Effectiveness and Health Outcomes of Collaborative Nurse Prescribing for Patients Anticoagulated with Antivitamin K in Primary Care: A Study Protocol.

The development of collaborative nurse prescribing (NP) in Andalusia (Spain) in 2018 gives us the opportunity to measure the impact of this practice. Scientific evidence indicates that prescribing is not more costly when performed by nurses and, in fact, is more economical in some cases. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of NP on the effectiveness, health outcomes and adverse events related to prescribing including in the follow-up of patients treated with antivitamin K oral anticoagulants in primary care (PC) by nurses. The design is a randomized clinical trial. The population comprises 1208 anticoagulated patients in 2019. The sample size calculation considers an alpha error of 0.05, a power of 99% and an effect size of 0.5, resulting in 127 users per group. Therefore, a total sample of 254 participants is needed. However, as the project intends to treat patients it will include the universal sample that meets the criteria in the two health centers participating in the study, with 575 participants in total. Data collection was carried out in the PC District of the Alamillo-San Jerónimo Clinical Management Unit of Sevilla for one year from January 2020. Data analysis is performed using the SPSS Statistics 25 package. We intend to study if nurse collaborative prescription in the follow-up and management of patients taking antivitamin K oral anticoagulants in PC is as effective as the traditional approach to follow-ups carried out by a family physician.

Repercusiones del confinamiento por COVID-19 en pacientes crónicos de Andalucía / Consequences of the COVID-19 lockdown in patients with chronic diseases in Andalusia

Objetivo: Conocer las repercusiones del confinamiento por la pandemia de COVID-19 en los autocuidados de personas con enfermedades crónicas y en su salud percibida, e identificar factores para el manejo y la gestión de su enfermedad en situaciones de emergencia. Método: Estudio cualitativo realizado en marzo-abril de 2020, durante el confinamiento por la pandemia de COVID-19, en Andalucía (España), mediante grupos focales virtuales usando la herramienta telemática Zoom. Se realizaron tres grupos con 34 pacientes (17 hombres y 17 mujeres) con enfermedades crónicas: artritis, diabetes, enfermedad cardiovascular, enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, cáncer de mama y fibromialgia. Resultados: Las personas con enfermedades crónicas refirieron repercusiones del confinamiento en relación con su vivencia emocional, sus recursos de afrontamiento, la información recibida, las dificultades para el autocuidado y el contacto/acceso a los servicios sanitarios, además de sugerir aprendizajes para el futuro. Más y mejor información, formación de pacientes, colaboración directa con asociaciones de pacientes por parte de los gestores y una mejora de la accesibilidad telemática a los servicios sanitarios destacan como las principales líneas de mejora para minimizar el impacto de futuros confinamientos en el autocuidado y en la salud de las personas con enfermedades crónicas. Conclusiones: Durante el confinamiento, las personas con enfermedades crónicas experimentaron dificultades más allá del riesgo de contagio: interferencias en el cuidado y en la atención sanitaria recibida. Es necesaria mayor información y más formación a los/las pacientes y mejoras en la accesibilidad a los servicios sanitarios en situaciones de crisis sanitaria. (AU)

Objective: To understand the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on the self-care of people living with chronic diseases and on their self-perceived health, and to identify factors that may influence the management of their disease in emergency situations. Method: A qualitative study conducted in 2020 (March and April) in Andalusia (Spain) during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, through virtual focus groups, using the Zoom telematics tool. Three virtual focus groups were conducted, including 34 patients from Andalusia with different chronic conditions such as arthritis, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, breast cancer and fibromyalgia. Results: People with chronic diseases reported effects of the lockdown in relation to their emotional experience, their coping resources, the information they received, the difficulties to manage self-care, and the contact or access to health services. They also suggested some lessons learned for the future. The need for more and better information, patient training, involving patient associations, and improving telematics access to health services are the main areas for improvement to minimize the impact of future quarantines on the self-care and the health of people with chronic diseases. Conclusions: Besides the risk of contracting COVID-19, the difficulties encountered by people with chronic diseases during the lockdown include interferences in the self-care and the health care received. Health crisis situations demand more information, training for patients and improvements in the health services accessibility for patients with chronic conditions. (AU)

