Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for depression and anxiety in persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are common in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), and adversely affect fatigue, medication adherence, and quality of life. Though effective treatments for depression and anxiety exist in the general population, their applicability in the MS population has not been definitively established. OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall effect of psychological and pharmacological treatments for depression or anxiety in persons with MS. METHODS: We searched the Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES Full Text, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases using systematic review methodology from database inception until March 25, 2015. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and strength of evidence. We included controlled clinical trials reporting on the effect of pharmacological or psychological interventions for depression or anxiety in a sample of persons with MS. We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 1753 abstracts screened, 21 articles reporting on 13 unique clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Depression severity improved in nine psychological trials of depression treatment (N=307; SMD: -0.45 (95%CI: -0.74, -0.16)). The severity of depression also improved in three pharmacological trials of depression treatment (SMD: -0.63 (N=165; 95%CI: -1.07, -0.20)). For anxiety, only a single trial examined psychological therapy for injection phobia and reported no statistically significant improvement. CONCLUSION: Pharmacological and psychological treatments for depression were effective in reducing depressive symptoms in MS. The data are insufficient to determine the effectiveness of treatments for anxiety.

MS incidence and prevalence in Africa, Asia, Australia and New Zealand: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Studies of multiple sclerosis (MS) incidence and prevalence from Africa, Asia, Australia and New Zealand are relatively scarce. We systematically reviewed MS incidence and prevalence in these regions including a standardized evaluation of study quality. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies of MS prevalence or incidence in Africa, Asia, Australia and New Zealand published in English or French between January 1, 1985 and January 31, 2011. Study quality was assessed using a standardized tool. All steps of the review were performed in duplicate. RESULTS: Of 3925 citations identified, 28 studies met inclusion criteria and 21 of these were from Asia. Quality scores ranged from 1/8 to 8/8; the lowest scores were observed in studies from Asia (median 4/8, IQR 3,6). Prevalence was lowest in South African Blacks (0.22/100,000) and highest amongst Australian-born individuals in Australia (125/100,000). Prevalence increased over time in many countries. MS prevalence increased with increasing latitude only in some regions, and prevalence varied significantly with ethnicity. Eight studies reported incidence, which ranged from 0.67/100,000/year in Taiwan to 3.67/100,00/year in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive study provides an update of MS epidemiology in Africa, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Incidence and prevalence were lowest in Africa and Asia and highest in Australia, but many Asian studies were of poor quality. Use of consistent case ascertainment methods, standardized data collection tools, and similar outcomes would all improve study quality and comparability. The underlying basis of observed ethnic differences is an important area for future study.