Mangled extremity: limb salvage for reconstruction versus primary amputation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While MESS has historically influenced limb salvage versus amputation decisions, its universal applicability remains uncertain. With trauma systems expanding and advancements in trauma care, the need for a nuanced understanding of limb salvage has become paramount. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature reflects a shift in the management of mangled extremities. Vascular surgery, plastic surgery, and technological advancements have garnered attention. The MESS's efficacy in predicting amputation postvascular reconstruction has been questioned. Machine learning techniques have emerged as a means to predict peritraumatic amputation, incorporating a broader set of variables. Additionally, advancements in socket design, such as automated adjustments and bone-anchored prosthetics, show promise in enhancing prosthetic care. Surgical strategies to mitigate neuropathic pain, including targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), are evolving and may offer relief for amputees. Predicting the long-term course of osteomyelitis following limb salvage is challenging, but it significantly influences patient quality of life. SUMMARY: The review underscores the evolving landscape of limb salvage decision-making, emphasizing the need for personalized, patient-centered approaches. The Ganga Hospital Score (GHS) introduces a nuanced approach with a 'grey zone' for patients requiring individualized assessments. Future research may leverage artificial intelligence (AI) and predictive models to enhance decision support. Overall, the care of mangled extremities extends beyond a binary choice of limb salvage or amputation, necessitating a holistic understanding of patients' injury patterns, expectations, and abilities for optimal outcomes.

Evidence of the medical and economic benefits of implementing hygiene measures by a prevention link physician in trauma surgery: Study protocol for a biphasic multicenter prospective interventional pre-post cohort study using a structured intervention bundle development and tools of behavior change management.

INTRODUCTION: The German Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention recommends nominating one authorized medical specialist in every medical department as an infection prevention link physician (PLP). It has been roughly described that a PLP serves as a link between the infection prevention team and the respective clinical departments. No detailed evidence about the contribution made by PLPs to the decrease of infection rates is available in Germany. The "HygArzt" project aims to demonstrate the medical and economic benefits of the implementation of hygiene measures by PLP in trauma surgery/orthopedics. METHODS: A multicenter interventional pre/post cohort study design was chosen. The study will run for a three-year period, including a pre-, post-, and an intervention phase, in four different hospitals, one of which will serve as pilot. A complex intervention containing evidence-based infection control measures will be developed and implemented by a PLP to proof efficacy. After the successful implementation of the preventive measures in the pilot hospital, the concept will be transposed to the three remaining trauma and orthopedic departments to confirm the transferability and generalizability. To enable the PLPs of the non-pilot departments, a subject-specific training program will be developed based on the study results of the pilot hospital and offered to the PLPs. DISCUSSION: Data are intended to provide evidence that and, if so, to which extent the implementation of specific preventive measures by a medical department-specific PLP is possible and results in a reduction of nosocomial infections in orthopedic surgery and traumatology. CONTRIBUTION TO THE LITERATURE: The present study describes a novel complex study design to prove the effectiveness of intervention measures for infection prevention. The study design and newly developed methodological approach could serve as a model for similar studies on infection prevention in the future. For the first time, the presented research project "HygArzt" focuses on the implementation of hygiene measures by an infection prevention link physician (PLP) and investigates whether nosocomial infections, especially surgical site infections, can be reduced by the measures implemented. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German clinical Trials register DRKS-ID:00013,296. Registered on March 5, 2018, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00013296.

Implementation methods of infection prevention measures in orthopedics and traumatology - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of hospital-acquired infections, in the clinical field of orthopedics and traumatology especially surgical site infections, is one of the major concerns of patients and physicians alike. Many studies have been conducted proving effective infection prevention measures. The clinical setting, however, requires strategies to transform this knowledge into practice. QUESTION/PURPOSE: As part of the HYGArzt-Project ("Proof Of Effectivity And Efficiency Of Implementation Of Infection Prevention (IP) Measures By The Physician Responsible For Infection Prevention Matters In Traumatology/Orthopedics"), the objective of this study was to identify effective implementation strategies for IP (infection prevention) measures in orthopedics and trauma surgery. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A review protocol was drafted prior to the literature search (not registered). Literature search was performed in MEDLINE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE between January 01, 1950 and June 01, 2019. We searched for all papers dealing with infection and infection control measures in orthopedics and traumatology, which were then scanned for implementation contents. All study designs were considered eligible. Exclusion criteria were language other than English or German and insufficient reporting of implementation methods. Analyzed outcome parameters were study design, patient cohort, infection prevention measure, implementation methods, involved personnel, reported outcome of the studies and study period. RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 8414 citations. 13 records were eligible for analysis (all published between 2001 and 2019). Studies were primarily prospective cohort studies featuring various designs and including single IP measures to multi-measure IP bundles. Described methods of implementation were heterogeneous. Main outcome parameters were increase of adherence (iA) to infection prevention (IP) measures or decrease in surgical site infection rate (dSSI%). Positive results were reported in 11 out of 13 studies. Successful implementation methods were building of a multidisciplinary team (considered in 8 out of 11 successful studies [concerning dSSI% in 5 studies, concerning iA in five studies]), standardization of guidelines (considered in 10/11 successful studies [concerning dSSI% in 5 studies, concerning iA in seven studies]), printed or electronic information material (for patient and/or staff; considered in 9/11 successful studies [concerning dSSI% 4/4, concerning iA 5/5]), audits and regular meetings, personal training and other interactive measures as well as regular feedback (considered in 7/11 successful studies each). Personnel most frequently involved were physicians (of those, most frequently surgeons) and nursing professions. CONCLUSION: Although evidence was scarce and quality-inconsistent, we found that adhering to a set of implementation methods focusing on interdisciplinary and interactive /interpersonal work might be an advisable strategy when planning IP improvement interventions in orthopedics and traumatology.