[Consequences of the COVID-19 lockdown in patients with chronic diseases in Andalusia]. / Repercusiones del confinamiento por COVID-19 en pacientes crónicos de Andalucía.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on the self-care of people living with chronic diseases and on their self-perceived health, and to identify factors that may influence the management of their disease in emergency situations. METHOD: A qualitative study conducted in 2020 (March and April) in Andalusia (Spain) during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, through virtual focus groups, using the Zoom telematics tool. Three virtual focus groups were conducted, including 34 patients from Andalusia with different chronic conditions such as arthritis, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, breast cancer and fibromyalgia. RESULTS: People with chronic diseases reported effects of the lockdown in relation to their emotional experience, their coping resources, the information they received, the difficulties to manage self-care, and the contact or access to health services. They also suggested some lessons learned for the future. The need for more and better information, patient training, involving patient associations, and improving telematics access to health services are the main areas for improvement to minimize the impact of future quarantines on the self-care and the health of people with chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Besides the risk of contracting COVID-19, the difficulties encountered by people with chronic diseases during the lockdown include interferences in the self-care and the health care received. Health crisis situations demand more information, training for patients and improvements in the health services accessibility for patients with chronic conditions.

Repercusiones del confinamiento por COVID-19 en pacientes crónicos de Andalucía / Consequences of the COVID-19 lockdown in patients with chronic diseases in Andalusia

OBJETIVO: Conocer las repercusiones del confinamiento por la pandemia de COVID-19 en los autocuidados de personas con enfermedades crónicas y en su salud percibida, e identificar factores para el manejo y la gestión de su enfermedad en situaciones de emergencia. MÉTODO: Estudio cualitativo realizado en marzo-abril de 2020, durante el confinamiento por la pandemia de COVID-19, en Andalucía (España), mediante grupos focales virtuales usando la herramienta telemática Zoom. Se realizaron tres grupos con 34 pacientes (17 hombres y 17 mujeres) con enfermedades crónicas: artritis, diabetes, enfermedad cardiovascular, enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, cáncer de mama y fibromialgia. RESULTADOS: Las personas con enfermedades crónicas refirieron repercusiones del confinamiento en relación con su vivencia emocional, sus recursos de afrontamiento, la información recibida, las dificultades para el autocuidado y el contacto/acceso a los servicios sanitarios, además de sugerir aprendizajes para el futuro. Más y mejor información, formación de pacientes, colaboración directa con asociaciones de pacientes por parte de los gestores y una mejora de la accesibilidad telemática a los servicios sanitarios destacan como las principales líneas de mejora para minimizar el impacto de futuros confinamientos en el autocuidado y en la salud de las personas con enfermedades crónicas. CONCLUSIONES: Durante el confinamiento, las personas con enfermedades crónicas experimentaron dificultades más allá del riesgo de contagio: interferencias en el cuidado y en la atención sanitaria recibida. Es necesaria mayor información y más formación a los/las pacientes y mejoras en la accesibilidad a los servicios sanitarios en situaciones de crisis sanitaria

OBJECTIVE: To understand the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on the self-care of people living with chronic diseases and on their self-perceived health, and to identify factors that may influence the management of their disease in emergency situations. METHOD: A qualitative study conducted in 2020 (March and April) in Andalusia (Spain) during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, through virtual focus groups, using the Zoom telematics tool. Three virtual focus groups were conducted, including 34 patients from Andalusia with different chronic conditions such as arthritis, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, breast cancer and fibromyalgia. RESULTS: People with chronic diseases reported effects of the lockdown in relation to their emotional experience, their coping resources, the information they received, the difficulties to manage self-care, and the contact or access to health services. They also suggested some lessons learned for the future. The need for more and better information, patient training, involving patient associations, and improving telematics access to health services are the main areas for improvement to minimize the impact of future quarantines on the self-care and the health of people with chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Besides the risk of contracting COVID-19, the difficulties encountered by people with chronic diseases during the lockdown include interferences in the self-care and the health care received. Health crisis situations demand more information, training for patients and improvements in the health services accessibility for patients with chronic conditions

La perspectiva de personas migrantes sobre el acceso a la atención sanitaria en el contexto de políticas de austeridad en Andalucía / The perspective of migrants on access to health care in the context of austerity policies in Andalusia (Spain)

