Self-medication of antibacterials without prescription (also called 'over-the-counter' use). A report of a Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

The availability of antimicrobial agents for self-medication may increase and could include antibacterial agents for oral or topical use. Wholesale deregulation of antibacterials would be undesirable and likely to encourage misuse of classes of agents currently important in the management of serious infections. Changed regulation from Prescription-Only Medicine (POM) to Pharmacy (P) medicine of selected agents with indications for short-term use in specific minor infections and illness is likely to have advantages to the user. However, safeguards to their use would need to be included in the Patient Information Leaflet (PIL). Agents and indications for self-medication are discussed. Any alteration in licensed status from POM to P will require careful risk-benefit assessment, including the likely impact on bacterial resistance. Safety issues also include concerns relating to age of the user, pregnancy, underlying disease and the potential for drug interactions. The importance of appropriate information with the PIL is emphasized, as is the role of the pharmacist, while ways of improving adverse event notification and monitoring are discussed. The paucity of good denominator-controlled data on the prevalence of in-vitro resistance is highlighted, and recommendations for improving the situation are made. There are currently no levels of resistance accepted by regulatory bodies on which to base a licensing decision, be it for granting a product licence, renewal of a licence or a change in licensed status from POM to P. Due consideration should be given to: the validation of user-defined indications in comparison with those medically defined; the enhancement of pharmacy advice in the purchase of such agents; improved safety monitoring; the establishment of systematic surveillance of susceptibility data.

Low-dose famotidine and effervescent cimetidine in healthy subjects: a placebo-controlled overnight pH study.

BACKGROUND: Amongst the low-dose H2-receptor antagonists available for the self-medication of dyspepsia, both famotidine 10 mg and cimetidine 200 mg have been shown to raise intragastric pH, but there is a delay after ingestion before significant effects can be demonstrated. A new effervescent preparation of cimetidine 200 mg releases an acid buffer which has a more rapid effect on intragastric pH. AIM: To investigate the relative abilities of low-dose famotidine and effervescent cimetidine to raise intragastric pH after a single postprandial evening dose. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects (12 men, 12 women, median age 32 years) completed a three-period crossover trial of famotidine 10 mg, effervescent cimetidine 200 mg and placebo. After a standard meal was given at 18.30 h to subjects fasted for 5.5 h, drug or placebo was given at 19.30 h. Intragastric pH was recorded with combined glass electrodes from 18.00 to 07.30 h by digital recorders. RESULTS: Over the 12 h post-dose period the mean area under the pH/time curve (AUC) after famotidine 10 mg was 3.73, after cimetidine 200 mg effervescent 2.79, and after placebo 2.07. Over the same period the median pH and percentage of time that recordings were above pH 3 were 3.45 and 52.5 after famotidine 10 mg, 2.40 and 33.8 after cimetidine 200 mg effervescent, and 1.68 and 15.9 after placebo. Both active treatments were significantly different from placebo by each measure (P < 0.001), and famotidine 10 mg was significantly more effective than cimetidine 200 mg effervescent by each measure over the 0-12 h period (P < 0.001). Comparisons of mean AUCs for each 15 min period after dosing showed that decrease in acidity was significantly greater after cimetidine 200 mg effervescent than after famotidine 10 mg for the first 60 min. In the later post-dose period only famotidine 10 mg raised pH for all time points to 12 h, whilst the effect of effervescent cimetidine 200 mg was detectable to = 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of gastric acidity over the 12 h post-dose period was significantly greater and endured longer after famotidine 10 mg than after effervescent cimetidine 200 mg, but for the 60 min period immediately after dosing the effect on intragastric pH was significant following effervescent cimetidine 200 mg but not famotidine 10 mg. This suggests effervescent formulations of H2-receptor antagonists with an acid buffer have a more rapid effect on intragastric pH than film-coated tablets.

Nocturnal intragastric acidity after over-the-counter doses of famotidine, ranitidine or placebo.

