Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Pharyngeal Flow Limitation during Sleep: Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b).

RATIONALE: Pharyngeal flow limitation during pregnancy may be a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes but was previously challenging to quantify. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a novel objective measure of flow limitation identifies an increased risk of preeclampsia (primary outcome) and other adverse outcomes in a prospective cohort: Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study Monitoring Mothers-to-be. METHODS: Flow limitation severity scores (0%=fully obstructed, 100%=open airway)- quantified from breath-by-breath airflow shape-were obtained from home sleep tests during early (6-15 weeks) and mid (22-31 weeks) pregnancy. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations between flow limitation (median overnight severity, both time-points averaged) and preeclampsia, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index (BMI), race, ethnicity, chronic hypertension, and flow limitation during wakefulness. Secondary outcomes were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and infant birthweight. RESULTS: Of 1939 participants with flow limitation data at both time-points (age: 27.0±5.4 yr [mean±sd], BMI: 27.7±6.1 kg·m-2), 5.8% developed preeclampsia, 12.7% developed HDP, and 4.5% developed GDM. Greater flow limitation was associated with increased preeclampsia risk: adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) 2.49, 95% Confidence Interval [1.69, 3.69], per 2SD increase in severity. Findings persisted in women without sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index <5 events·hr-1). Flow limitation was associated with HDP (OR: 1.77 [1.33, 2.38]) and reduced infant birthweight (83.7 [31.8, 135.6] g), but not GDM. CONCLUSIONS: Greater flow limitation is associated with increased risk of preeclampsia, HDP, and lower infant birthweight. Flow limitation may provide an early target for mitigating the consequences of sleep disordered breathing during pregnancy.

Flow Limitation Is Associated with Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Individuals without Moderate or Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Moderate-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA, AHI>15) disturbs sleep through frequent bouts of apnea and is associated with daytime sleepiness. However, many individuals without moderate-severe OSA (i.e., AHI<15) also report sleepiness. Objective: To test the hypothesis that sleepiness in the AHI<15 group is a consequence of substantial flow limitation, in the absence of overt reductions in airflow (i.e., apnea/hypopnea). Methods: N=1886 participants from the MESA sleep cohort were analyzed for frequency of flow limitation from polysomnogram recorded nasal airflow signal. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) was defined by Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≥11. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression assessed the association between EDS (binary dependent variable) and frequency of flow limitation (continuous) in individuals with an AHI<15. Results: N=772 individuals with an AHI<15 were included in primary analysis. Flow limitation was associated with EDS (odds ratio of 2.04, CI95% [1.17-3.54], per 2 standard deviation (2SD) increase in flow limitation frequency) after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race/ethnicity, and sleep duration. This effect size did not appreciably change after additionally adjusting for AHI. Conclusions: In individuals with an AHI<15, increasing flow limitation frequency by 2SD is associated with a 2-fold increase in risk of EDS. Future studies should investigate addressing flow limitation in low AHI individuals as a potential mechanism for ameliorating sleepiness.

Reducing crash risk for young drivers: Protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to improve young driver sleep.

Background: Road trauma is a leading cause of death and disability for young Australians (15-24 years). Young adults are overrepresented in crashes due to sleepiness, with two-thirds of their fatal crashes attributed to sleepy driving. This trial aims to examine the effectiveness of a sleep extension and education program for improved road safety in young adults. Methods: Young adults aged 18-24 years (n = 210) will be recruited for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial employing a placebo-controlled, parallel-groups design. The intervention group will undergo sleep extension and receive education on sleep, whereas the placebo control group will be provided with information about diet and nutrition. The primary outcomes of habitual sleep and on-road driving performance will be assessed via actigraphy and in-vehicle accelerometery. A range of secondary outcomes including driving behaviours (driving simulator), sleep (diaries and questionnaire) and socio-emotional measures will be assessed. Discussion: Sleep is a modifiable factor that may reduce the risk of sleepiness-related crashes. Modifying sleep behaviour could potentially help to reduce the risk of young driver sleepiness-related crashes. This randomised control trial will objectively assess the efficacy of implementing sleep behaviour manipulation and education on reducing crash risk in young adult drivers.

