The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in heart failure.

Alterations in the pharmacokinetic parameters of a number of medications have been observed in patients with heart failure. Because the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan has beneficial effects in patients with heart failure, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in 10 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure compared with 10 control subjects matched with respect to race, age, weight, and sex were studied. In a crossover study, participants were randomized to receive open-label irbesartan 75 mg as either an oral capsule or an intravenous (i.v.) infusion in the first treatment period. After a 7- to 10-day washout period, participants were crossed over to the other treatment arm. Single-dose noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, angiotensin II levels, and plasma renin activity (PRA) of irbesartan were determined for each participant. Following oral and i.v. administration, the pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in patients with heart failure was not significantly different from those of matched controls, indicating that there is little influence of potential changes in organ/tissue perfusion and gut edema on the absorption, distribution, and elimination of irbesartan. After dosing with irbesartan, mean increases in angiotensin II and PRA concentrations were higher in patients with heart failure than in the matched controls, but there was more interpatient variability in the patients with heart failure. Given the variability of the data, no definitive conclusions can be made with regard to these pharmacodynamic parameters. The results of this study indicate that the pharmacokinetics of irbesartan following oral and i.v. administration is not altered in patients with heart failure. Therefore, this indicates that no dosage adjustment is needed when prescribing irbesartan in heart failure patients.

Drug interactions with irbesartan.

Irbesartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of patients with hypertension. Although irbesartan does not require biotransformation for its pharmacological activity, it does undergo metabolism via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 isoenzyme and negligible metabolism by the CYP3A4 isoenzyme. The long term treatment of patients with hypertension is generally required for effective management of the disease, and the use of concurrent medications is usually inevitable. This paper reviews the drug and food interaction trials involving irbesartan that have been conducted to date. Based on the available literature, no significant interactions have been identified between irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide, nifedipine, simvastatin, tolbutamide, warfarin, magnesium and aluminum hydroxides, digoxin or food. Fluconazole did increase the steady-state peak plasma concentration (by 19%) and area under the concentration-time curve (by 63%) of irbesartan, but these increases are not likely to be clinically significant. In summary, irbesartan has demonstrated minimal potential for drug or food interactions in trials conducted to date.

The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in hypertensive children and adolescents.

An open-label study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics and antihypertensive response to irbesartan in children (1-12 years) and adolescents (13-16 years) with hypertension. Patients received single once-daily oral doses of irbesartan 2 mg/kg (maximum of 150 mg once daily) for 2 to 4 weeks (+/- nifedipine or hydrochlorothiazide). Plasma irbesartan concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography/fluorescence method from blood samples taken predose, up to 24 hours after dosing on Day 1, and up to 48 hours after the final dose. The plasma concentration-time profiles were similar between the 6- to 12-year and the 13- to 16-year age groups and to that previously determined from a study of adult subjects receiving approximately 2 mg/kg (i.e., 150 mg) oral irbesartan once daily. Mean reductions in systolic/diastolic blood pressure were 16/10 mmHg at Day 28 with irbesartan monotherapy (n = 8). Irbesartan was well tolerated and may be a treatment option for pediatric hypertensive patients.

Irbesartan does not affect the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in healthy subjects.

This open-label, single-dose, crossover study was conducted to assess the effect of irbesartan on the pharmacokinetics of total simvastatin acid in 14 healthy subjects. Subjects were randomized to receive one simvastatin 40 mg tablet or one simvastatin 40 mg tablet + one irbesartan 300 mg tablet. Subjects were crossed over to the other treatment after a 7- to 10-day washout period. Serum samples were collected at specified times before and over a 24-hour period after dosing. Safety was assessed by monitoring vital signs, laboratory tests, and adverse events. Irbesartan did not exhibit a clinically significant effect on the peak serum concentration and area under the concentration versus time curve to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of total simvastatin acid. The mean AUC0-infinity of total simvastatin acid was 74.55 ng x h/mL when simvastatin was given alone and 67.55 ng x h/mL when simvastatin and irbesartan were given concomitantly. The time to peak serum concentration for both treatments was 3 hours. No serious adverse events occurred during the study, and both agents were well tolerated. In summary, irbesartan had no significant effect on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of total simvastatin acid.