AIM: To compare the inhibitory effects of over-the-counter doses of famotidine or ranitidine on nocturnal intragastric acidity in a placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Twelve-hour intragastric acidity was measured simultaneously in 24 healthy subjects who ate a standard meal at 18.30 h and were dosed (at 19.30 h) with either famotidine 10 mg, ranitidine 75 mg or placebo in a balanced three-period crossover design. Five-millilitre aliquots of gastric juice were aspirated half-hourly 0-3 h post-dose, and then hourly until the end of the study. pH was measured with a glass electrode. Integrated pH (area under the curve (AUC) of the pH-time curve) was calculated for the intervals 0-12 h and 9-12 h post-dose. Statistical analysis was by ANOVA. RESULTS: In the 0-12 h post-dose period, when the 24 subjects were dosed with placebo, mean AUC was 2.12, increasing by 75% to 3.70 with famotidine (P < 0.001) and by 81% to 3.83 with ranitidine (P < 0.001). In the 9-12 h post-dose period, when the subjects were dosed with placebo, mean AUC was 2.13, increasing by 91% to 4.07 with famotidine (P < 0.001) and by 79% to 3.82 with ranitidine (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the pH-raising effects of famotidine and ranitidine in both periods. CONCLUSIONS: Famotidine and ranitidine in over-the-counter doses have a similar, sustained, effect on post-prandial nocturnal intragastric acidity in healthy subjects lasting up to 12 h after oral dosing.

Famotidine for healing and maintenance in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastroduodenal ulceration.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are strongly associated with gastroduodenal ulceration. How to manage patients with NSAID-associated ulcers is a common clinical dilemma. High-dose famotidine in the healing and maintenance of NSAID-associated gastroduodenal ulceration was therefore evaluated. METHODS: One hundred four patients with rheumatoid or osteoarthritis who had gastroduodenal ulceration received famotidine, 40 mg twice daily. Sixteen patients stopped and 88 continued their NSAID treatment. Ulcer healing was assessed endoscopically at 4 and 12 weeks. Seventy-eight NSAID users with healed ulcers were then randomized to receive 40 mg twice daily famotidine or placebo and underwent endoscopy at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Cumulative ulcer healing rates at 12 weeks were 89.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.3%-95.7%) for patients who continued NSAID treatment and 100% (95% CI, 82.9%-100.0%) for those who stopped. The subsequent estimated cumulative gastroduodenal ulcer relapse over 6 months for NSAID users who took placebo was 53.5% (95% CI, 36.6%-70.3%). This was reduced to 26.0% (12.1%-39.9%) in patients taking famotidine (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose famotidine is effective ulcer healing therapy in patients who stop or continue NSAID treatment and significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of gastroduodenal ulcer recurrence compared with placebo when given as maintenance therapy.

Prevention of heartburn relapse by low-dose famotidine: a test meal model for duration of symptom control.

AIM: To establish whether patients taking famotidine 10 mg to treat an episode of heartburn were protected from a recurrence of symptoms after a subsequent test meal. METHODS: Frequent heartburn sufferers (n = 366) were randomized to receive double blind treatment with famotidine 10 mg or 2 x 250 mg chewable alginate tablets within 30 min of a spontaneous episode of heartburn. After 4 h, patients with no or slight residual symptoms consumed a meal likely to induce heartburn. Over the next 4 h patients recorded the severity of heartburn and any consumption of 'rescue' antacids. At the end of this time they rated the global efficacy of their treatment in controlling meal-induced symptoms. RESULTS: Study groups were well matched for all baseline characteristics. Of the 366 randomized patients, 276 took study medication and data from 269 patients (132 famotidine, 137 alginate) were analysed for efficacy. Compared to the alginate control group famotidine treated patients reported better global efficacy following the test meal (P < 0.001; relative odds for a more favourable response: 2.26 [95% CI: 1.45-3.53]). Fewer patients receiving famotidine resorted to antacid rescue (P = 0.038; relative odds for a more favourable response: 2.24 [95% CI: 1.04-4.79]) and peak heartburn was significantly less severe with famotidine treatment (P < 0.001: relative odds for a more favourable response: 2.90 [95% CI: 1.85-4.53]). Eleven famotidine-treated patients (8%) and 13 alginate patients (9%) reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: Compared to patients receiving an alginate preparation, patients self medicating with famotidine 10 mg for heartburn are better protected against a recurrence of their symptoms when they next eat. This suggests that the duration of acid control (9 h) previously demonstrated with this dose translates into a similar duration of measurable symptom control during the day.

