Relationship of interleukin-16 with different phenogroups in acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Interleukin-16 (IL-16) has been reported to mediate left ventricular myocardial fibrosis and stiffening in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We sought to elucidate whether IL-16 has a distinct impact on pathophysiology and prognosis across different subphenotypes of acute HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 211 patients enrolled in a prospective multicentre registry of acute decompensated HFpEF for whom serum IL-16 levels after stabilization were available (53% female, median age 81 [interquartile range 75-85] years). We divided this sub-cohort into four phenogroups using our established clustering algorithm. The study endpoint was all-cause death. Patients were subclassified into phenogroup 1 ('rhythm trouble' [n = 69]), phenogroup 2 ('ventricular-arterial uncoupling' [n = 49]), phenogroup 3 ('low output and systemic congestion' [n = 41]), and phenogroup 4 ('systemic failure' [n = 52]). After a median follow-up of 640 days, 38 patients had died. Among the four phenogroups, phenogroup 2 had the highest IL-16 level. The IL-16 level showed significant associations with indices of cardiac hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and congestion only in phenogroup 2. Furthermore, the IL-16 level had a significant predictive value for all-cause death only in phenogroup 2 (C-statistic 0.750, 95% confidence interval 0.606-0.863, P = 0.017), while there was no association between the IL-16 level and the endpoint in the other phenogroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that the serum IL-16 level had a significant association with indices that reflect the pathophysiology and prognosis of HFpEF in a specific phenogroup in acute HFpEF.

Duration of atrial fibrillation persistence: implications for recurrence risk after catheter ablation and efficacy of additional substrate ablation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) persistence for predicting poor outcomes after catheter ablation of long-standing AF (LsAF) and the best ablation strategy for these patients remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact of the duration of AF persistence on outcomes after catheter ablation of AF. METHODS: We analyzed the Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (EARNEST-PVI) trial data comparing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone (PVI-alone) with additional linear ablation or defragmentation (PVI-plus) in persistent AF (PerAF). Patients who received catheter ablation by contact force-sensing catheter were enrolled in the study. In patients with LsAF, the optimal cutoff duration of AF persistence was evaluated. With use of the threshold, patients with LsAF were divided into 2 groups and compared with PerAF <1 year for arrhythmia-free survival after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff duration was 2.4 years. Of 458 patients, arrhythmia-free survival rates for LsAF 1-2.4 years were comparable to those of PerAF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.67-1.52). However, LsAF >2.4 years had a higher recurrence risk than PerAF (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.42-3.47). In LsAF >2.4 years, the PVI-plus strategy showed advantages over the PVI-alone strategy (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.89). However, the interaction effect between LsAF 1-2.4 years and LsAF >2.4 years did not reach statistical significance (P = .116). CONCLUSION: Whereas LsAF 1-2.4 years has similar outcomes to those of PerAF, LsAF >2.4 years was linked to higher arrhythmia recurrence risks. For LsAF >2.4 years, the PVI-plus strategy showed a potential to be superior to the PVI-alone strategy.

Endoscopic view of the vertebra during laser balloon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Key Clinical Message: Left atrial posterior wall on the vertebra is often difficult to obtain stable tissue contact with ablation-catheter. Laser balloon ablation is effective because the compression from the vertebra can be visualized through endoscopy. Abstract: When performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency, left atrial posterior wall on the vertebra is often difficult to obtain stable tissue contact with ablation-catheter because of the movement of the ablation point. Laser balloon ablation is effective for the achievement of durable PVI in cases with such anatomical characteristics because the compression from the vertebra can be visualized through endoscopy.

Uplift modeling to identify patients who require extensive catheter ablation procedures among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Identifying patients who would benefit from extensive catheter ablation along with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) among those with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has been a subject of controversy. The objective of this study was to apply uplift modeling, a machine learning method for analyzing individual causal effect, to identify such patients in the EARNEST-PVI trial, a randomized trial in patients with persistent AF. We developed 16 uplift models using different machine learning algorithms, and determined that the best performing model was adaptive boosting using Qini coefficients. The optimal uplift score threshold was 0.0124. Among patients with an uplift score ≥ 0.0124, those who underwent extensive catheter ablation (PVI-plus) showed a significantly lower recurrence rate of AF compared to those who received only PVI (PVI-alone) (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19-0.84; P-value = 0.015). In contrast, among patients with an uplift score < 0.0124, recurrence of AF did not significantly differ between PVI-plus and PVI-alone (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.57-2.39; P-value = 0.661). By employing uplift modeling, we could effectively identify a subset of patients with persistent AF who would benefit from PVI-plus. This model could be valuable in stratifying patients with persistent AF who need extensive catheter ablation before the procedure.

