Mandatory reporting legislation in Canada: improving systems for patient safety?

Patient safety is a complex systems issue. In this study, we used a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature and a case study of provincial and territorial legislation in Canada to explore the influence of mandatory reporting legislation on patient safety outcomes in hospital settings. We drew from a conceptual model that examines the components of mandatory reporting legislation that must be in place as a part of a systems governance approach to patient safety and used this model to frame our results. Our results suggest that mandatory reporting legislation across Canada is generally designed to gather information about - rather than respond to and prevent - patient safety incidents. Overall, we found limited evidence of impact of mandatory reporting legislation on patient safety outcomes. Although legislation is one lever among many to improve patient safety outcomes, there are nonetheless several considerations for patient safety legislation to assist in broader system improvement efforts in Canada and elsewhere. Legislative frameworks may be enhanced by strengthening learning systems, accountability mechanisms and patient safety culture.

The 2018 decision to establish an Advisory Council on adding pharmaceuticals to universal health coverage in Canada.

Canada is the only Universal Health Insurance country in the OECD without universal insurance for outpatient prescription drugs, a situation generally perceived as unfair and inefficient. In June 2018, the federal government launched an Advisory Council on the Implementation of National Pharmacare, to report in 2019 on the best strategy to implement a national Pharmacare program that would provide all Canadians access to affordable outpatient prescription drugs. The Council was asked to consider three options: a universal public plan for all Canadians; a public catastrophic insurance plan that would kick off once spending on prescription drugs reaches a given threshold; and a more modest patching of existing gaps, providing coverage to those who are not eligible to any form of insurance. Beyond the relative consensus around the ideas that gaps in coverage should be filled to make drugs affordable to all, and that the costs of drugs are too high in Canada, the Council faces the challenge of addressing three underlying issues: 1) what amount of income redistribution will result from each of the three options; 2) how much savings would the implementation of a single payer generate? 3) what role restricting a national formulary would play in achieving those savings, and what would be the political consequences of narrowing the formulary?