Early and late effects of low-dose famotidine, ranitidine or placebo on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in man.

BACKGROUND: There are no published comparative studies on the effect of low-dose H2-antagonists on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects were dosed with either famotidine 10 mg, ranitidine 75 mg or placebo in a balanced three-period cross-over design. The subjects were studied in groups of 12, simultaneously, under identical controlled environmental conditions. Gastric juice was aspirated in 15-min aliquots during sub-maximal (0.6 microgram.h/kg) intravenous pentagastrin stimulation in the third and fourth hours (early period) and the eighth and ninth hours (late period) after oral dosing. The hydrogen ion (H+) content of gastric juice was measured ex vivo, by titrating to pH7 known volumes of gastric aspirate against 0.1 M sodium hydroxide, using a versatile microprocessor-controlled auto-titration unit. Gastric acid output during the period of interest was calculated by adding the hydrogen ion content of 15-min aliquots collected during that period. The geometric mean of the cumulative pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid output during the early and late periods was determined for the subjects dosed with either famotidine, ranitidine or placebo. Comparisons were performed by ANOVA. RESULTS: During the early period (2-4 h post-dose), When the subjects were given placebo, mean gastric acid output was 46.6 mmol, decreasing by 76% to 11.3 mmol (P < 0.001) when treated with famotidine and by 76% to 11.1 mmol (P < 0.001) when treated with ranitidine. During the late period (7-9 h post-dose), when the subjects were dosed with placebo, mean gastric acid output was 41.2 mmol, decreasing by 38% to 25.7 mmol (P < 0.001) when treated with famotidine and by 27% to 30.0 mmol (P = 0.007) when treated with ranitidine. The difference between the inhibitory effects of famotidine and ranitidine on gastric acid output were non-significant during either period. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose famotidine and ranitidine, intended for over-the-counter use, inhibit stimulated gastric acid secretion profoundly in the third and fourth hours after an oral dose. Modest effects are still detectable up to 9 h after dosing.

Low-dose famotidine and ranitidine as single post-prandial doses: a three-period placebo-controlled comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose H2-receptor antagonists are available without prescription for the self-medication of dyspepsia. METHODS: To investigate the relative abilities of low doses of famotidine and ranitidine to raise intragastric pH after a single post-prandial evening dose, 25 healthy volunteers completed a three-period cross-over trial of famotidine 10 mg, ranitidine elixir 75 mg and placebo. A standard meal was given at 18.30 h and drug or placebo at 19.30 h to subjects fasted for 5.5 h. Intragastric pH was recorded with nasogastric electrodes from 18.00 to 07.30 h by GastrograpH II recorder. RESULTS: The geometric mean area under the pH-time curve for the 5-9 h post-dose period was 1.49 pH units/h following placebo, 3.43 pH units/h following famotidine 10 mg (agent/placebo ratio 2.3; P < 0.001, ANOVA) and 2.6 pH units/h following ranitidine 75 mg (1.75; P < 0.001). The geometric mean area under the pH-time curve ratio of famotidine 10 mg to ranitidine 75 mg was 1.32 (P < 0.016). Median pH over the 5-9 h period was 1.1 following placebo, 2.7 following famotidine 10 mg (P < 0.05 by comparison with placebo) and 1.9 following ranitidine 75 mg (P < 0.05); comparison of median pH showed no significant difference between the active drugs. The percentage of pH values greater than 3.0 for the period 0-12 h post-dose was 9.7% following placebo, 30.0% following famotidine 10 mg (P < 0.05) and 24.9% following ranitidine 75 mg (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference between the active drugs. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that both famotidine 10 mg and ranitidine 75 mg significantly raise intragastric pH when given as single post-prandial doses. Famotidine 10 mg may have a greater effect than ranitidine elixir 75 mg over the 5-9-h period after dosing.