OBJETIVO: Conocer la valoración de personas migrantes sobre su acceso al sistema sanitario tras la entrada en vigor del Real Decreto-Ley16/2012 y sobre el efecto que han podido producir los recortes económicos en dicho acceso. MÉTODO: Estudio cualitativo fenomenológico con entrevistas semiestructuradas, realizado en Andalucía, en dos fases (2009-2010 y 2012-2013), con 36 participantes. Se segmentó la muestra por tiempo de estancia, nacionalidad y ámbito de residencia. Las nacionalidades de las personas migrantes son Bolivia, Marruecos y Rumanía. RESULTADOS: Como elementos facilitadores del acceso en ambas fases se identifican la situación administrativa regular, la posesión de tarjeta sanitaria individual, el conocimiento del idioma, las redes sociales y la información. Los resultados muestran diferencias en el acceso a la atención sanitaria de las personas migrantes antes y después de la aplicación del RDL 16/2012, en el marco de las políticas de austeridad. En la segunda fase se agravan algunas barreras de acceso, como los tiempos de espera y la incompatibilidad de horarios, y empeoran las condiciones socioeconómicas y administrativas de las personas participantes. CONCLUSIONES: El diseño de políticas económicas y de regulación de la atención sanitaria debería tener en cuenta las barreras y los facilitadores de acceso como ejes fundamentales de la protección de la salud de las personas migrantes y, por ende, de la población general

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an assessment of migrant people regarding their access to the health system following entry into force of Royal Decree-Law 16/2012 along with the impact of economic cuts on such access. METHOD: Qualitative phenomenological study with semi-structured interviews, conducted in Andalusia (Spain), in two phases (2009-2010 and 2012-2013), with 36 participants. The sample was segmented by length of stay, nationality and area of residence. The nationalities of origin are Bolivia, Morocco and Romania. RESULTS: Elements facilitating access in both periods: regular administrative situation, possession of Individual Health Card, knowledge of the language, social networks and information. The results show differences in access to health care for migrants before and after the enforcement of the RDL 16/2012, within austerity policies. In the second period, access barriers such as waiting times or incompatibility of schedules are aggravated and the socio-economic and administrative conditions of participants worsen. CONCLUSIONS: The design of policies, economic and regulatory health care, should take into account barriers and facilitators of access as fundamental main points of health protection for migrants and, therefore, for the general population

Heroína, pero no Superwoman. Evaluación de una formación entre iguales para mujeres con cáncer de mama / Heroine, but no Superwoman. Evaluation of a peer-training activity for women with breast cancer

OBJETIVO: Evaluar una actividad formativa entre iguales para pacientes con cáncer de mama desde la perspectiva de género; conocer los resultados y profundizar en las experiencias de pacientes y profesionales sanitarios participantes. MÉTODO: Diseño multicéntrico mixto (Andalucía, 2017) con un cuestionario de evaluación pretest/postest con 102 pacientes formadas, midiendo hábitos de vida, limitaciones, uso y comunicación con los servicios sanitarios, y autocuidados; y con un análisis de contenido de entrevistas individuales y grupales (con 21 pacientes formadoras y 5 profesionales), centradas en experiencias, necesidades y propuestas de mejora. RESULTADOS: Las pacientes describen una buena salud general, con mejoras en dieta (7 a 7,7 de prestest a postest), limitaciones (se redujeron de 1,93 a 1,64 puntos) y autoeficacia (aumentó de 6,46 a 7,42 puntos), con diferencias significativas por edad, estado civil y nivel de estudios (mayor mejoría entre los perfiles más vulnerables). Las participantes reflejaron los beneficios de la formación en los aspectos personal, relacional, psicoemocional y sociocultural, y expresaron cambios en sus modelos identitarios y de vivencias de roles de género tras la formación. Los ámbitos de mejora fueron las cuestiones organizativas, de evaluación y continuidad de la estrategia formativa. CONCLUSIONES: La estrategia formativa es una experiencia con resultados positivos en la salud física, relacional y emocional de las participantes, y desde la perspectiva de género se constituye como una oportunidad, individual y compartida, para (re)negociar o deconstruir roles de género, en torno a la experiencia del cáncer de mama

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a peer-training intervention for women with breast cancer, from a gender perspective: to discover the results of the intervention and examine in-depth the personal experiences of patients and health professionals participating in the training activity. METHOD: Mixed method multicentre design completed in 2017 in Andalusia (Spain), with a pre and post evaluation questionnaire with 102 patients, measuring life style, limitations, use of health services, communication with professionals and self-management; and content analysis of semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 21 patient-trainers and 5 health professionals, looking at experiences, needs and suggestions for improvement. RESULTS: The patients described a good general health status, with improvements of: diet quality (7 in pre-test to 7.7 in post-test), limitations for daily life (from 1.93 to 1.64 points), self-efficacy (from 6.46 to 7.42 points). Age, civil status and level of education generated statistically significant differences, with more improvement in more vulnerable social profiles. Participants revealed the benefits of the peer-training at a personal, relational, psycho-emotional and socio-cultural level and expressed how the training changed their experiences around identity-construction and gender roles. The improvement dimensions related to organization, evaluation and continuity. CONCLUSIONS: The peer-training intervention is a positive experience for women's physical, relational and emotional health and, from a gender perspective, it represents an opportunity, at both individual and group level, to negotiate and deconstruct gender roles when living with breast cancer

