Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic and metastatic prostate cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Objective: To analyze data available in the literature regarding a possible prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients stratified in non-metastatic and metastatic diseases. Methods: A literature search process was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In our meta-analysis, the pooled event rate estimated and the pooled hazard ratio were calculated using a random effect model. Results: Forty-two articles were selected for our analysis. The pooled risk difference for non-organ confined PCa between high and low NLR cases was 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.03-0.15) and between high and low PLR cases increased to 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16-0.43). In non-metastatic PCa cases, the pooled hazard ratio for overall mortality between high and low NLR was 1.33 (95% CI: 0.78-1.88) and between high and low PLR was 1.47 (95% CI: 0.91-2.03), whereas in metastatic PCa cases, between high and low NLR was 1.79 (95% CI: 1.44-2.13) and between high and low PLR was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.87-1.24). Conclusion: The prognostic values of NLR and PLR in terms of PCa characteristics and responses after treatment show a high level of heterogeneity of results among studies. These two ratios can represent the inflammatory and immunity status of the patient related to several conditions. A higher predictive value is related to a high NLR in terms of risk for overall mortality in metastatic PCa cases under systemic treatments.

Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Biochemical Progression After Primary Therapy in Hormone-Sensitive Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Comparative Analysis in Terms of CRPC-M0 Progression.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze whether the use of an intermittent (IAD) versus continuous (CAD) androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of biochemical progression after primary treatments in prostate cancer can influence the development of nonmetastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC-M0). PATIENTS: 170 male patients with an histologically confirmed diagnosis of PC, presenting a biochemical progression after primary treatments (82 after radical prostatectomy and 88 after external radiation therapy), nonmetastatic at imaging were considered for continuous (85 cases) or intermittent (85 cases) administration of androgen deprivation therapy. METHODS: we retrospectively collect all data regarding histological diagnosis, primary treatment, imaging for M0-M1 staging, PSA at progression, time to biochemical progression from primary therapy, ADT used, IAD cycles, so to compare in 2 groups (IAD vs. CAD) time for progression from the beginning of ADT treatment and type of progression in terms of CRPC-M0 versus CRPC-M1 cases. RESULTS: no significant (P= .4955) difference in the whole CRPC progression was found between IAD (25.8%) and CAD (30.5%) treatment at a mean of 32.7 ± 7.02 months and 35.6 ± 13.1 months respectively (P= .0738). Mean PSA at CRPC development was significantly higher in the IAD group (5.16 ± 0.68 ng/mL) than in the CAD group (3.1 ± 0.7 ng/mL) (P < .001). In all cases, imaging to detect M status at CRPC development was PET TC scan. At univariate analysis CAD administration significantly increases the RR for CRPC-M0 progression (RR 3.48; 95%CI 1.66-7.29; P = .01) when compared to the IAD administration, and this effect at multivariate analysis remained significant and independent to the other variables (RR 2.34, 95%CI 1.52-5.33; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: in our population with biochemical progression after primary treatment for PC, the intermittent administration of ADT significantly reduces the risk to develop CRPC-M0 disease when compared to a continuous administration of ADT, whereas no difference between the 2 strategies in terms of CRPC-M1 progression exists.

Is It Time to Anticipate the Use of PARP Inhibition in Prostate Cancer Patients?