Increased Flow Limitation During Sleep Is Associated With Increased Psychomotor Vigilance Task Lapses in Individuals With Suspected OSA.

BACKGROUND: Impaired daytime vigilance is an important consequence of OSA, but several studies have reported no association between objective measurements of vigilance and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Notably, the AHI does not quantify the degree of flow limitation, that is, the extent to which ventilation fails to meet intended ventilation (ventilatory drive). RESEARCH QUESTION: Is flow limitation during sleep associated with daytime vigilance in OSA? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Nine hundred ninety-eight participants with suspected OSA completed a 10-min psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) before same-night in-laboratory polysomnography. Flow limitation frequency (percent of flow-limited breaths) during sleep was quantified using airflow shapes (eg, fluttering and scooping) from nasal pressure airflow. Multivariable regression assessed the association between flow limitation frequency and the number of lapses (response times > 500 ms, primary outcome), adjusting for age, sex, BMI, total sleep time, depression, and smoking status. RESULTS: Increased flow limitation frequency was associated with decreased vigilance: a 1-SD (35.3%) increase was associated with 2.1 additional PVT lapses (95% CI, 0.7-3.7; P = .003). This magnitude was similar to that for age, where a 1-SD increase (13.5 years) was associated with 1.9 additional lapses. Results were similar after adjusting for AHI, hypoxemia severity, and arousal severity. The AHI was not associated with PVT lapses (P = .20). In secondary exploratory analysis, flow limitation frequency was associated with mean response speed (P = .012), median response time (P = .029), fastest 10% response time (P = .041), slowest 10% response time (P = .018), and slowest 10% response speed (P = .005). INTERPRETATION: Increased flow limitation during sleep was associated with decreased daytime vigilance in individuals with suspected OSA, independent of the AHI. Flow limitation may complement standard clinical metrics in identifying individuals whose vigilance impairment most likely is explained by OSA.

Nasal Pressure Derived Airflow Limitation and Ventilation Measurements are Resilient to Reduced Signal Quality.

Obstructive sleep apnea is a disorder characterized by partial or complete airway obstructions during sleep. Our previously published algorithms use the minimally invasive nasal pressure signal routinely collected during diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) to segment breaths and estimate airflow limitation (using flow:drive) and minute ventilation for each breath. The first aim of this study was to investigate the effect of airflow signal quality on these algorithms, which can be influenced by oronasal breathing and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). It was hypothesized that these algorithms would make inaccurate estimates when the expiratory portion of breaths is attenuated to simulate oronasal breathing, and pink noise is added to the airflow signal to reduce SNR. At maximum SNR and 0% expiratory amplitude, the average error was 2.7% for flow:drive, -0.5% eupnea for ventilation, and 19.7 milliseconds for breath duration (n = 257,131 breaths). At 20 dB and 0% expiratory amplitude, the average error was -15.1% for flow:drive, 0.1% eupnea for ventilation, and 28.4 milliseconds for breath duration (n = 247,160 breaths). Unexpectedly, simulated oronasal breathing had a negligible effect on flow:drive, ventilation, and breath segmentation algorithms across all SNRs. Airflow SNR ≥ 20 dB had a negligible effect on ventilation and breath segmentation, whereas airflow SNR ≥ 30 dB had a negligible effect on flow:drive. The second aim of this study was to explore the possibility of correcting these algorithms to compensate for airflow signal asymmetry and low SNR. An offset based on estimated SNR applied to individual breath flow:drive estimates reduced the average error to ≤ 1.3% across all SNRs at patient and breath levels, thereby facilitating for flow:drive to be more accurately estimated from PSGs with low airflow SNR.Clinical Relevance- This study demonstrates that our airflow limitation, ventilation, and breath segmentation algorithms are robust to reduced airflow signal quality.

Oronasal vs Nasal Masks: The Impact of Mask Type on CPAP Requirement, Pharyngeal Critical Closing Pressure (Pcrit), and Upper Airway Cross-Sectional Areas in Patients With OSA.

BACKGROUND: CPAP delivered via an oronasal mask is associated with lower adherence, higher residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and increased CPAP therapeutic pressure compared with nasal masks. However, the mechanisms underlying the increased pressure requirements are not well understood. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do oronasal masks affect upper airway anatomy and collapsibility? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with OSA underwent a sleep study with both a nasal and oronasal mask, each for one-half of the night (order randomized). CPAP was manually titrated to determine therapeutic pressure. Upper airway collapsibility was assessed using the pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit) technique. Cine MRI was done to dynamically assess the cross-sectional area of the retroglossal and retropalatal airway throughout the respiratory cycle with each mask interface. Scans were repeated at 4 cm H2O and at the nasal and oronasal therapeutic pressures. RESULTS: The oronasal mask was associated with higher therapeutic pressure requirements (ΔM ± SEM; +2.6 ± 0.5; P < .001) and higher Pcrit (+2.4 ± 0.5 cm H2O; P = .001) compared with the nasal mask. The change in therapeutic pressure between masks was strongly correlated with the change in Pcrit (r2 = 0.73; P = .003). Increasing CPAP increased both the retroglossal and retropalatal airway dimensions across both masks. After controlling for pressure and breath phase, the retropalatal cross-sectional area was moderately larger when using a nasal vs an oronasal mask (+17.2 mm2; 95% CI, 6.2-28.2, P < .001) while nasal breathing. INTERPRETATION: Oronasal masks are associated with a more collapsible airway than nasal masks, which likely contributes to the need for a higher therapeutic pressure.

Quantitative and Qualitative Changes in Peripheral Chemoreceptor Activity in Preterm Infants.

Rationale: Preterm infants are at risk for ventilatory control instability that may be due to aberrant peripheral chemoreceptor activity. Although term infants have increasing peripheral chemoreceptor contribution to overall ventilatory drive with increasing postnatal age, how peripheral chemoreceptor contribution changes in preterm infants with increasing postmenstrual age is not known. Objectives: To evaluate peripheral chemoreceptor activity between 32 and 52 weeks postmenstrual age in preterm infants, using both quantitative and qualitative measures. Methods: Fifty-five infants born between 24 weeks, 0 days gestation and 28 weeks, 6 days gestation underwent hyperoxic testing at one to four time points between 32 and 52 weeks postmenstrual age. Quantitative [Formula: see text] decreases were calculated, and qualitative responses were categorized as apnea, continued breathing with a clear reduction in [Formula: see text], sigh breaths, and no response. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 280 hyperoxic tests were analyzed (2.2 ± 0.3 tests per infant at each time point). Mean peripheral chemoreceptor contribution to ventilatory drive was 85.2 ± 20.0% at 32 weeks and 64.1 ± 22.0% at 52 weeks. Apneic responses were more frequent at earlier postmenstrual ages. Conclusions: Among preterm infants, the peripheral chemoreceptor contribution to ventilatory drive was greater at earlier postmenstrual ages. Apnea was a frequent response to hyperoxic testing at earlier postmenstrual ages, suggesting high peripheral chemoreceptor activity. A clearer description of how peripheral chemoreceptor activity changes over time in preterm infants may help explain how ventilatory control instability contributes to apnea and sleep-disordered breathing later in childhood. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03464396).

A single dose of noradrenergic/serotonergic reuptake inhibitors combined with an antimuscarinic does not improve obstructive sleep apnoea severity.