Impacto diferencial, necesidades heterogéneas. La formación entre iguales para mejorar la salud y los hábitos de vida de los pacientes crónicos / Differential impact and heterogeneous needs. A peer-led training program for improving chronic patients' health status and health behaviors

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el impacto de la formación entre iguales de la Escuela de Pacientes sobre la salud autopercibida y los hábitos de vida de las personas con enfermedades crónicas. DISEÑO: Descriptivo, transversal de evaluación cuantitativa pretest/postest. EMPLAZAMIENTO: Andalucía. PARTICIPANTES: Novecientos sesenta y cuatro pacientes con diabetes, fibromialgia e insuficiencia cardíaca participantes en la Escuela de Pacientes entre 2013 y 2015. INTERVENCIONES: Sesión de formación para formadores en autocuidados para personas con enfermedades crónicas. Mediciones principales: Se usó un cuestionario que midió salud autopercibida, limitaciones, dieta y actividad física. El análisis estadístico fue descriptivo, bivariante, de correlaciones y de ganancias netas. RESULTADOS: Tras realizar la formación se observó una mejoría de la salud, con menos limitaciones y mejor dieta y ejercicio físico, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas en función del sexo, enfermedad, nivel de estudios y estado civil. Se plantean propuestas de mejora de la estrategia formativa, con atención a las necesidades específicas de los colectivos más vulnerables: mujeres y personas con menor nivel educativo. CONCLUSIONES: El impacto de la formación fue positivo y diferencial en función de los perfiles de participantes. Se recomienda profundizar en los resultados, a través de metodología cualitativa, realizar mediciones postest posteriores y adaptar la estrategia formativa a la heterogeneidad de las necesidades de la población formada

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of the peer-led training for chronic patients on their health status and behaviors. DESIGN: Descriptive, transversal pretest and posttest quantitative approach. PLACEMENT: Andalusia. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred sixty-four patients with Diabetes, fibromyalgia and heart failure, trained at the School of Patients between 2013 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Peer-training intervention for self-efficacy for chronic patients. Main measurement: Self-reported health status, activity limitation, diet and physical activity. Statistical analysis included descriptive and bivariate statistics, correlation coefficient and net gains for paired variables. RESULTS: Health status improved after the training, with less limitations and better diet and physical activity, with significant differences by sex, chronic illness, education level and marriage status. Improvement areas where identified for the training strategy, with special attention on the needs of more vulnerable groups (women, people with less education level). CONCLUSIONS: The peer training had a positive impact, with differences depending on social profiles. 1-year and 2-years posttest measurements are needed and a qualitative study is required in order to better evaluate the peer-led strategy and to adapt it to participants' needs and expectations

[Heroine, but no Superwoman. Evaluation of a peer-training activity for women with breast cancer]. / Heroína, pero no Superwoman. Evaluación de una formación entre iguales para mujeres con cáncer de mama.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a peer-training intervention for women with breast cancer, from a gender perspective: to discover the results of the intervention and examine in-depth the personal experiences of patients and health professionals participating in the training activity. METHOD: Mixed method multicentre design completed in 2017 in Andalusia (Spain), with a pre and post evaluation questionnaire with 102 patients, measuring life style, limitations, use of health services, communication with professionals and self-management; and content analysis of semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 21 patient-trainers and 5 health professionals, looking at experiences, needs and suggestions for improvement. RESULTS: The patients described a good general health status, with improvements of: diet quality (7 in pre-test to 7.7 in post-test), limitations for daily life (from 1.93 to 1.64 points), self-efficacy (from 6.46 to 7.42 points). Age, civil status and level of education generated statistically significant differences, with more improvement in more vulnerable social profiles. Participants revealed the benefits of the peer-training at a personal, relational, psycho-emotional and socio-cultural level and expressed how the training changed their experiences around identity-construction and gender roles. The improvement dimensions related to organization, evaluation and continuity. CONCLUSIONS: The peer-training intervention is a positive experience for women's physical, relational and emotional health and, from a gender perspective, it represents an opportunity, at both individual and group level, to negotiate and deconstruct gender roles when living with breast cancer.