Famotidine for the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcers caused by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND: Acid suppression with famotidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, provides protection against gastric injury in normal subjects receiving short courses of aspirin or naproxen. The efficacy of famotidine in preventing peptic ulcers in patients receiving long-term therapy with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is not known. METHODS: We studied the efficacy of two doses of famotidine (20 mg and 40 mg, each given orally twice daily), as compared with placebo, in preventing peptic ulcers in 285 patients without peptic ulcers who were receiving long-term NSAID therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (82 percent) or osteoarthritis (18 percent). The patients were evaluated clinically and by endoscopy at base line and after 4, 12, and 24 weeks of treatment. The evaluators were unaware of the treatment assignment. The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of gastric or duodenal ulceration at 24 weeks. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of gastric ulcers was 20 percent in the placebo group, 13 percent in the group of patients receiving 20 mg of famotidine twice daily (P = 0.24 for the comparison with placebo), and 8 percent in the group receiving 40 mg of famotidine twice daily (P = 0.03 for the comparison with placebo). The proportion of patients in whom duodenal ulcers developed was significantly lower with both doses of famotidine than with placebo (13 percent in the placebo group, 4 percent in the low-dose famotidine group [P = 0.04], and 2 percent in the high-dose famotidine group [P = 0.01]). Both doses of famotidine were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with high-dose famotidine significantly reduces the cumulative incidence of both gastric and duodenal ulcers in patients with arthritis receiving long-term NSAID therapy.

Low dose famotidine and cimetidine in single postprandial doses: a placebo controlled comparative study of overnight pH.

To investigate the relative abilities of low doses of famotidine and cimetidine to raise intragastric pH after a single postprandial evening dose, 16 healthy volunteers were recruited to a four period crossover trial of famotidine 10 mg, cimetidine 100 mg and 200 mg compared with placebo. Intragastric pH was monitored between 1800 and 0730 with a nasogastric pH electrode. Median gastric pH rose from 1.35 (interquartile range 1.1-1.65) with placebo to 1.95 (1.6-5.35, p < 0.001 Friedman rank) after dosing with famotidine 10 mg, to 1.46 (1.3-2.0, 0.05 < p < 0.1) after cimetidine 200 mg, and remained 1.35 (1.1-1.6, p > 0.2) after cimetidine 100 mg. Intragastric pH was above 3 for 34% (p < 0.005) of the time after dosing with famotidine, compared with 13.6% (p > 0.2) after cimetidine 200 mg, 9.5% (p > 0.2) after cimetidine 100 mg, and 4.7% after placebo. The rise of intragastric pH after famotidine 10 mg is significantly greater than that after either 200 mg or 100 mg cimetidine when the drugs are used postprandially.

Low dose famotidine in the prevention of sleep disturbance caused by heartburn after an evening meal.

AIM: To determine whether, in a susceptible population, dosing with 10 mg famotidine 1 h before an evening meal could decrease the interference with sleep caused by heartburn. METHODS: Patients with a history of frequent heartburn (n = 309) were randomized to receive 10 mg famotidine or placebo 1 h before an evening meal likely to induce symptoms. Patients assessed the efficacy of the treatment in preventing heartburn after the meal, at bedtime and during the night. The number of awakenings due to heartburn and the consumption of antacid tablets taken to alleviate symptoms were also recorded. RESULTS: Treatment groups were well matched and data from 302 patients were available for analysis. Compared to placebo, famotidine treated patients had: less heartburn after the meal (P < 0.0001 mean global scores), less interference with getting to sleep (P = 0.0156 mean global scores), fewer awakenings (P = 0.0001 difference in mean number) and better control of heartburn during the night (P < 0.0001 mean global scores). They were also almost three times less likely to need antacid treatment than the placebo group during the night (relative odds for no antacid 2.78 (95% CI: 1.29-5.96). Only four patients in each group suffered adverse events. CONCLUSION: Taking a 10 mg dose of famotidine 1 h before an evening meal appears to be a successful and well tolerated strategy for preventing post-prandial heartburn and avoiding the associated interference with sleep.

Continuous intravenous famotidine for haemorrhage from peptic ulcer.