Irbesartan does not affect the steady-state pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the initiation or titration of irbesartan alters the pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics of warfarin in a clinically significant manner, thereby requiring additional monitoring of the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. METHODS: Daily doses of warfarin were administered to 16 healthy males for 21 days (10 mg on day 1 and 2.5-10 mg on days 2-21). Irbesartan (300 mg/day) or placebo was concomitantly administered on days 15-21. The pharmacodynamic parameters prothrombin time (PT) and prothrombin time ratio (PTR) were evaluated throughout the study. Plasma and urine samples were collected before and up to 24 h after administration on days 14, 15 and 21 for the determination of the maximum concentration (C(max)), time to reach C(max)(t(max)), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of S-warfarin and the cumulative urinary excretion of warfarin and its metabolites. Pre-dose plasma samples were also collected to determine the C(min) of S-warfarin (days 12, 13, 14 and 21) and irbesartan (days 19, 20 and 21). RESULTS: Analysis of PTR data revealed no significant difference between the group mean PTR values at day 22 and those at day 15 (P=0.699). S-warfarin concentrations in plasma and urine, as well as the urinary concentrations of the metabolites of warfarin, were not affected by concomitant single- or multiple-dose administration of irbesartan. Plasma C(min) concentrations of S-warfarin and irbesartan were also not affected. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically important effect of irbesartan on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin are likely to occur during concomitant administration; therefore, neither a dosage adjustment of irbesartan or warfarin nor any additional monitoring of the anticoagulant effect of warfarin is necessary.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.

The effect of hepatic impairment on the clinical pharmacology of the angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist irbesartan was assessed by comparing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in 10 patients with hepatic cirrhosis with a matched group of 10 healthy volunteers. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan, 300 mg taken orally once daily, were evaluated after single- and multiple-dose (7 consecutive days) administration to normotensive subjects in an open-label, multiple-dose, parallel group study. Pharmacokinetic data obtained after administration of single and multiple doses of irbesartan showed no significant difference between the two groups in time to maximum observed plasma concentration of drug (tmax), half-life (t1/2), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), apparent oral clearance (Cl(t)/F), renal clearance (Cl(r)), and accumulation index (AI). Steady-state levels of irbesartan were reached within 3 days in both treatment groups. After irbesartan administration on day 1, mean increases from baseline in plasma AII levels and plasma renin activity (PRA) were greater in the group with cirrhosis than in the control group. On day 7, mean increases from baseline in PRA were greater in the control group than in the group with cirrhosis. No discontinuations or serious adverse events occurred during the study. The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan after repeated oral administration were not significantly affected in patients with mild-to-moderate cirrhosis of the liver. No dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with hepatic insufficiency.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in healthy subjects.

The safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple doses of the angiotensin II (AII) AT1 blocker irbesartan were assessed in healthy subjects. In this single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind within dose group, sequential, dose-ascending study, 48 men were randomized to receive irbesartan at doses of 150 mg, 300 mg, 600 mg, or 900 mg daily. Subjects received a single dose of irbesartan (n = 9 per group) or placebo (n = 3 per group), followed by 3 days of placebo, and then multiple doses of irbesartan or placebo once daily for 7 days. The values for plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of irbesartan were dose proportional up to 600 mg. There were no significant differences between the dose groups in time to maximum concentration (tmax) or half-life (t1/2) after single and multiple doses. After multiple doses, urinary recovery was significantly lower in the 600-mg and 900-mg dose groups compared with the 150-mg and 300-mg dose groups. Steady-state concentrations of irbesartan were achieved within 3 days of administration with no clinically important accumulation. Irbesartan produced dose-dependent increases in plasma renin activity and AII levels. Irbesartan was well tolerated at doses from 150 mg to 900 mg daily; a maximally tolerated dose was not reached. Modest decreases in blood pressure without orthostatic symptoms were observed at irbesartan doses of 300 mg or higher. These results demonstrated the dose-proportionality of irbesartan 150 mg to 600 mg and indicated that doses up to 900 mg daily were well tolerated.

The effect of nefazodone on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of phenytoin in healthy male subjects.