[The perspective of migrants on access to health care in the context of austerity policies in Andalusia (Spain)]. / La perspectiva de personas migrantes sobre el acceso a la atención sanitaria en el contexto de políticas de austeridad en Andalucía.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an assessment of migrant people regarding their access to the health system following entry into force of Royal Decree-Law 16/2012 along with the impact of economic cuts on such access. METHOD: Qualitative phenomenological study with semi-structured interviews, conducted in Andalusia (Spain), in two phases (2009-2010 and 2012-2013), with 36 participants. The sample was segmented by length of stay, nationality and area of residence. The nationalities of origin are Bolivia, Morocco and Romania. RESULTS: Elements facilitating access in both periods: regular administrative situation, possession of Individual Health Card, knowledge of the language, social networks and information. The results show differences in access to health care for migrants before and after the enforcement of the RDL 16/2012, within austerity policies. In the second period, access barriers such as waiting times or incompatibility of schedules are aggravated and the socio-economic and administrative conditions of participants worsen. CONCLUSIONS: The design of policies, economic and regulatory health care, should take into account barriers and facilitators of access as fundamental main points of health protection for migrants and, therefore, for the general population.

[Differential impact and heterogeneous needs. A peer-led training program for improving chronic patients' health status and health behaviors]. / Impacto diferencial, necesidades heterogéneas. La formación entre iguales para mejorar la salud y los hábitos de vida de los pacientes crónicos.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of the peer-led training for chronic patients on their health status and behaviors. DESIGN: Descriptive, transversal pretest and posttest quantitative approach. PLACEMENT: Andalusia. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred sixty-four patients with Diabetes, fibromyalgia and heart failure, trained at the School of Patients between 2013 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Peer-training intervention for self-efficacy for chronic patients. MAIN MEASUREMENT: Self-reported health status, activity limitation, diet and physical activity. Statistical analysis included descriptive and bivariate statistics, correlation coefficient and net gains for paired variables. RESULTS: Health status improved after the training, with less limitations and better diet and physical activity, with significant differences by sex, chronic illness, education level and marriage status. Improvement areas where identified for the training strategy, with special attention on the needs of more vulnerable groups (women, people with less education level). CONCLUSIONS: The peer training had a positive impact, with differences depending on social profiles. 1-year and 2-years posttest measurements are needed and a qualitative study is required in order to better evaluate the peer-led strategy and to adapt it to participants' needs and expectations.

Formación en salud comunitaria: retos, amenazas y oportunidades. Informe SESPAS 2018 / Training in community health: challenges, threats and opportunities. SESPAS Report 2018

La incorporación de contenidos docentes relativos a la salud comunitaria en los programas formativos de enfermería y medicina contribuye a acrecentar la calidad, el rigor y la sostenibilidad de las intervenciones comunitarias. En este artículo dialogamos sobre cómo la medicina familiar y comunitaria y la atención primaria siguen sin ser consideradas disciplinas nucleares y transversales en las facultades de medicina españolas. Durante la formación especializada médica y enfermera existe una gran variabilidad en el aprendizaje sobre salud comunitaria, dependiendo de la capacitación, las prioridades y la motivación de los profesionales de atención primaria, las unidades docentes y sus residentes. La creciente inestabilidad laboral y los actuales sistemas de contratación dificultan la puesta en práctica de las competencias adquiridas, el desarrollo de actividades comunitarias y la consolidación de espacios y redes para la formación. A pesar de las adversidades, existen iniciativas que potencian con ilusión una formación de calidad en salud comunitaria, y que merecen ser impulsadas y visibilizadas

Incorporating community health teaching in the undergraduate nursing and medicine curriculum and postgraduate training programmes contributes to enhance the quality, rigour and sustainability of health-promoting community interventions. In this article, we discuss the failure of Spanish Medical Universities to include family and community medicine and primary health care as integrated and cross-cutting disciplines on the undergraduate curriculum. During specialized medical and nursing training, community health teaching varies widely depending on the qualification, priorities and motivation of the primary health care workers, teaching units and trainees. Growing job instability and current nurse and medical recruitment systems, are hindering learning being put into practice, as well as the development of health-promoting community activities and the strengthening of training networks and facilities. Amid such adversity, there are initiatives that provide quality training on community health and should, accordingly, be fostered and acknowledged

[Training in community health: challenges, threats and opportunities. SESPAS Report 2018]. / Formación en salud comunitaria: retos, amenazas y oportunidades. Informe SESPAS 2018.