Previous trials have demonstrated that the combination of noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors with an antimuscarinic can substantially reduce the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) and improve airway collapsibility in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, some studies have shown that when administered individually, neither noradrenergic or serotonergic agents have been effective at alleviating OSA. This raises the possibility that serotonergic agents (like noradrenergic agents) may also need to be delivered in combination to be efficacious. Therefore, we investigated the effect of an antimuscarinic (oxybutynin) on OSA severity when administered with either duloxetine or milnacipran, two dual noradrenergic/serotonergic reuptake inhibiters. A randomized, double-blind, 4 way cross-over, placebo-controlled trial in ten OSA patients was performed. Patients received each drug condition separately across four overnight in-lab polysomnography (PSG) studies ~1-week apart. The primary outcome measure was the AHI. In addition, the four key OSA endotypes (collapsibility, muscle compensation, arousal threshold, loop gain) were measured non-invasively from the PSGs using validated techniques. There was no significant effect of either drug combinations on reducing the total AHI or improving any of the key OSA endotypes. However, duloxetine+oxybutynin did significantly increase the fraction of hypopnoeas to apnoeas (FHypopnoea ) compared to placebo (p = 0.02; d = 0.54). In addition, duloxetine+oxybutynin reduced time in REM sleep (p = 0.009; d = 1.03) which was positively associated with a reduction in the total AHI (R2  = 0.62; p = 0.02). Neither drug combination significantly improved OSA severity or modified the key OSA endotypes when administered as a single dose to unselected OSA patients.

The impact of daytime transoral neuromuscular stimulation on upper airway physiology - A mechanistic clinical investigation.

There is a need for alternatives to positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring. Improving upper airway dilator function might alleviate upper airway obstruction. We hypothesized that transoral neuromuscular stimulation would reduce upper airway collapse in concert with improvement in genioglossal muscle function. Subjects with simple snoring and mild OSA (AHI < 15/h on screening) underwent in-laboratory polysomnography with concurrent genioglossal electromyography (EMGgg) before and after 4-6 weeks of twice-daily transoral neuromuscular stimulation. Twenty patients completed the study: Sixteen males, mean ± SD age 40 ± 13 years, and BMI 26.3 ± 3.8 kg/m2 . Although there was no change in non-rapid eye movement EMGgg phasic (p = 0.66) or tonic activity (p = 0.83), and no decrease in snoring or flow limitation, treatment was associated with improvements in tongue endurance, sleep quality, and sleep efficiency. In this protocol, transoral neurostimulation did not result in changes in genioglossal activity or upper airway collapse, but other beneficial effects were noted suggesting a need for additional mechanistic investigation.

Ventilatory control instability as a predictor of persistent periodic breathing in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Periodic breathing (PB) is common in preterm infants. We aimed to characterize the contribution of ventilatory control instability to the presence and persistence of PB longitudinally. METHODS: Infants born between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation were studied using daytime polysomnography at: 32-36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) (N = 32), 36-40 weeks PMA (N = 20), 3 months corrected age (CA) (N = 18) and 6 months CA (N = 19). Loop gain, a measure of sensitivity of the ventilatory control system, was estimated by fitting a mathematical model to ventilatory patterns associated with spontaneous sighs. RESULTS: The time spent in PB decreased from 32-36 weeks PMA to 6 months CA (P = 0.005). Across all studies, studies with PB (N = 62) were associated with higher loop gain compared to those without PB (N = 23) (estimated marginal mean ± SEM: 0.445 ± 0.01 vs 0.388 ± 0.02; P = 0.020). A threshold of loop gain >0.415 (measured at 32-36 weeks PMA) provided a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 75% to detect the presence of PB at 6 months CA. CONCLUSIONS: The course of PB in preterm infants is related to changes in loop gain. Higher loop gain at 32-36 weeks PMA was associated with a greater risk of persistent PB at 6 months CA. IMPACT: The developmental trajectory of periodic breathing and its relationship to ventilatory control instability is currently unclear. Unstable ventilatory control is a determinant of periodic breathing in preterm infants up to 6 months corrected age. Infants who display greater ventilatory control instability at 32-36 weeks postmenstrual age may be at increased risk of persistent periodic breathing at 6 months corrected age. Assessment of ventilatory control stability may assist in the early identification of infants at risk of persistent periodic breathing and its potential adverse effects.

