ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate if the Strokefinder MD 100 by Medfield Diagnostics AB can be used as a point of care device in overcrowded Emergency Departments (ED). Patients and Methods: We used the strokefinder MD 100 by Medfield Diagnostics AB in two Greek National Health System (NHS) Hospitals Emergency Departments. Our research protocol was approved by local scientific and ethics committees. We prospectively enrolled 71 adult patients from two NHS emergency departments in whom stroke was included as a differential diagnosis after triage. The feasibility of using the Strokefinder MD 100 by Medfield Diagnostics AB in various emergency department settings was evaluated through a structured questionnaire. Results: The strokefinder MD 100 was used on 71 patients in various settings in the Emergency Department. In every case, the test was completed at the patient bedside without interfering with other ongoing and diagnostic and resuscitation procedures. There was no additional delay to patient care caused by performing the test when compared with current local Emergency Department practice and protocol. In almost 90% of the cases, a clear result was produced by the device. Conclusion: The Strokefinder MD 100 can be safely used as a point of care device by all trained healthcare professionals, in the most overcrowded emergency department, in various ED locations. MeSH terms: Point of Care Systems, Cerebrovascular Stroke, Proof of Concept Study.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Surgical site infections (SSI) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and they occur more frequently during unplanned emergency surgical (ES) procedures rather than elective. Our aim was to determine the incidence of SSI within our ES cohort and to identify risk factors for SSI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from consecutive patients undergoing ES in a single institution during a 5-year period were prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 838 consecutive patients were included. The median age was 52 (IQR=25-71) years and some 368 (44%) were female. 157 (18.7%) of those patients developed SSI. The most commonly isolated pathogen was E. Coli (55.4%) followed by Staphylococcus Aureus (40.1%). The 30-day mortality rate of patients who presented SSIs was 14.6% compared to 6.8% of patients without SSI (p=0.002). Multivariable analysis showed that the type of wound, American Society of Anesthesiology score, severity and duration of surgery >90 min were independent risk factors for the occurrence of SSI. CONCLUSION: Identification of modifiable causative factors for SSI within an ES unit is paramount as they can critically impact postoperative outcomes.