The increasing diffusion of genetic analysis regarding the pathogenetic variants (PVs) of genes involved in DNA Damage Repair (DDR) mechanisms and the development of Poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) led to the first valid precision medicine option tailored toward metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). The concept of anticipation in the systemic treatment of mPC was initially adopted for androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to describe the expansion of their indications, from the setting of the late-stage second-line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to first-line therapy in selected cases. There is already mounting evidence in favor of the anticipation of PARPis in the first line of mCRPC therapy, and further evidence in favor of mHSPC is emerging. Many studies have demonstrated the synergism between ARSIs and PARP inhibitors. Recent discoveries regarding the crosstalk between the androgen receptor (AR) and DNA repair mechanisms are disconnecting the use of PARPis from genetic analysis. The new message emerging is that the combination of PARPis with ARSIs may work independently of DDR mutational status. As a matter of fact, most of the recent trials analyzing the combination of PARPis with abiraterone or enzalutamide as a first-line therapy enrolled mCRPC patients irrespective of their mutational status. The PROPEL trial concluded that the advantage of the combination was independent of PV status, despite a higher advantage being reported in the BRCA1/2 mutated subgroup. The MAGNITUDE trial, however, showed a significant advantage only in the DDR mutated subgroup, and the DDR non-mutated cohort was closed for further enrollment. The combination of PARPis with ARSIs represents a significant strategy with a view to the anticipation and intensification of care in mPC. However, it should not nullify the advantages of precision medicine linked to the genetic analysis of DDR genes.

Exosome Analysis in Prostate Cancer: How They Can Improve Biomarkers' Performance.

Exosomes are extracellular nanovesicles (EV), that is, carriers of different biomolecules such as lipids, proteins, nucleic acids. Their composition and the fact that their release dramatically increases in cases of tumorigenesis open up different scenarios on their possible application to research into new biomarkers. The first purpose of the present review was to specifically analyze and compare different methodologies available for the use of exosomes in prostate cancer (PC). The most widely applied methodologies include ultracentrifugation techniques, size-based techniques, immunoaffinity capture-based techniques (mainly ELISA), and precipitation. To optimize the acquisition of exosomes from the reference sample, more techniques can be applied in sequence for a single extraction, thereby determining an increase in labor time and costs. The second purpose was to describe clinical results obtained with the analysis of PSA-expressing exosomes in PC; this provides an incredibly accurate method of discriminating between healthy patients and those with prostate disease. Specifically, the IC-ELISA alone method achieved 98.57% sensitivity and 80.28% specificity in discriminating prostate cancer (PC) from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). An immunocapture-based ELISA assay was performed to quantify and characterize carbonic anhydrase (CA) IX expression in exosomes. The results revealed that CA IX positive exosomes were 25-fold higher in plasma samples from PC patients than in those from healthy controls. The analysis of PC-linked exosomes represents a promising diagnostic model that can effectively distinguish patients with PC from those with non-malignant prostatic disease. However, the use of exosome analysis in clinical practice is currently limited by several issues, including a lack of standardization in the analytical process and high costs, which are still too high for large-scale use.

Translation and validation of the Italian version of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-WISQOL) for assessing quality of life in patients with urolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis is a chronic condition, and it has been associated with a significant negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Several tools to assess patients' HRQOL have been validated in Italian, however disease-specific HRQOL instruments are still lacking. We aimed to develop and validate the Italian version of the WISQOL (I-WISQOL) in patients with urolithiasis. METHODS: The Italian version of the WISQOL was developed in a multistep process involving primary translation, back-translation, and pilot testing among a group of patients (N.=10). Patients presenting with urolithiasis were prospectively recruited from the outpatient stone clinics and completed both questionnaire WISQOL and SF-36. Demographic information, as well as medical and surgical data, were obtained through an interview. Internal consistency of the I-WISQOL was obtained with Cronbach's α. Correlation of total scores of the I-WISQOL and SF36 was assessed to determine convergent validity using Spearman Rho. Correlations between clinical variables and results from the I-WISQOL were analyzed to descriptively assess the association of interest. RESULTS: A total of 93 participants were evaluated and completed the Italian version of the I-WISQOL. The I-WISQOL demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.95) and good convergent validity with the validated SF-36 (Spearman Rho r=0.70, P<0.001). Using ANOVA analysis, a significant decline in WISQOL Score was noted with the increasing number of renal colics (P=0.0543), ER visits (P=0.037), number of inpatient hospitalization (P=0.025). At multivariate analysis, worse WISQOL total score was predicted by a greater number of renal colic events (ß=-4.92 [-8.81-1.04], P=0.014) and by a greater number inpatient hospitalization (ß=-7.31 [-14.35 -0.26], P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: The I-WISQOL is an internally consistent and valid instrument to assess HRQOL in Italian-speaking patients with kidney stones. Its use in clinical practice should be implemented in order to tailor the management of each patient.

