Mid-Arm Point in PAEDiatrics (MAPPAED): An effective procedural aid for safe pleural decompression in trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Life-threatening thoracic trauma requires emergency pleural decompression and thoracostomy and chest drain insertion are core trauma procedures. Reliably determining a safe site for pleural decompression in children can be challenging. We assessed whether the Mid-Arm Point (MAP) technique, a procedural aid proposed for use with injured adults, would also identify a safe site for pleural decompression in children. METHODS: Children (0-18 years) attending four EDs were prospectively recruited. The MAP technique was performed, and chest wall skin marked bilaterally at the level of the MAP; no pleural decompression was performed. Radio-opaque markers were placed over the MAP-determined skin marks and corresponding intercostal space (ICS) reported using chest X-ray. RESULTS: A total of 392 children participated, and 712 markers sited using the MAP technique were analysed. Eighty-three percentage of markers were sited within the 'safe zone' for pleural decompression (4th to 6th ICSs). When sited outside the 'safe zone', MAP-determined markers were typically too caudal. However, if the site for pleural decompression was transposed one ICS cranially in children ≥4 years, the MAP technique performance improved significantly with 91% within the 'safe zone'. CONCLUSIONS: The MAP technique reliably determines a safe site for pleural decompression in children, albeit with an age-based adjustment, the Mid-Arm Point in PAEDiatrics (MAPPAED) rule: 'in children aged ≥4 years, use the MAP and go up one ICS to hit the safe zone. In children <4 years, use the MAP.' When together with this rule, the MAP technique will identify a site within the 'safe zone' in 9 out of 10 children.

Conservative post-natal management of antenatally diagnosed congenital pulmonary airway malformations.

AIM: Management of congenital pulmonary airway malformations (CPAM) is controversial, especially for asymptomatic patients. We aim to describe the clinical manifestations and management of CPAM at a tertiary paediatric hospital using a retrospective audit. METHODS: Infants with CPAM were identified on the Fetal Diagnostic Unit database from 2007 to 2014. Information on antenatal and post-natal management was collected from medical record. RESULTS: Thirty-five infants with antenatally diagnosed CPAM were included. Fetal CPAM volume ratio (CVR) was calculated from antenatal ultrasound measurement and used to categorise the infants into three groups of large (CVR ≥ 1.6, n = 8), medium (CVR of 0.5-1.6, n = 12) and small CPAM (CVR of ≤0.5, n = 15), respectively. Ten infants (10/35 = 29%) were symptomatic in the neonatal period. Overall, nine infants (26%) had surgical resection, among whom eight had large or medium-sized CPAM lesions as defined by the antenatal CVR. Three infants had neonatal emergency surgery and the remaining six had late elective surgery. Histology of eight cases showed CPAM, but one case showed congenital lobar emphysema. Criteria for surgery varied and included persistent symptoms after birth, complications during childhood and persistently abnormal chest X-ray. Most asymptomatic infants with CPAM were safely managed using a conservative approach, with no significant increase in late symptoms or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management of CPAM may be considered for infants/children who remain asymptomatic, especially those with a small lesion. For large and medium-sized CPAM, delineation using computed tomography is required, and surgery may be beneficial to prevent late symptoms and the risk of emergency surgery.