ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to determine if the racial representation of patients enrolled in a large prospective scoliosis registry is reflective of the general United States population. Further, we studied whether there was an association between race, pre-operative parameters, outcomes and loss to follow-up. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for patients who underwent spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was reviewed, including self-reported race/ethnicity. The U.S. pediatric population and U.S. patients enrolled in the prospective registry were compared. The data obtained was analyzed for variations between races, for pre-operative variables and follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 2210 included patients in the registry 66% of patients reported as White, while 52% of the 2018 U.S. pediatric population reported as White. 15% of the registry reported as Hispanic/Latino compared to 22% of the U.S. pediatric population, 13% Black compared to 14% of the U.S. pediatric population, and 4% Asian compared to 5% of the U.S. pediatric population. Asian and White patients had statistically significant higher 2-year follow-up in all but one of six enrollment sites (P < 0.001). Native American, Other, and Hispanic/Latino patients had the highest BMIs. Native American and Black patients had the highest pre-op thoracic Cobb angles. Pre-op ages of Black, Hispanic, and Native American patients were statistically lower (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the association between race and patient follow-up and pre-operative factors in patients who underwent surgery for AIS. Black, Native American, and Hispanic populations were underrepresented both at pre-op and follow-up when compared to their relative proportion in the U.S. pediatric population.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed 15-year trends in operative factors, radiographic and quality of life outcomes, and complication rates in children with cerebral palsy (CP)-related scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Over the past two decades, significant efforts have been made to decrease complications and improve outcomes of this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a multicenter registry of pediatric CP patients who underwent spinal fusion from 2008 to 2020. We evaluated baseline and operative, hospitalization, and complication data as well as radiographic and quality of life outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Mean estimated blood loss and transfusion volume declined from 2.7±2.0 L in 2008 to 0.71±0.34 L in 2020 and 1.0±0.5 L in 2008 to 0.5±0.2 L in 2020, respectively, with a concomitant increase in antifibrinolytic use from 58% to 97% (all, P <0.01). Unit rod and pelvic fusion use declined from 33% in 2008 to 0% in 2020 and 96% in 2008 to 79% in 2020, respectively (both, P <0.05). Mean postoperative intubation time declined from 2.5±2.6 to 0.42±0.63 days ( P< 0.01). No changes were observed in preoperative and postoperative coronal angle and pelvic obliquity, operative time, frequency of anterior/anterior-posterior approach, and durations of hospital and intensive care unit stays. Improvements in the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities postoperatively did not change significantly over the study period. Complication rates, including reoperation, superficial and deep surgical site infection, and gastrointestinal and medical complications remained stable over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 15 years of CP scoliosis surgery, surgical blood loss, transfusion volumes, duration of postoperative intubation, and pelvic fusion rates have decreased. However, the degree of radiographic correction, the rates of surgical and medical complications (including infection), and health-related quality of life measures have broadly remained constant.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Scoliosis , Spinal Fusion , Child , Humans , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Kyphosis , Scoliosis , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Adolescent , Scoliosis/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Bone Screws , Kyphosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to design a risk-stratified benchmarking tool for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Machine learning (ML) is an emerging method for prediction modeling in orthopedic surgery. Benchmarking is an established method of process improvement and is an area of opportunity for ML methods. Current surgical benchmark tools often use ranks and no "gold standards" for comparisons exist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 6076 AIS surgeries were collected from a multicenter registry and divided into three datasets: encompassing surgeries performed (1) during the entire registry, (2) the past 10 years, and (3) during the last 5 years of the registry. We trained three ML regression models (baseline linear regression, gradient boosting, and eXtreme gradient boosted) on each data subset to predict each of the five outcome variables, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Pain and SRS-Self-Image. Performance was categorized as "below expected" if performing worse than one standard deviation of the mean, "as expected" if within 1 SD, and "better than expected" if better than 1 SD of the mean. RESULTS: Ensemble ML methods classified performance better than traditional regression techniques for LOS, EBL, and operative time. The best performing models for predicting LOS and EBL were trained on data collected in the last 5 years, while operative time used the entire 10-year dataset. No models were able to predict SRS-Pain or SRS-Self-Image in any useful manner. Point-precise estimates for continuous variables were subject to high average errors. CONCLUSIONS: Classification of benchmark outcomes is improved with ensemble ML techniques and may provide much needed case-adjustment for a surgeon performance program. Precise estimates of health-related quality of life scores and continuous variables were not possible, suggesting that performance classification is a better method of performance evaluation.
Subject(s)
Kyphosis , Scoliosis , Humans , Adolescent , Scoliosis/surgery , Benchmarking , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , PainABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Late infection after posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the leading cause of late revision. While implant removal and antibiotic therapy are usually curative, patients may experience deformity progression. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes after implant exchange (IE) or removal (IR) to treat late-onset (≥1 y postoperative) deep surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal arthrodesis in patients with AIS. METHODS: Using a multicenter AIS registry, patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2005 and 2019 and developed late deep SSI treated with IE or IR were identified. Radiographic, surgical, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes at most recent follow-up were compared. RESULTS: Of 3,705 patients, 47 (1.3%) developed late infection 3.8±2.2 years (range 1 to 9.7 y) after index surgery. Mean follow-up after index surgery was 6.1 years, with 2.8 years (range 25 to 120 mo) of follow-up after revision surgery. Twenty-one patients were treated with IE and 26 with IR. At the latest follow-up, average major-curve loss of correction (1° vs 9°, P <0.001) and increase in kyphosis (1° vs. 8°, P =0.04) were smaller in the IE group than in the IR group. Two IR patients but no IE patients had reoperation. Patients who underwent IE had higher Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item Patient Questionnaire (SRS-22) total scores (4.38 vs. 3.81, P =0.02) as well as better subscores for self-image, function, and satisfaction at the latest follow-up than those who underwent IR only. There were no significant between-group differences in operative duration, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, or changes in SRS-22 total scores. No patient had a subsequent infection during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: When treating late-onset deep SSI after posterior spinal fusion for AIS, single-stage IE is associated with better maintenance of major curve correction, sagittal profile, and patient-reported outcomes and fewer reoperations compared with IR, with no significant differences in blood loss, operative duration, or length of stay. No time interval from index surgery to IR was observed where the corrected deformity remained stable. Both techniques were curative of infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Subject(s)
Kyphosis , Scoliosis , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Adolescent , Scoliosis/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Treatment Outcome , Bone Screws , Kyphosis/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To identify the prevalence and predictors of nonspecific back pain in primary thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients at 10 years after surgery. METHODS: This was a case-control multi-center study. A query of patients who underwent surgical correction of major thoracic AIS between 1997 and 2007 with 10-year follow-up was reviewed. SRS-22 pain scores at 10 years were classified as below normal (≤ 2 standard deviations below average for controls of similar age/sex from published literature) or within/above the control range. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients with an average of 10.5 ± 0.8-years follow-up were included. Average age at surgery was 14 ± 2 years. The rate of pain was 23% for males and 11% for females (p = 0.08). Differences in age, 10-year SRS mental health score, and radiographic measures were noted. Of 12 patients who underwent revision surgery, 42% reported below normal pain scores versus 11% in cases without revision (p = 0.012). Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified 10-year thoracic curve magnitude and 10-year mental health scores as significant predictors. Thoracic Cobb of ≤ 26° at 10 years was associated with a 7% rate of below normal pain scores compared to 27.5% when the curve was > 26° (OR = 4.8, p < 0.05). Of those with a curve ≤ 26°, no patients had abnormal pain if the SRS mental health score was > 4.2 and 15% had more pain than normal if mental health score was ≤ 4.2 (OR 23, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Increased primary thoracic curve magnitude (> 26°) at 10 years was the primary predictor of increased pain. For patients with less coronal deformity (< 26°), a poor mental health score was associated with an increased rate of pain. Male gender and revision surgery may also play a role in increased pain, however, the overall frequency of these variables were low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Subject(s)
Scoliosis , Spinal Fusion , Adolescent , Back Pain/epidemiology , Back Pain/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis , Scoliosis/complications , Scoliosis/psychology , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effectsABSTRACT