Regenerative Medicine-Based Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence with Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze clinical trials on the use of autologous stem cell [SC] injection for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence [SUI] in humans. METHODS: We analyzed the effect in terms of UI improvement and continence recovery after treatment. A literature search was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Entry into the analysis was restricted to data collected from clinical prospective trials on humans, including female and male patients with SUI. We performed a cumulative meta-analysis to explore the trend in the effect size across different groups at follow-up. Available data were compared in terms of Event Rate [ER] for the percentage of pad-free patients. RESULTS: 12 trials were enclosed in the analysis. The sample size of patients with SUI ranged from 5 to 123 cases, mainly female cases. Autologous muscle-derived stem cells [MDSCs] were used in 9 and adipocyte- derived SCs [ADSC] in 3 trials. Considering a random effect model, ER of continence recovery was 0.41 [95%CI 0.29 - 0.54], with similar results between the ADSC [ER, 0.40;95%CI 0.12 - 0.69] and the MDSC group [ER 0.41; 95%CI 0.27-0.55] [I2 84.69%; Q 104.69 - p<0.01] [Test of group differences p=0.96]. CONCLUSION: Autologous MDSC or ADSC injection to treat SUI is demonstrated to be a safe procedure and a 41% mean rate of continence recovery is described. A higher effort should be produced to design better clinical trials, objectively evaluating either modifications inside the urethral sphincter or long-term functional results in terms of pad test and UI questionnaires.

Comparative Prospective and Longitudinal Analysis on the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte, and Albumin-to-Globulin Ratio in Patients with Non-Metastatic and Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the albumin/globulin ratio (AGR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) diagnostic and prognostic predictive value in a stratified population of prostate cancer (PC) cases. METHODS: Population was divided based on the clinical and histologic diagnosis in: Group A: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) cases (494 cases); Group B: all PC cases (525 cases); Group B1: clinically significant PC (426 cases); Group B2: non-metastatic PC (416 cases); Group B3: metastatic PC (109 cases). NLR, PLR, and AGR were obtained at the time of the diagnosis, and only in cases with PC considered for radical prostatectomy, determinations were also repeated 90 days after surgery. For each ratio, cut-off values were determined by receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis and fixed at 2.5, 120.0, and 1.4, respectively, for NLR, PLR, and AGR. RESULTS: Accuracy in predictive value for an initial diagnosis of clinically significant PC (csPC) was higher using PLR (0.718) when compared to NLR (0.220) and AGR (0.247), but, despite high sensitivity (0.849), very low specificity (0.256) was present. The risk of csPC significantly increased only according to PLR with an OR = 1.646. The percentage of cases with metastatic PC significantly increased according to high NLR and high PLR. Accuracy was 0.916 and 0.813, respectively, for NLR and PLR cut-off, with higher specificity than sensitivity. The risk of a metastatic disease increased 3.2 times for an NLR > 2.5 and 5.2 times for a PLR > 120 and at the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: PLR and NLR have a significant predictive value towards the development of metastatic disease but not in relation to variations in aggressiveness or T staging inside the non-metastatic PC. Our results suggest an unlikely introduction of these analyses into clinical practice in support of validated PC risk predictors.