Incorporating community health teaching in the undergraduate nursing and medicine curriculum and postgraduate training programmes contributes to enhance the quality, rigour and sustainability of health-promoting community interventions. In this article, we discuss the failure of Spanish Medical Universities to include family and community medicine and primary health care as integrated and cross-cutting disciplines on the undergraduate curriculum. During specialized medical and nursing training, community health teaching varies widely depending on the qualification, priorities and motivation of the primary health care workers, teaching units and trainees. Growing job instability and current nurse and medical recruitment systems, are hindering learning being put into practice, as well as the development of health-promoting community activities and the strengthening of training networks and facilities. Amid such adversity, there are initiatives that provide quality training on community health and should, accordingly, be fostered and acknowledged.

La formación entre iguales para pacientes con diabetes mellitus 2. Una evaluación cuantitativa y cualitativa en el País Vasco y Andalucía / Peer training for patients with diabetes mellitus 2. A quantitative and qualitative evaluation in the Basque Country and Andalusia

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la estrategia formativa entre iguales para pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 de los programas «Paciente Activo» (País Vasco) y «Escuela de Pacientes» (Andalucía). DISEÑO: Diseño mixto cuantitativo/cualitativo de evaluación pre/post de los programas de formación llevado a cabo entre 2012 y 2014. Emplazamiento: País Vasco y Andalucía. PARTICIPANTES: Un total de 409 pacientes y pacientes-formadores, participantes en la formación entre iguales. Muestreo intencional de 44 pacientes para el estudio cualitativo. MÉTODO: Análisis estadístico bivariante y ganancias netas de las variables comunes de cuestionarios pre/post del País Vasco y Andalucía: salud autopercibida, actividades diarias, ejercicio físico, uso de servicios sanitarios y autocuidados. Análisis de contenido de 8 grupos focales con pacientes y pacientes-formadores, incluyendo: codificación, árbol de categorías y triangulación de resultados. RESULTADOS: La formación entre iguales incide positivamente en la realización de ejercicio físico, uso de recursos sanitarios y autoeficacia en los cuidados, con diferencias por género en algunas dimensiones. La formación se valora positivamente en cuanto que: favorece la relación de los/las pacientes con el personal sanitario, genera apoyo grupal y autoconfianza y facilita la gestión emocional. Las áreas de mejora identificadas son: acceso y continuidad de la formación, y aceptación y apoyo por parte del personal y las instituciones sanitarias. CONCLUSIONES: Los beneficios en salud y calidad de vida promovidos a través de la formación entre iguales requiere la colaboración de las instituciones y personal sanitario, que deben facilitar el acceso, la continuidad y la adecuación de los contenidos a las necesidades y expectativas de los/las pacientes

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a peer training strategy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, developed in two training programmes in the Basque Country and Andalusia. DESIGN: Quantitative pre- and post-intervention and qualitative evaluation, developed between 2012 and 2014. Place: The Basque Country and Andalusia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 409 patients and trainer-patients, participating in self-management peer training programmes. Intentional sample of 44 patients for the qualitative study. METHOD: Bivariate analysis and net gains for common variables used in questionnaires in the Basque Country and Andalusia: self-reported health, daily activities, physical activity, use of health services, and self-management. Content analysis of 8 focus groups with patients and trainer-patients, including: coding, categorisation, and triangulation of results. RESULTS: Peer training has a positive impact on physical activity, the use of health services, and self-management, with some gender differences. The peer-training strategy is considered positive, as it strengthens the patient-health provider relationship, generates group support and self-confidence, and improves the emotional management. Patients identify two areas of potential improvement: access and continuity of training strategies, and more support and recognition from health providers and institutions. CONCLUSIONS: The positive impact on health and quality of life that this patient peer-training provides, requires the collaboration of health professionals and institutions, which should improve the access, continuity and adaptation to patient needs and expectations

Evaluación de una estrategia formativa entre iguales en fibromialgia: Un análisis de género / Evaluation of a Training Strategy between Peers in the Field of Fibromyalgia: A Gender Analysis / Avaliação de uma estratégia formadora entre pessoas com fibromialgia: Uma análise de gênero

La fibromialgia es una enfermedad crónica altamente feminizada que requiere mayor autonomía y autoeficiencia en el manejo de los cuidados. Objetivo: evaluar, desde una perspectiva de género, la estrategia formativa de pacientes con fibromialgia de la Escuela de Pacientes, basada en la formación "entre iguales". Método: estudio cuantitativo, con diseño cuasiexperimental pretest- postest, con 600 participantes con fibromialgia. Se utilizó un cuestionario adaptado del Programa de Paciente Experto de la Universidad de Stanford que recoge las variables: salud autopercibida, estrés emocional, calidad y hábitos de vida, limitaciones, relación con el personal sanitario y autoeficiencia. Se empleó el análisis bivariado y multivariado y análisis del cambio entre pretest/postest. Resultados: los participantes en la formación (98 % mujeres) describieron un mal estado de salud, con altos niveles de cansancio, dolor y limitaciones, con diferencias significativas en función del perfil sociodemográfico. Tras la formación, mejoró el estrés emocional y los hábitos de vida, se redujeron las visitas médicas y aumentó el automanejo de la enfermedad. Conclusión: la formación entre iguales representó una estrategia educativa eficiente y un espacio óptimo para reforzar el compromiso y apoyo social, con resultados positivos para la salud emocional y autoconfianza de las mujeres con fibromialgia.