DESIGN: Prospective cerebral palsy (CP) registry review. OBJECTIVES: (1) Evaluate the incidence/risk factors of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in CP patients after spinal fusion (SF); and (2) investigate the validity of the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink classification. BACKGROUND: Perioperative GI complications result in increased length of stay (LOS) and patient morbidity/mortality. However, none have analyzed the outcomes of GI complications using an objective classification system. METHODS: A prospective/multicenter CP database identified 425 children (mean, 14.4 ± 2.9 years; range, 7.9-21 years) who underwent SF. GI complications were categorized using the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink classification. Grades I-II were minor complications and grades III-V major. Patients with and without GI complications were compared. RESULTS: 87 GI complications developed in 69 patients (16.2%): 39 minor (57%) and 30 major (43%). Most common were pancreatitis (n = 45) and ileus (n = 22). Patients with preoperative G-tubes had 2.2 × odds of developing a GI complication compared to oral-only feeders (OR 2.2; 95% CI 0.98-4.78; p = 0.006). Similarly, combined G-tube/oral feeders had 6.7 × odds compared to oral-only (OR 6.7; 95% CI 3.10-14.66; p < 0.001). The likelihood of developing a GI complication was 3.4 × with normalized estimated blood loss (nEBL) ≥ 3 ml/kg/level fused (OR 3.41; 95% CI 1.95-5.95; p < 0.001). Patients with GI complications had more fundoplications (29% vs. 17%; p = 0.03) and longer G-tube fasting periods (3 days vs. 2 days; p < 0.001), oral fasting periods (5 days vs. 2 days; p < 0.001), ICU admissions (6 days vs. 3 days; p = 0.002), and LOS (15 days vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). LOS correlated with the Clavien-Dino-Sink classification. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal complications such as pancreatitis and ileus are not uncommon after SF in children with CP. This is the first study to investigate the validity of the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink classification in GI complications after SF. Our results suggest a correlation between complication severity grade and LOS. The complexity of perioperative enteral nutritional supplementation requires prospective studies dedicated to enteral feeding protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic-level III.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Spinal Fusion , Cerebral Palsy/epidemiology , Child , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Fusion/adverse effectsABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, prospectively collected database of 20 years of operatively treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was utilized to retrospectively examine pre- and postoperative thoracic kyphosis at 2-year follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the adoption of advanced three-dimensional correction techniques has led to improved thoracic kyphosis correction in AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Over the past 20 years, there has been an evolution of operative treatment for AIS, with more emphasis on sagittal and axial planes. Thoracic hypokyphosis was well treated with an anterior approach, but this was not addressed sufficiently in early posterior approaches. We hypothesized that patients with preoperative thoracic hypokyphosis prior to 2000 would have superior thoracic kyphosis restoration, but the learning curve with pedicle screws would reflect initially inferior restoration and eventual improvement. METHODS: From 1995 to 2015, 1063 patients with preoperative thoracic hypokyphosis (<10°) were identified. A validated formula for assessing three-dimensional sagittal alignment using two-dimensional kyphosis and thoracic Cobb angle was applied. Patients were divided into 1995-2000 (Period 1, primarily anterior), 2001-2009 (Period 2, early thoracic pedicle screws), and 2010-2015 (Period 3, modern posterior) cohorts. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance and post-hoc Bonferroni corrections were utilized with Pâ<â0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Significant differences were demonstrated. Period 1 had excellent restoration of thoracic kyphosis, which worsened in Period 2 and improved to near Period 1 levels during Period 3. Period 3 had superior thoracic kyphosis restoration compared with Period 2. CONCLUSION: Although the shift from anterior to posterior approaches in AIS was initially associated with worse thoracic kyphosis restoration, this improved with time. The proportion of patients restored to >20° kyphosis with a contemporary posterior approach has steadily improved to that of the era when anterior approaches were more common. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Subject(s)
Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Kyphosis/surgery , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Scoliosis/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Pedicle Screws/trends , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/trends , Time FactorsABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort review. OBJECTIVE: To compare two AIS databases to determine if a performance improvement-based surgeon group has different outcomes compared to a national database. The American College of Surgeon's National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) and a surgeon study group (SG) collect prospective data on AIS surgery outcomes. NSQIP offers open enrollment to all institutions, and SG membership is limited to 15 high-volume institutions, with a major initiative to improve surgeon performance. While both provide important outcome benchmarks, they may reflect outcomes that are not relatable nationwide. METHODS: The ASC-NSQIP Pediatric Spine Fusion and SG database were queried for AIS 30- and 90-day complication data for 2014 and 2015. Prospective enrollment and a dedicated site coordinator with rigorous data quality assurance protocols existed for both registries. Outcomes were compared between groups with respect to superficial and deep surgical site infections (SSI), neurologic injury, readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: There were a total of 2927 AIS patients included in the ASC-NSQIP data and 721 in the SG database. Total complication rate was 9.4% NSQIP and 3.6% SG. At 90 days, there were fewer surgical site infections reported by SG than ASC-NSQIP (0.6% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.03). Similarly, there were less spinal cord injuries (0.8% vs 1.5%, p = 0.006), 30-day readmissions (0.