A Cross-sectional Study on the Prevalence of Cervical Dysplasia Among Women With Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of cervical dysplasia among migrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) at a specialized clinic in Switzerland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study. We reviewed the electronic medical records of all women who attended a specialized FGM/C clinic at the Geneva University Hospitals between 2010 and 2016. We examined sociodemographic data, sexually transmitted infections, FGM/C types, Pap smear results, and follow-up in women diagnosed with cervical dysplasia. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty records were reviewed and 338 women were included. The average age was 33 years (SD = 7.47 years). Most women were from Eritrea and Somalia (n = 204, 60.4%) and had FGM/C type III (n = 188, 55.6%). A total of 12.4% (n = 42) of the patients had abnormal Pap smears: 1.5% (n = 5) with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), 7.9% (n = 27) with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and 2.9% (n = 10) with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or higher (HSIL +). Of the 37 patients with dysplasia, 22 (59.4%) completed follow-up and 15 (40.5%) received incomplete follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion+ among migrant women with FGM/C is high (2.95%) compared with the general Swiss population (0.58%). Follow-up for cervical dysplasia must be improved by increasing provider knowledge of this patient population and by addressing barriers to care.

HPV self-sampling in the follow-up of women after treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: A prospective study in a high-income country.

Current follow-up strategy for women after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) is burdened by a low compliance. We evaluated the performance of home-based Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling (Self-HPV) after treatment for CIN with the aim to assess the (i) feasibility and (ii) follow-up compliance. This study took place at the Geneva University Hospitals between May 2016 and September 2020. Women aged 18 years or older, undergoing LLETZ for a biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or worse (CIN1 + ) were invited to participate. Agreement statistics, interpreted according to the scale of κ values, were calculated for Self-HPV and HPV performed by the physician (Dr-HPV). The samples were analyzed using GeneXpert and Cobas. Sample size was calculated to provide a 10% precision to estimate the kappa coefficient. A total of 127 women were included, with a median age of 35 years (interquartile range 30-41 years). There was a substantial agreement between Self-HPV and Dr-HPV using GeneXpert at 6 and 12 months, with a κ value of 0.63 (95%CI: 0.47-0.79) and 0.66 (95%CI: 0.50-0.82), respectively. Up to 9/10 (90%) women who did not come to their follow-up visit did not send their Self-HPV, either. In the follow-up after LLETZ treatment, home-based self-HPV is feasible, with substantial agreement between the two groups, however, concern remains regarding adherence to Self-HPV performance at home and loss to follow-up. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT02780960.

Self-sampling to improve cervical cancer screening coverage in Switzerland: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether self-sampling can increase screening attendance of women who do not attend regular screening in Switzerland. METHODS: Participants were proactively recruited in Geneva between September 2011 and November 2015. Women (25-69 years) who had not undergone CC screening in the last 3 years were considered eligible. Through a 1 : 1 ratio randomisation, enrolled participants were invited to either undergo liquid-based cytology, which was performed by a health-care provider (control group, CG) or to take a self-sample for HPV-testing, which was mailed to their home (intervention group, IG). RESULTS: A total of 331 and 336 women were randomised in the CG and in the IG, respectively. Overall, 7.3% (95% CI: 4.9-10.6) women in the CG and 5.7% (95% CI: 3.6-8.7) women in the IG did not undergo the initial screening (P=0.400). There were 1.95% (95% CI: 0.8-4.3) women in the CG and 5.05% (95% CI: 3.1-8.1) women in the IG with a positive screen who did not attend triage and colposcopy (P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The participation in CC screening in women offered self-sampling was not higher than among those offered specimen collection by a clinician. Compliance with further follow-up for women with a positive HPV test on the self-sample requires further attention.