ABSTRACT
Ischemic heart disease, associated with high morbidity and mortality, represents a major challenge for the development of drug-based strategies to improve its prognosis. Results of pre-clinical studies suggest that agonists of cannabinoid CB2 receptors and multitarget cannabidiol might be potential cardioprotective strategies against ischemia-reperfusion injury. The aim of our study was to re-evaluate the cardioprotective effects of cannabinoids against ischemia-reperfusion injury according to the IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria published recently by the European Union (EU) CARDIOPROTECTION COST ACTION. To meet the minimum criteria of those guidelines, experiments should be performed (i) on healthy small animals subjected to ischemia with reperfusion lasting for at least 2 hours and (ii) confirmed in small animals with comorbidities and co-medications and (iii) in large animals. Our analysis revealed that the publications regarding cardioprotective effects of CB2 receptor agonists and cannabidiol did not meet all three strict steps of IMPACT. Thus, additional experiments are needed to confirm the cardioprotective activities of (endo)cannabinoids mainly on small animals with comorbidities and on large animals. Moreover, our publication underlines the significance of the IMPACT criteria for a proper planning of preclinical experiments regarding cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury.
ABSTRACT
We studied whether the function of presynaptic inhibitory cannabinoid CB1 receptors on the sympathetic nerve fibres innervating resistance vessels is increased in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) like in deoxycorticosterone (DOCA)-salt hypertension. An increase in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was induced by electrical stimulation of the preganglionic sympathetic neurons or by phenylephrine injection in pithed SHR and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). The electrically (but not the phenylephrine) induced increase in DBP was inhibited by the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP55940, similarly in both groups, and by the endocannabinoid reuptake inhibitor AM404 in SHR only. The effect of CP55940 was abolished/reduced by the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (in both groups) and in WKY by endocannabinoid degradation blockade, i.e., the monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inhibitor MJN110 and the dual fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)/MAGL inhibitor JZL195 but not the FAAH inhibitor URB597. MJN110 and JZL195 tended to enhance the effect of CP55940 in SHR. In conclusion, the function of presynaptic inhibitory CB1 receptors depends on the hypertension model. Although no differences occurred between SHR and WKY under basal experimental conditions, the CB1 receptor function was better preserved in SHR when the endocannabinoid tone was increased by the inhibition of MAGL or the endocannabinoid transporter.