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.002), and 30-day reoperations (0.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.02) in the SG cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of these two data sets suggests a range of complications and readmission rates, with the SG demonstrating lower values. These results are likely multi-factorial with the performance improvement initiative of the SG playing a role. Understanding the rate and ultimate risk factors for readmission and complications from big data sources has the potential to further drive quality improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Improvement , Quality of Health Care , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion , Adolescent , Child , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Cord Injuries/epidemiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/prevention & control , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Surgeons , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether major postoperative complications ("complications") are associated with 2-year improvements in Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD) scores after scoliosis surgery, and whether complications and preoperative characteristics predict 2-year improvements in CPCHILD Total score. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal arthrodesis can halt the progression of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy (CP)-related scoliosis. However, these patients are prone to postoperative complications. METHODS: Using a multicenter CP registry, we identified 222 patients aged ≤21 years who underwent spinal fusion from 2008 to 2015 and had ≥2-year follow-up. We compared CPCHILD score improvement between 71 patients who had 1 or more complications ("complications group") versus 151 who did not ("no-complications group"). Complications were deep infections, thromboembolic events, and cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, and neurologic complications. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of 2-year postoperative CPCHILD score improvement (alphaâ=â0.05). RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, the complications group had similar mean improvement in CPCHILD score across all domains compared with the no-complications group (Pâ>â0.05). When stratifying by complication type, deep infection was associated with less improvement in CPCHILD Comfort and Emotions (Pâ=â0.02), Quality of Life (Pâ<â0.01), and Total (Pâ=â0.04) scores. When controlling for Gross Motor Function Classification System subcategory, age, and body mass index, only preoperative CPCHILD Total score and postoperative deep infection (F[4, 176]â=â14; Pâ<â0.0001; Râ=â0.24) predicted 2-year improvement in CPCHILD Total score. Higher preoperative Total score and postoperative deep infection independently predicted less improvement in Total score. CONCLUSION: Postoperative deep infection and higher preoperative CPCHILD Total score independently predicted less improvement in CPCHILD Total score. Other major postoperative complications were not associated with differences in 2-year postoperative improvements in CPCHILD scores across all domains. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Quality of Life , Spinal Fusion , Surgical Wound Infection , Adolescent , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cerebral Palsy/epidemiology , Cerebral Palsy/surgery , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have reported on the risks and preventative measures associated with acute surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Few studies have evaluated treatment and results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the need for development of best practice guidelines based on the management of an acute SSI across 9 different centers. METHODS: A prospectively collected, multicenter database of patients undergoing surgical correction of AIS was reviewed for all acute SSI. Infection characteristics, treatment methods, and outcomes were summarized. RESULTS: Twenty-three (0.6%) from a total of 3926 AIS patients were treated for an acute SSI, all of which resolved. Twenty patients had documentation of the infection treatment (10 deep infections, 10 superficial). All ten patients with deep infections underwent operative incision and drainage. Six patients ultimately found to have a superficial infection underwent I&D and another 3 had dressing changes in the office. In the deep group, one patient had instrumentation exchanged and seven patients had bone graft removed. All 16 patients who underwent operative I&D had cultures obtained with 11 positive cultures. All deep infection patients were started on IV antibiotics for 2 days to 6 weeks prior to conversion to oral antibiotics. Five of six operative superficial infections were begun on IV antibiotics with conversion to oral antibiotics. Total antibiotic administration ranged from 5 days to 7 months in the deep infection group and 1 to 6 weeks in the superficial group. CONCLUSIONS: While deep infections are consistently treated with I&D, there is significant variability in the surgical and medical management of acute SSI. Considering the universal resolution of the infection, there is opportunity for the development of BPG to minimize treatment morbidity and cost, while optimizing outcomes for this major complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic-IV.