A Simple Technique for Deploying the SENTINEL Cerebral Protection System in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy.

The SENTINEL Cerebral Protection System is one of the most commonly used devices for embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. However, successful deployment of the SENTINEL device is often challenging in patients with a bovine aortic arch anatomy using the standard technique and requires extensive manipulation in the aortic arch increasing the risk of stroke. We describe a novel and simple technique of 2-filter deployment of SENTINEL device in patients with bovine arch anatomy. In this technique, after the deployment of the proximal filter, the device is hyperflexed on itself facing the lateral aspect of the ascending aorta instead of facing the descending aorta, with its tip pointing toward the common origin of the left common carotid artery (LCCA) and brachiocephalic trunk. The guidewire is then advanced to the LCCA. Since the guidewire can pass either anterior or posterior to the device shaft, the device needs to be untwisted either by clockwise or counterclockwise motion, before pulling the device shaft back to engage the LCCA, after which the distal filter can be deployed. Computed tomography scans obtained for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement should be reviewed for the presence of bovine aortic arch anatomy so that this technique can be deployed directly, thereby reducing manipulations in the aortic arch, saving time, and not requiring additional equipment.

Cerebral emboli detection and autonomous neuromonitoring using robotic transcranial Doppler with artificial intelligence for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with and without embolic protection devices: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Periprocedural ischemic stroke remains a serious complication in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We used a novel robotic transcranial Doppler (TCD) system equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) for real-time continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring during TAVR to establish the safety and potential validity of this tool in detecting cerebral emboli, report the quantity and distribution of high intensity transient signals (HITS) with and without cerebral protection, and correlate HITS occurrence with various procedural steps. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR procedures during which the robotic system was used between October 2021 and May 2022 were prospectively enrolled in this pilot study. The robotic TCD system included autonomous adjustment of the TCD probes and AI-assisted post-processing of HITS and other cerebral flow parameters. Basic demographics and procedural details were recorded. Continuous variables were analyzed by a two-sample Mann-Whitney t-test and categorical variables by a χ2 or Fisher test. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were prospectively enrolled (mean age 79.9±7.6 years; 16 men (51.6%)). Mean aortic valve stenotic area was 0.7 cm2 and mean aortic-ventricular gradient was 43 mmHg (IQR 31.5-50 mmHg). Cerebral protection was used in 16 cases (51.6%). Significantly fewer emboli were observed in the protection group than in the non-protection group (mean 470.38 vs 693.33; p=0.01). Emboli counts during valve positioning and implantation were significantly different in the protection and non-protection groups (mean 249.92 and 387.5, respectively; p=0.01). One (4%) transient ischemic attack occurred post-procedurally in the non-protection group. CONCLUSION: We describe a novel real-time intraoperative neuromonitoring tool used in patients undergoing TAVR. Significantly fewer HITS were detected with protection. Valve positioning-implantation was the most significant stage for intraprocedural HITS.

A Case of Unintentional Release of the Watchman FLX Device During Implantation: A Cautionary Tale.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that increases the risk of stroke and other cardiovascular complications. The Watchman FLX device is a percutaneous device used for the closure of the left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation and prevents blood clots from forming, thereby decreasing the risk of stroke. However, device dislodgement during the procedure can occur and compromise the effectiveness of the device. In this case report, we present the experience of an 86-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and recent gastrointestinal bleeding due to diverticulosis. During the procedure, the device became dislodged prior to the planned release from the shaft due to the difficult anatomy of the appendage, which caused the operator to over-torque and kink the delivery sheath. The kinked sheath prevented the transmission of torque to the appropriate region of the sheath and caused the device to unscrew prematurely. Fortunately, the device was self-deployed in a satisfactory position, and no further intervention was required. The patient did not experience any complications prior to discharge and follow-up echocardiography showed proper positioning of the device. This case highlights the importance of careful technique during the Watchman FLX procedure and the need to replace the delivery sheath if kinking is noted to prevent unintentional dislodgement of the device. In addition, the case was written with the aid of the artificial intelligence-powered language model ChatGPT and demonstrates its benefits as well as calls for caution while using it for medical writing.

Superior safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to Warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and underlying cancer: a national veterans affairs database study.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating safety of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking. METHODS & RESULTS: All patients (n = 196,521) receiving care at veteran's affairs with active cancer and AF from 2010-2015 were included. One-year mortality was significantly higher in unadjusted analysis with warfarin (44.9%) compared to dabigatran (25%, P < 0.001), rivaroxaban (24.4%, P < 0.001) and apixaban (30%, P < 0.001) and after adjusting for age, sex and type of cancer mortality (OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 2.52-2.82, P < 0.001). Risk of ischemic stroke (13.5% vs. 11.1%, 12.0%, 14.0%) was similar, however risk of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly higher among patients receiving warfarin (1.2%) compared to patients receiving dabigatran (0.5%), rivaroxaban (0.7%) and apixaban (0.8%) respectively, P = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the superior safety profile of DOACs compared to warfarin among patients with underlying cancer and AF. Warfarin was associated with higher mortality, similar ischemic stroke risk but higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

Inter- and Intraoperator Variability in Measurement of On-Site CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Structural and Fluid Analysis: A Comprehensive Analysis.

PURPOSE: To measure the inter- and intraobserver variability among operators of varying expertise in conducting CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT FFR) measurements on-site by using structural and fluid analysis and to evaluate differences in reproducibility between two different training methods for end users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the prospectively enrolled cohort included 22 symptomatic patients who underwent both 320-detector row coronary CT angiography and catheter-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) within 90 days. Thirteen operators of varying expertise were assigned to one of two training arms: arm 1, on-site training by a specialist in CT FFR technology; arm 2, self-training through use of written materials. After the training, all 13 operators reviewed the CT data and measured CT FFR in 24 vessels in 22 patients. Inter- and intraoperator variability and agreements between CT FFR and catheter-derived FFR measurements were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) among operators was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.58, 0.83) with a mean absolute difference (± standard deviation) of 0.027 ± 0.022. The operators in arm 2 showed greater interoperator differences than those in arm 1 (0.031 ± 0.024 vs 0.023 ± 0.018; P = .024). Among operators who recalculated CT FFR, the mean CT FFR value did not significantly differ between the first and second calculations (ICC, 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.46, 0.87), with the medical specialists producing the lowest intraoperator variability (0.053 ± 0.060). The overall correlation coefficient between CT FFR and catheter FFR was r = 0.61, with a mean absolute difference of 0.096 ± 0.089. CONCLUSION: Good reproducibility of CT FFR values calculated on-site on the basis of structural and fluid analysis was observed among operators of varying expertise. Face-to-face training sessions may cause less variability.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.

Third-degree atrioventricular block followed by syncope, labile hypertension, and orthostatic hypotension in a patient with nasopharyngeal cancer: baroreflex failure.

Baroreflex failure is a rare cause of syncope and labile blood pressures. Here, we present a case of baroreflex failure in a patient with history of nasopharyngeal cancer, status-post neck radiation. A 76-year-old male presented from an outside facility for possible pacemaker placement as he was found to have symptomatic third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block. The AV block resolved following discontinuation of the patient's his verapamil. The patient then developed labile blood pressures. A work-up for secondary causes of hypertension was negative, but due to the patient's neck radiation history, it was suggested that the labile blood pressures were due to baroreflex failure. We then started the patient on clonidine and other nonpharmacological interventions. The blood pressure was maintained after these treatments and on follow-up, the labile blood pressures had resolved. Our case demonstrates that baroreflex failure can be managed without any invasive intervention by performing frequent blood pressure measurements along with medication management.