Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Transl Oncol ; 31: 101638, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36805919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Somatic pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination DNA repair (HR)-related genes found in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) are not well-characterised in older patients (≥70 years). This may reflect low testing rates in older patients. METHODS: Data from 1210 HGSC patients in AACR Project GENIE and 324 patients in an independent dataset INOVATe were analysed. Cases where somatic variants could be distinguished from germline variants were included, and analysis was restricted to those with a somatic TP53 variant, to ensure cases were HGSC. RESULTS: Of 1210 patients in GENIE, 27% (n = 325) were aged ≥70 years at testing. Patients with somatic-only PVs in BRCA2 were older compared with BRCA1 (median 71 vs 60 years, p = 0.002). Median age for 21 patients with somatic-only PVs in 11 other HR-related genes ranged from 40 to 67 years. In older patients, 7% (n = 22) had somatic BRCA1/2 PVs, and 1% (n = 2) had PVs other HR-related genes; this rate was not significantly different to younger patients (<70 years), 7% (n = 62) BRCA1/2 and 2% (n = 19) other HR-related genes (p = 0.36). The overall frequency of somatic BRCA1/2 PVs was similar in INOVATe (n = 25; 7.7%) and somatic-only BRCA2 PVs were again found in older patients compared with BRCA1 (median age: at testing, 70 vs 63 years; at diagnosis, 68 vs 60 years). CONCLUSIONS: The overall frequency of somatic-only PVs in HR-related genes was similar in older and younger patients with HGSC, highlighting the importance of somatic testing irrespective of age. Limiting somatic testing by age may exclude patients who could benefit from maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

2.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol ; 18(6): 660-668, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35098672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) have unique characteristics. Contemporary data on the pathological and molecular features, and survival of EO-CRC are limited in the Australian context. AIM: To determine the demographic, histopathological and molecular characteristics of adults with EO-CRC, and their survival. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adults aged 18-49 years with EO-CRC who were referred to the Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District and Royal North Shore Hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2014 and 2018. RESULTS: Of 257 patients included, 94 (37%) patients presented with de novo metastatic CRC, 80% patients had near-average risk family history and 89% had a symptomatic presentation. In 159 patients with nonmetastatic disease at diagnosis, stage III disease (OR 3.88 [95% CI: 1.13-13.3]; p = .03) and the presence of perineural invasion (PNI) (OR 6.63 [95% CI: 2.21-19.84]; p = .001) were risk factors associated with the development of metastatic disease. Among 94 patients with de novo metastatic disease, 43 (43%) and 12 (14%) patients harbored a KRAS or BRAF V600E mutation, respectively. The median overall survival was 29.6 months (95% CI: 20.4-38.7). BRAF mutation was associated with inferior survival (HR 3.00 [95% CI: 1.30-6.94]; p = .01). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of KRAS and BRAF mutations in our cohort is similar to the overseas experience. Stage III disease at diagnosis, presence of PNI and BRAF mutation are adverse prognostic indicators. A better understanding of the molecular landscape is needed for this patient cohort, so as to better tailor prevention strategies, screening and treatment pathways.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Humans , Young Adult , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Australia/epidemiology , Prognosis , Mutation
3.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 30(5): e86, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31328463

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) may benefit from antiestrogen therapy with higher response rates reported in tumors that are strongly estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER⁺). PARAGON is a basket trial that incorporates 7 phase 2 trials investigating the activity of anastrozole in patients with ER⁺ and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (PR⁺) recurrent/metastatic gynecological cancers. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with ER⁺ and/or PR⁺ ROC, who were asymptomatic and had cancer antigen 125 (CA125) progression after response to first line chemotherapy, where chemotherapy was not clinically indicated. Patients received anastrozole 1 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled (52 evaluable). Clinical benefit at three months (primary endpoint) was observed in 18 patients (34.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]=23%-48%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months (95% CI=2.1-3.1). The median duration of clinical benefit was 6.5 months (95% CI=2.8-11.7). Most patients progressed within 6 months of starting anastrozole but 12 (22%) continued treatment for longer than 6 months. Anastrozole was well tolerated. In the exploratory analysis, ER histoscores and the intensity of ER staining did not correlate with clinical benefit rate or PFS. CONCLUSION: A subset of asymptomatic patients with ER⁺ and/or PR⁺ ROC and CA125 progression had durable clinical benefit on anastrozole, with acceptable toxicity. Anastrozole may delay symptomatic progression and the time to subsequent chemotherapy. The future challenge is to identify the subset of patients most likely to benefit from an aromatase inhibitor and whether the clinical benefit could be increased by the addition of other agents.


Subject(s)
Anastrozole/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , CA-125 Antigen/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Quality of Life , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Treatment Outcome
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 150(2): 239-246, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807697

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare response rates and survival in women with "platinum resistant" epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received further platinum-based or non­platinum chemotherapy for treatment at first relapse. METHODS: Patients with high-grade EOC (including fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer) of all histologies recruited to the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS) and treated with platinum-based primary chemotherapy were included. Response to second-line chemotherapy, overall survival (OS) and survival after treatment for first progression (OS2) were determined in all histologies and separately in women with high-grade serous tumors. RESULTS: Of the 341 patients classified as platinum-resistant by the 6-month threshold, 243 (71%) were treated with chemotherapy at relapse. CA-125 response rates to platinum-based chemotherapy were significantly higher compared to non­platinum chemotherapy (51% vs 21%, P < 0.001). Among patients with a platinum-free interval (PFI) of 3-6 months, OS2 in patients treated with platinum was significantly longer compared to individuals receiving non­platinum-based treatment (median 17.67 months, 95% CI: 14.79-20.75 vs. 10.62 months, 95% CI: 8.02-12.72, P = 0.022). The patterns were similar when restricted to patients with high-grade serous histology. In patients with PFI <3 months, there was no significant difference in response or survival according to type of second-line treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings further question the use of a 6-month PFI as an arbitrary threshold for subsequent treatment decision-making. Some patients considered "platinum resistant" still derive clinical benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy. Biomarkers of platinum sensitivity are needed in clinical practice to identify potential responders who should be offered re-treatment with platinum.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Organoplatinum Compounds/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Cohort Studies , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
5.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 27(5): 900-906, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28498256

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that a subset of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer may benefit from antiestrogen therapy. The Paragon study is a basket protocol that includes a series of phase 2 trials investigating the activity of anastrozole in patients with estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive recurrent gynecological cancers. We report the results of treatment in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Postmenopausal women who had estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent ovarian cancer and disease measurable by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or GCIG (Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup) CA-125 criteria were eligible. Patients received anastrozole 1 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study was prospectively registered (ACTRN12610000796088). RESULTS: There were 49 evaluable patients, and clinical benefit was observed in 13 (27%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16%-40%). There were no complete or partial RECIST version 1.1 responses. Clinical benefit was associated with higher global quality-of-life scores. Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.0-2.8 months). The median duration of clinical benefit was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.7 months). Most patients (83%) progressed within 6 months. Seven patients continued on treatment for longer than 6 months. Anastrozole was well tolerated in most patients. Subgroup analysis suggested greater clinical benefit in patients with tumors with estrogen-receptor histoscore of more than 200, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with estrogen- or progesterone-positive platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian cancers derives clinical benefit from anastrozole, with acceptable toxicity. The challenge remains how to identify them.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/metabolism , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastrozole , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Nitriles/adverse effects , Organoplatinum Compounds/pharmacology , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Tissue Array Analysis , Triazoles/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...