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drainage , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Scoliosis/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/surgery , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective registry. The evolution of spinal instrumentation has provided better outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); however, there is a paucity of reliable prospective information on 10-year post-operative outcomes of modern surgical techniques. METHODS: A prospective multicenter registry of patients who had surgical correction of AIS was reviewed. Patients with major thoracic scoliosis (Lenke types 1-4) operated on between 1997 and 2007, with 10-year post-operative follow-up data were included. Radiographic and clinical outcomes including Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores and revision surgeries were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-four patients (mean 25.0 years of age at most recent evaluation) were included. Pedicle screw constructs were used in 102 patients (58%), hook or hybrid constructs in 22 (13%), and anterior screw-rod constructs in 50 (29%). The mean pre-operative thoracic Cobb angle was corrected from 53° to 18° initially. At 10-year follow-up, the mean thoracic curve was 22° (mean 57% correction), with 29 patients (16.7%) having loss of correction (LOC) ≥ 10°. There were a total of 14 revision surgeries performed in 13 patients (7.5%). SRS-22 pain (p = 0.035), self-image (p < 0.001), and total scores (p < 0.001) significantly improved at 2-year follow-up. The mean pain score at 10-year follow-up was similar to pre-operative scores and lower (more pain) than previously published mean scores of normal adults aged 20-40 years (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal fusion patients report SRS-22 quality of life 10 years after scoliosis surgery that is minimally reduced compared to healthy peers and substantially better than an un-operated cohort of comparably aged scoliosis patients. Adolescents with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis should expect little if any change in their health-related quality of life compared to before surgery, high satisfaction, and a 7.5% chance of revision surgery 10 years after their index spinal fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.
Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Scoliosis/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Pedicle Screws , Peptides , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of sparing lumbar motion segments on spinal mobility and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores at 10 years after spinal fusion for major thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In surgical correction for major thoracic AIS, the long-term benefits of sparing lumbar motion segments remain unclear. METHODS: A prospective multicenter registry was reviewed and patients with major thoracic AIS (Lenke types 1-4) and availability of both preoperative and 10-year postoperative mobility data were included. Spinal fusions ending at L1 or above were defined as thoracic fusions (T), and at L2 or below as thoracic and lumber fusions (T + L). Spinal mobility was evaluated with a measuring tape. The excursions between the starting and ending positions were measured using the distance from the spinous processes of C7 to S1 for forward flexion (FF), and the distance from the tip of the middle finger to the floor for lateral flexion (LF). Substantial reduction of mobility was defined as a reduction rate (a ratio of postoperative change divided by preoperative mobility) of 40% or more. Motion data were correlated with lowest instrumented vertebra levels and group comparisons were performed. RESULTS: We identified 151 patients (average age, 25.1 years). The spinal mobility decreased with more distal lowest instrumented vertebrae (FF, rhoâ=â0.208; right LF, 0.257; left LF, 0.371; Pâ≤â0.01). Consequently, the incidence of substantial reduction of mobility was lower in the T group (nâ=â109) than in the T + L group (nâ=â42) (FF: 17.4% vs. 50%, LF: 14.8% vs. 51.2%; Pâ<â0.001). Patients with substantial reduction in LF had lower Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores for pain, function, satisfaction, and total scores than those without substantial reduction at 10-year follow-up (Pâ<â0.05). CONCLUSION: The sparing of lumbar motion segments demonstrated clinically significant benefits at 10-year postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Postoperative Care/trends , Scoliosis/diagnosis , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a multicenter, prospective database. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare complication rates and maintenance of radiographic correction at 2 years after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with or without cross-links in patients with cerebral palsy (CP)-related scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cross-links are frequently used in PSF to correct scoliosis in patients with CP because they are thought to increase the stiffness and torsional rigidity of the construct. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients with CP who underwent primary PSF with or without cross-links between August 2008 and April 2015. Inclusion criteria were minimum follow-up of 2 years, availability of complications data (implant failure, surgical site infection, revision), and pre- and postoperative measurements of the major curve (measured using the Cobb method). The 256 patients included in this analysis had a mean age of 14.1â±â2.7 years. Ninety-four patients had cross-links (57% using one cross-link; 43% using two cross-links) and 162 patients did not have cross-links. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to sex, age at surgery, preoperative menarche status, Gross Motor Function Classification System level, major curve magnitude, pelvic obliquity, kyphosis, and lordosis angles. There were no significant differences between groups in the correction achieved or the maintenance of correction at 2 years for the major curve, pelvic obliquity, kyphosis, or lordosis (all P > 0.05). Complication rates were similar between the cross-link group (16%, Nâ=â15) and the non-cross-link group (14%, Nâ=â22). CONCLUSION: At 2 years after PSF to treat CP-related scoliosis, patients had no significant differences in the degree of correction achieved, the maintenance of correction, or the rate of complications between those whose fusion constructs used cross-links and those whose constructs did not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/complications , Scoliosis/etiology , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Kyphosis/pathology , Lordosis/pathology , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/pathology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness of surgical reduction in high-grade spondylolisthesis in maintaining or restoring a normal pelvic balance, as related to the QoL. METHODS: It is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 60 patients (17 males, 43 females) aged 15 ± 3.1 years who underwent surgery for high-grade spondylolisthesis and were followed for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Patients with a residual high-grade slip following surgery were referred to the postoperative high-grade (PHG) group, while patients with a residual low-grade slip were referred to the postoperative low-grade (PLG) group. Pelvic balance was assessed from pelvic tilt and sacral slope, in order to identify patients with a balanced pelvis or unbalanced pelvis. The SRS-22 questionnaire was completed before surgery and at last follow-up. RESULTS: Postoperatively, there were 36 patients with a balanced pelvis and 24 patients with an unbalanced pelvis. The improvement in QoL was better in patients with a postoperative balanced pelvis. There were 14 patients in the PHG group and 46 patients in the PLG group. Four of seven patients (57%) in the PHG group and 21 of 26 patients (81%) in the PLG group with a preoperative balanced pelvis maintained a balanced pelvis postoperatively (P = 0.1). None of the patients in the PHG group and 11 of 20 patients (55%) in the PLG group improved from an unbalanced to a balanced pelvis postoperatively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical reduction in high- to low-grade slip is more effective in maintaining and restoring a normal pelvic balance postoperatively. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Subject(s)
Pelvis/physiology , Sacrum/physiology , Spondylolisthesis , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Orthopedic Procedures , Posture/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Spine/surgery , Spondylolisthesis/physiopathology , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative blood loss during posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been reportedly associated with multiple factors. This study aims to investigate the effect of thoracic kyphosis on blood loss in AIS spinal fusion. METHODS: Patients with AIS who underwent posterior-only procedures for Lenke I and II type curves were identified. All included patients had intraoperative tranexamic acid. Difference in estimated blood loss per blood volume (EBL/BV) was identified between hypokyphotic curves (-), normal curves (N), and hyperkyphotic curves (+) classified based on Lenke sagittal modifier. Regression analysis was then performed with EBL/BV as dependent variable. Independent variables included radiographically measured T5-T12 kyphosis and calculated 3D T5-T12 kyphosis in addition to sex, body mass index (BMI), operative time, number of fused vertebrae, number of Ponte osteotomy levels, and main thoracic coronal curve. RESULTS: In total, 837 patients were included. For female patients: EBL/BV was significantly higher for (-) (18%) compared with (N) (16%) and (+) (14%). A total of 29 female patients had T5-T12≤0 (-15 to 0 degree). EBL/BV was not significantly higher than patients with T5-T12>0 degree (18%±9% vs. 16%±11%; P=0.212). For male patients: EBL/BV was significantly higher in (-) (23%) compared with (+) (16%). In total, 14 male patients had T5-T12≤0 (-13 to 0) degree. EBL/BV was significantly higher than patients with T5-T12>0 degree (32%±18% vs. 18%±13%; P=0.015). Significant factors in predicting EBL/BV were sex, BMI, number of fused levels, and both 2D and 3D T5-T12 kyphosis. Male sex as well as every fused-level predicted an increase in EBL/BV~2%. Every 10-unit decrease in BMI predicted an increase in EBL/BV of 7%. Every 10-degree decrease in 2D or 3D T5-T12 kyphosis predicted an increase in EBL/BV~1%. The impact of the number of Ponte osteotomy levels was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the role of sagittal thoracic alignment in affecting EBL/BV in AIS surgery. Male patients with severe thoracic lordosis (T5-T12≤0 degree) are the highest risk group for intraoperative bleeding. These findings are helpful in predicting the intraoperative blood loss for patients with AIS undergoing posterior spinal fusion. In addition to sex and number of fused levels, decreased thoracic kyphosis is associated with increased blood loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic study.
