The natural history of COVID-19 in vaccinated inflammatory bowel disease patients.

AIM: Assess the characteristics of break through COVID-19 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients, despite complete vaccination. METHODS: Patients who reported a COVID-19 at least 3 weeks after complete vaccination were asked to answer an on-line anonymous questionnaire which included patient and disease characteristics, vaccination history, and the evolution of COVID-19. RESULTS: Among 3240 IBD patients who reported complete vaccination between 1st May 2021 and 30thJune 2022, 402 (12.4%) were infected by SARS Cov-2 [223 male, 216 Crohn's disease (CD), 186 Ulcerative Colitis (UC), mean (SD) age 42.3 (14.9) years, mean (SD) IBD duration 10.1 (9.7) years]. Three hundred and sixty-nine patients (91.8%) were infected once and 33 (8.2%) twice. The mean (SD) time between last vaccination and infection was 4.1 (1.6) months. Overall, 351 (87.3%) patients reported mild constitutional and/or respiratory symptoms, 34 (8.4%) were asymptomatic and only 17 patients (4.2%) required hospitalization. Of hospitalized patients, 2 UC patients died of COVID-19 pneumonia. The remaining hospitalized patients did not need high flow oxygen supply or ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of completely vaccinated IBD patients developed COVID-19 which evolved with mild symptoms and a favorable outcome. These results reinforce the importance of vaccination especially in vulnerable populations.

Efficacy of switching from infliximab to golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis in deep remission.

BACKGROUND-AIM: Intravenously administered biologicals are associated with a huge pressure to Infusion Units and increased cost. We aimed to assess the impact of switching infliximab to golimumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in deep remission. Patients and method: In a prospective, single-centre pilot study UC patients on infliximab mono-therapy for = 2 years, whowere in deep remission, consented to switch to golimumab and were followed for 1 year with clinical assessment, serum and faecal biomarkers, work productivity, satisfaction with treatment and quality of life parameters. Endoscopic remission was assessed by colonoscopy at 1 year. Patients fulfilling the same inclusion criteria, who did not consent to switch to golimumab and continued to receive infliximab mono-therapy, for the same period, served as controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, single-centre pilot study UC patients on infliximab mono-therapy for ≥ 2 years, who were in deep remission, consented to switch to golimumab and were followed for 1 year with clinical assessment, serum and faecal biomarkers, work productivity, satisfaction with treatment and quality of life parameters. Endoscopic remission was assessed by colonoscopy at 1 year. Patients fulfilling the same inclusion criteria, who did not consent to switch to golimumab and continued to receive infliximab mono-therapy, for the same period, served as controls. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and October 2017, 20 patients were recruited; however one patient stopped therapy because of pregnancy. All 19 patients who were switched to golimumab were still in clinical, biomarker and endoscopic remission at 1 year and maintained excellent quality of life without any complications. In the control group, 18 of 19 patients were also in deep remission, since only one patient had a flare which was managed with IFX dose intensification. During a median 3 years extension treatment with golimumab only 2 patients experienced a flare of colitis. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that switching from in-fliximab to golimumab in UC patients in deep remission does not compromise treatment effectiveness or the course of disease; golimumab offers a valid alternative to intravenous infliximab infusions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease [IBD] and Physical Activity: A Study on the Impact of Diagnosis on the Level of Exercise Amongst Patients With IBD.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] can impair patients' functional capacity with significant negative effects on their quality of life. Our aim was to determine the impact of IBD diagnosis on fitness levels and to assess the levels of engagement in physical activity and fatigue in IBD patient before and after diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective multi-centre cross-sectional study was performed. Patients diagnosed with IBD in the previous 18 months were recruited. Inclusion criteria included clinical remission and/or no treatment changes within the previous 6 months. Physical exercise levels were assessed by the Godin score and fatigue levels was assessed by the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy [FACIT] score. RESULTS: In total, 158 patients (100 Crohn's disease [CD]) were recruited. Mean age was 35.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 2.0). Gender distribution was approximately equal [51.3% male]. The Mean Harvey Bradshaw and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity indices were 2.25 [95% CI ± 0.40] and 1.64 [95% CI ± 0.49], respectively. The mean Godin score difference before and after IBD diagnosis was 6.94 [p = 0.002]. Patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] [41.8%] were more likely than patients with CD [23.0%] to reduce their exercise levels [p = 0.04]. FACIT scores were lower in patients who had experienced relapses [p = 0.012] and had severe disease [p = 0.011]. Approximately one-third of patients reduced their activity level following IBD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were significantly less physically active after a diagnosis of IBD and this was more apparent in UC. Identification of the risk factors associated with loss of fitness levels would help to address the reduced patient quality of life.

