How reliable is assessment of true vocal cord-arytenoid unit mobility in patients affected by laryngeal cancer? a multi-institutional study on 366 patients from the ARYFIX collaborative group.

PURPOSE: In clinical practice the assessment of the "vocal cord-arytenoid unit" (VCAU) mobility is crucial in the staging, prognosis, and choice of treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). The aim of the present study was to measure repeatability and reliability of clinical assessment of VCAU mobility and radiologic analysis of posterior laryngeal extension. METHODS: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, patients with LSCC-induced impairment of VCAU mobility who received curative treatment were included; pre-treatment endoscopy and contrast-enhanced imaging were collected and evaluated by raters. According to their evaluations, concordance, number of assigned categories, and inter- and intra-rater agreement were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-two otorhinolaryngologists evaluated 366 videolaryngoscopies (total evaluations: 2170) and 6 radiologists evaluated 237 imaging studies (total evaluations: 477). The concordance of clinical rating was excellent in only 22.7% of cases. Overall, inter- and intra-rater agreement was weak. Supraglottic cancers and transoral endoscopy were associated with the lowest inter-observer reliability values. Radiologic inter-rater agreement was low and did not vary with imaging technique. Intra-rater reliability of radiologic evaluation was optimal. CONCLUSIONS: The current methods to assess VCAU mobility and posterior extension of LSCC are flawed by weak inter-observer agreement and reliability. Radiologic evaluation was characterized by very high intra-rater agreement, but weak inter-observer reliability. The relevance of VCAU mobility assessment in laryngeal oncology should be re-weighted. Patients affected by LSCC requiring imaging should be referred to dedicated radiologists with experience in head and neck oncology.

Three-dimensional, high-definition exoscopic parotidectomy: a valid alternative to magnified-assisted surgery.

The authors report their experience regarding parotidectomy performed under a three-dimensional-high-definition (3D-HD) exoscope, with the aim of evaluating its effectiveness in parotid surgery. This is a prospective study on nine patients treated by the same surgeon. All patients underwent parotidectomy for extrafacial primary tumours without preoperative involvement of the skin or of the facial nerve from March 2019 to June 2019 with the use of a 3D-HD exoscope. Magnification was variable from 8x to 30x with direct vision supplied by a 3D monitor. Six men and three women, mean (range) age 47.8 (19-74) years underwent parotidectomy. No patient experienced postoperative complications or definitive facial palsy. The mean (range) time of surgery was 149.4 (115 - 210) minutes. The 3D exoscope represents a valid alternative to the operative microscope or surgical loupe for parotid surgery. It is a light instrument allowing for precise surgical dissection of the parotid region by reducing the risks for iatrogenic lesions of the facial nerve using a real 3D magnification of the anatomical structures in HD. Furthermore, its use does not prolong the operative time and shows high potential for training and educational purposes since the operating room staff can better perceive the procedure and the surgeon's fine gestures. Although the preliminary applications show promising results, there is still a need for wider scientific validation.