Long-Term Impact of Additional Ablation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results From EARNEST-PVI Trial.

Background An optimal strategy for left atrial ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been determined. Methods and Results We conducted an extended follow-up of the multicenter randomized controlled EARNEST-PVI (Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) trial, which compared 12-month rhythm outcomes in patients with persistent AF between patients randomized to a PVI-alone strategy (n=248) or PVI-plus strategy (n=248; PVI followed by left atrial additional ablation, including linear ablation or ablation targeting areas with complex fractionated electrograms). The present study extended the follow-up period to 3 years after enrollment. Outcomes were compared not only between randomly allocated groups but also between on-treatment groups categorized by actually created ablation lesions. Recurrence rate of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was lower in the randomly allocated to PVI-plus group than the PVI-alone group (29.0% versus 37.5%, P=0.036). On-treatment analysis revealed that patients with PVI+linear ablation (n=205) demonstrated a lower AF/AT recurrence rate than those with PVI only (26.3% versus 37.8%, P=0.007). In contrast, patients with PVI+complex fractionated electrograms ablation (n=37) had an AF/AT recurrence rate comparable to that of patients with PVI only (40.5% versus 37.8%, P=0.76). At second ablation in 126 patients with AF/AT recurrence, ATs excluding common atrial flutter were more frequent in patients with PVI+linear ablation than in those with PVI only (32.6% versus 5.7%, P<0.0001). Conclusions Left atrial ablation in addition to PVI was efficacious during 3-year follow-up. Linear ablation was superior to other ablation strategies but may increase iatrogenic ATs. Registration URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm; Unique identifier: UMIN000019449.

Registry for Evaluating Healthy Life Expectancy and Long-Term Outcomes after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in the Very Elderly (REHEALTH AF) study: rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, observational, comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Data are lacking on the extent to which patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who are aged ≥80 years benefit from ablation treatment. The question pertains especially to patients' postablation quality of life (QoL) and long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are initiating a prospective, registry-based, multicentre observational study that will include patients aged ≥80 years with non-valvular AF who choose to undergo treatment by catheter ablation and, for comparison, such patients who do not choose to undergo ablation (either according to their physician's advice or their own preference). Study subjects are to be enrolled from 52 participant hospitals and three clinics located throughout Japan from 1 June 2022 to 31 December 2023, and each will be followed up for 1 year. The planned sample size is 660, comprising 220 ablation group patients and 440 non-ablation group patients. The primary endpoint will be the composite incidence of stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or systemic embolism (SE), another cardiovascular event, major bleeding and/or death from any cause. Other clinical events such as postablation AF recurrence, a fall or bone fracture will be recorded. We will collect standard clinical background information plus each patient's Clinical Frailty Scale score, AF-related symptoms, QoL (Five-Level Version of EQ-5D) scores, Mini-Mental State Examination (optional) score and laboratory test results, including measures of nutritional status, on entry into the study and 1 year later, and serial changes in symptoms and QoL will also be secondary endpoints. Propensity score matching will be performed to account for covariates that could affect study results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Studies issued by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Results of the study will be published in one or more peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000047023.

Peripartum Cardiomyopathy with the Cardiac Function Restored by Cabergoline.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a left ventricular systolic dysfunction associated with heart failure (HF) in late-term pregnancy or peripartum. A 29-year-old pregnant woman with no history of cardiac disease noted lower extremity edema around 34 weeks' gestation with significant weight gain. She delivered twins via caesarean section, and the edema regressed postpartum. On postpartum day 4, however, she experienced difficulty breathing at night and was diagnosed with HF owing to PPCM. HF treatment along with cabergoline was initiated. With low prolactin blood levels, her symptoms and cardiac function improved over time. This case demonstrated the usefulness of anti-prolactin therapy with cabergoline in PPCM.

Erratum to "Twice- or once-daily dosing of direct oral anticoagulants and gastrointestinal bleeding in patient with atrial fibrillation" [Am. Heart J. Plus: Cardiol. Res. Pract. Volume 22, October 2022, 100203].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100203.].

Cardiac involvement of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting as various arrythmias.

Symptomatic cardiac involvement of malignant lymphoma is rare. Silent invasion of malignant lymphoma makes it difficult to diagnose it in the early phase of clinical course. We describe a case with cardiac involvement of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting various types of arrythmias that were not diagnosed until autopsy.