Randomised clinical trial: deep remission in biologic and immunomodulator naïve patients with Crohn's disease - a SONIC post hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: As treatment goals in Crohn's disease (CD) evolve, targets now include clinical remission (CR), mucosal healing (MH) and biological remission [C-reactive protein normalisation (CRPnorm )]. AIMS: To evaluate the association of baseline factors and treatment with the achievement of different composite remission parameters at week 26. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the SONIC trial evaluated different composite remission measures at week 26 in a subgroup of patients with Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) scores, CRP, and endoscopic data available at baseline and week 26 (N = 188). Assessed composite remission measures were: CR (CDAI < 150) and MH (absence of any mucosal ulcerations), previously referred to as 'deep remission;' and alternative composite endpoints: CR + CRPnorm (CRP < 0.8 mg/dL); CRPnorm  + MH; and CR + CRPnorm  + MH. RESULTS: Among analysed patients, 136/188 (72.3%) achieved CR and 90/188 (47.9%) achieved MH at week 26. All composite outcomes were significantly greater (Bonferroni significance level, P ≤ 0.016) with combination therapy (i.e. infliximab and azathioprine; 52.3-63.6%) vs. azathioprine monotherapy (12.9-29.0%; p ≤ 0.005 for all comparisons). Composite remission rates including MH were significantly greater with combination therapy (52.3-56.9%) vs. infliximab (25.6-32.3%; P ≤ 0.015 for all comparisons except CRPnorm  + MH, P = 0.017) and vs. azathioprine monotherapy (12.9-20.4%; P ≤ 0.002 for all comparisons). Median serum trough infliximab concentrations among patients who achieved MH or CR + MH were greater when compared with those among patients who did not achieve MH (P = 0.018) or CR + MH (P = 0.053). Among the subgroup of patients with early Crohn's disease, MH alone or in combination with composite remission criteria significantly improved clinical outcomes of patients who received combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy was more effective in achieving various composite remission measures vs. azathioprine or infliximab monotherapy. These data illustrate that 'deep remission' is achievable with combination therapy in a high percentage of patients with early Crohn's disease. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00094458.

The management of iron deficiency in inflammatory bowel disease--an online tool developed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is a common and undertreated problem in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIM: To develop an online tool to support treatment choice at the patient-specific level. METHODS: Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM), a European expert panel assessed the appropriateness of treatment regimens for a variety of clinical scenarios in patients with non-anaemic iron deficiency (NAID) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). Treatment options included adjustment of IBD medication only, oral iron supplementation, high-/low-dose intravenous (IV) regimens, IV iron plus erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA), and blood transfusion. The panel process consisted of two individual rating rounds (1148 treatment indications; 9-point scale) and three plenary discussion meetings. RESULTS: The panel reached agreement on 71% of treatment indications. 'No treatment' was never considered appropriate, and repeat treatment after previous failure was generally discouraged. For 98% of scenarios, at least one treatment was appropriate. Adjustment of IBD medication was deemed appropriate in all patients with active disease. Use of oral iron was mainly considered an option in NAID and mildly anaemic patients without disease activity. IV regimens were often judged appropriate, with high-dose IV iron being the preferred option in 77% of IDA scenarios. Blood transfusion and IV+ESA were indicated in exceptional cases only. CONCLUSIONS: The RUAM revealed high agreement amongst experts on the management of iron deficiency in patients with IBD. High-dose IV iron was more often considered appropriate than other options. To facilitate dissemination of the recommendations, panel outcomes were embedded in an online tool, accessible via http://ferroscope.com/.