The effect of nefazodone on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of phenytoin was evaluated in 18 healthy male subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of phenytoin, 300 mg, on day 1 of the study and the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug was determined. After a washout period followed by oral administration of nefazodone, 200 mg twice daily for 7 days, subjects received a single dose of phenytoin, 300 mg concomitantly with the morning dose of nefazodone on day 12, and the pharmacokinetic profile of phenytoin was determined again. Minimum plasma concentrations of nefazodone and its main metabolites indicated that steady state had been achieved for nefazodone when phenytoin and nefazodone were administered concomitantly. No significant differences were demonstrated between mean single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters of phenytoin when administered alone on day 1 and concomitantly with nefazodone on day 12. Assessment of adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and physical examinations indicated that concomitant administration of nefazodone and phenytoin was safe and well tolerated. These data demonstrate that nefazodone does not affect the single-dose pharmacokinetics of phenytoin, but do not preclude the possibility of such an interaction when phenytoin is administered on a long-term basis. A clinically significant interaction between nefazodone and phenytoin through a pharmacokinetic mechanism is unlikely.

Pre- and postoperative intra-articular analgesia for arthroscopic surgery of the knee and arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A double-blind randomized, prospective study.

We tested the effectiveness of different intra-articular analgesics and of pre-emptive intra-articular analgesia for arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and for operative knee arthroscopy. Eighty-two patients underwent operative knee arthroscopy under selective subarachnoid anaesthesia (group A), and 60 patients underwent arthroscopy-assisted ACLR under general anaesthesia (group B). Patients were randomly assigned to intra-articular analgesic treatment as follows. Group A: 1, morphine 2 mg; 2, preoperative morphine 2 mg; 3, morphine 5 mg; 4, preoperative morphine 5 mg; 5, bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml; 6, bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml + morphine 2 mg; 7, saline solution 20 ml. Group B: 1, morphine 2 mg; 2, morphine 5 mg; 3, preoperative morphine 5 mg; 4, bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml; 5, bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml + morphine 2 mg; 6, saline solution 20 ml. All opioids were diluted in 20 ml of saline solution. After postoperative administration the tourniquet was left in place for 10 min. After preoperative administration the intra-articular surgical procedure was delayed for about 5-10 min. In the postoperative period we recorded: total consumption of ketoprofen given i.v. on demand as rescue analgesic treatment; pain scores before surgery and at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th and 24th h; occurrence of local anaesthetic or opioid side-effects. Group A (operative knee arthroscopy): all morphine groups (A1, A2, A3, A4) and the bupivacaine group (A5) did not require ketoprofen postoperatively (P < 0.01 vs both groups A6 and A7). Pain scores did not differ significantly among groups. The percentage of patients reporting higher pain scores than before surgery was larger in control group A7 and in bupivacaine groups A5, A6 (83%, 40%, 60%, respectively) and lower in morphine groups A1, A2, A3, A4 (25%, 16%, 27%, 23%, respectively). Group B (ACLR): total consumption of ketoprofen was lowest in groups B2 and B3 (P < 0.001 vs all other treatments and vs control group). The percentage of patients who did not require any rescue analgesic was 60% in group B3, 50% in group B2, 32% in group B5 and 0% in all other groups. No-side effects occurred in any patient. Intra-articular analgesia is safe and effective for arthroscopic knee surgery. Morphine provides a better pain control both in operative knee arthroscopy patients and in ACLR. A 2 mg dose is adequate for operative knee arthroscopy but not for ACLR, where higher dosages are required (5 mg). Pre-emptive intra-articular morphine provides better analgesia than postoperative administration.

The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in renal failure and maintenance hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: An open-label, multiple-dose, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. METHODS: Forty subjects were divided into four treatment groups on the basis of 24-hour creatinine clearance (CLCR): normal renal function (> 75 ml/min/1.73 m2), mild to moderate renal impairment (30 to 74 ml/min/1.73 m2), severe renal impairment (< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2), and maintenance hemodialysis. Subjects received 100 mg irbesartan daily for 8 days (or 300 mg daily for 9 days for the hemodialysis group). Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 24 hours after the first and last of eight successive daily doses. In addition, arterial and venous blood samples were collected during two hemodialysis sessions from subjects requiring maintenance hemodialysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant linear relationship between CLCR and maximum plasma concentrations, dose-adjusted area under the plasma concentration time curve values on days 1 or 8, or any other pharmacokinetic parameters among the renal function groups studied. There was no indication of drug accumulation with repetitive dosing. In the subjects receiving hemodialysis, arterial-venous concentration differences for irbesartan were negligible, suggesting that this compound is not cleared through hemodialysis. In addition, irbesartan was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Based on pharmacokinetic parameters, no starting dose adjustment is necessary in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment, inclusive of hemodialysis. Subjects with volume depletion may have an exaggerated response to an initial dose of irbesartan and, under such circumstances, volume depletion should be corrected or a lower starting dose of irbesartan should be considered.