Vancomycin-soaking of the graft reduces the incidence of septic arthritis following ACL reconstruction: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: (1) To compare the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between patients receiving routine pre-operative intravenous (IV) prophylaxis only intravenous (IV) infection prophylaxis and patients receiving additional graft-soaking in a vancomycin solution (5 mg/ml) perioperatively. (2) To review the literature regarding effects of graft-soaking in vancomycin solutions on outcomes, complication rates and tendon properties in ACLR. METHODS: To identify studies pertaining to routine pre-operative IV prophylaxis and additional usage of intra-operative vancomycin-soaked grafts in primary ACLR, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and MEDLINE were searched till June 2018 for English and German language studies of all levels of evidence following the PRISMA guidelines. Additionally, all accepted abstracts at the ESSKA 2018, ISAKOS 2017, AGA 2017 and AOSSM 2017 meetings were screened. Data regarding the incidence of septic arthritis were abstracted and combined in a meta-analysis. Data including outcome scores, complication rates and in vitro analyses of tendon properties were collected and summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Upon screening 785 titles, 8 studies were included. These studies examined 5,075 patients following ACLR and followed from 6 to 52 weeks post-operatively. Of those 2099 patients in the routine pre-operative IV prophylaxis group, 44 (2.1%) cases of early septic arthritis were reported. In contrast, there were no reports of septic arthritis following ACLR in 2976 cases of vancomycin-soaked grafts. The meta-analysis yielded an odds ratio of 0.04 (0.01-0.16) favouring the addition of intra-operative vancomycin-soaking of grafts. Across all available studies, no differences in clinical outcome (i.e. incidence of ACL revision, IKDC score, Tegner score), biomechanical tendon properties, or cartilage integrity between patients with and without vancomycin-soaked grafts were identified. CONCLUSION: The incidence of septic arthritis following ACLR can be reduced dramatically by vancomycin-soaking the grafts intra-operatively prior to graft passage and fixation. Within the limitation confines of this study, intra-operative graft-soaking in vancomycin appears to be a safe and effective method to reduce the incidence of septic arthritis following ACLR. Still, it remains debatable if the available data facilitate the recommendation for a universal application of vancomycin-soaking for all ACLR patients or if it should be reserved for patients at risk, including the use hamstring tendons, revision cases and in the presence of medical preconditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and Level IV studies.

High prevalence of bacteria in clinically aseptic non-unions of the tibia and the femur in tissue biopsies.

PURPOSE: There are several hints that bacterial colonization might be an often overseen cause of non-union. Modern procedures like PCR have been reported to diagnose bacterial colonization with a high degree of accuracy. While PCR is not ubiquitously available, we hypothesize that biopsies from the non-union site are comparable to PCR results reported in the literature. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of microbiological results of biopsies from non-unions (femoral or tibial, history of revision surgery, and/or open fracture) with stable osteosynthesis, no clinical signs of local infection were analysed. CRP and leucocyte count were taken on admission. Multiple tissue samples (soft tissue and bone) were from the non-union (1-4 cm incision). Samples were cultivated for 2 weeks and tested following EUCAST protocols using VITEK® 2. RESULTS: 11 tibia- and 7 femur non-union (44 ± 23.9 years), 11 open fractures (1 I°, 6 II°, 4 III° Gustillo Anderson), 0-5 revisions, and 4.1 (± 1.8) tissue samples were taken 8.5 (± 1.7) months after trauma. Cultures were positive in 8/18 (44,4%) (3/18 Propionibacterium acnes, 1/18 S. capitis, and 4/18 S. epidermidis). There was neither a correlation between number of biopsies taken and positive culture results (Pearson R: - 0.0503, R2 0.0025), nor between positive culture results and leucocytes counts (Pearson R: - 0.0245, R2 0.0006) or CRP concentration (Pearson R: 0.2823, R2 0.0797). CONCLUSION: The results confirm that the presence of bacteria in cases with no clinical signs of infection is a relevant issue. The prevalence of bacteria reported here is comparable that reported from cohorts tested with PCR or sonication. In most cases, there was only one positive biopsy, raising the question whether a contamination has been detected. Thus, to better understand the problem, it is necessary to gather more knowledge regarding the sensitivities and specificities of the different diagnostic procedures.