Acute Myopericarditis After the Third Vaccination of BNT162b2 in a Middle-Aged Man.

Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are highly effective in preventing and decreasing disease severity, but the duration of the effect is attenuated over time and repeated vaccination is required. A 41-year-old Japanese male presented to our hospital with chest pain three days after receiving the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. After various examinations, such as endomyocardial biopsy and viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of endomyocardial biopsy tissue, we made the diagnosis of acute myopericarditis associated with booster vaccination. Here, we report a rare case of myopericarditis after booster mRNA vaccination.

Comparison of Low-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Patients <80 Versus ≥80 Years of Age With Atrial Fibrillation.

Evidence on the efficacy and safety of low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in older patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is still scarce. We conducted a single-center prospective registry of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs: the DIRECT registry (n = 2,216; follow-up, 407 ± 388 days, UMIN000033283). The whole population was divided into 2 groups: the older group (age ≥80 years, n = 548) versus the younger group (age <80 years, n = 1,668). Primary safety and efficacy end points were major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, and stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), respectively. Effects of known risk factors and low-dose DOAC on major bleeding and SSE were assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. In the older group, low-dose DOAC was associated with lower bleeding events (hazard ratio 0.279, 95% confidence interval 0.087 to 0.892, p = 0.031) but was not associated with increased SSE (p = 0.894). In the younger group, low-dose DOAC was neither associated with risk of major bleeding nor SSE (both p >0.05). In conclusion, in older patients, low-dose DOAC was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding without compromising its efficacy.

Twice- or once-daily dosing of direct oral anticoagulants and gastrointestinal bleeding in patient with atrial fibrillation.

Aims: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is widely used for the prevention of embolic stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. However, the gastrointestinal bleeding risk in several DOAC regimens was higher than warfarin, especially in once-daily regimens. Methods and results: We conducted a single-center prospective registry of patients with NVAF treated with DOACs: the DIRECT registry (N = 2216; follow-up duration 650 [IQR 103-1574] days, UMIN000033283). All patients were divided into 2 groups: the twice-daily (BID) regimen group (dabigatran and apixaban) versus the once-daily (QD) regimen group (rivaroxaban and edoxaban). Out of 2216 patients, we successfully matched 904 patients in the QD group and 904 patients in the BID group using propensity score. The primary endpoint was gastrointestinal bleeding defined as any bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract that was identified through medical records regardless of bleeding site or severity. The BID group showed a significantly lower gastrointestinal bleeding rate than the QD group (3.5/100 person-year vs. 6.2/100 person-year, log-rank P < 0.0001). The secondary endpoints were all death, stroke, major bleeding, and any bleeding. The rate of major bleeding was significantly lower in patients with BID regimen group (log-rank P = 0.040). In contrast, all death, stroke, and any bleeding did not differ between both groups (log-rank P = 0.280, 0.520 and 0.066, respectively). Conclusions: The BID regimen as compared with the QD regimen was associated with reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

The efficacy and safety of left atrial low-voltage area guided ablation for recurrence prevention compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation trial: Design and rationale.

Recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are higher in patients with a left atrial low-voltage area (LVA) than those without. However, the efficacy of LVA guided ablation is still unknown. The purpose of this study-the Efficacy and Safety of Left Atrial Low-voltage Area Guided Ablation for Recurrence Prevention Compared to Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation trial (SUPPRESS-AF trial)-is to elucidate whether LVA guided ablation in addition to PVI is superior to PVI alone in patients with persistent AF. The Osaka Cardiovascular Conference will conduct a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial aiming to examine whether LVA guided ablation in addition to PVI is superior to PVI alone in patients with persistent AF and LVAs. The primary outcome is the recurrence of AF documented by scheduled or symptom-driven electrocardiography (ECG) during the 1 year follow-up period after the index ablation. The key secondary endpoints include all-cause death, symptomatic stroke, bleeding events, and other complications related to the procedure. A total of 340 patients with an LVA will be enrolled and followed up to 1 year. The SUPPRESS-AF trial is a randomized controlled trial designed to assess whether LVA guided ablation in addition to PVI is superior to PVI alone for patients with persistent AF and LVAs detected while undergoing their first catheter ablation.

Recurrent Fulminant Myocarditis Accompanied by Lymphoid Follicle Formation in Myocardium.