European consensus on the histopathology of inflammatory bowel disease.

The histologic examination of endoscopic biopsies or resection specimens remains a key step in the work-up of affected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and can be used for diagnosis and differential diagnosis, particularly in the differentiation of UC from CD and other non-IBD related colitides. The introduction of new treatment strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) interfering with the patients' immune system may result in mucosal healing, making the pathologists aware of the impact of treatment upon diagnostic features. The European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly elaborated a consensus to establish standards for histopathology diagnosis in IBD. The consensus endeavors to address: (i) procedures required for a proper diagnosis, (ii) features which can be used for the analysis of endoscopic biopsies, (iii) features which can be used for the analysis of surgical samples, (iv) criteria for diagnosis and differential diagnosis, and (v) special situations including those inherent to therapy. Questions that were addressed include: how many features should be present for a firm diagnosis? What is the role of histology in patient management, including search for dysplasia? Which features if any, can be used for assessment of disease activity? The statements and general recommendations of this consensus are based on the highest level of evidence available, but significant gaps remain in certain areas.

The efficacy of shortening the dosing interval to once every six weeks in Crohn's patients losing response to maintenance dose of infliximab.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with infliximab for Crohn's disease (CD) frequently require intensified dosage due to loss of response. There are scant data regarding the efficacy of shortening the dosing interval to 6 weeks. AIM: We sought to investigate the efficacy of a once every 6 weeks' strategy compared with dose-doubling. METHODS: This work was a multicentre retrospective study of infliximab-treated CD patients who required dose escalation. The clinical outcome of patients treated by intensification to 5 mg/kg/6 weeks (6-week group) was compared with the outcome of patients whose infliximab was double-dosed (10 mg/kg/8 weeks or 5 mg/kg/4 weeks). RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (mean age: 29.8 years) were included in the study, 55 (59%) in the 6-week group and 39 (41%) in the double-dose group. Demographics and disease characteristics were similar between the two groups, although patients with re-emerging symptoms 5-7 weeks postinfusion were more likely to receive 5 mg/kg/6 weeks dosing (OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.4-8.8, P < 0.01). Early response to dose-intensification occurred in 69% of patients in the 6-week group and 67% in the double-dose group (P = N.S.). Regained response was maintained for 12 months in 40% compared with 29% of the patients respectively (P = N.S.). CONCLUSION: In CD patients who lost response to standard infliximab dose, especially when symptoms re-emerge 5-7 weeks postinfusion, shortening the dosing interval to 6 weeks appears to be at least as effective as doubling the dose to 10 mg/kg or halving the infusion intervals to once in 4 weeks.

Role of small-bowel endoscopy in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an international OMED-ECCO consensus.