Prognostic Value of Albumin to Globulin Ratio in Non-Metastatic and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

The aim of our meta-analysis is to analyze data available in the literature regarding a possible prognostic value of the albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. We distinguished our analysis in terms of PC staging, histologic aggressiveness, and risk of progression after treatments. A literature search process was performed ("prostatic cancer", "albumin", "globulin", "albumin to globulin ratio") following the PRISMA guidelines. In our meta-analysis, the pooled Event Rate (ER) estimate for each group of interest was calculated using a random effect model. Cases were distinguished in Low and High AGR groups based on an optimal cut-off value defined at ROC analysis. Four clinical trials were enclosed (sample size range from 214 to 6041 cases). The pooled Risk Difference for a non-organ confined PC between High AGR and Low AGR cases was −0.05 (95%CI: −0.12−0.01) with a very low rate of heterogeneity (I2 < 0.15%; p = 0.43) among studies (test of group differences p = 0.21). In non-metastatic PC cases, the pooled Risk Difference for biochemical progression (BCP) between High AGR and Low AGR cases was −0.05 (95%CI: −0.12−0.01) (I2 = 0.01%; p = 0.69) (test of group differences p = 0.12). In metastatic PC cases, AGR showed an independent significant (p < 0.01) predictive value either in terms of progression free survival (PFS) (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.642 (0.430−0.957)) or cancer specific survival (CSS) (OR: 0.412 (0.259−0.654)). Our meta-analysis showed homogeneous results supporting no significant predictive values for AGR in terms of staging, grading and biochemical progression in non-metastatic PC.

Comparison of Different Invasive Devices for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy.

Purpose: To compare different forms of invasive treatments for postradical prostatectomy (RP) urinary incontinence (UI) in terms of quantitative and qualitative parameters and continence recovery rate. Methods: We distinguished five categories of treatment: A = bulking agents, B = fixed slings, C = adjustable slings, D = circumferential compressor devices (artificial sphincter), and E = noncircumferential compressor devices (ProACT). A literature search was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a cumulative meta-analysis to explore the trend in the effect sizes across groups at postoperative follow-up. We compared the available treatment arms using standardized mean difference (SMD) and event rate (ER) for questionnaire results, number of pads/day, and percentage of pad-free patients. Evidence synthesis. 36 clinical trials were selected. At baseline, in the different populations, mean number of pad-day varied from 1.1 to 8.8, 24-hour pad weight varied extremely from 17.3 g to 747.0 g, and mean ICIQ-UI-SF questionnaire score varied from 4.8 to 18.6. Considering a random effect model among eligible studies, ER of continence recovery was 0.33 (95% CI -0.12-0.78), 0.63 (95% CI 0.55-0.71), 0.65 (95% CI 0.58-0.72), 0.50 (95% CI 0.34-0.66), and 0.53 (95%CI 0.36-0.70), respectively, in groups A, B, C, D, and E (I 2 85.87%; Q 249.82-P > 0.01) (test of group differences P=0.22). Conclusion: In our analysis, the use of adjustable and fixed slings is associated with the highest whereas the use of bulking agents is associated with the lowest recovery rate of continence after treatment. Results are conditioned by an elevated rate of heterogeneity in part explained with a high variability of consistence in urinary leakage at baseline among populations.

Which factors can influence post-operative renal function preservation after nephron-sparing surgery for kidney cancer: a critical review.

Introduction: The aim of this article was to compare different surgical approaches to perform nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in terms of preservation of renal function. Material and methods: We critically reviewed the literature from January 2000 to December 2020 including studies comparing different surgical techniques. Results: A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. Functional outcomes were evalutated in terms of percentual change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and impaired renal function (IRF) on scintigraphy. In cases with a mean age <60 years, the mean decrease in eGFR after NSS was 11.7% and that of IRF 10.0%, whereas higher changes were found in cases with a mean age ≥60 years. For open NSS, the mean eGFR and IRF changes were 15.3% and 21.1%, respectively; using the laparoscopic approach, the mean percentual eGFR and IRF changes were 13.9% and 11.1%, respectively; in robotic cases, the mean eGFR and IRF changes were 10.8% and 13.1%, respectively. In cases performed with global ischemia, the mean eGFR and IRF changes were 12.7% and 15.1%, respectively. Similar results were found distinguishing ischemia time ≤20 and >20 minutes, whereas using the off-clamp technique the mean decreases in eGFR and IRF were only 4.2% and 6%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients' age, tumor size, off-clamp technique, and robot-assisted approach were significant independent predictive factors able to influence renal function changes after NSS. A lower reduction of eGFR and IRF after NSS was reported in patients aged <60 years, submitted to a robot-assisted procedure, and using selective and cold ischemia <20 minutes or an off-clamp technique.

