Association Between Increased Linezolid Plasma Concentrations and the Development of Severe Toxicity in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis with linezolid is characterized by high rates of adverse events. Evidence on therapeutic drug monitoring to predict drug toxicity is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the association of linezolid trough concentrations with severe toxicity. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed consecutive patients started on linezolid for MDR tuberculosis between 2011 and 2017. The primary outcome was severe mitochondrial toxicity (SMT) due to linezolid, defined as neurotoxicity or myelotoxicity leading to drug discontinuation. The impact of plasma linezolid trough concentrations >2 mg/L was assessed in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models including time-varying covariates. RESULTS: SMT occurred in 57 of 146 included patients (39%) at an incidence rate of 0.38 per person-year (95% confidence interval, .30-.49). A maximum linezolid trough concentration >2 mg/L was detected in 52 patients (35.6%), while the mean trough concentration was >2 mg/L in 22 (15%). The adjusted hazard ratio for SMT was 2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.38; P = .01) in patients with a mean trough concentration >2 mg/L and 2.63 (1.55-4.47; P < .01) for SMT after the first detection of a trough concentration >2 mg/L. In an exploratory analysis, higher maximum trough concentrations were dose-dependently associated with toxicity, while lowering elevated trough concentrations did not restore baseline risk. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid trough concentrations >2 mg/L are strongly associated with the development of severe treatment-emergent toxicity in patients treated for MDR tuberculosis. Pending further prospective evidence, an individual risk-benefit assessment on the continuation of linezolid treatment is warranted in any patient with trough concentrations >2 mg/L.

Clinical Features and Outcome of Multidrug-Resistant Osteoarticular Tuberculosis: A 12-Year Case Series from France.

The optimal treatment for osteoarticular infection due to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis strains (MDR-OATB) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcome of MDR-OATB in France. We present a case series of MDR-OATB patients reviewed at the French National Reference Center for Mycobacteria between 2007 and 2018. Medical history and clinical, microbiological, treatment and outcome data were collected. Twenty-three MDR-OATB cases were reported, representing 3% of all concurrent MDR-TB cases in France. Overall, 17 were male, and the median age was 32 years. Six patients were previously treated for TB, including four with first-line drugs. The most frequently affected site was the spine (n = 16). Bone and joint surgery were required in 12 patients. Twenty-one patients (91%) successfully completed the treatment with a regimen containing a mean of four drugs (range, 2-6) for a mean duration of 20 months (range, 13-27). Overall, high rates of treatment success were achieved following WHO MDR-TB treatment guidelines and individualized patient management recommendations by the French National TB Consilium. However, the optimal combination of drugs, duration of treatment and role of surgery in the management of MDR-OATB remains to be determined.

Improvement of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders after antiretroviral therapy intensification: the Neuro+3 study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the effectiveness of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy to control HIV infection, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain frequent. The Neuro+3 study assessed the cognitive improvement associated with ARV intensification based on increased CNS penetration effectiveness (CPE) scoring ≥+3 and total CPE score ≥9. METHODS: Thirty-one patients, aged 18-65 years, with confirmed diagnosis of HAND and effective ARV therapy were included. The cognitive improvement was measured using Frascati three-stage classification and global deficit score (GDS) after 48 and 96 weeks of ARV intensification. Ultrasensitive HIV-RNA, neopterin, soluble CD14, CCL2, CXCL10, IL6, IL8 and NF-L were measured in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid at Day 0 (baseline), Week 48 (W48) and W96. RESULTS: The intensified ARV was associated with a median (IQR) CPE score increase from 6 (4-7) at baseline to 10 (9-11). From baseline to W96, the median (IQR) GDS decreased from 1.4 (0.8-2.2) to 1.0 (0.6-2.0) (P = 0.009); HAND classification improved from 2 to 1 HIV-associated dementia, 22 to 8 mild neurocognitive disorders, 7 to 17 asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment and 0 to 5 patients without any neurocognitive alterations (P = 0.001). In multivariable linear regression analysis, GDS improvement at W96 was significantly associated with CPE score ≥9 after intensification (P = 0.014), CD4 lymphocyte increase at W48 (P < 0.001) and plasma CXCL10 decrease at W96 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HAND, a significant cognitive improvement was observed after the ARV intensification strategy, with a higher CPE score. Cognitive improvement was more often observed in the case of a switch of two drug classes, arguing for better control of CNS HIV immune activation.