Frequency of flow limitation using airflow shape.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The presence of flow limitation during sleep is associated with adverse health consequences independent of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity (apnea-hypopnea index, AHI), but remains extremely challenging to quantify. Here we present a unique library and an accompanying automated method that we apply to investigate flow limitation during sleep. METHODS: A library of 117,871 breaths (N = 40 participants) were visually classified (certain flow limitation, possible flow limitation, normal) using airflow shape and physiological signals (ventilatory drive per intra-esophageal diaphragm EMG). An ordinal regression model was developed to quantify flow limitation certainty using flow-shape features (e.g. flattening, scooping); breath-by-breath agreement (Cohen's ƙ); and overnight flow limitation frequency (R2, %breaths in certain or possible categories during sleep) were compared against visual scoring. Subsequent application examined flow limitation frequency during arousals and stable breathing, and associations with ventilatory drive. RESULTS: The model (23 features) assessed flow limitation with good agreement (breath-by-breath ƙ = 0.572, p < 0.001) and minimal error (overnight flow limitation frequency R2 = 0.86, error = 7.2%). Flow limitation frequency was largely independent of AHI (R2 = 0.16) and varied widely within individuals with OSA (74[32-95]%breaths, mean[range], AHI > 15/h, N = 22). Flow limitation was unexpectedly frequent but variable during arousals (40[5-85]%breaths) and stable breathing (58[12-91]%breaths), and was associated with elevated ventilatory drive (R2 = 0.26-0.29; R2 < 0.01 AHI v. drive). CONCLUSIONS: Our method enables quantification of flow limitation frequency, a key aspect of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing that is independent of the AHI and often unavailable. Flow limitation frequency varies widely between individuals, is prevalent during arousals and stable breathing, and reveals elevated ventilatory drive. Clinical trial registration: The current observational physiology study does not qualify as a clinical trial.

Children with down syndrome and sleep disordered breathing display impairments in ventilatory control.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of ventilatory control instability (i.e. loop gain) in children with Down syndrome and sleep disordered breathing. METHODS: Children (3-19 years) with Down syndrome and sleep disordered breathing (n = 14) were compared with typically developing children (n = 14) matched for age, sex and sleep disordered breathing severity. All children underwent overnight polysomnography. Spontaneous sighs were identified and a 180s analysis window (60s pre-sigh to 120s post-sigh) containing flow measurements and oxygen saturation were created. Loop gain, a measure of the sensitivity of the negative feedback loop that controls ventilation, was estimated by fitting a mathematical model of ventilatory control to the post-sigh ventilatory pattern. Results; Loop gain was significantly higher in children with Down syndrome compared to matched typically developing children (median loop gain [interquartile range]: 0.36 [0.33, 0.55] vs 0.32 [0.24, 0.38]; P = 0.0395). While children with Down syndrome also had significantly lower average oxygen saturation associated within each analysis window compared to typically developing children (mean ± standard deviation: 96.9 ± 1.3% vs 98.0 ± 1.0%; P = 0.0155), loop gain was not related to polysomnographic measures of hypoxia. CONCLUSIONS: Higher loop gain in children with Down syndrome and sleep disordered breathing indicates that these children have more unstable ventilatory control, compared to age, sex and sleep disordered breathing severity matched typically developing children. This may be due to an inherent impairment in ventilatory control in children with Down syndrome contributing to their increased risk of sleep disordered breathing which may inform alternative treatment options for this population.

Assessing the Physiologic Endotypes Responsible for REM- and NREM-Based OSA.