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are lifelong diseases seen predominantly in the developed countries of the world. Whereas ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition causing diffuse and continuous mucosal inflammation of the colon, Crohn's disease is a heterogeneous entity comprised of several different phenotypes, but can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract. A change in diagnosis from Crohn's disease to ulcerative colitis during the first year of illness occurs in about 10 % - 15 % of cases. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) restricted to the colon that cannot be characterized as either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease is termed IBD-unclassified (IBDU). The advent of capsule and both single- and double-balloon-assisted enteroscopy is revolutionizing small-bowel imaging and has major implications for diagnosis, classification, therapeutic decision making and outcomes in the management of IBD. The role of these investigations in the diagnosis and management of IBD, however, is unclear. This document sets out the current Consensus reached by a group of international experts in the fields of endoscopy and IBD at a meeting held in Brussels, 12-13th December 2008, organised jointly by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) and the Organisation Mondiale d'Endoscopie Digestive (OMED). The Consensus is grouped into seven sections: definitions and diagnosis; suspected Crohn's disease; established Crohn's disease; IBDU; ulcerative colitis (including ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]); paediatric practice; and complications and unresolved questions. Consensus guideline statements are followed by comments on the evidence and opinion. Statements are intended to be read in context with qualifying comments and not read in isolation.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of intravenous ciprofloxacin as an adjunct to corticosteroids in acute, severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: The role of antibiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is controversial. This study aims at assessing the therapeutic role of ciprofloxacin as an adjunct to corticosteroids in acute severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 55 consecutive patients fulfilling the criteria of Truelove and Witts for severe ulcerative colitis were randomized on admission to the hospital to receive intravenously ciprofloxacin (400 mg b.i.d.) (n = 29) or placebo (n = 27). All patients received parenteral nutrition, intravenous hydrocortisone (100 mg q.i.d.) and hydrocortisone enemas (100 mg b.i.d.). Patients were assessed after 10 days of continuous treatment, or at any time a severe complication occurred. RESULTS: At study entry, there were no significant differences between treatment groups in any patient or disease-related parameter. Twenty-three of 29 patients (79.3%) treated with ciprofloxacin and 20 of 26 patients (77%) treated with placebo showed substantial improvement and were given oral steroids (P > 0.1). Six patients in each group did not improve (n = 10) or developed complications (n = 2). Nine of these 12 patients underwent emergency colectomy; three patients consented to receive intravenous cyclosporin but did not achieve remission of colitis and they underwent elective colectomy. There were no perioperative or late deaths. CONCLUSIONS: A short course of intravenous ciprofloxacin does not seem to augment the effect of corticosteroids for patients with acute, severe ulcerative colitis.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of oral ciprofloxacin in acute ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate the role of ciprofloxacin as an adjunct to corticosteroids in acute ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients with mild (n = 37) or moderately active (n = 33) ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive oral ciprofloxacin (250 mg b.i.d., n = 34) or placebo (n = 36) for 14 days. In addition, they were given oral prednisolone (initial dose 20 or 40 mg for mild and moderately active ulcerative colitis, respectively) and rectal betamethasone enemas (2 g at night) for 7-9 weeks. All patients were receiving olsalazine (0.5 g twice daily). At study entry, the groups were similar with respect to age, sex, extent, duration, and severity of disease, and previous treatments. Patients were assessed clinically, endoscopically, and histologically before, at the end of the trial (day 14), and on completion of steroid treatment, or at any time worsening of symptoms or a complication of ulcerative colitis occurred. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 24 patients (70.5%) in the ciprofloxacin group and 26 patients (72%) in the placebo group achieved remission (p > 0.1, Yates chi 2). Ten patients in each group necessitated higher doses of oral (n = 12) or intravenous (n = 8) steroids. Of the latter patients, two underwent emergency colectomy without perioperative deaths. Clostridium difficile toxin A was not detected in nonresponders to ciprofloxacin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A short course of oral ciprofloxacin treatment does not seem to increase the proportion of patients with active ulcerative colitis going into remission.

The role of colonoscopy in the differential diagnosis of acute, severe hemorrhagic colitis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study assesses the diagnostic value of colonoscopy performed at an early stage of a first attack of acute, severe hemorrhagic colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fourteen consecutive patients were prospectively studied. The colonoscopic diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis of the colitis, which was based on clinical, microbiological, endoscopic, and histological criteria during the acute illness, but also on the results of a thirty-month follow-up of the patients aiming to confirm whether the colitis was relapsing or nonrelapsing in nature. RESULTS: The colonoscopic diagnosis was ulcerative colitis (UC) in 40, Crohn's disease in four, and infective colitis (IC) in 70 patients. The endoscopic diagnosis was finally confirmed in all 40 UC patients and in 68 of 70 (97.1%) IC patients. Two patients with an initial endoscopic and histological diagnosis of IC presented with typical attacks of UC 28 and 30 months later, respectively. Prominent endoscopic appearances in IC were mucosal edema, erythematous areas, hemorrhagic spots, bleeding, microaphthoid ulcers, and luminal exudate. Although rectal sparing was occasionally seen, endoscopic lesions were continuous and severe in the distal colon, but were patchily and unevenly distributed in other parts of the colon in IC. In UC, prominent colonoscopic findings were bleeding, mucosal friability, granularity, and ulceration; lesions were continuously distributed in the involved area. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy is a useful procedure in the differential diagnosis of severe bloody diarrhea of unknown cause.