Peptic ulcer bleeding often stops spontaneously but rebleeding may be catastrophic. Emergency surgery carries risks so safe medical therapies are needed. Since platelet function and plasma coagulation are both pH sensitive and since pepsin lyses clot at low pH the maintenance of gastric pH close to neutrality might influence rebleeding rates. Previous trials with H2 antagonists have been inadequate although a 1985 meta-analysis did support an important clinical effect. We report here a large multicentre trial of famotidine in ulcer bleeding. 1005 patients admitted to one of sixty-seven hospitals in the UK or Eire with haemorrhage from peptic ulcer with endoscopic signs of oozing, black slough, fresh clot or visible vessel were randomly allocated to famotidine (10 mg bolus followed by 3.2 mg/h intravenously) or matching placebo for 72 h. This famotidine regimen had previously been shown to maintain pH near 7 in such patients. 497 patients received famotidine and 508 placebo. The treatment groups were similar in respect of age, sex, ulcer site, and signs and severity of bleeding. Case fatality (6.2% famotidine vs 5.0% placebo), rebleeding (23.9% vs 25.5% placebo), and surgery (15.5% vs 17.1% placebo) rates were not significantly different between the two groups. This trial suggests that potent inhibition of gastric secretion does not influence the natural history of peptic ulcer haemorrhage.

Secretion of single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator from insect cells.

A cDNA encoding human urokinase-type plasminogen activator was inserted downstream from the polyhedrin promoter of the baculovirus Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. A protein of similar Mr to urokinase (UK) was synthesized and approx. 90% was secreted from recombinant virus-infected Spodoptera frugiperda cells. Zymography and Western blotting analysis of the insect-derived protein demonstrated that it was comprised solely of the high-Mr form of UK. No low-Mr UK was detected. Amidolytic activity assays showed that 96% of the insect cell-derived UK was in the single-chain proenzyme form. The yield of UK from insect cells was 1986 international units/ml/10(6) infected cells.

Controlled study of the effects of intravenous famotidine on intragastric pH in bleeding peptic ulcers.

As blood coagulation and platelet aggregation are abolished at pH less than 5.4 the failure of antisecretory drugs to promote haemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers may reflect inadequate pH control. This study examined the ability of famotidine, a potent, long-acting H2 blocker to maintain intragastric pH above 5.4 in patients presenting with bleeding peptic ulcers. Twenty patients with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage confirmed endoscopically to be related to peptic ulceration (17 duodenal, 3 gastric ulcers), were entered into the study within 24 h of presentation. Each patient was randomly allocated to receive either intravenous famotidine (n = 10) administered as a 10 mg bolus followed by a constant infusion of 3.2 mg/h or similarly administered placebo (n = 10). All patients remained fasted over the 22-h study period. Their median intragastric pH values ranged from 6.8 to 7.9 (median 7.1) in the famotidine group and from 1.1 to 6.9 (median 1.6) in the placebo group (P less than 0.001). Over this same period intragastric pH was greater than 6 for 64%-100% (median 98%) of the recording time in the famotidine group compared with 0%-93% (median 13%) in the placebo group (P less than 0.001). We conclude that intravenous famotidine can maintain intragastric pH greater than 6 in fasting patients with acute upper gastro-intestinal bleeding from peptic ulceration. This provides a rational basis for further studies assessing its clinical efficacy in such patients.

Pharmacokinetics of famotidine in normal subjects and in patients with chronic liver disease.

The pharmacokinetics of famotidine were studied in seven healthy control subjects and in 14 patients with cirrhosis, following single oral and intravenous 20-mg dose administration, and after seven daily doses of 40 mg. Following intravenous (i.v.) administration, the mean (range) total plasma clearance values were not significantly different in the patients with compensated cirrhosis (n = 7), 337 (241-576) ml/min or in the patients with decompensated cirrhosis (n = 7), 270 (120-408) ml/min compared with the control group, 370 (154-612) ml/min. The mean half-life in the compensated cirrhotics, 2.86 (1.87-4.98) h, was similar to that in the control group 2.91 (1.86-6.03) h, but it was insignificantly prolonged in the decompensated cirrhotics 3.35 (2.00-5.77) h. The mean, maximum, plasma famotidine concentrations after single oral doses were comparable between the groups but there was considerable inter-subject variability, with individual values ranging from 17 to 139 ng/ml. Peak plasma concentrations were reached within 2-3 h, although more variability was observed among patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The mean systemic availability of the drug, estimated from urinary recovery, was 0.39 (0.15-0.64) in the healthy controls, 0.35 (0.14-0.51) in the patients with compensated cirrhosis and 0.38 (0.13-0.77) in the patients with decompensated cirrhosis. No significant increases were observed in plasma trough famotidine concentrations following multiple oral dosing in any of the subjects, and the kinetic variables after the seventh dose were not significantly different from those following the single oral dose. No significant changes were observed in psychometric performance in control subjects or in patients between the pre-study day and day seven of the multiple oral dose phase.