How the Analysis of the Pathogenetic Variants of DDR Genes Will Change the Management of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Herein, we analyze answers achieved, open questions, and future perspectives regarding the analysis of the pathogenetic variants (PV) of DNA damage response (and repair) (DDR) genes in prostate cancer (PC) patients. The incidence of PVs in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes among men with metastatic PC varied between 11% and 33%, which was significantly higher than that in non-metastatic PC, and BRCA2 mutations were more frequent when compared to other DDR genes. The determination of the somatic or germline PVs of BRCA2 was able to define a tailored therapy using PARP inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progression after first-line therapy, with significant improvements in the radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. We propose testing all metastatic PC patients for somatic and germline HRR mutations. Somatic determination on the primary site or on historic paraffin preparations with a temporal distance of no longer than 5 years should be preferred over metastatic site biopsies. The prognostic use of DDR PVs will also be used in selected high-risk cases with non-metastatic stages to better arrange controls and therapeutic primary options. We anticipate that the use of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) and in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) will be new strategies.

A biofeedback-guided programme or pelvic floor muscle electric stimulation can improve early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

PURPOSE: Urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is an early side effect after catheter removal. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare different forms of non-invasive treatments for post-RP UI and to analyse whether the addition of biofeedback (BF) and/or pelvic floor muscle electric stimulation (PFES) to PF muscle exercise (PFME) alone can improve results in terms of continence recovery rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a cumulative meta-analysis to explore the trend in the effect sizes across subgroups during a 12-months follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles were selected. At baseline after RP and catheter removal, mean pad weight varied extremely. At 1- and 3-months intervals, mean difference in pad weight recovery from baseline was significantly higher using guided programs (BF, PFES or both) than using PFME alone (3-months: PFME 111.09 g (95%CI 77.59-144.59), BF 213.81 g (95%CI -80.51-508-13), PFES 306.88 g (95%CI 158.11-455.66), BF + PFES 266.31 g (95%CI 22.69-302.93); P < .01), while at 6- and 12-months differences were similar (P > .04). At 1- and 3-months intervals, event rate (ER) of continence recovery was significantly higher using guided programs than using PFME alone (3-months: PFME 0.40 (95%CI 0.30-0.49), BF 0.49 (95%CI 0.31-0.67), PFES 0.57 (95%CI 0.46-0.69), BF + PFES 0.75 (95%CI 0.60-0.91); P < .01), while at 6- and 12-months ERs were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding non-invasive treatment of UI secondary to RP, the addition of guided programs using BF or/and PFES demonstrated to improve continence recovery rate, particularly in the first 3-month interval, when compared with the use of PFME alone.

How to Predict Outcomes from a Biofeedback and Pelvic Floor Muscle Electric Stimulation Program in Patients with Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to analyze the pre-operative and intra-operative variables that can condition urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), as well as continence rate recovery during a pelvic floor rehabilitation program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 cases with UI after RP were prospectively examined. All cases were homogeneously treated by the same surgeon, using the same RP technique. A combination of biofeedback (BF) and pelvic floor electric stimulation (PFES) performed by the same clinician and using the same protocol was used. Clinical, pathologic and surgical variables were analyzed in terms of 24 h pad test results (pad weight and pad-free status). RESULTS: Prostate volume (PV) strongly varied from 24 to 127 cc (mean ± SD 46.39 ± 18.65 cc), and the baseline pad weight varied from 10 to 1500 cc (mean ± SD 354.29 ± 404.15 cc). PV strongly and positively correlated with the baseline pad weight (r = 0.4215; p = 0.0269) and inversely with the three-month pad weight (r = - 0.4763; p = 0.0213) and pad-free status (r =- 0.3010; p = 0.0429). The risk of a residual pad weight >10 g after the rehabilitative program significantly increased according to PV (p = 0.001) and the baseline pad weight (p = 0.002 and < 0.0001). In particular, PV > 40 cc and a baseline pad weight >400 g significantly (p = 0.010 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and independently predicted a 5.7 and a 35.4 times increase in the risk of a residual pad weight at the three-month follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective trial whose primary objective is to verify the possible predictors, such as PV, that are able to condition the response to a pelvic floor rehabilitation program for UI after RP.

Influence of operative time and blood loss on surgical margins and functional outcomes for laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article was to analyze whether operative time and blood loss during radical prostatectomy (RP) can significantly influence surgical margins (SM) status and post-operative functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively analyzed prostate cancer (PC) patients undergoing RP, using robot-assisted (RARP) or laparoscopic (LRP) procedures. Blood loss was defined using the variation in hemoglobin (Hb, g/dl) values from the day before surgery and no later than 4 hours after surgery. RESULTS: From a whole population of 413 cases considered for RP, 67% underwent LRP and 33.0% RARP. Positive SM (SM+) were found in 33.9% of cases. Mean surgical operative time was 172.3 ±76 min (range 49-485), whereas blood loss was 2.3 ±1.2 g/dl (range 0.3-7.6). Operative time and blood loss at RP were not significantly correlated (r = -0.028275; p = 0.684). SM+ rates significantly (p = 0.002) varied by operative time; a higher SM+ rate was found in cases with an operative time <120 min (41.2%) and >240 min (53.4%). The risk of SM+ significantly increased 1.70 and 1.94 times in cases with an operative time <120 min and >240 min, respectively, independently to the surgical approach. The rate of erectile disfunction (ED) varied from 22.4% to 60.3% between <120 min and >240 min procedures (p = 0.001). According to blood loss, SM+ rates slightly but significantly (p = 0.032) varied; a higher rate of SM+ was found in cases with a Hb variation between 2-4 g/dl (35.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Independently to the surgical approach, operative time, more than blood loss at RP, represents a significant variable able to influence SM status and post-operative ED.

Recovery of Urinary Continence After Radical Prostatectomy Using Early vs Late Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation and Biofeedback-associated Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the early vs late use of pelvic floor electrical stimulation (FES) plus biofeedback (BF) in terms of time to recovery and rate of continence after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2007 and April 2012, a total of 120 patients who underwent RP were prospectively included in the study. In group 1 (60 cases), we included patients who presented a urinary leakage weight ≥50 g for 24 hours, 14 days after catheter removal. In group 2 (60 cases), we included patients who continued to present a urinary leakage weight ≥50 g for 24 hours, 12 months after surgery. In both groups, patients were prospectively submitted to the same program of BF+FES. RESULTS: Mean leakage weight became significantly lower (P <.002) in group 1 than in group 2 starting from visit 1 (2 weeks) through visit 7 (24 weeks). However, a significant difference (P <.05) between the 2 groups in terms of percentage of continent patients was achieved only at 2 weeks (group 1 = 20%; group 2 = 0%) and 4 weeks (group 1 = 66.7%; group 2 = 46.7%). The objective continence rate 6 months after the beginning of treatment was 96.7% in group 1 and 91.7% in group 2. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the treatment with BF and FES has a significant positive effect on the recovery of urinary continence independently to the time in which it is used (early vs delayed). This protocol might represent a noninvasive method for all patients undergoing RP, also in a 12-month interval from surgery.