Whole-genome sequencing differentiates relapse from re-infection in TB.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing TB relapse from re-infection is important from a clinical perspective to document transmission patterns. We investigated isolates from patients classified as relapse to understand if these were true relapses or re-infections. We also investigated shifts in drug susceptibility patterns to distinguish acquired drug resistance from re-infection with resistant strains.METHODS: Isolates from pulmonary TB patients from 2009 to 2017 were analysed using whole-genome sequencing (WGS).RESULTS: Of 11 patients reported as relapses, WGS results indicated that 4 were true relapses (single nucleotide polymorphism difference ≤5), 3 were re-infections with new strains, 3 were both relapse and re-infection and 1 was a suspected relapse who was later categorised as treatment failure based on sequencing. Of the 9 patients who went from a fully susceptible to a resistant profile, WGS showed that none had acquired drug resistance; 6 were re-infected with new resistant strains, 1 was probably infected by at least two different genotype strains and 2 were phenotypically misclassified.CONCLUSIONS: WGS was shown to distinguish between relapse and re-infection in an unbiased way. The use of WGS minimises the risk of false classification of treatment failure instead of re-infection. Furthermore, our study showed that strains without major genetic differences can cause re-infection.

Cross-border outbreak of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis linked to a university in Romania.

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) poses a threat to public health due to its complicated, expensive and often unsuccessful treatment. A cluster of three XDR TB cases was detected among foreign medical students of a Romanian university. The contact investigations included tuberculin skin testing or interferon gamma release assay, chest X-ray, sputum smear microscopy, culture, drug susceptibility testing, genotyping and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and were addressed to students, personnel of the university, family members or other close contacts of the cases. These investigations increased the total number of cases to seven. All confirmed cases shared a very similar WGS profile. Two more cases were epidemiologically linked, but no laboratory confirmation exists. Despite all the efforts done, the source of the outbreak was not identified, but the transmission was controlled. The investigation was conducted by a team including epidemiologists and microbiologists from five countries (Finland, Israel, Romania, Sweden and the UK) and from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Our report shows how countries can collaborate to control the spread of XDR TB by exchanging information about cases and their contacts to enable identification of additional cases and transmission and to perform the source investigation.