Efficient transfection of insect cells with baculovirus DNA using electroporation.

Efficient transfection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells with Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcNPV) DNA has been carried out using the technique of electroporation. The efficiency of transfection was monitored by assaying the extracellular virus in cell culture supernatants 3 days post-electroporation. Maximum titres of 2 x 10(9) p.f.u./ml AcNPV were obtained when using a pulse length of 7.7 ms and a field strength of 500 V/cm. This compared with a titre of 2 x 10(6) p.f.u./ml AcNPV using the standard calcium phosphate transfection method. Cotransfections of wild-type AcNPV DNA and the transfer plasmid pAcRP23-lacZ were also performed using electroporation and gave beta-galactosidase recombinant virus titres of 5 x 10(4) p.f.u./ml; this compared with 5 x 10(2) p.f.u./ml using the calcium phosphate method. The maximum proportion of recombinant virus, 2.9%, was obtained by harvesting the transfection medium after 2 days, and using a pulse length of 2.8 ms and a field strength of 750 V/cm. We therefore conclude that electroporation provides a very efficient method for the transfection of insect cells with baculovirus DNA.

Comparison of 40 mg famotidine nightly and 150 mg ranitidine b.d.: ulcer healing and symptom relief in benign gastric ulcer.

Two hundred and eight patients with benign gastric ulcers seen on endoscopy were recruited by 13 hospitals in the United Kingdom and Ireland into this double-blind study. Patients were assigned by pre-randomized schedule to 8 weeks of treatment with either 40 mg famotidine at night or 150 mg ranitidine b.d. Repeat endoscopy confirmed complete ulcer healing in 62 of 77 evaluable patients in the famotidine group (81%) and 58 of 71 in the ranitidine group (82%). The treatments were equally effective in promptly relieving day and night pain. Adverse events were uncommon; dizziness and headaches were the most frequently reported in both groups. In conclusion, night-time famotidine is as effective as twice daily ranitidine in healing benign gastric ulcers and provides similarly rapid symptomatic relief.

Single night-time doses of 40 mg famotidine or 800 mg cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Famotidine (40 mg) and 800 mg cimetidine as single night-time doses were compared in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study of acute treatment for duodenal ulceration. Fifteen centres recruited 304 patients into the study. Of these, 274 were included for analysis, with 136 receiving famotidine and 138 receiving cimetidine. After 4 weeks, 75% of the patients who received famotidine and 77% of the patients who received cimetidine were healed. At 6 weeks the cumulative healing rates were 91% with famotidine and 87% with cimetidine. Differences between the groups were not significant at 4 or 6 weeks. No significant difference in healing rates between smokers and non-smokers was found. Day and night pain resolved rapidly in both groups. Both treatments were well-tolerated; adverse events were reported in 17 patients on famotidine and 18 on cimetidine, with headache the most frequent event in both groups. Famotidine is effective and well-tolerated in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Prophylaxis against acid aspiration syndrome. Single oral dose of H2-antagonist on the evening before elective surgery.

We have compared famotidine 40 mg, ranitidine 300 mg and placebo given in a single oral dose at 2200 hours as the sole means of prophylaxis in 286 patients who underwent elective surgery the following day. Standardised premedication was administered and anaesthesia induced. Gastric contents were aspirated by nasogastric suction and the pH and volume measured. Median values of pH after famotidine, ranitidine and placebo were 6.17, 6.74 and 2.45 respectively; median aspirate volumes were 8, 8 and 10 ml respectively. The proportions of patients considered 'not at risk' (pH greater than 2.5) were 90% after famotidine, 91% after ranitidine and 52% after placebo. We conclude that the administration of a potent H2-antagonist in a single oral dose at night offers a convenient routine means of providing extensive prophylactic cover in patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery the following day.