A 76-year-old man developed repeated fulminant myocarditis in a short period, and immunosuppressive therapy was remarkably effective. A pathologic evaluation showed that inflammatory cells had infiltrated the myocardium. Not only invasion of inflammatory cells but also the formation of lymphoid follicle was noted. Chronic myocardial inflammation was proven, but cardiac sarcoidosis was negative according to the results of various examinations. This is the first report of recurrent autoimmune myocarditis with a lymphoid follicle in the myocardium. These findings may suggest a novel pathogenesis of myocarditis.

Persistent Systemic Inflammation Is Associated With Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of systemic inflammation on bleeding risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).Methods and Results:We conducted a single-center prospective registry of 2,216 NVAF patients treated with DOAC: the DIRECT registry (UMIN000033283). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured ≤3 months before (pre-DOAC hsCRP) and 6±3 months after initiation of DOAC (post-DOAC hsCRP). Multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the influence of systemic inflammation and conventional bleeding risk factors on major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Based on the findings, we created a new bleeding risk assessment score: the ORBIT-i score, which included post-DOAC hsCRP >0.100 mg/dL and all components of the ORBIT score. A total of 1,848 patients had both pre- and post-DOAC hsCRP data (follow-up duration, 460±388 days). Post-DOAC hsCRP was associated with major bleeding (OR, 2.770; 95% CI: 1.687-4.548, P<0.001). Patients with post-DOAC hsCRP >0.100 mg/dL more frequently had major bleeding than those without (log-rank test, P<0.001). ORBIT-i score had the highest C-index of 0.711 (95% CI, 0.654-0.769) compared with the ORBIT and HAS-BLED scores. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent systemic inflammation was associated with major bleeding risk. ORBIT-i score had a higher discriminative performance compared with the conventional bleeding risk scores.

Impact of Angioscopic Evaluation for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis Before and After Excimer Laser Atherectomy.

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a prevalent problem following stenting of femoropopliteal lesions. A potential novel treatment modality for ISR including excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) has become available. We performed ELA for in-stent chronic total occlusion (CTO) of femoropopliteal lesions and evaluated lesion morphology before and after ELA by angioscopy in 2 patients. The angioscopic findings clearly showed removal of in-stent thrombi after ELA. Thus, ELA may be effective for in-stent CTO of femoropopliteal lesions. This is the first report describing the direct visualization of ELA effect for vaporization of thrombi in femoropopliteal in-stent lesions by angioscopy.

Comparison of Angiographic and 1-Year Outcomes Between a Long Single Stent and Overlapping Double Stents in Patients With Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Long Narrowings.

Although some clinical studies have revealed adverse clinical and angiographic outcomes of early-generation overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES), the safety and efficacy of overlapping newer-generation DES for long narrowings have not been well established. This study aimed to compare angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes between a long single stent (LSS) and overlapping double stents (ODS) in patients treated with newer-generation DES for similarly long narrowings. We analyzed 8 to 10 months angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes of 112 lesions of 105 patients with long (30 to 38 mm) narrowings treated with everolimus-eluting stent, a newer-generation DES, using LSS or ODS. We divided our patients into LSS group (46 patients with 49 lesions) and ODS group (59 patients with 63 lesions). As a result, the rates of freedom from major adverse cardiac events (92.9% vs 93.1%, p = 0.91) and target lesion revascularization (94.5% vs 95.1%, p = 0.79) during 1-year follow-up were similar between the 2 groups. There was no stent thrombosis observed between the 2 groups. In conclusion, everolimus-eluting stent provided similar angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes regardless of overlap status in long narrowings.

Different risk factors for bleeding and discontinuation between dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether risk factors for bleeding and discontinuation are different between dabigatran and rivaroxaban. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who received dabigatran or rivaroxaban, had a CHADS2 score >1 and creatinine clearance >30ml/min. During this period, only dabigatran and rivaroxaban were available as non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in our hospital. We compared the clinical and demographic data and the incidence of bleeding for one year between dabigatran group and rivaroxaban group. As a result, the dabigatran group consisted of 177 patients and the rivaroxaban group consisted of 179 patients. The incidence of discontinuation was significantly higher in the dabigatran group than in the rivaroxaban group (27.7% vs. 13.4%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis, even after propensity score-matching analysis, revealed that there were no independent risk factors for bleeding in the dabigatran group, while in the rivaroxaban group, use of antiplatelet therapy was an independent factor correlating with bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for bleeding may be different between dabigatran and rivaroxaban. To avoid bleeding, rivaroxaban should be prescribed with caution or avoided in patients using antiplatelet therapy. Upon discontinuation, rivaroxaban may be more favorable than dabigatran.