ABSTRACT
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are regulatory RNAs. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains transcribe hundreds of lncRNAs. LncRNAs can regulate the expression of adjacent genes (cis-regulation) or distant genes from lncRNAs (trans-regulation). Here, we analyzed the potential global cis and trans-regulation of lncRNAs of yeast subjected to ethanol stress. For potential cis regulation, for BMA641-A and S288C strains, we observed that most lncRNA-neighbor gene pairs increased the expression at a certain point followed by a decrease, and vice versa. Based on the transcriptome profile and triple helix prediction between lncRNAs and promoters of coding genes, we observed nine different ways of potential trans regulation that work in a strain-specific manner. Our data provide an initial landscape of potential cis and trans regulation in yeast, which seems to be strain-specific.
Subject(s)
Ethanol , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , RNA, Long Noncoding , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Stress, Physiological , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Ethanol/pharmacology , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal/drug effects , Stress, Physiological/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA, Fungal/genetics , RNA, Fungal/metabolism , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , TranscriptomeABSTRACT
Ethanol (EtOH) alters many cellular processes in yeast. An integrated view of different EtOH-tolerant phenotypes and their long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) is not yet available. Here, large-scale data integration showed the core EtOH-responsive pathways, lncRNAs, and triggers of higher (HT) and lower (LT) EtOH-tolerant phenotypes. LncRNAs act in a strain-specific manner in the EtOH stress response. Network and omics analyses revealed that cells prepare for stress relief by favoring activation of life-essential systems. Therefore, longevity, peroxisomal, energy, lipid, and RNA/protein metabolisms are the core processes that drive EtOH tolerance. By integrating omics, network analysis, and several other experiments, we showed how the HT and LT phenotypes may arise: (1) the divergence occurs after cell signaling reaches the longevity and peroxisomal pathways, with CTA1 and ROS playing key roles; (2) signals reaching essential ribosomal and RNA pathways via SUI2 enhance the divergence; (3) specific lipid metabolism pathways also act on phenotype-specific profiles; (4) HTs take greater advantage of degradation and membraneless structures to cope with EtOH stress; and (5) our EtOH stress-buffering model suggests that diauxic shift drives EtOH buffering through an energy burst, mainly in HTs. Finally, critical genes, pathways, and the first models including lncRNAs to describe nuances of EtOH tolerance are reported here.