Linezolid-Associated Neurologic Adverse Events in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis, France.

Linezolid is one of the most effective drugs for treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB), but adverse effects remain problematic. We evaluated 57 MDR TB patients who had received >1 dose of linezolid during 2011-2016. Overall, patients received 600 mg/day of linezolid for a median of 13 months. In 33 (58%) patients, neurologic or ophthalmologic signs developed, and 18 (32%) had confirmed peripheral neuropathy, which for 78% was irreversible at 12 months after the end of TB treatment despite linezolid withdrawal. Among the 19 patients who underwent ophthalmologic evaluation, 14 patients had optic neuropathy that fully reversed for 2. A total of 16 (33%) of 49 patients had a linezolid trough concentration >2 mg/L, and among these, 14 (88%) experienced adverse effects. No significant association was found between trough concentration and neurologic toxicity. These findings suggest the need to closely monitor patients for neurologic signs and discuss optimal duration of linezolid treatment.

Long-term outcome and safety of prolonged bedaquiline treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Bedaquiline, a recently approved drug for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), is recommended for a duration of 24 weeks. There are scarce data on patients treated with this drug outside clinical trials.All MDR-TB patients who started treatment from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and received ≥30 days of bedaquiline were included in a multicentre observational cohort.Among 45 MDR-TB patients, 53% harboured isolates resistant to both fluoroquinolones and second-line injectables, and 38% harboured isolates resistant to one of these drug classes. Median bedaquiline treatment duration was 361 days and 33 patients (73%) received prolonged (>190 days) bedaquiline treatment. Overall, 36 patients (80%) had favourable outcome, five were lost to follow-up, three died, and one failed and acquired bedaquiline resistance. No cases of recurrence were reported. Severe and serious adverse events were recorded in 60% and 18% of patients, respectively. Values of Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) >500 ms were recorded in 11% of patients, but neither arrhythmias nor symptomatic cardiac side-effects occurred. Bedaquiline was discontinued in three patients following QTcF prolongation. No significant differences in outcomes or adverse events rates were observed between patients receiving standard and prolonged bedaquiline treatment.Bedaquiline-containing regimens achieved favourable outcomes in a large proportion of patients. Prolonged bedaquiline treatment was overall well tolerated in this cohort.

[Comparative study of two on aged care-based occupational (professional) training in medical home for aged and dependent patients with neuropsychiatric behaviors]. / Évaluation comparative de deux dispositifs de formation professionnelle axés sur l'accompagnement des résidents d'Ehpad présentant des troubles psycho-comportementaux.

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric behaviours of the elderly is the main issue for caregivers' distress, burn out and high turn-over. This situation will steadily worsen with longer lifetime. AIM OF THE STUDY: Specialised training of medical staff may decrease their distress: we compare both training programs Humanitude® et Formadep® outcomes. METHODS: A comparative open multicentric non randomised study included 459 elderlies of 9 EHPAD of Korian Company into 3 training groups: Humanitude®, Formadep® and a group control, with 29 weeks follow-up. We studied the scoring NPI-ES (FG and R), BMS-10, ECPA and GIR, medications, caregivers' burn out/absences/turn-over levels. Statistical significance were done by Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Ancova and linear regression. RESULTS: 320 caregivers and 3 groups of nearly 150 elderlies each, with around 50% dementia. In Formadep® group : lower scoring for a short time of total NPI-R (p<0.05), sustained lower scoring of NPI-FG « agitation/agressivity¼ (p=0.035) but transitional for its NPI-R (p<0.05), sustained higher scoring of NPI-FG «apathy/indifference¼ (p=0.002) but transitional for its NPI-R (p=0 .003), sustained lower scoring of NPI-R (p=0.0039) for Motor Aberrant Behaviours (MAB). In Humanitude® group: transitional higher scoring of NPI-R (p=0.025) for MAB et transitional lower scoring NPI-R (p=0.0032) for depression (Alzheimer Disease sub-groupe). No change for other parameters. CONCLUSION: Despite high variability of the neuropsychiatric behaviours in elderly, Formadep® training has shown a positive impact on the global distress and on three main challenging behaviours, compared to Humanitude®: this may be depend on their own philosophy. But caregivers' burden in dementia is not a one-factor problem.