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Kyphosis/complications , Lordosis/complications , Scoliosis/complications , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion , Adolescent , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Lordosis/diagnostic imaging , Male , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Thoracic VertebraeABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Cost-utility analysis OBJECTIVE.: To compare the cost utility of operative versus nonoperative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and identity factors that influence cost-utility estimates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: AIS affects 1% to 3% of children aged 10 to 16 years. When the major coronal curve reaches 50°, operative treatment may be considered. The cost utility of operative treatment of AIS is unknown. METHODS: A decision-analysis model comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment was developed for a hypothetical 15-year-old skeletally mature girl with a 55° right thoracic (Lenke 1) curve. The AIS literature was reviewed to estimate the probability, health utility, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each event. For the conservative model, we assumed that operative treatment did not result directly in any QALYs gained, and the health utility in AIS patients was the same as the age-matched US population mean. Costs were inflation-adjusted at 3.22% per year to 2015 US dollars. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using mixed first-order and second-order Monte Carlo simulations. Incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) and incremental net monetary benefit were calculated. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed by varying cost, probability, and QALY estimates. RESULTS: Operative treatment was favored in 98.5% of simulations, with a median ICUR of $20,600/QALY (95% confidence interval, $20,500-$21,900) below the societal willingness-to-pay threshold (WTPT) of $50,000/QALY. The median incremental net monetary benefit associated with operative treatment was $15,100 (95% confidence interval, $14,800-$15,700). Operative treatment produced net monetary benefit across various WTPTs. Factors that most affected the ICUR were net costs associated with uncomplicated operative treatment, undergoing surgery during adulthood, and development of pulmonary complications. CONCLUSION: Cost-utility analysis suggests that operative treatment of AIS is favored over nonoperative treatment and falls below the $50,000/QALY WTPT for patients with Lenke 1 curves. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures/economics , Scoliosis/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Scoliosis/economics , Scoliosis/surgeryABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Delphi process with multiple iterative rounds using a nominal group technique. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use expert opinion to achieve consensus on various methods for minimizing blood loss in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). BACKGROUND DATA: Perioperative blood loss management represents a critical component of safely performing PSF in children with AIS. Little consensus exists on ways to mitigate excessive blood loss after PSF. METHODS: An expert panel composed of 21 pediatric spine surgeons was selected. Using the Delphi process and iterative rounds using a nominal group technique, participants in this panel were presented with a detailed literature review and asked to voice opinion collectively during three rounds of voting. Agreement >80% was considered consensus. Interventions without consensus were discussed and revised, if feasible. RESULTS: Consensus was reached to support 21 best practice guideline measures for perioperative management of blood loss in patients undergoing PSF for AIS. Areas included preoperative assessment and preparation, intraoperative strategies to decrease blood loss, and postoperative transfusion indications. CONCLUSION: We present a consensus-based best practice guideline consisting of 21 recommendations for strategies to minimize and manage blood loss during PSF. This can serve to reduce variability in practice in this area, help develop hospital specific protocols, and guide future research.
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Delphi Technique , Humans , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of a prospective registry. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to prospectively assess caregivers' perceptions regarding changes in the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with cerebral palsy (CP) after spinal arthrodesis. We assessed caregiver perceptions from three perspectives: 1) qualitative assessment of changes in global quality of life, comfort, and health; 2) relative valuation of spine surgery versus other common interventions in CP patients; and 3) quantitative changes in HRQL scores. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies of children with CP who undergo surgical treatment of spinal deformity have focused largely on radiographic changes. METHODS: We queried a multicenter prospective registry of CP patients with level IV or V motor function according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System who were treated with spinal arthrodesis, and whose caregivers completed preoperative and 2-year postoperative qualitative and quantitative HRQL surveys. A total of 212 caregivers and their patients were included in the study. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, most caregivers reported that patients' global quality of life, comfort, and health were "a lot better" after spinal arthrodesis. Spinal arthrodesis was ranked as the most beneficial intervention in the patients' lives by 74% of caregivers, ahead of hip, knee, and foot surgeries and baclofen pump insertion. Gastrostomy tube insertion was the only intervention ranked superior to spinal arthrodesis in terms of impact. Quantitative HRQL scores improved significantly during 2-year follow-up across various domains. CONCLUSION: In qualitative and quantitative HRQL assessments, caregivers reported overall improvement in patients' lives after spinal arthrodesis. Caregivers ranked spine surgery as the most beneficial intervention in the patients' lives, secondary only to gastrostomy tube insertion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.