Prospective Study on the Influence of Occupational Hand Protection Products on the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection.

BACKGROUND: To prevent occupational skin diseases, employees are instructed to periodically apply hand protection products as a barrier to protect their hands from water, cleaning agents or other irritants. The aim of this work was to investigate whether bacteria present on the skin at the time of protection product application are enclosed underneath this protective layer, if they can be transferred to other surfaces and if a standard isopropanol-based skin disinfectant can nonetheless reduce the bacterial burden. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in human volunteers based on the European Standard (EN 1500) to assess the burden of microorganisms before and after the application of various protection product formulations and subsequent hand disinfection. RESULTS: All protection products, with the exception of alcohol-based gels, enclosed bacteria underneath a lipid layer which could be transferred onto other surfaces. Still, the hand disinfectant efficiently reduced the bacteria burden. DISCUSSION: In occupations where proper hand hygiene is vital, alcohol-based gels might be the best option for the protection of the skin barrier as well as for reducing the contamination risk. CONCLUSION: An alcohol-based disinfection agent can dissolve the lipid film of protection products following the standard protocol for hygienic hand disinfection.

In vitro and Ex vivo Assessments of the Compatibility of Fibrin Sealant with Antimicrobial Compounds.

Background: Fibrin sealants are used as antimicrobial-releasing carriers for preventing surgical site infections; however, it is important to determine the release kinetics and antimicrobial effects of drugs added to fibrin sealants and the effects of drugs on clot/clotting properties. Materials and Methods: The antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of cefazolin, colistin, gentamicin, oxacillin, tobramycin, and silver nitrate released from fibrin sealant were characterized using in vitro and ex vivo assays against bacteria commonly found on the skin. The effects of antimicrobial agents on the physical structure of the fibrin sealant were assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and on the clotting rate and strength of fibrin clots using run-off tests and rheology. Results: Generally, antibiotic agents were released gradually from fibrin sealant and were stable after release, with antimicrobial effects evident up to three days. Cefazolin, gentamicin, and oxacillin prevented biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus in porcine skin explants; gentamicin and colistin prevented biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gentamicin, cefazolin, colistin, and tobramycin did not affect the structural integrity or viscoelastic properties of fibrin sealant; changes were observed with oxacillin (SEM) and particularly silver nitrate (SEM and rheology). No antimicrobial agents caused deterioration of clotting time (run-off tests). Conclusions: From the antimicrobial agents tested, gentamicin and cefazolin showed prolonged release from fibrin sealant, sustained antimicrobial activity, and biofilm prevention properties against Staphylococcus aureus; similar results were observed for gentamicin and colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For each of these findings, the physical structure of the fibrin sealant, clotting rate, and strength of fibrin clots were unaffected.

A comparative high-resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance.

Fibrin sealants are well-established components of the surgical toolbox, especially in procedures that harbor a high risk of perioperative bleeding. Their widespread use as hemostats, sealants or tissue-adhesives in various surgical settings has shown that the choice of the appropriate sealant system affects the clinical outcome. While many studies have compared the hemostatic efficiency of fibrin sealants to that of other natural or synthetic sealants, there is still limited data on how subtle differences in fibrin sealant formulations relate to their biological performance. Here, we performed an in-depth physicochemical and biological characterization of the two most commonly used fibrin sealants in the US and Europe: TISSEEL™ ("FS") and VISTASEAL™/VERASEAL™ ("FS+Osm"). Our chemical analyses demonstrated differences between the two sealants, with lower fibrinogen concentrations and supraphysiological osmolality in the FS+Osm formulation. Rheological testing revealed FS clots have greater clot stiffness, which strongly correlated with network density. Ultrastructural analysis by scanning electron microscopy revealed differences between FS and FS+Osm fibrin networks, the latter characterized by a largely amorphous hydrogel structure in contrast to the physiological fibrillar network of FS. Cytocompatibility experiments with human fibroblasts seeded on FS and FS+Osm fibrin networks, or cultured in presence of sealant extracts, revealed that FS+Osm induced apoptosis, which was not observed with FS. Although differential sealant osmolality and amounts of fibrinogen, as well as the presence of Factor XIII or additives such as antifibrinolytics, may explain the mechanical and structural differences observed between the two fibrin sealants, none of these substances are known to cause apoptosis at the respective concentrations in the sealant formulation. We thus conclude that hyper osmolality in the FS+Osm formulation is the primary trigger of apoptosis-a mechanism that should be evaluated in more detail, as it may affect the cellular wound healing response in situ.