Intermittent therapy with high-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas maintains remission in ulcerative proctitis and proctosigmoiditis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intermittent therapy with mesalazine enemas and continuous oral mesalazine to maintain remission of distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with distal ulcerative colitis (n = 17) or ulcerative proctitis (n = 21) in clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission were randomly assigned to receive either oral mesalazine (0.5 g three times/day, Eudragit L coating, n = 19) or intermittent therapy with mesalazine enemas (4 g of 5-aminosalicylic acid enema every third night, n = 19). Both groups were comparable in regard to sex, age, age at disease onset, extent and duration of disease, number and mode of treatment of previous attacks, and time in remission. Patients were reviewed at the beginning of the study and, subsequently, at two-month intervals for 24 months or until a relapse occurred. At each visit, diaries were reviewed and clinical and laboratory assessments were performed. Sigmoidoscopy was carried out and biopsies were obtained by a blinded observer. Histology was assessed without knowledge of the patient's clinical state or treatment category. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 6 of 19 patients on oral mesalazine (32 percent) and 14 of 19 patients on mesalazine enemas (74 percent) were still in full remission (log rank test: 15.28, P < 0.001). Differences in relapse rates between groups were significant even when data were stratified by extent of disease (P < 0.01). In the oral group, six and seven patients relapsed at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In the enema group, three and two relapses occurred in the first and second year of the study, respectively. All patients complied with the treatment satisfactorily and there were no dropouts. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that intermittent therapy with mesalazine enemas is more effective than continuous oral mesalazine in maintaining remission in patients with distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis.

Intravenous tobramycin and metronidazole as an adjunct to corticosteroids in acute, severe ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of metronidazole and tobramycin as an adjunct to corticosteroids in acute, severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients with severe ulcerative colitis were randomized on admission to the hospital to receive intravenously either metronidazole (0.5g tid) and tobramycin (4 mg/kg tid) (n = 19), or placebo (n = 20). In addition, they were given parenteral nutrition, intravenous hydrocortisone (100 mg qid) and hydrocortisone enemas (100 mg bid). All patients were assessed after 10 days of continuous treatment, or at any time a severe complication occurred. RESULTS: Twelve of 19 patients (63.15%) treated with antibiotics and 13/20 patients (65%) with placebo showed substantial improvement. Seven patients in each group did not improve (n = 9), or developed complications (n = 5) and underwent emergency colectomy without perioperative deaths or late deaths. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the routine use of intravenous tobramycin and metronidazole in the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis.

Prospective, randomized, investigator-blind trial of Helicobacter pylori infection treatment in patients with refractory duodenal ulcers. Healing and long-term relapse rates.

In this study, 26 patients with duodenal ulcers refractory to treatment with H2-receptor antagonists for 8-12 weeks were randomly assigned to eight weeks of treatment with colloidal bismuth subcitrate (120 mg four times a day) alone (N = 12) or in combination with tetracycline hydrochloride (500 mg four times a day, days 0-14) and metronidazole (500 mg three times a day, days 15-28). Symptoms were scored and endoscopy, histology, and CLO tests were performed before, on completion of treatment, and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. Treatment was considered successful when Helicobacter pylori was not detected by CLO tests and Warthin-Starry stains on gastric biopsies taken from antrum, body, and fundus. On triple therapy, ulcers healed in 12/14 patients (85.71%) and 10/14 (71.42%) patients became Helicobacter pylori-negative. On bismuth, only one patient became Helicobacter pylori-negative (8.33%, P < 0.0001), but ulcers healed in 8/12 patients (67%, P = NS). Six patients on bismuth, whose ulcers remained unhealed or relapsed early after healing, were offered triple therapy, which resulted in ulcer healing in three and Helicobacter pylori clearance in two patients. At 18 months, none of the Helicobacter pylori-negative patients had ulcer relapse. On the contrary, ulcers relapsed in all but one patient, who remained Helicobacter pylori-positive. Smoking and drinking did not influence the therapeutic outcome. The data confirm previous reports that many duodenal ulcers are infectious and therefore curable.