Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Am J Eval ; 44(3): 353-373, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37719780

ABSTRACT

Organizational evaluation policies describe how evaluation practices should be structured and implemented. As such, they provide key insights into organizational priorities and values regarding evaluation. However, the link between evaluation policies and how evaluation policies translate into concrete practices has seldom been explored until now. Our study examines the implementation of two Canadian federal government evaluation policies over a 10-year timespan, through the secondary analysis of reports produced on behalf of governmental evaluation functions. Our findings show that some policy elements have been fully implemented, but the way in which these have been implemented varies between organizations. Further, we observed that the level of control of various organizational members responsible for implementing policy elements, as well as time, can influence implementation of certain policy requirements. We conclude by proposing further directions for research to examine the policy-practice link.

2.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 3(5): e0001156, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37224115

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, growing evidence from the United States, the United Kingdom, and China has demonstrated the unequal social and economic burden of this health crisis. Yet, in Canada, studies assessing the socioeconomic and demographic determinants of COVID-19, and how these determinants vary by gender and ethnic minority status, remain scarce. As new strains of COVID-19 emerge, it is important to understand the disparities to be able to initiate policies and interventions that target and prioritise the most at-risk sub-populations. AIM: The objective of this study is to assess the socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with COVID-19-related symptoms in Canada, and how these determinants vary by identity factors including gender and visible minority status. METHODS: We implemented an online survey and collected a nationally representative sample of 2,829 individual responses. The original data collected via the SurveyMonkey platform were analysed using a cross-sectional study. The outcome variables were COVID-19-related symptoms among respondents and their household members. The exposure variables were socioeconomic and demographic factors including gender and ethnicity as well as age, province, minority status, level of education, total annual income in 2019, and number of household members. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to test the associations. The results were presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) at p < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: We found that the odds of having COVID-19-related symptoms were higher among respondents who belong to mixed race [aOR = 2.77; CI = 1.18-6.48] and among those who lived in provinces other than Ontario and Quebec [aOR = 1.88; CI = 1.08-3.28]. There were no significant differences in COVID-19 symptoms between males and females, however, we did find a significant association between the province, ethnicity, and reported COVID-19 symptoms for female respondents but not for males. The likelihood of having COVID-19-related symptoms was also lower among respondents whose total income was $100,000 or more in 2019 [aOR = 0.18; CI = 0.07-0.45], and among those aged 45-64 [aOR = 0.63; CI = 0.41-0.98] and 65-84 [aOR = 0.42; CI = 0.28-0.64]. These latter associations were stronger among non-visible minorities. Among visible minorities, being black or of the mixed race and living in Alberta were associated with higher odds of COVID-19-related symptoms. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ethnicity, age, total income in 2019, and province were significantly associated with experiencing COVID-19 symptoms in Canada. The significance of these determinants varied by gender and minority status. Considering our findings, it will be prudent to have COVID-19 mitigation strategies including screening, testing, and other prevention policies targeted toward the vulnerable populations. These strategies should also be designed to be specific to each gender category and ethnic group, and to account for minority status.

3.
Sante Publique ; 34(4): 557-567, 2022.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36577682

ABSTRACT

Introduction : The case of Ebola in Guinea (2013-2016) revealed weaknesses in the resilience of the health system and highlighted the challenge of coordinating all actors in the response. After the epidemic, national authorities and their international partners began to strengthen the health system. In 2021, Guinea faced COVID-19 simultaneously with the resurgence of Ebola and other diseases with epidemic potential.Purpose of research : The objective of this article is to analyze the evolution of the five characteristics of health resilience of Kruk et al. (2015) in the Guinean context. To do this, data triangulation was carried out through a literature review, 41 semi-structured interviews with international, national and local stakeholders, and 37 events observed in the post-Ebola period.Results : Our results show that the characteristic of integration was the most important in our study. This is because of the importance of coordination, communication and information sharing among stakeholders during crises. Then, diversity exposes the need to be able to face several health challenges simultaneously. Efforts were focused on Ebola during the first outbreak, but since the COVID-19 pandemic, Guinea has been able to cope with several health challenges. Raising awareness, on the other hand, necessitates an understanding of the context, its strengths, and weaknesses. Guinea learned lessons from Ebola and implemented a program to strengthen the emergency response system. On self-regulation, the speed of the response relies on mechanisms for early detection, notification, and response. The country is now well resourced and has proven information and response mechanisms. Finally, constant adaptability by taking into account lessons learned allows us to set course and prepare for other potential crises and this is what is being done constantly.Conclusions : Given Guinea’s ubiquitous fragility before Ebola, the health system is still not fully resilient. However, gains in each of the characteristics of resilience improve the response to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Humans , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Guinea/epidemiology , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks
4.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0277238, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36395148

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During major pandemics such as COVID-19, the fear of being infected, uncertain prognoses, and the imposition of restrictions may result in greater odds of emotional and psychological distress. Hence, the present study examines the predictors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, and how they differ by gender. METHODS: Data of 2,756 adults aged 18 years and above from a cross-sectional online survey conducted between July and October 2020 was used for this study. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out. The results were presented as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with their respective confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Lower odds of psychological distress were found among males compared to females and among individuals aged 45-64 or 65-84 years compared to those aged 18-44. The odds of psychological distress decreased with a rise in income, with individuals whose annual income was greater than or equal to $100,000 being less likely to experience psychological distress compared to those whose income was less than $20,000. The odds of psychological distress were higher among residents of Ontario compared to residents of Quebec. Similarly, the odds of psychological distress were higher among individuals who reported experiencing COVID-19 symptoms compared to those who did not report any COVID-19 symptoms. The disaggregated results by gender showed that age, province, and self-reported COVID-19 symptoms had significant associations with psychological distress in both males and females, but these effects were more pronounced among females compared to males. In addition, income was negatively associated with psychological distress for both males and females, with this effect being stronger among males. CONCLUSION: Five exposure variables (gender, age, province, experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, and total annual income in 2019) significantly predicted the likelihood of reporting psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Clearly, there is an imminent need to provide mental health support services to vulnerable groups. Additionally, interventions and policies aimed at combating psychological distress during pandemics such as COVID-19 should be gender specific.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychological Distress , Adult , Male , Female , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Ontario/epidemiology
5.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e056229, 2022 03 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35246421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Studies on the management of the COVID-19 pandemic through testing have been conducted in countries that have been hardest hit by this pandemic. Considering the importance of testing in containing the spread of COVID-19, it is useful to have evidence on continuing COVID-19 testing even in countries where the prevalence of COVID-19 is relatively low. We, therefore, examined the association between reported COVID-19 symptoms and testing for COVID-19 in Canada. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: We conducted an online survey using the SurveyMonkey platform between July and October 2020 across Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample size of 2790 adult individuals was used. RESULTS: Our findings show that respondents who reported that they and/or members of their households had COVID-19 symptoms were more likely to test for COVID-19 (adjusted OR, aOR 1.91; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.76) as compared with those who did not report COVID-19 symptoms. The likelihood of testing for COVID-19 was lower among male respondents compared with females (aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.96), respondents aged 65-84 compared with those aged 18-44 (aOR 0.62; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.93), and respondents in British Columbia compared with those residing in Quebec. Higher odds of testing for COVID-19 were found among respondents who lived in Alberta compared with those who lived in Quebec (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.75) and respondents who had postgraduate education compared with those with high school or less education (aOR 1.84; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.36). The association between reported COVID-19 symptoms and testing for COVID-19 was statistically significant among female respondents (aOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.81 to 3.52) but not among male respondents. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study provides evidence in support of the hypothesis that there is significant association between reported COVID-19 symptoms and COVID-19 testing among adult Canadians. The study highlights the need for the Canadian government to prioritise subpopulations (ie, males, those aged 65-85, and those with high school or less education) that have lower likelihood of seeking COVID-19 testing to get tested when they have symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alberta , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Canada/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL