ABSTRACT
AIMS: The National Palliative Care and Interventional Radiotherapy Study Groups of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) carried out a survey whose aim was to obtain a "snapshot" of the real-world practice of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatments in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey was conducted on SurveyMonkey's online interface and was sent via e-mail to our society Radiation Oncologists. RESULTS: Fifty-eight Italian radiation oncologists (ROs), representing 54 centers, answered the survey. Thirteen percent of the ROs declared they treat fewer than 10 NMSC lesions annually, 36% treat between 11 and 20, and 51% treat more than 20 lesions annually. Interventional radiotherapy (IRT) was offered by 25% of the ROs, and every case was reportedly discussed by a multidisciplinary team (71%). Electrons (74%), volumetric modulated arc therapy (V-MAT) (57%), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) (43%), and IRT (26%) were the main treatment options. With external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 46 and 53 different RT schedules were treated for curative and palliative intent, respectively; whereas for IRT, there were 21 and 7 for curative and palliative intent, respectively. The most popular EBRT curative options were 50-70.95/22-35 fractions (fx) and 50-70 Gy/16-20fx and for EBRT palliative settings, 30Gy/10fx, and 20-35Gy/5fx. For IRT, the most popular curative options were 32-50Gy/8-10fx and 30-54Gy/3-5fx, whereas 30Gy/6fz was the palliative option. Less than 10 re-RT cases were reported in one year in 42.5%, 11-20 cases in 42.5%, and >20 cases annually in 15%. Electrons (61%), VMAT (49%), and BRT (25%) were the most widely used approaches: 20-40Gy in 10fx and 20-25Gy in 5fx were the recommended fractionations. CONCLUSION: The survey shows a variegated reality. A national registry with more detailed data could help in undercover its causes.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to increase survival in oligometastatic disease, but local control of colorectal metastases remains poor. We aimed to identify potential predictive factors of SBRT response through a multicenter large retrospective database and to investigate the progression to the polymetastatic disease (PMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 23 centers, and was approved by the Ethical Committee (Prot. Negrar 2019-ZT). 1033 lung metastases were reported. Clinical and biological parameters were evaluated as predictive for freedom from local progression-free survival (FLP). Secondary end-point was the time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC). RESULTS: Two-year FLP was 75.4%. Two-year FLP for lesions treated with a BED < 00 Gy, 100-124 Gy, and ≥125 Gy was 76.1%, 70.6%, and 94% (p = 0.000). Two-year FLP for lesion measuring ≤10 mm, 10-20 mm, and >20 mm was 79.7%, 77.1%, and 66.6% (p = 0.027). At the multivariate analysis a BED ≥125 Gy significantly reduced the risk of local progression (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.11-0.51; p = 0.000). Median tPMC was 26.8 months. Lesions treated with BED ≥125 Gy reported a significantly longer tPMC as compared to lower BED. The median tPMC for patients treated to 1, 2-3 or 4-5 simultaneous oligometastases was 28.5, 25.4, and 9.8 months (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: The present is the largest series of lung colorectal metastases treated with SABR. The results support the use of SBRT in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients as it might delay the transition to PMD or offer relatively long disease-free period in selected cases. Predictive factors were identified for treatment personalization.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Lung Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Rectal Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Radiosurgery/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/etiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To report outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with oligoprogression (≤ 5 metastases) during first-line treatment with androgen receptor-targeted therapy (ARTT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective multi-institutional analysis of mCRPC patients treated with SBRT to oligoprogressive lesions during ARTT. End-points were time to next-line systemic treatment (NEST), radiological progression-free survival (r-PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was registered according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed. RESULTS: Data from 34 patients were analyzed. Median NEST-free survival, r-PFS, and OS were 16.97, 13.47, and 38.3 months, respectively. At MVA, factors associated with worse NEST-free survival and r-PFS were polymetastatic burden at diagnosis of metastatic hormone-sensitive disease (hazard ratio [HR] 3.66, p = 0.009; HR 3.03, p = 0.034), PSA ≤ 7 ng/ml at mCRPC diagnosis (HR 0.23, p = 0.017; HR 0.19, p = 0.006) and PSADT ≤ 3 months at mCRPC diagnosis (HR 3.39, p = 0.026; HR 2.79, p = 0.037). Polymetastatic state at mHSPC diagnosis was associated with a decreased OS (HR 4.68, p = 0.029). No patient developed acute or late grade ≥ 2 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that SBRT in oligoprogressive mCPRC is safe, effective and seems to prolong the efficacy of the ongoing systemic treatment positively affecting disease progression. Prospective trials are needed.
Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/methods , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Disease Progression , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa) is recommended as soon as PSA rises above 0.20 ng/ml, but many patients (pts) still experience local macroscopic relapse. The aim of this multicentric retrospective analysis was to evaluate the role of SRT in pts with macroscopic relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2016, 105 consecutive pts with macroscopic PCa relapse underwent SRT ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Mean age was 72 years. At time of relapse, 29 pts had a PSA value < 1.0 ng/mL, 50 from 1.1 to 5, and 25 pts > 5. Before SRT, 23 pts had undergone 18F-choline PET and 15 pts pelvic MRI. Ninety-four pts had prostatic bed relapse only, and four nodal involvement. Fifty-one pts were previously submitted to first-line ADT, while 6 pts received ≥ 2 lines. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 52 months, 89 pts were alive, while 16 were dead. Total RT dose to macroscopic lesions was > 70 Gy in 58 pts, 66-70 Gy in 43, and < 66 Gy in 4 pts. In 72 pts, target volume encompassed only the prostatic bed with sequential boost to macroscopic site; 33 pts received prophylactic pelvic RT. Ten-year overall survival was 76.1%, while distant metastasis-free survival was 73.3%. No grade 4-5 toxicities were found. CONCLUSIONS: SRT ± ADT for macroscopic relapse showed a favorable oncological outcome supporting its important role in this scenario. Data from this series suggest that SRT may either postpone ADT or improve results over ADT alone in appropriately selected pts.
Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Salvage Therapy/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Positron-Emission Tomography , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisSubject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/therapy , Pain Management , Administration, Oral , Analgesics/adverse effects , Constipation/chemically induced , Constipation/drug therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Laxatives/therapeutic use , Needs Assessment , Pain/drug therapy , Pain Measurement , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
AIM: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is an alternative to radiosurgery or conformal radiotherapy when meningiomas are surgically inaccessible, incompletely removed, or recurrent. The authors report preliminary results of a feasible trial on hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT) in patients (pts) with intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: From August 2003 to May 2007, 35 consecutive pts with a median age of 59 years (range, 23-86) underwent hFSRT for intracranial meningiomas. Male/female ratio was 9/26, median Karnofsky performance status was 90 (range, 60-100). In 14 lesions (40%) diagnosis was based upon clinical and radiological data. After surgery or biopsy, 19 pts had histologically proven World Health Organization grade I and 2 pts grade II meningiomas. The median treatment volume was 23 cc (range, 4-58 cc). Before hFSRT, 26 (74%) pts had neurologic symptoms. Nineteen (54%) pts received 42 Gy and 16 (46%) 45 Gy of total dose, 3 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 29 months (range, 10-51) and 22 (63%) pts had a follow-up 24 months. Treatment was well tolerated and we did not observe clinically significant acute and late toxicity. At instrumental control, 32 (91%) lesions remained stable, 2 (6%) decreased and 1 (3%) progressed in size. Median duration of local control was 24 months (range, 4-47), and median progression free survival 23 months (range, 4-47). Clinical improvement of pre-existing neurological symptoms was observed in 84% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that hFSRT is a safe and effective treatment modality for intracranial meningiomas.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Meningioma/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Stereotaxic Techniques , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Radiation-induced emesis (RIE) is often considered to be less frequent and less severe than nausea/vomiting encountered in patients receiving chemotherapy, although the issue has only been addressed in a few studies. It is possible that radiation oncologists undervalue the clinical relevance of RIE. If untreated, sickness produces an adverse effect on the patient's quality of life and may cause interruption of the treatment with possible unfavorable effects on tumor control. A prospective observational trial on RIE has recently been published by the Italian Group for Antiemetic Research in Radiotherapy (IGARR). The study evidenced that the overall cumulative incidence of vomiting and nausea occurred in about 40% of patients undergoing radiotherapy, and that the irradiated site, radiation field size, and previous chemotherapy were significant risk factors. Patients submitted to abdominal radiotherapy were at major risk of vomiting and nausea (71%), followed by those treated on the thorax, brain, head and neck, and pelvis (49%, 40%, 40%%, and 39%, respectively). Few small randomized clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of various antiemetic drugs in preventing RIE. Generally, patients who entered these trials were those submitted to total body irradiation, half body irradiation or upper abdomen irradiation because of the greater risk of developing nausea and/or vomiting. The few controlled trials published have shown that dopamine receptor antagonists were effective in only about 50% of patients, whereas 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonists were more effective. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of antiemetics have recently been published by MASCC (Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer) and ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology). Unfortunately, their recommendations were quite different, when classifying radiation emetogenic risk categories and when giving indications for the use of antiemetic drugs. However, MASCC and ASCO recommendations both suggested a prophylaxis with a 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist and a corticosteroid for patients submitted to high emetogenic radiotherapy. There is evidence about the effectiveness of oral dexamethasone alone in fractionated upper abdomen radiotherapy and the use of a rescue antiemetic treatment as a possible alternative to the prophylaxis. Many questions remain open, and other prospective controlled trials on RIE are needed to answer them. Considering that radiotherapy to the abdomen, pelvis and thorax presents the most frequent problems in radiation oncology clinical practice, future trials on RIE should deal with these irradiated sites. The IGARR is carrying out a double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing prophylactic ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus ondansetron and dexamethasone given as a rescue treatment in patients undergoing fractionated radiotherapy to the upper abdomen.
Subject(s)
Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Vomiting/etiology , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Humans , Incidence , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vomiting/drug therapy , Vomiting/epidemiologyABSTRACT
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In 1990 the National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference recommended adjuvant combined therapy for patients with radically resected rectal cancer at high risk for relapse (ie, stage II-III). The purpose of our prospective non-randomized study was to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of postoperative radiochemotherapy in terms of improvement in disease-free and overall survival in this patient subgroup. STUDY DESIGN: From January 1990 to October 1998, 191 consecutive patients with radically resected stage II-III rectal cancer were treated. A total of 159 patients with a 24-month follow-up were assessable for toxicity and survival. Anterior resection was performed in 129 (81%) and abdomino-perineal resection in 30 (19%) patients. Fifty-four (34%) stage II and 105 (66%) stage III patients entered the study. Within 45-60 days of surgery, all patients received 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy at the dose of 500 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus on days 1-5, every 4 weeks, for 6 cycles. Chemotherapy cycles III and IV were administered at the same daily dose on radiotherapy days 1-3 and 29-31. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy/25 fractions plus a boost dose of 5.4 Gy. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 57 months (range, 25-123), overall recurrent disease was reported in 58 (36%) patients: local, systemic, and both local and systemic relapses in 12 (8%), 37 (23%) and 9 (6%) cases, respectively. According to local extension, recurrence rates were 15% and 48% in stage II and III, respectively. Five-year overall and disease-free survival were 71% and 66%, respectively. Overall survival was 87% in stage II and 62% in stage III patients, and disease-free survival was 84% and 56% in stage II and III disease, respectively. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, significant prognostic factors for better tumor control were: stage (II vs III, P <0.001), the number of involved nodes (< or = 3 vs > 3, P <0.0001), and no extracapsular node invasion (P <0.0001). The recommended dose of the combined radiochemotherapy regimen was generally well tolerated. The incidence of any > or = grade 3 acute toxicity (according to the WHO scale) was 13% diarrhea, 11% proctitis, 5% perineal dermatitis and 4% myelosuppression. Four (3%) patients had radiotherapy-related severe late toxicity which required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The study provided recurrence rates and survival similar to other adjuvant radiochemotherapy regimens published in the literature. However, in view of the low 5-year survival rate recorded in stage III patients, a different approach should be investigated.
Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Chemotherapy and concurrent irradiation, intended to cure, are presently standard treatments for non metastatic, unresectable oesophageal cancer. The results of the combined therapy are superior to those of radiotherapy alone, attaining 25-35% 2-year survival rates. However these results mainly refer to stage I and II tumours as most of the available literature has focussed on these groups. The aim of our report is to present our experience with Stage III and IV patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-four Stage III and IV oesophageal cancer patients were referred to our Departments from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1996. Diagnosis was obtained through oesophagoscopy and biopsy, stage was assessed by physical examination, chest CT scan, bronchoscopy, barium X-ray examination, upper abdomen ultrasonography and bone nuclide scan. Thirty-four patients, with no signs of blood-born metastases and in satisfactory medical conditions (i.e. age not exceeding 70 years, weight loss not exceeding 10% of body weight, normal serum values of BUN and creatinine, no other severe disease), were submitted to concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. The case features were as follows: histology of squamous cell carcinoma in 32 cases, of adenocarcinoma in 2; tumour in the upper third of the oesophagus in 11 (32.5%), in the middle third in 18 (53%), in the lower third in 5 (14.5%); male/female ratio 29/5, age 48-68 years (mean 56), Karnofsky performance status of 60% or higher. On referral, 18 out of 34 (53%) had a weight loss more than 5% of body weight and 22 (64.5%) had dysphagia. Twenty-one had Stage III (61.75%) and 13 stage IV (38.25%) cancer, with metastasis limited to the supraclavicular or coeliac nodes, which could be included in the radiation volume. In all cases chemotherapy consisted of 5-Fluoruracil (administered in a continuous i.v. infusion, from day 1 to 5, with a 750-1.000 mg/n.sq daily dose) and Cisplatin (75-100 mg/n.sq on the first day, or 20 mg/n.sq for 5 consecutive daily doses, administered by i.v. bolus). Three to 5 cycles were administered, one every 21 days. Irradiation started with the first cycle of chemotherapy in 5 patients, with the second or third cycle in 29. At least two cycles of chemotherapy were administered during the course of radiation. Radiotherapy was performed with 4 to 18 MeV linear accelerator X-rays, or telecobalt, through opposite anterior and posterior treatment portals or more complex field arrangements. The doses were in the range of 44-66 Gy, with fractionation of 5x180-200 cGy weekly sessions. After treatment, periodic follow-up controls were carried out in all cases. Thorough restaging was performed only in selected cases, thus a systematic evaluation of objective responses was not possible. Data on improvement of swallowing were always available, however, and the early therapeutic results were analysed accordingly. Toxicity was recorded according to the WHO parameters. Two-year survival after conclusion of the treatment was calculated according to Kaplan and Maier. Survival was analysed (log-rank test) according to stage, Performance Status, oesophagectomy and body weight loss. RESULTS: After treatment, subjective symptomatic relief occurred in 17 of the 22 patients presenting dysphagia (77.5%). Acute toxicity (Grade III or IV WHO) of the treatment accounted for 47% of hematologic adverse effects, 40% of mucositis, 20.5% of vomiting or diarrhoea not responding to drug treatment. Treatment delays of more than one week, due to toxicity, occurred in 23.5%. Moreover, we observed 20.5% of mild cardiotoxicity and 6% of mild nephrotoxicity. No symptomatic lung fibrosis was observed. No death could be related to toxicity. Overall 2 year survival was 13%, with a median value of 10 months. Survival analysis, according to stage, showed 2 year values of 24% in Stage III and 0% in Stage IV (p=0.09). No significant difference was related to Performance Status and weight loss. Six patients showed a remarkable improvement in symptoms and general conditions after treatment, and were restaged with oesophagoscopy, thoracic CT scan and bronchoscopy, which evidenced resectable residual tumors, and they were then operated. Although histologic examination showed tumour in all the resected specimens, 2 patients survived more than two years (33.5% survival, median 14 months). Due to the small number of operated patients, no attempt was made to assess the significance of this result, in comparison with the other cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Many Stage III and IV patients, selected for an aggressive chemo-radiation approach on the grounds of satisfactory medical conditions, can obtain relief of dysphagia. Toxicity can be severe, but is rarely life-threatening. Some cases, without extrathoracic spread of the tumor can achieve long term survival (in our experience 24% 2-year survival in Stage III, in our experience which favourably compares with the results obtained by other authors). Whether surgery may improve the therapeutic results of chemo-radiotherapy in patients whose tumour has become resectable, is an issue that cannot be satisfactorily addressed on the basis of our experience, nor are the results from the available literature exhaustive to this regard.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiotherapy is often administered in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), but no studies have been published on the incidence of radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM) in long-term surviving patients. Our report addresses this topic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 465 consecutive MSCC patients submitted to radiotherapy between 1988 and 1997, 13 live patients (seven females, six males, median age 69 years, median follow-up 69 months) surviving for 2 years or more were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate RIM. All patients underwent radiotherapy. Eight patients underwent a short-course regimen of 8 Gy, with 7 days rest, and then another 8 Gy. Five patients underwent a split-course regimen of 5 Gy x 3, 4 days rest, and then 3 Gy x 5. Only one patient also underwent laminectomy. Full neurological examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed. RESULTS: Of 12 patients submitted to radiotherapy alone, 11 were ambulant (eight without support and three with support) with good bladder function. In nine of these 11 patients, MRI was negative; in one case MRI evidenced an in-field relapse 30 months after the end of radiotherapy, and in the other, two new MSCC foci outside the irradiated spine. In the remaining patient RIM was suspected at 18 months after radiotherapy when the patient became paraplegic and cystoplegic, and magnetic resonance images evidenced an ischemic injury in the irradiated area. The only patient treated with surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy worsened and remained paraparetic. Magnetic resonance images showed cord atrophy at the surgical level, explained as an ischemic necrosis due to surgery injury. CONCLUSIONS: On the grounds of our data regarding RIM in long-term surviving MSCC patients, we believe that a hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen can be used for the majority of patients. For a minority of patients, more protracted radiation regimens could be considered.
Subject(s)
Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Spinal Cord Compression/radiotherapy , Spinal Cord Diseases/etiology , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Aged , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord/pathology , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Cord Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
Experiences on preoperative radiation therapy with conventional fractionation for rectal cancer are reviewed. Results in terms of local control, survival and sphincter preservation are focused in resectable disease; the impact on resectability, local control and survival are analysed in unresectable disease. Randomized trials reported in the 80s, demonstrated a significant impact on local control with a pre-op dose of 34.5-40 Gy vs surgery alone. An increased risk of complications was reported because of the suboptimal treatment techniques used. No increase in operative mortality was noted and no impact on survival was reported. Recent non-randomized trials demonstrated more acceptable toxicity with appropriated treatment techniques. Doses of 45-50.4 Gy allowed an high clinical remission rate and downstaging at surgery. A longer interval between radiation therapy and surgery (4-6 weeks) influenced these results and about 75% of patients, who were declared to need an abdominoperineal resection at diagnosis, underwent conservative surgery. Retrospective studies in unresectable disease reported a resectability rate of 39.64% after 45-60 Gy of pre-op radiation therapy. Surgical resection demonstrated an impact on survival in most of these patient series. In conclusion, preoperative radiation therapy with conventional fractionation allows downstaging of initial disease with possible impact on local control, sphincter preservation in resectable disease and surgical resection in unresectable disease.
Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Preoperative Care , Rectal Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
From February 1993 to October 1997, 91 consecutive patients with inoperable (stage IIIB-IV) histologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer underwent palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy. Recently, the Medical Research Council studies on hypofractionated short-course radiotherapy (8.5 Gy x 2) have reported high control of symptoms caused by thoracic disease without toxicity. Based on these experiences and our previous positive trial on short-course radiotherapy (8 Gy x 2) in metastatic spinal cord compression, a prospective study of short-course palliative radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer was carried out. The regimen was 16 Gy given in two 8-Gy fractions, 1 week apart. Eighty-one patients were evaluable for response to treatment. Forty-eight (59%) patients were 65 years or older. Forty (49%) patients were naive to radiotherapy, whereas 41 (51%) had previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy. All but four stage IV patients (95%) had poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (i.e., 2-3). Clinical palliation was achieved in 62 (77%) patients. Performance status improved in 59 (73%) patients. The median palliation time ranged from 28% to 57% of patient survival. The median survival from the beginning of treatment was 148 days (range, 5-681 days). No difference in overall survival according to stage and previous chemotherapy was observed. Only performance status conditioned survival (performance status 1-2 vs. performance status 3; p = 0.0289). Short-course radiotherapy gave good results in terms of clinical palliation for thoracic symptoms, even in patients with poor performance status and pretreated with chemotherapy. The median palliation time was approximately 50% of patient survival time. Treatment was generally well tolerated-only 4 (5%) patients experienced World Health Organization grade III dysphagia. No late toxicity was recorded. The two-fraction regimen had social and economic advantages compared with the conventional ones.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Palliative Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy Dosage , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To assess the clinical outcome and toxicity of two different radiotherapy (RT) schedules for the management of metastatic spinal cord compression from prostate cancer, we performed a prospective analysis of 44 patients with the complication. METHODS: Two different RT schedules were adopted, a split-course regimen of 5 Gy x 3, 4 days rest, and then 3 Gy x 5, and a short-course regimen of 8 Gy, 7 days rest, and then 8 Gy. The split-course RT was adopted for all prostate cancer patients referred to our center between 1986 and 1992. Starting in 1993, the short-course RT was added for patients with a poor prognosis (i.e., paresis or paraplegia, low performance status, and/or short life expectation), whereas others still underwent the split-course regimen. So, 27 (61%) patients were treated with the split-course and the other 17 (39%) with the short-course regimen. Medium follow-up was 48 months (range, 6 to 123). RESULTS: Back pain total response rate was 82%. Effectiveness of RT on motor and bladder capacity was conditioned by pretreatment status of patients. All 20 (100%) walking cases maintained the function, whereas 11 of 24 (46%) with motor impairment regained the ability. The difference in response rate was statistically significant (P < 0.001). All 36 (100%) patients, able to void at presentation preserved the capacity, whereas 3 of 8 (38%) with sphincter dysfunction no longer needed an indwelling catheter. Posttreatment neurologic status was the only factor found to affect survival. Median survival, 9 months for the whole group, was 10 and 2 months for posttreatment walking and nonwalking patients, respectively (10 vs 2 months, P < 0.001). Neither presence of other metastases nor RT regimen used (split vs short-course) conditioned response rate, duration of response or survival. Acute or late, severe toxicity was never recorded. No patient complained of spinal cord morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Both split-course and short-course RT schedules were effective and without complications. Early diagnosis was the most important prognostic factor, but there was also recovery of function in about half of the patients unable to walk, and about one-third of patients with bladder dysfunction before treatment. Since length of the course of therapy is a factor with an important impact on the patient's quality of life, the short-course RT regimen adopted in the trial merits further investigation.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Cord Compression/radiotherapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Activity/physiology , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Compression/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Cord Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Spinal Cord Neoplasms/secondary , Urinary Bladder/physiopathologyABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January, 1990, to December, 1995, 138 consecutive patients with radically resected stage II and III rectal and rectosigmoid cancers were treated with adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Eighty-one patients with 24 months' follow-up were assessable. Low anterior resection (LAR) was performed in 64 (79%) patients and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in 17 (21%). Twentynine (36%) stage II and 52 (64%) stage III patients entered the study. Within 45-60 days from surgery all patients received 5-Fluorouracil chemotherapy at the dose of 500 mg/m2/iv/d 1-5, every 4 weeks, for six cycles. Chemotherapy cycles 3 and 4 were administered at the same daily dose on radiotherapy days 1-3 and 29-31. Radiotherapy total dose consisted of 45 Gy/1.8 Gy/day administered in 5 weeks with 18 MV photon beam to the pelvis with the four field "box" technique. Perineal scar was encompassed only after APR. A boost dose of 5.4 Gy to the tumor bed was given in 3 fractions of 1.8 Gy. Median follow-up was 37 months (range: 24-74 months). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Overall recurrent disease was reported in 28 of 81 patients (34%): local, systemic and both local and systemic relapses in 9 (11%), 14 (17%) and 5 (6%) cases, respectively. According to local extension, recurrence rates were 10% and 48% in stages II and III, respectively. Five-year overall and disease-free actuarial survivals were 64% and 61%, respectively. Median time to relapse was 15 months (range: 7-43 months). Significant prognostic factors for better tumor control were: stage (II vs III), disease site (proximal vs distal rectum), the surgical procedure (LAR vs APR), the number of involved nodes (< or = 4 vs > 4) and no extracapsular node invasion. The recommended dose of combined radiochemotherapy regimen used in this trial was generally well tolerated. The incidence of any grade > or = 3 acute toxicity (according to WHO grading) was 20% diarrhea, 6% tenesmus and 4% myelosuppression. Five (6%) patients had cronic diarrhea and other 3 (4%) radiotherapy-related severe late toxicity which required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study seems to provide similar survival and recurrence notes to other radio-chemotherapy regimens published in the literature. However, a more aggressive approach is warranted in stage III patients considering the low 5-year survival recorded.
Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Risk Factors , Survival RateABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome and toxicity of a short-course regimen of radiotherapy (RT) in selected metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1993 and 1995, 53 consecutive patients with MSCC from low radio-responsive primary tumors (non small cell lung, kidney, head and neck and gastrointestinal carcinomas, melanoma and sarcomas), or more radio-responsive ones (breast and prostate carcinomas, myeloma and lymphomas) with paresis, plegia, low performance status (PS ECOG > or = 2), and/or short life expectation, underwent short-course RT; a single fraction of 8 Gy repeated after 1 week in responders or stable patients, for a total dose of 16 Gy. Of 49 (92%) evaluable cases, 4 (8%) underwent surgery plus RT and the other 45 RT alone. Medium doses of parenteral dexamethasone (8 mg x 2/d) were given in all cases and precautional anti-emetics to those treated with fields covering the upper abdomen (20 of 49 cases). Median follow up was 25 months (range, 6-34). Response was assessed according to back pain, and motor and bladder capacity before and after RT. RESULTS: Pain relief was achieved in 67% of patients and motor function response rate reached 63%. Early diagnosis and therapy were very important in predicting response to RT; all but two (91%) pretreatment walking patients and all but one (98%) with good bladder function preserved these capacities. On the contrary, when diagnosis was late, only 38% of nonambulatory patients and 44% of those with bladder retention improved. Median survival was 5 months, with a 30% probability of survival for 1 year. Length of survival was significantly longer for patients able to walk before and/or after RT. Good agreement between survival and duration of response was found with no evidence of relapse in the irradiated spine. Sickness appeared only in a few cases. Slight esophagitis was more frequent: dysphagia for solid foods in one-third of patients irradiated on the thoracic spine. Late toxicity was never recorded. CONCLUSION: The short-course RT adopted gave a clinical outcome comparable with that resulting from more protracted regimens with only slight side effects. The use of a few large treatment fractions could be explored considering the associated advantages for patients and radiotherapy centers often overloaded by long patient waiting lists.
Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Compression/radiotherapy , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Adult , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy Dosage , Spinal Cord Compression/mortality , Spinal Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a conditioning regimen designed to overcome the increased risk of rejection and relapse associated with T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with acute leukemia received an allogeneic T-depleted bone marrow transplant from an HLA-matched (n=52) or one locus mismatched (n=2) sibling donor between June 1989 and November 1993. Nineteen acute myeloid leukemia patients and 17 acute lymphoid leukemia patients were in complete remission, and 11 acute myeloid leukemia patients and 7 acute lymphoid leukemia patients were in relapse. Patients were preconditioned with hyperfractionated total body irradiation of 1.2 Gy three times a day on days -9 to -6 (total 14.4 Gy), 10 mg/kg thiotepa on day -5, 4 mg/kg rabbit antithymocyte globulin on days -4 to -1, and 50 mg/kg cyclophosphamide on days -3 and -2. RESULTS: All patients were fully engrafted at a median of 15 days after transplant. No patient rejected the transplant or developed acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. Of 19 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission, 14 survive. Four of the 11 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in relapse survive. Twelve acute myeloid leukemia patients died (three of relapse, eight of toxicity, one of other causes). Eleven of 24 patients with acute lymphoid leukemia (one treated in relapse) are alive in complete remission; the other 13 died (nine of relapse, four of toxicity). Interstitial pneumonia, the main cause of toxic death, occurred in 9.26% of total patients. The median follow-up time at this writing is 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of rejection and graft-versus-host disease and the relatively low relapse and toxicity rates are evidence for the efficacy of our conditioning regimen.