Fibromyalgia is a chronic disease found more commonly in women that requires a greater autonomy and self-sufficiency in care management. Objective: To evaluate, from a gender perspective, the strategy for training fibromyalgia patients from the School of Patients, based on training "between peers". Method: Quantitative study before and after testing, with 600 participants with fibromyalgia. A questionnaire adapted from the Expert Patients Programme at Standford University that includes the following variables: self-perceived health, emotional stress, quality and lifestyle, limitations, relationship with the health care personnel and self-efficacy. The bivariate and multivariate analysis was used, as well as the analysis of change between pre-test/post-test. Results: Participants in the training (98% women) described a poor health, with high levels of fatigue, pain and limitations, with significant differences according to the sociodemographic profile. After the training, emotional stress and lifestyle improved, the number of visits to the doctor dropped and disease self-management increased. Conclusion: Training between peers represented an effective education strategy and an optimal opportunity to reinforce social commitment and support, with positive results for the emotional health and self-confidence of women with fibromyalgia.

A fibromialgia é uma doença crônica altamente feminizada que requer maior autonomia e autoeficiência na gestão dos cuidados. Objetivo: avaliar, sob uma perspectiva de gênero, a estratégia formadora de pacientes com fibromialgia da Escola de Pacientes, baseada na formação "entre iguais". Método: estudo quantitativo pré-teste e pós-teste, realizado com 600 participantes na formação sobre fibromialgia. Utilizou-se um questionário adaptado do Programa de Paciente Especializado da Stanford University, que coleta as variáveis: saúde autopercebida, estresse emocional, qualidade e hábitos de vida, limitações, relação com o pessoal sanitário e autoeficiência. Empregou-se a análise bivariada e multivariada, e a análise da mudança entre pré-teste e pós-teste. Resultados: os participantes na formação (98% mulheres) descreveram um mau estado de saúde, com altos níveis de cansaço, dor e limitações, com diferenças significativas em função do perfil sociodemográfico. Após a formação, melhorou-se o estresse emocional e os hábitos de vida, reduzem-se as visitas médicas e aumentou-se a autogestão da doença. Conclusão: a formação entre iguais representou uma estratégia educativa eficiente e um espaço adequado para reforçar o compromisso e o apoio social, com resultados positivos para a saúde emocional e a autoconfiança das mulheres com fibromialgia.

[Peer training for patients with diabetes mellitus 2. A quantitative and qualitative evaluation in the Basque Country and Andalusia]. / La formación entre iguales para pacientes con diabetes mellitus 2. Una evaluación cuantitativa y cualitativa en el País Vasco y Andalucía.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a peer training strategy for patients with type2 diabetes mellitus, developed in two training programmes in the Basque Country and Andalusia. DESIGN: Quantitative pre- and post-intervention and qualitative evaluation, developed between 2012 and 2014. PLACE: The Basque Country and Andalusia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 409 patients and trainer-patients, participating in self-management peer training programmes. Intentional sample of 44 patients for the qualitative study. METHOD: Bivariate analysis and net gains for common variables used in questionnaires in the Basque Country and Andalusia: self-reported health, daily activities, physical activity, use of health services, and self-management. Content analysis of 8 focus groups with patients and trainer-patients, including: coding, categorisation, and triangulation of results. RESULTS: Peer training has a positive impact on physical activity, the use of health services, and self-management, with some gender differences. The peer-training strategy is considered positive, as it strengthens the patient-health provider relationship, generates group support and self-confidence, and improves the emotional management. Patients identify two areas of potential improvement: access and continuity of training strategies, and more support and recognition from health providers and institutions. CONCLUSIONS: The positive impact on health and quality of life that this patient peer-training provides, requires the collaboration of health professionals and institutions, which should improve the access, continuity and adaptation to patient needs and expectations.

