Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 90(3): 512-520, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37871801

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited and conflicting data have been reported on the impact of dupilumab (DUPI) on patch test (PT) results and its efficacy against allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to analyze PT reactivities and relevance during treatment with DUPI to determine whether they could detect ACD in patients with uncontrolled or worsened atopic dermatitis (AD) who were receiving this agent. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study examined 76 DUPI-treated patients who had undergone PTs. The relevant information was collected during 3 visits. RESULTS: Overall, 36 patients (47%) had ≥1 positive PT reaction, and 142 PT results were positive. Twenty-three patients (30%) had ≥1 positive and clinically relevant PT result. Five of them had clinical eczema improvement after allergen avoidance. We compared the PT results of 36 patients before and during DUPI therapy, representing 1230 paired PT allergens, of which 1022 were the same, 34 were positive, 44 were lost, and 130 were uninterpretable. LIMITATIONS: Because the number of patients included remains limited, our findings should be confirmed with a larger sample. CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed the usefulness of PTs for patients receiving DUPI, with good PT reproducibility. We suggest that all DUPI-treated patients with AD developing partial responses or experiencing symptom worsening should undergo PTs to look for contact sensitization.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Atopic , Humans , Patch Tests/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Prospective Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/chemically induced , Allergens/adverse effects
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 89(3): 190-197, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37403438

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical characteristics and sensitivity of an essential oil patch test series (EOS) in patients sensitized to their own essential oils (EOs). METHOD: We analysed the clinical data and patch test results obtained with the European baseline series (BSE) and an EOS, as well as the mode of use of EOs, through a questionnaire included in the patient file. RESULTS: The study included 42 patients (79% women, average age 50 years) with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), 8 patients required hospitalization. All patients were sensitized to the EO they used, primarily lavender (Lavandula augustifolia, 8000-28-0), tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia leaf oil, 68647-73-4), ravintsara (Cinnamomum camphora oil, 92201-50-8), and 2 cases were attributed to helichrysum (helichrysum italicum flower absolute, 90045-56-0). 71% had positive patch tests to fragrance mix I or II, 9 only to the EOS and 4 only with their personal EO. Interestingly, 40% of patients did not spontaneously mention the use of EOs, and only 33% received advice on their use at the time of purchase. CONCLUSION: Patch tests with the BSE, limonene and linalool HP, and oxidized tea tree oil is sufficient to detect most EO-sensitized patients. The most important is to test the patient's own used EOs.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatology , Lavandula , Oils, Volatile , Tea Tree Oil , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Oils, Volatile/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Patch Tests , Tea Tree Oil/adverse effects
3.
Contact Dermatitis ; 89(3): 143-152, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37331721

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis to gloves is mostly induced by rubber accelerators. The European baseline series (EBS) appears insufficient to detect glove allergy. Since 2017, it is recommended to use the European rubber series (ERS) and to test the patients' own gloves. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical profile of glove-wearing patients with hand eczema (HE) and to evaluate their sensitisation profile to glove allergens and the value of testing the patients' own gloves. METHODS: We conducted a French multicentre study of patients evaluated for HE between 2018 and 2020 and tested with the EBS, the ERS and their own gloves in patch tests and semi-open (SO) tests. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were included; 32.6% of patients had positive tests to their own gloves or to glove allergens. Almost 45% of the sensitisations to glove allergens were detected only by the ERS. Among the patients tested both in patch tests and SO tests with their own gloves with positive results, 28% had positive SO tests only. Polyvinylchloride (PVC) gloves were positive in four patients. CONCLUSION: Our series confirms the need to test the ERS. All the patients' gloves must also be tested including PVC gloves. SO tests with gloves are useful as a complement to patch tests.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Rubber/adverse effects , Eczema/etiology , Allergens/adverse effects , Patch Tests , Polyvinyl Chloride/adverse effects , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Gloves, Protective/adverse effects
4.
Contact Dermatitis ; 87(2): 170-175, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35383393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The repeated open application test (ROAT) is an adjuvant investigation measure to patch testing in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. ESCD recommends a 15 days duration but its overall duration varies according to publications and patients hardly adhere to prolonged ROAT duration beyond 1 week. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Dermatology and Allergy Group of the French Society of Dermatology performed a prospective study with the aim of determining the best duration for the ROAT. RESULTS: A total of 328 ROAT results were collected for topical products, including cosmetics (60%) and topical medications (31.1%). Fifty-nine (18%) ROATs were positive, and 16 (5%) were doubtful. All the positive ROATs occurred within 10 days, with a median time to positivity of 3 days. CONCLUSION: According to our results, a minimum duration of 10 days is necessary to achieve a positive ROAT to a topical product.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatology , Allergens , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Patch Tests/methods , Prospective Studies
5.
Cutis ; 109(1): E5-E7, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35180059

ABSTRACT

Herpes zoster (HZ) was suspected as a predictive cutaneous manifestation of COVID-19, with a debated prognostic significance. We report a series of 5 cases of HZ occurring after vaccination with a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine (Comirnaty, Pfizer-BioNTech). These new cases do not prove causality between COVID-19 vaccination and HZ. The pathophysiologic mechanism remains elusive, but local vaccine-induced immunomodulation may be involved. The occurrence of HZ does not justify avoiding the second injection of vaccine due to the benefit of vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Herpes Zoster Vaccine , Herpes Zoster , COVID-19 Vaccines , Herpes Zoster/diagnosis , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/adverse effects , Humans , Nucleosides/adverse effects , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Oncol ; 2018: 1908065, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30631354

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective was to assess the response rate and survival of patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma (MM) and uveal melanoma (UM) treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 25 dermatology departments in France. All patients with stage III-C to IV MM or UM who were treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 mAbs between 2008 and 2016 were included and compared after adjustment for main prognostic factors with a second cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST v. 1.1 criteria at Week 12. RESULTS: Four-hundred-and-thirty-nine patients were included, 229 MM (151 immunotherapy, 78 chemotherapy) and 210 UM (100 immunotherapy, 110 chemotherapy). Response rates of MM patients treated with immunotherapy were 18/151 (11.9%; 95% CI:7.2%-18.2%), versus 11/78 (14.1%, 95% CI:7.3%-23.8%) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p=0.87). No tumor response was observed in UM patients treated with immunotherapy, versus 4/110 responses (3.6%, 95% CI:1.0-9.0%) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p=0.15). The adjusted overall survival (OS) of MM patients treated with immunotherapy was longer than that of patients treated with chemotherapy HR=0.62 (95% CI: 0.43-0.91), p=0.014, with an unadjusted median OS of 15.97 months [interquartile range (IQR)=6.89-27.11] and 8.82 months [IQR=5.02-14.92], respectively. The adjusted OS of UM patients treated with immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of patients treated with chemotherapy (HR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.66-1.44) p=0.92, with an unadjusted median OS of 13.38 months [IQR=6.03-29.57] and 11.02 months [IQR=6.13-23.93], respectively. CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy significantly improves OS for MM. The prognosis of metastatic UM remains poor.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...