Technical assessment of different extraction methods and transcriptome profiling of RNA isolated from small volumes of blood.

Transcriptome profiling of human whole blood is used to discover biomarkers of diseases and to assess phenotypic traits. Recently, finger-stick blood collection systems have allowed a less invasive and quicker collection of peripheral blood. Such non-invasive sampling of small volumes of blood offers practical advantages. The quality of gene expression data is strictly dependent on the steps used for the sample collection, extraction, preparation and sequencing. Here we have: (i) compared the manual and automated RNA extraction of small volumes of blood using the Tempus Spin RNA isolation kit and the MagMAX for Stabilized Blood RNA Isolation kit , respectively; and (ii) assessed the effect of TURBO DNA Free treatment on the transcriptomic data of RNA isolated from small volumes of blood. We have used the QuantSeq 3' FWD mRNA-Seq Library Prep kit to prepare RNA-seq libraries, which were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 500 system. The samples isolated manually displayed a higher variability in the transcriptomic data as compared to the other samples. The TURBO DNA Free treatment affected the RNA samples negatively, decreasing the RNA yield and reducing the quality and reproducibility of the transcriptomic data. We conclude that automated extraction systems should be preferred over manual extraction systems for data consistency, and that the TURBO DNA Free treatment should be avoided when working on RNA samples isolated manually from small volumes of blood.

Gene Expression Profiling of FFPE Samples: A Titration Test.

The gene expression analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues is often hampered by poor RNA quality, which results from the oxidation, cross-linking and other chemical modifications induced by the inclusion in paraffin. Yet, FFPE samples are a valuable source for molecular studies and can provide great insights into disease progression and prognosis. With the advancement of genomic technologies, new methods have been established that offer reliable and accurate gene expression workflows on samples of poor quality. NanoString is a probe-based technology that allows the direct counting of the mRNA transcripts and can be applied to degraded samples. Here, we have tested 2 RNA extraction methods for FFPE samples, and we have performed a titration experiment to evaluate the impact of RNA degradation and RNA input on the gene expression profiles assessed using the NanoString IO360 panel. We have selected FFPE samples of different DV200 values and assessed them on the nCounter platform with 2 different amounts of input RNA. This study concludes that the nCounter is a robust and reliable platform to assess the gene expression of RNA samples with DV200 > 30%; its robustness and ease of use could be of particular benefit to clinical settings.

When Mosquito HV bites Biomark HD: An automated workflow for high-throughput qPCR.

Automation solutions can significantly improve sample processing efficiency and can be of particular help in core facility settings. Centralized core facilities are being established world-wide aimed at strengthening institutions' clinical and research enterprises and at addressing the need to process large volumes of samples on expensive cutting-edge technologies in a limited time. High-throughput qPCR profiling is a service offered by most genomics facilities. Several platforms have been developed to process large numbers of samples in a short time, including the Fluidigm Biomark HD, which has also been proved useful to increase the SARS-CoV-2 testing capacities. Several automation systems are currently available to miniaturize volumes and improve bioanalytical workflows, including the SPT Labtech Mosquito HV system. Here we have applied the Mosquito HV platform for the automation of the sample preparation of the Fluidigm gene expression workflow. We have successfully automated the pre-amplification and exonuclease cleanup steps with the aim of reducing manual error and sample processing time. We show consistency in the expression of reference genes when assessing pooled RNA control samples for the manual and automated workflows of Fluidigm gene expression profiling.

Human sample authentication in biomedical research: comparison of two platforms.

Samples used in biomedical research are often collected over years, in some cases from subjects that may have died and thus cannot be retrieved in any way. The value of these samples is priceless. Sample misidentification or mix-up are unfortunately common problems in biomedical research and can eventually result in the publication of incorrect data. Here we have compared the Fluidigm SNPtrace and the Agena iPLEX Sample ID panels for the authentication of human genomic DNA samples. We have tested 14 pure samples and simulated their cross-contamination at different percentages (2%, 5%, 10%, 25% and 50%). For both panels, we report call rate, allele intensity/probability score, performance in distinguishing pure samples and contaminated samples at different percentages, and sex typing. We show that both panels are reliable and efficient methods for sample authentication and we highlight their advantages and disadvantages. We believe that the data provided here is useful for sample authentication especially in biorepositories and core facility settings.

The Salivary miRNome: A Promising Biomarker of Disease.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding RNAs ranging from 18-24 nucleotides, also known to regulate the human genome mainly at the post-transcriptional level. MiRNAs were shown to play an important role in most biological processes such as apoptosis and in the pathogenesis of many diseases such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Recent developments of advanced molecular high-throughput technologies have enhanced our knowledge of miRNAs. MiRNAs can now be discovered, interrogated, and quantified in various body fluids serving as diagnostic and therapeutic markers for many diseases. While most studies use blood as a sample source to measure circulating miRNAs as possible biomarkers for disease pathogenesis, fewer studies have assessed the role of salivary miRNAs in health and disease. This review aims at providing an overview of the current knowledge of the salivary miRNome, addressing the technical aspects of saliva sampling, and highlighting the applicability of miRNA screening to clinical practice.