Caesarean delivery of a patient with truncus arteriosus.

Truncus arteriosus Type IV is a rare congenital cardiac malformation characterized by agenesis of the pulmonary arteries. Pulmonary perfusion is ensured by bronchial arteries. One common arterial trunk arises from both ventricles and systemic pulmonary and coronary arteries originate from this common vessel. Survival is rare without surgical correction. We report a case of uncorrected truncus arteriosus Type IV in a 28-year-old primigravid woman who underwent caesarean section.

Giardia intestinalis in North Island possums, house mice and ship rats.

Giardia intestinalis cysts were detected in faeces from 12.9% of 124 brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) trapped in Auckland, Hawke's Bay, the Wairarapa and Wellington; in faecal material from 61.0% of 77 ship rats (Rattus rattus) from areas of Auckland, Hawke's Bay and Wellington; and in faecal material from 25.3% of 182 house mice (Mus musculus) from the North Island. Possums and rodents in forested areas of Auckland and Wellington city water catchments were infected. The role of wild animals in maintaining and spreading Giardia in New Zealand is discussed.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of long-acting propranolol 60-mg capsules: a comparative evaluation.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period cross-over study was undertaken to evaluate the sustained-release characteristics of long-acting propranolol hydrochloride (Inderal LA, Ayerst Laboratories, New York, NY) 60 mg qd, to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of this formulation with conventional propranolol 20 mg tid, and to evaluate the proportionality of long-acting propranolol 60 mg (LA 60 mg) and long-acting propranolol 80 mg (LA 80 mg). Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated in 34 healthy subjects by assessing heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and the product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure (double product) after exercise-induced tachycardia following both acute (day 1) and steady state (day 4) drug administration. The Cmax following administration of LA 60 mg was 9.5 and 11.4 ng/mL on days 1 and 4, respectively, compared with 18.8 and 20.0 ng/mL with 20 mg tid (P less than .0001). The tmax for LA 60 mg was significantly later (P less than .0001) than for conventional propranolol. Additionally, the apparent plasma half-life was significantly longer (P less than .0001) than with conventional propranolol. The LA 60-mg formulation was dose proportional to the LA 80-mg formulation. Pharmacodynamic evaluations showed no significant differences between LA 60 mg and 20 mg tid at any times tested with either acute or steady state dosing. This study demonstrates that LA 60 mg displays characteristics of a sustained-release formulation, is proportional with LA 80 mg, and produces pharmacodynamic effects that are similar to 20-mg tid dosing.

Clonal growth and serial propagation of rat esophageal epithelial cells.

The clonal growth and serial propagation of rat esophageal epithelial cells in low serum-containing medium has been achieved without feeder layers or conditioned medium. To date, a total of four lines have been developed and maintained for as many as 40 passages in culture. Growth of the cells was possible only after modifying the culture medium (PFMR-4) by reducing the calcium concentration from 1 to 0.1 mM, and by adding low levels of dialyzed fetal bovine serum and seven growth factors; i.e. epidermal growth factor, hydrocortisone, ethanolamine, phosphoethanolamine, insulin, transferrin, and cholera toxin. Cell lines have been developed from both explant outgrowths and enzyme dissociated esophagi. The epithelial nature of the cells was confirmed by electron microscopy and immunological methods. Clonal growth studies revealed that optimal cell growth occurred in medium containing 2.4% dialyzed fetal bovine serum and 0.1 mM calcium. Calcium levels of 0.3 mM or higher caused the cells to stratify and undergo terminal differentiation. Coating the culture dishes with collagen, or a combination of collagen, fibronectin, and bovine serum albumin, increased both the cell growth rate and the colony forming efficiency. The successful long term culture of rat esophageal epithelial cells permits their use as models in studies concerned with esophageal differentiation and carcinogenesis.