Clima emocional y liderazgo en los equipos sanitarios de Andalucía / Emotional climate and leadership in health care teams Andalusian

Objetivo: Conocer cómo influye el tipo de liderazgo de equipo en la calidad del clima emocional, en los equipos sanitarios de Andalucía. Diseño: Estudio descriptivo, cuantitativo con 6440 profesionales de la medicina y enfermería de 481 Unidades de Gestión Clínica del Servicio Andaluz de Salud. Metodología: Cuestionario on line de elaboración propia, con 15 preguntas de clima emocional y liderazgo. Resultados: El liderazgo de equipo es bien valorado por el personal sanitario, acompañado de valores de clima emocional medio. La capacidad del líder de facilitar la participación de todos los profesionales en el equipo, así como de definir y comunicar los objetivos y tareas a realizar, incide positivamente en la calidad del clima emocional. Conclusiones: Es necesario impulsar las habilidades motivacionales y cognitivas de liderazgo, para conferir mayor protagonismo y reconocimiento al personal sanitario y favorecer la gestión compartida en los equipos de trabajo

Objective: To research the influence of the leadership on the quality of the emotional climate, in the health care teams in Andalusia. Design: Quantitative, descriptive study with 6440 physicians and nurses from 481 health management units included in the Andalusian Health System. Methods: On-line questionnaire with 15 questions about emotional climate and leadership. Results: The statistical analysis revealed the existence of a well-considered leadership and a medium valued emotional climate. Leaders' capacity to promote participation of all members in the work team, and his o her ability to define and communicate the objectives, functions and tasks, have a positive effect on the quality of the emotional climate. Discussion: It seems important to promote leaders' motivational and cognitive skills, in order to confer a protagonist role and a more active professional recognition to the health professionals and to stimulate a shared management

El derecho de acceso sanitario en el contexto del Real Decreto-ley 16/2012: la perspectiva de organizaciones de la sociedad civil y asociaciones profesionales / Right of access to healthcare in the context of the Royal Decree-Law 16/2012: the perspective of civil society organizations and professional associations

Objetivo. La publicación del Real Decreto-ley 16/2012 (RDL 16/2012), que introduce cambios estructurales en el Sistema Sanitario Público Español, puede situarse en el contexto más amplio de políticas de ajuste en el momento actual de crisis económica. En el análisis de la interrelación de crisis económica, políticas sanitarias y salud, la participación ciudadana se nombra entre las potenciales estrategias para mitigar un impacto de la situación en la población. Desde esta valoración, se plantea el interés de un conocimiento de la perspectiva de la ciudadanía sobre las modificaciones introducidas por el RDL 16/2012. Métodos. Revisión narrativa de publicaciones de organizaciones de la sociedad civil y asociaciones profesionales relacionadas con el RDL 16/2012 en el contexto español. Resultados. Se observa una amplia respuesta ciudadana a la introducción del RDL 16/2012. Los documentos revisados incluyen un análisis del cambio del modelo sanitario inherente al RDL 16/2012, así como la previsión de su impacto en el acceso sanitario, la calidad asistencial y la salud. Las organizaciones de la sociedad civil y las asociaciones profesionales aportan recomendaciones y propuestas, además de ofrecer su colaboración en la elaboración de estrategias alternativas de ahorro. Conclusiones. La respuesta al RDL 16/2012 por parte de organizaciones de la sociedad civil y asociaciones profesionales indica el interés de fomentar canales de participación ciudadana para el desarrollo de políticas sanitarias basadas en el objetivo de mantener el carácter universal y la sostenibilidad del Sistema Sanitario Público Español en el momento actual de crisis económica y sistémica (AU)

Objective. The recent publication of the Royal Decree-Law 16/2012 (RDL 16/2012), which introduces structural changes in the Spanish Public Healthcare System, can be placed in the broader context of budgetary adjustments in response to the current economic crisis. An analysis of the interrelationships among economic crisis, healthcare policies, and health reveals that citizen participation is one of several potential strategies for reducing the impact of this situation on the population. This observation raises the interest to know the citizens’ perspectives on the modifications introduced by the RDL 16/2012. Methods. Narrative review of documents related to the RDL 16/2012 published by civil society organizations and professional associations in the Spanish context. Results. A broad citizen response can be observed to the introduction of RDL 16/2012. The documents reviewed include an analysis of changes in the healthcare model inherent to the RDL 16/2012, as well as predictions on its impact on access to healthcare, healthcare quality, and health. The civil society organizations and professional associations offer recommendations and proposals, as well as collaboration in elaborating alternative strategies to reduce costs. Conclusions. The response of civil society organizations and professional associations underscores the importance of strengthening citizen participation in the development of healthcare policies aimed at maintaining the universal character and sustainability of the Spanish Public Healthcare System in the current moment of economic and systemic crisis (AU)