Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 29(2): 185-190, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30559043

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Reduction of left ventricular mass index (LVMi) during antihypertensive treatment is less likely to occur in obese subjects. The aim of the study was to assess whether weight loss influences reduction of LVMi in treated, obese, hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Campania Salute Network registry, we identified 1546 obese hypertensive patients (50 ± 9 years, 43% women) with more than 12 months follow-up. Echocardiographic reduction of LVMi was considered as achievement of normal values (<47 g/m2.7 in women or <50 g/m2.7 in men) or a reduction of ≥10% during follow-up. Weight loss was considered as ≥5% reduction in body weight, and occurred in 403 patients (26%) during a median follow-up of 50 months (IQrange:31-93). Median weight loss was 8.6% (IQrange:6.5-12). Patients with weight loss had higher baseline body mass index (p < 0.05), while there was no difference in age, sex, duration of hypertension, prevalence of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and average blood pressure during follow-up. During follow-up, 152 patients (9.8%) exhibited reduction of LVMi. Reduction of LVMi was more frequent (12.9% vs 9.1%, p < 0.030) in patients losing weight than in those who did not. In logistic regression analysis, weight loss was associated with reduction of left ventricular mass index (OR 1.51 [95%CI 1.02-2.23], p = 0.039), independent of significant associations with younger age, lower average systolic blood pressure during follow-up, longer follow-up time and higher LVMi at baseline. CONCLUSION: In treated obese hypertensive patients, weight loss during follow-up promotes significant reduction of LVMi, independent of baseline characteristics and blood pressure control.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Dietary Approaches To Stop Hypertension , Hypertension/therapy , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/physiopathology , Obesity/diet therapy , Ventricular Function, Left , Ventricular Remodeling , Weight Loss , Adult , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/diagnostic imaging , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/epidemiology , Italy/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/physiopathology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Reduction Behavior , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects , Ventricular Remodeling/drug effects
2.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 27(10): 850-857, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28965797

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The clustering of high levels of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and other risk factors represents a predisposing condition for atherosclerotic disease development. Cardiovascular prevention is based on effective control of these conditions. In adult subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia we compared in the real life the effects of a new combination of nutraceuticals on lipid and glucose metabolism and blood pressure with those of an established nutraceutical combination. METHOD AND RESULTS: This multicenter, controlled, randomized, single-blind trial was designed to compare the effect of Armolipid Plus® versus that of LopiGLIK® on lipid and glucose levels and blood pressure (BP) in subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia not on statin therapy. Primary outcome was the proportion of subjects achieving therapeutic targets of LDL-C (<130 mg/dl); secondary outcomes were the effects on HDL-C, glycated haemoglobin and insulin levels. Data from an overall sample of 359 adult individuals (age 55.2 ± 11.1 years, women 57.7%, LDL-C 157.3 ± 22.6 mg/dl, HDL-C 50.7 ± 13.0 mg/dl) are reported. 72% of subjects treated with LopiGLIK® and 43% treated with Armolipid Plus® achieved the primary endpoint (p < 0.0001). Both treatments reduced plasma levels of total and LDL-C and triglycerides (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The treatments also reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure, plasma levels of glycated haemoglobin, insulin and HOMA index. The changes induced by LopiGLIK® in all these metabolic parameters were greater than those obtained with Armolipid Plus®. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis shows that LopiGLIK® may represent a more effective tool for clinical management of CV risk factors in subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Dietary Supplements , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use , Morus , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/blood , Hypercholesterolemia/complications , Hypercholesterolemia/diagnosis , Hypolipidemic Agents/adverse effects , Insulin/blood , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Morus/chemistry , Phytotherapy , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/isolation & purification , Plants, Medicinal , Risk Factors , Single-Blind Method , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Hum Hypertens ; 31(6): 395-399, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28032631

ABSTRACT

Reduced myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency (MEE), estimated as stroke volume/heart rate ratio per g of left ventricular (LV) mass (LVM), and expressed in µl s-1 g-1 (MEEi), is a strong predictor of cardiovascular (CV) events, independently of LV hypertrophy and other confounders, including type II diabetes (DM). Decreased MEEi is more frequent in patients with diabetes. In the present analysis we evaluated the interrelation among MEEi, DM and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the setting of arterial hypertension. Hypertensive patients from the Campania Salute Network, free of prevalent CV disease and with ejection fraction >50% (n=12 503), were analysed. Coexistence of MetS and DM was ordinally categorized into 4 groups: 8235 patients with neither MetS nor DM (MetS-/DM-); 502 without MetS and with DM (MetS-/DM+); 3045 with MetS and without DM (MetS+/DM-); and 721 with MetS and DM (MetS+/DM+). After controlling for sex, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, relative wall thickness (RWT), antihypertensive medications and type of antidiabetic therapy, MEEi was 333 µl s-1 g-1 in MetS-/DM-, 328 in MetS-/DM+, 326 in MetS+/DM- and 319 in MetS+/DM+ (P for trend <0.0001). In pairwise comparisons (Sidak-adjusted), all conditions, except MetS-/DM+, were significantly different from MetS-/DM- (all P<0.02). No statistical difference was detected between MetS-/DM+ and MetS+/DM-. Both MetS and DM are associated with decreased MEEi in hypertensive patients, independently to each other, but the reduction is statistically less evident for MetS-/DM+. MetS+/DM+ patients have the lowest levels of MEEi, consistent with the alterations of energy supply associated with the combination of insulin resistance with insulin deficiency.


Subject(s)
Arterial Pressure , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Energy Metabolism , Hypertension/epidemiology , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Myocardium/metabolism , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/epidemiology , Ventricular Function, Left , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Arterial Pressure/drug effects , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/physiopathology , Energy Metabolism/drug effects , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Hypertension/blood , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin Resistance , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/blood , Metabolic Syndrome/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Registries , Risk Factors , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/blood , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL