion of poorly digested, fermentable carbohydrates (fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols; FODMAPs) have been implicated in exacerbating intestinal symptoms and the reduction of intake with symptom alleviation. Restricting FODMAP intake is believed to relieve colonic distension by reducing colonic fermentation but this has not been previously directly assessed. We performed a randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of a low FODMAP diet combined with either maltodextrin or oligofructose on colonic contents, metabolites and microbiota. METHODS: A parallel randomised controlled trial in healthy adults (n = 37). All subjects followed a low FODMAP diet for a week and supplemented their diet with either maltodextrin (MD) or oligofructose (OF) 7g twice daily. Fasted assessments performed pre- and post-diet included MRI to assess colonic volume, breath testing for hydrogen and methane, and stool collection for microbiota analysis. RESULTS: The low FODMAP diet was associated with a reduction in Bifidobacterium and breath hydrogen, which was reversed by oligofructose supplementation. The difference in breath hydrogen between groups post-intervention was 27ppm (95% CI 7 to 50, P<0.01). Colonic volume increased significantly from baseline in both groups (OF increased 110ml (19.6%), 95% CI 30ml to 190ml, P = 0.01; MD increased 90ml (15.5%), 95% CI 6ml to 175ml, P = 0.04) with no significant difference between them. Colonic volumes correlated with total breath hydrogen + methane. A divergence in Clostridiales abundance was observed with increased abundance of Ruminococcaceae in the maltodextrin group, while in the oligofructose group, Lachnospiraceae decreased. Subjects in either group with high methane production also tended to have high microbial diversity, high colonic volume and greater abundance of methanogens. CONCLUSION: A low FODMAP diet reduces total bacterial count and gas production with little effect on colonic volume.