BACKGROUND: Patients with OSA can have the majority of their respiratory events in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep or in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. No previous studies have linked the different physiologic conditions in REM and NREM sleep to the common polysomnographic patterns seen in everyday clinical practice, namely REM predominant OSA (REMOSA) and NREM predominant OSA (NREMOSA). RESEARCH QUESTION: (1) How does OSA physiologic condition change with sleep stage in patients with NREMOSA and REMOSA? (2) Do patients with NREMOSA and REMOSA have different underlying OSA pathophysiologic conditions? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We recruited patients with three polysomnographic patterns. (1) REMOSA: twice as many respiratory events in REM sleep, (2) NREMOSA: twice as many events in NREM sleep, and (3) uniform OSA: equal number of events in NREM/REM sleep. We deployed a noninvasive phenotyping method to determine OSA endotype traits (Vpassive, Vactive, loop gain, arousal threshold) in NREM sleep, REM sleep, and total night sleep in each group of patients (NREMOSA, REMOSA, uniform OSA). RESULTS: Patients with NREMOSA have significantly worse ventilatory control stability in NREM sleep compared with REM sleep (loop gain, 0.546 [0.456,0.717] in NREM vs 0.365 [0.238,0.459] in REM sleep; P = .0026). Patients with REMOSA displayed a significantly more collapsible airway (ie, lower Vpassive) in REM compared with NREM sleep (98.4 [97.3,99.2] %Veupnea in NREM vs 95.9 [86.4,98.9] %Veupnea in REM sleep; P < .0001). The major between-group difference across the whole night was a significantly higher loop gain in the NREMOSA group (0.561 [0.429,0.675]) compared with the REMOSA group (0.459 [0.388,0.539]; P = .0033). INTERPRETATION: This study is the first to link long-recognized polysomnographic patterns of OSA to underlying physiologic differences. Patients with NREMOSA have a higher loop gain in NREM sleep; patients with REMOSA have a worsening of Vpassive in REM sleep.

Quantifying the magnitude of pharyngeal obstruction during sleep using airflow shape.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Non-invasive quantification of the severity of pharyngeal airflow obstruction would enable recognition of obstructive versus central manifestation of sleep apnoea, and identification of symptomatic individuals with severe airflow obstruction despite a low apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI). Here we provide a novel method that uses simple airflow-versus-time ("shape") features from individual breaths on an overnight sleep study to automatically and non-invasively quantify the severity of airflow obstruction without oesophageal catheterisation. METHODS: 41 individuals with suspected/diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea (AHI range 0-91 events·h-1) underwent overnight polysomnography with gold-standard measures of airflow (oronasal pneumotach: "flow") and ventilatory drive (calibrated intraoesophageal diaphragm electromyogram: "drive"). Obstruction severity was defined as a continuous variable (flow:drive ratio). Multivariable regression used airflow shape features (inspiratory/expiratory timing, flatness, scooping, fluttering) to estimate flow:drive ratio in 136 264 breaths (performance based on leave-one-patient-out cross-validation). Analysis was repeated using simultaneous nasal pressure recordings in a subset (n=17). RESULTS: Gold-standard obstruction severity (flow:drive ratio) varied widely across individuals independently of AHI. A multivariable model (25 features) estimated obstruction severity breath-by-breath (R2=0.58 versus gold-standard, p<0.00001; mean absolute error 22%) and the median obstruction severity across individual patients (R2=0.69, p<0.00001; error 10%). Similar performance was achieved using nasal pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of pharyngeal obstruction can be quantified non-invasively using readily available airflow shape information. Our work overcomes a major hurdle necessary for the recognition and phenotyping of patients with obstructive sleep disordered breathing.

Ventilatory control sensitivity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea is sleep stage dependent.

Study Objectives: The severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is known to vary according to sleep stage; however, the pathophysiology responsible for this robust observation is incompletely understood. The objective of the present work was to examine how ventilatory control system sensitivity (i.e. loop gain) varies during sleep in patients with OSA. Methods: Loop gain was estimated using signals collected from standard diagnostic polysomnographic recordings performed in 44 patients with OSA. Loop gain measurements associated with nonrapid eye movement (NREM) stage 2 (N2), stage 3 (N3), and REM sleep were calculated and compared. The sleep period was also split into three equal duration tertiles to investigate how loop gain changes over the course of sleep. Results: Loop gain was significantly lower (i.e. ventilatory control more stable) in REM (Mean ± SEM: 0.51 ± 0.04) compared with N2 sleep (0.63 ± 0.04; p = 0.001). Differences in loop gain between REM and N3 (p = 0.095), and N2 and N3 (p = 0.247) sleep were not significant. Furthermore, N2 loop gain was significantly lower in the first third (0.57 ± 0.03) of the sleep period compared with later second (0.64 ± 0.03, p = 0.012) and third (0.64 ± 0.03, p = 0.015) tertiles. REM loop gain also tended to increase across the night; however, this trend was not statistically significant [F(2, 12) = 3.49, p = 0.09]. Conclusions: These data suggest that loop gain varies between REM and NREM sleep and modestly increases over the course of sleep. Lower loop gain in REM is unlikely to contribute to the worsened OSA severity typically observed in REM sleep, but may explain the reduced propensity for central sleep apnea in this sleep stage.

The relationship between partial upper-airway obstruction and inter-breath transition period during sleep.

Short pauses or "transition-periods" at the end of expiration and prior to subsequent inspiration are commonly observed during sleep in humans. However, the role of transition periods in regulating ventilation during physiological challenges such as partial airway obstruction (PAO) has not been investigated. Twenty-nine obstructive sleep apnea patients and eight controls underwent overnight polysomnography with an epiglottic catheter. Sustained-PAO segments (increased epiglottic pressure over ≥5 breaths without increased peak inspiratory flow) and unobstructed reference segments were manually scored during apnea-free non-REM sleep. Nasal pressure data was computationally segmented into inspiratory (TI, shortest period achieving 95% inspiratory volume), expiratory (TE, shortest period achieving 95% expiratory volume), and inter-breath transition period (TTrans, period between TE and subsequent TI). Compared with reference segments, sustained-PAO segments had a mean relative reduction in TTrans (-24.7±17.6%, P<0.001), elevated TI (11.8±10.5%, P<0.001), and a small reduction in TE (-3.9±8.0, P≤0.05). Compensatory increases in inspiratory period during PAO are primarily explained by reduced transition period and not by reduced expiratory period.

Correlation of non-uniform protein expression with variation in transmitter release probability.

The strength of synaptic transmission is highly variable between different synapses. The present study examined some factors that may contribute to this variation in the strength of neurotransmission in sympathetic varicosities of the mouse vas deferens. Transmitter release was measured using a focal macropatch electrode placed over pairs of visualised varicosities. By regulating the calcium concentration of the solutions inside the recording electrode and in the bath independently of each other, transmitter release was restricted to one or two surface varicosities at each recording site. Using this technique, transmitter release probability was shown to be highly variable, even between adjacent varicosities on single axon branches. Very little variation was observed in the calcium influx following single impulse nerve stimulation between adjacent Oregon Green BAPTA-1 loaded varicosities. However, the staining intensities of three vesicular proteins, SV2, synaptophysin, and synaptotagmin 1, showed considerable variation between adjacent varicosities on single axon branches. This variation in staining intensity may be partly explained by variation in the density of synaptic vesicles. However, double staining experiments using two vesicular antigens showed some varicosities staining for one vesicular antigen, but not for the second, suggesting that the expression of these release machinery proteins is regulated locally within the varicosities. The results of the present study strengthen suggestions that synaptic strength is at least in part, regulated by variation in the expression of vesicular proteins.